12 ia 1418 is 7 Bio
‘DOM M Y.Y. | Type.
DATE OF. oad DISCH.
DECISION. |
iy
35°36 37°38 39 40 Tew. 46450 4G AT 2549 50 |
‘DISCHARGE "AUTHORITY so REASOU FOR = >: BOARD DEC'N -
‘LEFT JUSTIFY) - [ SO _ _ DISCHARGE (LEFT: wuSTIY)
jl /} 1D
‘Hpie bs se 47 «| SS 80 Bee BA ES “667 6870 Nm WHS Te
SSUES ADDRESSED = ss : , , : 7
_ RECORD OF, PROCEEDINGS | .
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
lf
COUNSEL: None
_ : ao. #
HEARING DESIRED: Yes" _ .
wa m
Applicant requests He be granted senior master sergeant (E-8).
Applicant's submission is at Exhibit A.
and provided an advisory opinion to the. Board recommending the .
application be denied (Exhibit C): Applicant’s response to the
advisory opinion is at Exhibit EB. -
After careful consideration of applicant's | request and thé
available evidence of record, we. find insufficient. evidence of
error or injustice to warrant. corrective action. The: facts.‘and
opinions stated in the advisory opinion appear to. be based’ on the
evidence of record. and have not. been adequately rebutted. by -
applicant. Absent. persuasive . evidence applicant was denied.
rights to which entitled, appropriate: regulations were: not
followed, or appropriate standards wére not applied, we find no
basis to disturb the existing record. mg : "
Accordingly, applicant's request is denied.
The applicant's case is adequately documented and it has not been
shown that a personal. appearance -with or. without ' counsel .will
Materially add to our understanding of the issue(s) involved.
Therefore, the request for a hearing is not favorably considered.
The Board staff is directed to inform applicant of this decision:
Applicant should also be informed. that ‘this: de tsion is. final. and
will only be reconsidered upon. the presentation, of new relevant. . it
evidence. which was. not reasonably ‘available at the time” the -°
application was filed. Bos PU emery
Members of the Board Mr. Thomas S. Maxrkiewicz, Mr. Henry Romo, |
IN THE MATTER OF: _ DOCKET NUMBER: 98-00220 ~ SEP: 02 1988
Jr., and Mr. Walter 3. Hosey -considered this. application on : a
19 August 1998 in accordance with ‘the provisions of Air Force
‘Instruction 36-2603, and the governing statute, 10, U.S.C. 1552. .
(THOMAS §.. MARKIEWTCZ.
Panel Chair © .
Exhibits:
Applicant's DD Form.149. ae
Available Master Personnel Records
Advisory Opinion —
AFBCMR Ltr Forwarding Advisory Opinion
Applicant‘s Response
Aut
DEPARTMENT OF THE ‘AIR FORCE :
AIR FORCE RESERVE COMMAND: a
} APR
MEMORANDUM FOR AFBCMR 7
ee scm 7 oe a re at. cn :
Robins AFB.GA 31098- 1635
SUBJECT: Req
quest for Correction of Military: Recor a men
is ‘claiming his commander promised him a promotion by. moving him to an.
E8 slot when it became available, When he-did not receive the: promotion, he: asked the wing
commander to approve a promotion waiver..The wing, - commander-did:riot approve the waiver -
as it may be perceived as favoritism. ‘The wing commander acted within his authority not.
granting the waiver for promotion. .
2. Based on the documentation reviewed recommend disapproyel of member's § request,
- Point of contact is4 me
“MICHAEL W. LEER, Colonel, USAF - pada ey
Chief, ‘Military Personnel. Division . ee Pete. nto 5
- Directorate of Personnel © RT Mae
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02826
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The SAFPC recommends the application be denied and states, in part, that while there is little doubt the applicant demonstrated some extraordinary airmanship, decisive leadership, and heroism on 6 June 1972, for which he was awarded the DFC, the degree of heroism exhibited does not rise to the level required to merit the award of the SS. However, after a careful review and consideration of all factors...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action. The applicant is requesting that his mandatory separation date (MSD) of 1 April 1998 be extended to 27 November 1999 to allow for time he was assigned to the...
- ..... ..... ~ AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AUG 1 4 IN THE MATTER QF: DOCKET NO: 97-03806 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO Applicant requests that his discharge order, issued by the Air Force Reserve, be amended to correct his service number and to show he was promoted to sergeant. The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The...
To adjust applicant's .retirement date would not: be - consistent with the intent of the law; : BS At the time of his retirement, the overlap of marriage and his creditablé service ‘in determining eligibility to retired pay was 19 years, 11 months, and 29 days. THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected: to show .that he was not released from active duty on 31 August 1992.and: ‘retired for length ’ case...
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-02531
On 31 July 2007, the applicant retired in the grade of TSgt after serving 20 years and 6 months on active duty, _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOE recommends denial. Furthermore, had the request for a waiver been approved, which would have been no more than a deferment requiring completion of PME within 179 days of pin-on, she would also have had to serve a two-year active duty service commitment in order to retire in that...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01195
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-01195 INDEX CODE: 131.00 350-42-9512 COUNSEL: None STEVEN M. TORGERSON HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 10 OCTOBER 2006 ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be considered for promotion to the grade of colonel by Special Selection Boards (SSBs) for the CY03B and CY04C Colonel Central Selection Boards to...
The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant’s request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). Contrary to what the applicant states in her request, the "2Q" code was not assigned simply to prevent her immediate reenlistment, but rather to reflect the fact that she was separated with an unfitting medical condition under provisions of AFR 35-4 and the disability evaluation sys- tem. Page 2 AFBCMR Case #...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of your application and military records, the Board determined that the evidence you presented did not demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
Available Master Personnel Records C. Advisory Opinions D. E. F. AFBCMR Ltr Forwarding Advisory Opinions Addendum to Air Force Advisory Opinion AFBCMR Ltr Forwarding Advisory Opinion D E P A R T M E N T O F T H E A I R F O R C E H E A D Q U A R T E R S A I R F O R C E P E R S O N N E L C E N T E R R A N D O L P H A I R F O R C E E A S E T E X A S MEMORANDUM FOR AFBCMR 12 Jun 98 FROM: HQ AFPCDPPPEP 550 C Street West Ste 07 Randolph AFB TX 78 150-4709 SUB cords (DD Form 149) REQUESTED ACTION:...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of your application and military records, the Board determined that the evidence you presented did not demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.