c
c
A R FORCE BO
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
RD FOR CORRECTION OF M ITARY RECORDS
AUG 1 4 1998
IN THE MATTER OF: v
DOCKET NUMBER: 98-00540
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: YES
Applicant requests that his military records be cleared of any
unjust or wrong he did as a young man while serving his country.
Applicant's submission is at Exhibit A.
The Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) denied applicant's
request for discharge for the good of the service on 31 January
1974 (Exhibit B).
After careful consideration of applicant's request and the
available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of
error or injustice to warrant corrective action. Absent persuasive
evidence applicant was denied rights to which entitled, appropriate
regulations were not followed, or appropriate standards were not
applied, we find no basis to disturb the existing record.
Accordingly, applicant's request is denied.
The applicant's case is adequately documented and it has not been
shown that a personal appearance with or without counsel will
materially add to our understanding of the issue(s) involved.
Therefore, the request for a hearing is not favorably considered.
The Board staff is directed to inform applicant of this decision.
Applicant should also be informed that this decision is final and
will only be reconsidered upon the presentation of new relevant
evidence which was not reasonably available at the time the
application was filed.
Members of the Board Mr. Charles E. Beznett, Mr. Loren S.
Perlstein, and Ms. Peggy E. Gordon considered this application on
6 August 1998, in accordance with the provisions of Air Force
Instruction 36-2603, and the governing statute, 10, U.S.C. 1552.
L CHARLES E. BENNETT
Panel Chair
Exhibits :
A. Applicant's DD Form 149
B. Available Master Personnel Records
The Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) denied applicant's request for an upgrade of his discharge to honorable on 19 January 1982 (Exhibit B). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action. Accordingly, applicant's request is denied.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). The applicant was approved for retraining into AFSC lClXl and required 30 months retainability after class graduation date.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C ) . The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). We recommend disapproval of the applicant’s request to be awarded the NCO Professional Military Education Graduate Ribbon.
AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Separations Branch, Directorate of Personnel Program Management, HQ AFPC/DPPRS, reviewed this application and states that information reflected on his WD AGO Form 53-59, they find no evidence to indicate the applicant's discharge, over 48 years ago, was incorrect, an injustice occurred to the applicant, or 97- 03744 that the discharge did not comply with the discharge directive in effective at the time of his discharge. A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). On 14 August 1985, the applicant was discharged with a dishonorable discharge.
The appropriate Air Force off ices evaluated applicant I s request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinions were forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). Applicant's responses to the advisory opinions are at Exhibit E. After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). No such evidence is found in this record, and, therefore, the applicant’s request for a disability discharge cannot be granted. RECOMMENDATION: The BCMR Medical Consultant is of the opinion that the applicant’s request for a medical disability discharge is not supported by evidence of records and his request should, therefore, be denied.
ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 4GN 2 2 1998 AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 97-02414 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: NO Y RESUME OF CASE On 28 January 1998, the Board considered applicant's 28 August 1997 application requesting that his undesirable discharge be upgraded to honorable. A Discharge Review Board convened in April 1958 and considered the issues in the applicant's application for correction of military record and they concur...
\ L I - A - IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 98-00400 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES AUG 1 4 1998 Applicant requests that his NGB Form 22 be coded to allow him to reenlist in the U.S. Armed Forces. The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The applicant states NGB Form 22 (Record of Separatiori and Record of Service) is incorrectly coded.
AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-1997-03260A
On 29 June 1998, the applicant submitted a request for reconsideration of the Board’s decision through his Congressman (Exhibit F). Accordingly, his request for reconsideration was denied (Exhibit G). Exhibit G. Letter from SAF/LLI to C/M McNulty, dated 3 Sep 98.