AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AUG 1 4 l988
IN THE MATTER OF:
DOCKET NUMBER: 98-00926
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
Applicant requests that he receive payment of a Selective
Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) .
Applicant's submission is at
Exhibit A.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request
and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the
application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was
forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D).
As of this date, no response has been received by this office.
After careful consideration of applicant's request and the
available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of
error or injustice to warrant corrective action. The facts and
opinions stated in the advisory opinion appear to be based on the
evidence of record and have not been rebutted by applicant.
Absent persuasive evidence applicant was denied rights to which
entitled, appropriate regulations were not followed, or
appropriate standards were not applied, we find no basis to
disturb the existing record.
Accordingly, applicant's request is denied.
The Board staff is directed to inform applicant of this decision.
Applicant should also be informed that this decision is final and
will only be reconsidered upon the presentation of new relevant
evidence which was not reasonably available at the time the
application was filed.
Members of the Board Mr. Charles E. Bennett, Mr. Loren S.
Perlstein, and Ms. Peggy E. Gordon considered this application on
6 August 1998, in accordance with the provisions of Air Force
Instruction 36-2603, and the governing statute, 10, U.S.C. 1552.
-CHARLES
Panel Chair
E. BENNETT
Exhibits :
A. Applicant's DD Form 149
B. Available Master Personnel Records
C. Advisory Opinion
D. AFBCMR Ltr Forwarding Advisory Opinion
D E P A R T M E N T O F THE A I R F O R C E
H E A D Q U A R T E R S AIR FORCE P E R S O N N E L C E N T E R
R A N D O L P H AIR FORCE B A S E TEXAS
1 1 MAY 1998
MEMORANDUM FOR THE AFBCMR
FROM: HQ AFPCDPPAE
550 C Street West Ste 10
Randolph AFB TX 78 150-47 12
SUBJEC
rds
, .-
The applicant is requesting payment of a Selective Re
nlistment B us (SRB).
The applicant was approved for retraining into AFSC lClXl and required 30 months
retainability after class graduation date. The retainability was based on the Controlled Duty
Assignment (CDA) at that time. Since the applicant's original separation date was 3 Jan 87, a 23
month extension would bring him 9 months short of the required 30 months CDA based on a
class grad date of 3 Mar 87. As such, he had no choice but to reenlist to accept the retraining.
Recommend disapproval of the applicant's request. We do not see any errors or
irregularities in the applicant's reenlistment for the retraining.
Chief, Skills M a f g h e n t Branch
Dir of Personnel rogram Mgmt
Based on input from the Retraining Section at AFMPC, the applicant received approved CAREERS retraining into AFSC 115x0 (which was authorized a Zone A, Multiple One-Half SRB) on 4 February 1993, prior to his reenlistment in AFSC 361x1. DPMAPE recommended denial of the applicant's request to have the recouped SRB reinstated. As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit E).
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC2-06-0195
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-01952 INDEX CODE: 128.05 COUNSEL: NOT INDICATED HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 1 JAN 2008 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment on 14 December 2005 be declared void and his 8 January 2002 enlistment be extended for 23 months. DPPAE’s complete evaluations, with attachments, are at Exhibit C...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C ) . The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). We recommend disapproval of the applicant’s request to be awarded the NCO Professional Military Education Graduate Ribbon.
The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and pxovided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C ) . However, if the decision is to grant the relief sought, applicant’s record should be corrected to reflect his liE code as “3K: Reserved for use by HQ AFPC or the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records (AFBCMR) when no other reenlistment eligibility code applies or is appropriate.” - sgt, USAF Chief, Skills Mugement...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03826
On 19 Jan 10, the applicant was counseled by Military Personnel Flight (MPF) via the AF IMT 1411, Extension or Cancellation of Extensions of Enlistment in the Regular Air Force/Air Force Reserve on his extension request and his available options. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant reiterates his argument that he was miscounseled when told he...
I L. e AFBCMR 93-01781 DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION O F MILITARY RECORDS WASHINGTON DC 20330-1430 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF I Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code and Air Force Regulation 31-3, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is directed that: The pertinent Force relating to show that he enr Scholarship...
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, D. C. OCT 2 11998 Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 98-0227 1 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is directed that: records of the Department of the Air Force relating t be corrected to...
Applicant’s complete submission is attached at Exhibit A. The applicant entered the Technical School at Keesler AFB, MS on 8 January 1986, to complete the Air Traffic Control Operator course E3ABR27230. This extension would normally satisfy the service retainability for retraining requirements only if the controlled duty assignment (CDA) for the ATC course was less than 23 months and technical school completion date was prior to his initial date of separation of 6 May 1986.
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, DC Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 98-01429 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1 5 5 2 , Title 1 0 , United States Code, Air Force Instruction 3 6 - 2 6 0 3 , and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is directed that: I t of the Air The pertinen e corrected Force relating to to show that he...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00229-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 March 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...