RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 98-00242
XXXXXX COUNSEL: None
XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: No
Applicant requests his social security number be corrected on his military
payroll records. Applicant's submission is at Exhibit A.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and
provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be
denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant
for review and response (Exhibit D). As of this date, no response has been
received by this office.
After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available
evidence of record, we find the application untimely. Applicant did not
file this request within three years after the alleged error or injustice
was discovered, or reasonably could have been discovered, as required by
10, U.S.C. 1552 and Air Force Instruction 39-2603. Applicant has not shown
a plausible reason for the delay in filing, and we are not persuaded that
the record raises issues of error or injustice which require resolution on
the merits. Thus, we cannot conclude it would be in the interest of
justice to excuse applicant's failure to file in a timely manner.
Accordingly, applicant's request is denied as untimely.
The Board staff is directed to inform applicant of this decision.
Applicant should also be informed that this decision is final and will only
be reconsidered upon the presentation of new relevant evidence which was
not reasonably available at the time the application was filed.
Members of the Board Mr. David C. Van Gasbeck, Dr. Gerald B. Kauva, and Ms.
Rita J. Maldonado considered this application on 10 August 1998 in
accordance with the provisions of Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and the
governing statute, 10, U.S.C. 1552.
Panel Chairman
Exhibits:
A. Applicant's DD Form 149
B. Available Master Personnel Records
C. Advisory Opinion
D. AFBCMR Ltr Forwarding Advisory Opinion
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). EDDIE D. SWINT, MSgt, USAF Chief, Career Enhancement Branch Military Personnel Division DEPARTMENT OF T H E A I R F O R C E H E A D Q U A R T E R S AIR FORCE P E R S O N N E L C E N T E R R A N D O L P H AIR FORCE B A S E TEXAS MEMORANDUM FOR AFBCMR FROM: HQ AFPCDPPRP 550 C Street West, Suite 1 1 Randolph AFB TX 78 150-47...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). On 14 August 1985, the applicant was discharged with a dishonorable discharge.
Applicant's response to the advisory opinion is at Exhibit E. After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action. request for promotion to Major, . Furthermore, although he provides us with 2 OERs; promotions are generally based on much more information.
.I AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION QF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS ... The appropria$e Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). Applicant' should also be informed that this decision is final and will only be reconsidered upon the presentation of new relevant evidence which was not reasonably available at the time the application was filed.
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 04313
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-04313 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Bad Conduct Discharge (BCD) be upgraded. Specifically, section 1552(f)(1) permits the correction of a record to reflect actions taken by a reviewing authority under the UCMJ. The complete JAJM evaluation is at Exhibit D. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04516
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04516 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, blocks 19a/b be corrected to show his current address and current spouse and address. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR),...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). Available Master Personnel Records C. Advisory Opinion D. SAF/MIBR Ltr Forwarding Advisory Opinion 4 : DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE LEGAL SERVICES AGENCY (AFLSA) MEMORANDUM FOR AFBCMR FROM: AFLSNJAJM 112 Luke Avenue, Room 343 Bolling AFB, DC 20332-8000 SUBJECT: Correction of Military Records pplicant’s request: In an...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05097
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05097 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The date of his discharge certificate be changed from 1 Sep 55 to 1 Aug 59, and his enlistment date should be 1 Aug 55. The applicant provided a DD Form 256AF, Honorable Discharge Certificate, reflecting a discharge date of 1 Sep 55. While the application indicates his DD Form 214 was submitted as evidence, it was...
(Exhibit C) The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinions were forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). Applicant's response to the advisory opinions is at Exhibit F. After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-1997-03363
(Exhibit C) The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinions were forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). Applicant's response to the advisory opinions is at Exhibit F. After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.