RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 97-03363
INDEX NUMBER: 107.00;123.00;
100.07
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: YES
It appears that applicant is requesting that his WG ADO Form 53-55
(Enlisted Record and Report of Separation, Honorable Discharge) be
amended to delete reference to 17 days of lost time, and that a
comment be added to block 41 (Service Schools Attended) to reflect he
attended School; and, that he be awarded the Air Medal,
the Distinguished Flying Cross, and the Silver Star Medal.
Applicant's submission is at Exhibit A.
On 4 January 1994, the AFBCMR considered and rejected as untimely an
application submitted by applicant requesting that he and six other
crew members be awarded the Silver Star. (Exhibit C)
The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and
provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application
be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinions were forwarded to the
applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). Applicant's response
to the advisory opinions is at Exhibit F.
After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available
evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or
injustice to warrant corrective action. The facts and opinions stated
in the advisory opinion appear to be based on the evidence of record
and have not been adequately rebutted by applicant. Absent persuasive
evidence applicant was denied rights to which entitled, appropriate
regulations were not followed, or appropriate standards were not
applied, we find no basis to disturb the existing record.
Accordingly, applicant's request is denied.
The applicant's case is adequately documented and it has not been
shown that a personal appearance with or without counsel will
materially add to our understanding of the issues involved.
Therefore, the request for a hearing is not favorably considered.
The Board staff is directed to inform applicant of this decision.
Applicant should also be informed that this decision is final and will
only be reconsidered upon the presentation of new relevant evidence
which was not reasonably available at the time the application was
filed.
Members of the Board, Mrs. Barbara A. Westgate, Mr. Michael V.
Barbino, and Mr. Roger E. Willmeth, considered this application on
2 March 1999, in accordance with the provisions of Air Force
Instruction 36-2603 and the governing statute, 10 U.S.C. 1552.
BARBARA A. WESTGATE
Panel Chair
Exhibits:
A. Applicant's DD Form 149
B. Available Master Personnel Records
C. ROP, AFBCMR 93-01076
D. Advisory Opinions
E. SAF/MIBR Ltr Forwarding Advisory Opinion
F. Applicant's Response
(Exhibit C) The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinions were forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). Applicant's response to the advisory opinions is at Exhibit F. After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-1997-03363
(Exhibit C) The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinions were forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). Applicant's response to the advisory opinions is at Exhibit F. After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). Counsel's response to the advisory opinions is at Exhibit E. After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action. The facts and opinions stated in the advisory opinions appear to be based on the evidence of...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 98-00172 INDEX NUMBER: 137.01 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO Applicant requests that his records be corrected to reflect he made a timely election for spouse coverage under the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) following his marriage on 10 July 1993. The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be...
AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-1998-00172
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 98-00172 INDEX NUMBER: 137.01 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO Applicant requests that his records be corrected to reflect he made a timely election for spouse coverage under the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) following his marriage on 10 July 1993. The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). Therefore, the request for a hearing is not favorably considered.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). t In September 1998, our office reviewed the applicants records in response to his request for the PH.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). Applicant’s response to the advisory opinion is at Exhibit E. After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). Applicant should also be informed that this decision is final and will only be reconsidered upon the presentation of new relevant evidence which was not reasonably available at the time the application was filed.
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2008-01923
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2008-01923 INDEX CODE: 131.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The following corrections be made to his Officer Selection Brief (OSB) reviewed by the CY07B Lieutenant Colonel Central Selection Board: a. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s...