AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
IN THE MATTER OF:
DOCKET NUMBER: 98-00790
COUNSEL: NONE
DEC
4
HEARING: NO
The applicant requests that his disability discharge on 15 March
1971 be set aside and he receive a disability retirement.
Applicant's submission is at Exhibit A.
The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request
and provided an advisory opinions to the Board recommending the
application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinions were
forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D).
As of this date, no response has been received by this office.
After careful consideration of applicant's request and the
available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of
error or injustice to warrant corrective action. The facts and
opinions stated in the advisory opinions appear to be based on
the evidence of record and have not been rebutted by applicant.
Absent persuasive evidence applicant was denied rights to which
entitled, appropriate regulations were not followed, or
appropriate standards were not applied, we find no basis to
disturb the existing record. Accordingly, applicant's request is
denied.
The Board staff is directed to inform applicant of this decision.
Applicant should also be informed that this decision is final and
will only be reconsidered upon the presentation of new relevant
evidence which was not reasonably available at the time the
application was filed.
Members of the Board Mr. Henry C. Saunders, Mr. Henry Romo Jr.,
and Dr. Gerald B. Kauvar considered this application on
17 November 1998 in accordance with he provi ions of Air Force
Instruction 36-2603, and the governid s t a t u d 10, U.S.C. 1552.
Exhibits:
A. Applicant's DD Form 149
B. Available Master Personnel Records
C. Advisory Opinions
D. AFBCMR Ltr Forwarding Advisory Opinions
Y..
23 April 1998
98-00790
MEMORANDUM FOR AFBCMR
FROM: BCMR Medical Consultant
1535 Command Drive, EE Wing, 3rd Floor
Andrews AFB MD 20762-7002
SUBJECT:
This request is not timely submitted, as 27 years have elapsed since final disposition was made
in this case.
Applicant's entire case file has been reviewed and is forwarded with the following findings,
conclusions and recommendations.
REQUESTED ACTION: The applicant was removed from the Temporary Disability Retired List
(TDRL) and discharged with severance pay and 10% disability on 15 March 1971. He now applies
requesting that his status be changed to a permanent disability retirement.
FACTS: The records indicate that the applicant met a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) on 28
August 1967 and was referred to the Informal Physical Evaluation Board (IPEB) on 1 September
1967. He was assigned to the TDRL on 26 December 1967 with 100% disability for Schizophrenic
Reaction, paranoid type, chronic, VASRD Code 9203. Following a 3-year period of observation on
the TDRL, the applicant was found unfit for continued military service, removed from the TDRL, and
discharged with severance pay and 10% disability effective 15 March 1971. The evaluation he
underwent in December 1970, prior to this final disposition, found him in complete remission from all
symptoms relating to his disorder and only slightly impaired for social and industrial reasons. He
believes the record is in error because the military evaluated his disability at 10% and the
Department of Veterans Affairs has evaluated his disability variously at 70-1 00% depending on his
status at different re-evaluations. Findings and recommendations of the Physical Evaluation Board
were sustained at all levels of review, approved by the Air Force Personnel Board on 22 February
1971, and are well supported by the evidence of record. There is no evidence to support a higher
rating at the time of permanent disposition. His case was properly evaluated, appropriately rated
and received full consideration under the provisions of AFR 35-4. Action and disposition in this case
are proper and reflect compliance with Air Force directives which implement the law.
DISCUSSION: Once an individual has been declared unfit, the Service Secretaries are required
by law to rate the condition based upon the degree of disability at the time of permanent disposition
and not upon the possibility of future events. No change in military disability ratings can occur after
permanent disposition under the rules of the military disability system, even though the condition
may become better or worse. However, Title 38, USC authorizes the VA to increase or decrease
the VA compensation ratings based upon the individual's condition at the time of future evaluations
as has occurred in this case.
Page 2 (Cont'd)
AFBCMR Case # 98-00790
RECOMMENDATION: The Medical Consultant is of the opinion that no change in the records is
warranted and the application should be denied. L/aL&
.--
FREDERICK W. HORNICK, Col., USAF, MC, FS
Chief Medical Consultant, AFBCMR
Medical Advisor SAF Personnel Council
I -
i
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
HEADQUARTERS AIR FORCE PERSONNEL CENTER
RANDOLPH AIR FORCE BASE, TEXAS
22 May 98
MEMORANDUM FOR AFBCMR
FROM:
HQ AFPCIDPPD
550 C Street West Ste 06
Randolph AFB TX 78 150-4708
SUBJECT:
Recor
REQUESTED ACTION: Applicant requests that his disability discharge on 15 Mar 71
be set aside and he receive a disability retirement.
FACTS: Applicant was involuntarily relieved from active duty on 26 Dec 67 for physical
disability under the provisions of AFM 35-4, and subsequently placed on the Temporary
Disability Retired List (TDRL). He remained on the TDRL until he was Discharged With
Severance Pay (DWSP) with a 10 percent disability rating on 15 Mar 71. Member completed
seven years and twenty-three days of active duty. Member’s application is considered untimely
under the statute of limitations.
DISCUSSION: The purpose of the military disability system is to maintain a fit and vital
force by separating members who are unable to perform the duties of their office, grade, rank or
rating. Members who are separated or retired for reason of physical disability may be eligible, if
otherwise qualified, for certain disability compensations. Eligibility for disability processing is
established by a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) when that board finds that the member may
not be qualified for continued military service. The decision to conduct an MEB is made by the
medical treatment facility providing care to the member.
A review of the AFBCMR case file revealed that an MEB was convened
28 Aug 67, and referred to the Informal Physical Evaluation Board (IPEB). On
AFB,-n
1 Sep 67, the IPEB found the member unfit for continued military service for a diagnosis of
“schizophrenic reaction, paranoid type, chronic” and recommended he be placed on the TDRL
with a 100 percent disability rating. Applicant agreed with the findings and recommendations of
the IPEB on 8 Sep 67. Because of ongoing non-disability administrative actions, the member’s
case files were forwarded to the Secretary of the Air Force Personnel Council for adjudication.
On 8 Dec 67, officials within the office of the Secretary of the Air Force approved the
recommendation of the Physical Review Council (PRC) and directed that the member be placed
on the TDRL under the provisions of 10 USC 1202, effective 27 Dec 67.
c
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC 2009 00052
The AFBCMR Medical Consultant states even though PTSD may not have been an available diagnosis at the time of the applicant's military service, a mental health professional would have/should have been able to extract and list any signs and symptoms believed to be the result of an identifiable trauma, and to include these in the narrative summary if they were present at the time of evaluation. The AFBCMR Medical Consultant's complete evaluation is at Exhibit...
The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). Applicant's response to the advisory opinions is at Exhibit E. After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action. On 6 Dec 96, officials within the Office of the Secretary of the Air Force directed that the...
The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application -be denied ( E x h i b i t C ) . Eligibility for disability processing is established by a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) when that board finds that the member may not be qualified for continued military service. Member concurred with the findings and recommendation of the IPEB and, subsequently officials within the Office of the Secretary of the Air...
The results of his latest MRI show that he has more than degenerative arthritis. In a 30 Jan 98 TDRL evaluation, an orthopedic surgeon noted the applicant had continued symptoms after the operation with no improvement in either his back or leg pain. A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: In his first letter, the applicant indicates he did agree with the findings of the...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). On 19 Aug 69, the member was provided a memorandum which included a copy of the medical evaluation and an AF Form 356, Findings and Recommended Disposition of USAF Physical Evaluation Board. On 21 Aug 69, member concurred with the IPEB's findings and subsequently, officials within the Office of the Secretary of the Air Force...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100014604
The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his records to show he was permanently retired instead of discharged with severance pay. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1201, provides for the physical disability retirement of a member who has at least 20 years of service or a disability rating of at least 30 percent. The evidence of record shows the applicant presented a medical condition and subsequently underwent an MEB which recommended he be given a PEB.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03982 (2)
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-03982 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His service-connected medical condition, Psychotic Disorder/ Schizophrenia, be reevaluated as combat-related in order to qualify for compensation under the Combat Related Special Compensation (CRSC) Act. On 27 Dec 08, according to documentation...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03982
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-03982 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His service-connected medical condition, Psychotic Disorder/ Schizophrenia, be reevaluated as combat-related in order to qualify for compensation under the Combat Related Special Compensation (CRSC) Act. On 27 Dec 08, according to documentation...
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The decisions of the Formal Physical Evaluation Board (FPEB), dated 29 Jan 98, and the decision of the Air Force Personnel Council (SAF/PC), dated 3 Apr 98, are contrary to law and regulation and violate “minimum concepts of basic fairness.” When all the evidence is considered, the Board should reach the decision that she is unfit for further military service and should be permanently retired, with...
On 31 October 1996, the Secretary of the Air Force agreed with the findings of the IPEB and directed the applicant's permanent retirement, with a 30 percent disability rating. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The AFBCMR Medical Consultant stated that the applicant served his last five years of military service with a severe eating disorder that resulted in excessive weight loss and physical disability that was thoroughly evaluated at Wilford Hall Medical Center in 1994. Accordingly, we recommend that...