t
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
IN THE MATTER OF:
DOCKET NO: 9 7 - 0 3 5 9 2
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
JUN 1 2 f998
Applicant requests that his Servicemember's Group Life Insurance
(SGLI) election be changed. Applicant's submission is at Exhibit
A.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request
and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the
application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was
forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D).
As of this date, no response has been received by this office.
After careful consideration of applicant's request and the
available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of
error or injustice to warrant corrective action. The facts and
opinions stated in the advisory opinion appear to be based on the
evidence of record and have not been rebutted by applicant.
Absent persuasive evidence applicant was denied rights to which
entitled, appropriate regulations were not followed, or
appropriate standards were not applied, we find no basis to
disturb the existing record.
Accordingly, applicant's request is denied.
The Board staff is directed to inform applicant of this decision.
Applicant should also be informed that this decision is final and
will only be reconsidered upon the presentation of new relevant
evidence which was not reasonably available at the time the
application was filed.
Members of the Board Ms. Martha Maust, Mr. Gregory H. Petkoff,
and Mr. Michael P. Higgins, considered this application on
10 June 1 9 9 8 , in accordance with the provisions of Air Force
Instruction 3 6 - 2 6 0 3 , and the governing statute, 10, U.S.C. 1 5 5 2 .
MARTHA MAUST/
Panel Chair
Exhibits:
A. Applicant's DD Form 1 4 9
B. Available Master Personnel Records
C. Advisory Opinion
D. AFBCMR Ltr Forwarding Advisory Opinion
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
HEADQUARTERS AIR FORCE PERSONNEL CENTER
RANDOLPH AIR FORCE BASE TEXAS
2 I JAM lgd8
MEMORANDUM FOR AFBCMR
FROM HQ AFPC/DPWCS
660 C Street West, Suite 14
Randolph AFB TX 78160-4716
SUBJECT: Application for correction of Military Records -
RE0UlESTED ACTION It appear8 the member is requesting a correction to his
Servicemembers’ Group Life Insurance Election.
DISCUSSION: Upon receiving the applicant’s DD Form 149, Application for
Correction of Military Record, it was determined that additional information was
needed to sufficiently evaluate member’s claim and make an appropriate
recommendation. A letter was forwarded to the member requesting the additional
information. Unfortunately, the applicant failed to respond.
RECOMMENDATION: Board disapprove the applicant’s request due to lack of
sdicient evidence to support the claim.
guperintendent, Casualty Services
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). 14 Randolph AF’B ‘JX 78150-4716 SUBJECT: Application for Correction of Wtary Records -7 REQUESTED ACTION: The applicant declined Servicemen’s Group We Insurance (SGLI) in Dec 94. It’s our opinion that had member wanted this coverage, he would have completed the new election form sooner.
The appropriate Air Force off ice evaluated applicant s request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-03231
AFBCMR BC-2003-03231 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36- 2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for the Chief of Staff...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-03232
AFBCMR BC-2003-03232 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36- 2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for the Chief of Staff...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The facts and opinions stated in the advisory opinion appear to be based on the evidence of record and have not been rebutted by applicant. The applicant has requested that his record be corrected to retain previous election (no coverage) and that he be reimbursed premiums deducted as a result of the 1 Apr 96 increase in...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). Implementation Guidance dated 7 Mar 96, stipulated that members eligible for SGLI under section 1967 (a)(l)-(2) of title 38, United States Code, on 31 Mar 96 with continued eligibility on 1 Apr 96, would have their SGLI increased to $200,000 effective 1 Apr 96, regardless of any prior election. Members who failed to complete the...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit B). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit C). c. The statement on his DD Form 214, “Member served 17 Oct 90 to 1 Oct 93 in support of Operation Desert ShieldStom” is a generic statement and only qualifies the applicant for the National Defense Service Medal, which he received.
The Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) considered and denied the applicant's request for upgrade of his discharge and changed of reason for discharge (Exhibit C). The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request for change of his RE Code and provided an advisory opinion to the Board (Exhibit D). The decision of the AFDRB appears to be based on the evidence of record and have not been rebutted by applicant.
The Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) considered and denied the applicant's request for upgrade of his discharge and changed of reason for discharge (Exhibit C). The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request for change of his RE Code and provided an advisory opinion to the Board (Exhibit D). The decision of the AFDRB appears to be based on the evidence of record and have not been rebutted by applicant.
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NO: 97-01826 (Case 2) COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO I Applicant requests that the narrative reason for separation be changed from marginal performer to convenience of the government; that his reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of 2P be change to a 1; and that his separation code of JEM be changed. The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinions...