AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
IN THE MATTER OF:
---
DOCKET NO: 97-02934
COUNSEL: None
HEARING DESIRED: No
MAY 2 9 1998
Applicant requests that his two DD Forms 214 (Report of Transfer
or Discharge) and his two DD Forms 424 (Certification of
Information for Retirement Pay) be amended to show that his
disability, for which he was permanently retired, was a combat-
related injury so that his 3 years, 5 months and 23 days of
military service time can be credited toward his Civil Service
Retirement. Applicant's submission is at Exhibit A.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request
and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the
application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was
forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D).
Applicant's response to the advisory opinion is at Exhibit E.
After careful consideration of applicant's request and the
available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of
error or injustice to warrant corrective action. The facts and
opinions stated in the advisory opinion appear to be based on the
evidence of record and have not been sufficiently rebutted by
applicant.
Absent persuasive evidence applicant was denied
rights to which entitled, appropriate regulations were not
followed, or appropriate standards were not applied, we find no
basis to disturb the existing record.
Accordingly, applicant's request is denied.
The Board staff is directed to inform applicant of this decision.
Applicant should also be informed that this decision is final and
will only be reconsidered upon the presentation of new relevant
evidence which was not reasonably available at the time the
application was filed.
Members of the Board Mr. Thomas S. Markiewicz, Mr. David W.
Mulgrew, and Mr. Henry Romo, Jr. considered this application in
Executive Session on 10 April 1998 in accordance with the
provisions of Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and the governing
statute, 10, U.S.C. 1552.
/
Panel Chair
Exhibits :
A. Applicant's DD Form 149
B. Available Master Personnel Records
C. Advisory Opinion
D. AFBCMR Ltr Forwarding Advisory Opinion
E. Applicant's Response
SUBJECT: Application fbr correctioa of
REQUESTED ACTION: Applicant requests correction of his retirement orders (both temporary
and permanent) and all resulting forms to reflect that his disability was combat related and in line of duty
during a period of war in order to obtain credit for military service towards a Federal Civil Service
retirement.
-- - _. - -
- ----5-Eeh5&wAh
FACTS: The applicant was placed on the Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL) effective
asypensable rating of I00 percent due to diagnoses of tuberculosis, pulmonary, and
schizophrcnic reaction. acute. after serving 3 years, 5 months and 23 days on active duty. He WIIS
reevaluated in June 59 and permanently retired for disability with a compensable rating of SO percent
effective 3 1 Jut 59.
I
!
’
I
,
-*
DISCUSSION: The purpose of the military disability system is to maintain a M and vital f m e by
separating members who are unable to perfom the duties of the grade, office, rank or rating. Those
members who are separated or retired by reasofi of physical disability may be eligible, for certain
disability compensations. Eligibility for disability processing is established by a M a d i d Evaluation B o d I
(MEB) when the board finds that the member may not be qualified for continued military service. The
decision to conduct an MEB is madc by the medical treatment facility providing care to the member.
Applicant served in Korea beginning on 9 Mar 55 and in Japan on 19 Jan 56. While serving in
Japan and undergoing a routine examination. it was discovered that the applicant had pulmonary
tubcrculosis. In May 57, while on convalescent leave from an Army hospital, the symptoms of his
schizophrcnic reaction bcgan lo surface. Subsequently his MEB was convened and he was placed on the
TDRL.
Applicant believes his disability should be rated as combat-related because his illness took place
under conditions simulating war, including training exercises such as maneuvers during aperiod of war.
He states, “This veteran’s illness was incurred while serving in a extra-hazardous service area or combat
zone to protect that zone against aggression by an enemy of the United States.”
DoDl 1332.38, Nov 14, 1996, Part 5, has clearly defined the criteria for determining whether or
not a member’s condition was “combat-related”, caused by an “instrumentality of war”, and/or the result
of “armed conflict” and the type of benefits that may be obtainable, as follows:
,
I
,
’
I
A. Administrative Determinations for Purposes of Employment under Federal
Civil Service. Physical disability evaluation shall include a recommendation or final
decision and supporting documentation on whether the injury or disease that make the
member unfit or that contributes to unfitness was incurred in combat with an enemy of
the United States; or was the result of armed conflict; or was caused by an
instrumentality or war during a period of war, (These determinations p e d n to whether
a military retiree later employed under Federal Civil Service is entitled to the following
-
c
benotits; credit of m i l k y ldnicb towanla I Fsdarl CMI
5 U.S.C. 8332, ratation profcrsnce under 5 U.S.C. 3502,
compensation provbiw of S U.S.C. 5532, aed credit of
Service annual leave accrual undsr 5 U.S.C. 6303.)
_ .
the u. s. state Dopnrtment.
result of armed conflict. The fact that a member may hava hatnad 8
disability during a period of war or in an area of mad conflict, or while
participating in combat operations is not sufficient to support this finding.
There must be a definite cutuul relationship between the armed conflict
and the resulting unfitting disability.
3. Instrumentality of War During a Period of War (5 U.S.C.
3502, 5532, 6303, 8332). The injury or disease is caused by an
instrumentality of war and incurred in the line of duty during a pcriod of
war as delilied in 38 U.S.C. 101 and ?02 U.S.C. Instrumentality of War.
A vehicle. vessel, or device designed primarily for Military Service and
intended for use in such Service at the time of the occurrence of the
injury. It may also be a vehicle, vessel, or device not designed primarily
for Military service if use of or occurrence involving such a vehicle,
vessel, or device subjects the individual to a hazard peculiar to Military
Service. This use or occurrence differs from the use or o c c u m c e tinder
similar circumstances in civilian pursuits. There must be a direct carnal
relationship between the use of the instrumentality of war and the
disability, and the disability must be incurred incident to a hazard or risk
to the service. Applicable periods arc: ... Korca - The period beginning
27 June 1950 and ending 3 I January 1955 ....
h
U. Dotcrniinations for Fcderal T~LI Benefits. Physical disability evaluation shall
include a dctermination and supporting documentation on whether the member's physical
disability compensation is excludcd from Federal gross income under 26 U.S.C. IW....
I . e. On 24 Sep 75 the individual was member of the Armed
Forces. ...
2. Combat-related. This standard covers those injuries and diseases
attributable to the special dangers associated with armed conflict or the
preparation or training for armed conflict. A physical disability shali be
considered combat-related if it makes the member unfit or contributes to
unfitness and was incurred under any of the circumstances listed in B.2.a.
through 82.d., below.
a. As a direct result of armed conflict ....( same as above).
b. While engaged in hazardous service. Such service includes,
but is not limited to, aerial flight duty. parachute duty, demolition duty,
experimental stress duty, and diving duty.
j
grenade and live fire weapons practice, bayonet training, hand-to-hand
combat mining. repelling, and negotiation of cwnblt cootidepc# md
obstacle courses. It does not include Physical minh and actfvItl&&h
as calisth
djo
d. Caused by m ' ' ~ e n t a l i t y of war. Incurred during a
period of w(v is not required, A Favorable detenniantion ir made if the
disability was incurred during rory period of service Y a result
diverse causes 89 wounds cawed by n milky WOIIPOO,
involving a military combat vehicle, injury, or sickness cawed by =ea,
gases, or explosion of military ordinance, vehicles, or rnatu'ial.
However, there must be a direct cuusul relationship between the
instrumentality of war and the disability. For example, an injury
resulting from a Service member falling on the deck of a ship while
participating in a sport activity would not normally be considered an
injury caused by an instrumentality of war (the ship) since the sports
activity and not the ship caused the fall. The exception occurs if the
operation of the ship caused the fall.
1 '
5.r.P 1 r.
., t r -* Ji-
I
I
I
i
I
I
'
After a thorough review of the applicant's case tile, we found no errors or irregularities. His
disability case was correctly processed. his condition appropriatdy rated, and he was afforded all rights to
which he was entitled under department directives and law. Neither his pneumonia nor schizophrenia
qualify under the above provisions of Administrative Detenninations for the Purpose of Employment with
Federal Civil Service. His illness was not incuyed in combat with the enemy, due to m e d conflict, or
caused by an instrumentality of war. Further, he started his tour in Korea after the official end of the war
on 31 Jan 55.
appears to apply to Civil Service bcnefits. It applies only to the federal tax benefits. This portion does not
mcmbcr as his Air Force rotircmcnt payment is non-taxable since he retired before 25 Sep 75
elieve hc quolifics under the criteria set forth.
,
i
j
A Chief, USIF Physical Disability Division
Dir of Pen Prog Mgt
!
I
i
~
I
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-00220
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The BCMR Medical Consultant recommends denial of the applicant’s request for granting establishment of the designation that his PTSD was the direct result of armed conflict or caused by an instrumentality of war, during a period of war. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant, through his service representative states...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-03172
The FPEB, after reviewing new evidence and applicant’s medical records, determined a hearing was not necessary, and recommended he be discharged with severance pay, with a 20% disability rating. This injury is, instead, a pre-existing condition “aggravated by extreme shock of pounding heavy [aircraft] wheel chocks.” Designating an injury such as the applicant’s as being the direct result of armed conflict exceeds the DODI’s unambiguous intent to limit this classification to those service...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140003668
The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show his disability was a combat-related injury which was caused by an instrumentality of war. An MEB-Medical Record Report, dated 12 January 2011, shows the applicant was mobilized for deployment at the time of his injury. While the applicant's injury was incurred in the LOD, his disability cannot be classified as resulting from conditions simulating war.
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC 2007 03664
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-03664 INDEX CODE: 108.00 COUNSEL: XXXXXXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His disability retirement be corrected to show that his medical condition was the direct result of armed conflict or was caused by an instrumentality of war and incurred in the line of duty during a period of war," or was...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090019835
The applicant states: * his discharge orders and DA Form 199 should be corrected to show his injury was caused by an instrumentality of war * his medical records clearly show his condition was caused from noise exposure from his occupation in the military * he worked on tanks and these vehicles are instruments of war 3. The applicant contends his military records clearly show his condition was caused by noise exposure from his occupation in the military (tank mechanic). The applicant's...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120016669
The applicant requests correction of his DA Form 199 (Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) Proceedings) under Items 10a to 10c to show his right hip injury as a disability that was incurred in the line of duty (LOD) as a result of an instrumentality of war. The regulation states in: a. Paragraph 4-19(2)(b) states in block 10C the board will record its determination of whether the injury was combat-related as defined by Title 26, U.S. Code, section 104. b. Paragraph 4-19j that in making a...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00395
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00395 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His retirement order be corrected to reflect his disabilities were received in the line of duty as the direct result of armed conflict, caused by an instrumentality of war, incurred in the line of duty during a period of war, or were the direct result of a combat related injury. While we note the applicants...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-03452
The Air Force Personnel Board (AFPB) reviewed his case and disagreed with the IPEB’s determination that his coronary disease was unstable, and directed that he be permanently retired instead of being placed on the TDRL. After reviewing his claim and the evidence available, there is no basis for the Board to declare his coronary artery disease was caused by an instrumentality of war and was incurred in the line-of-duty during a period of war, and neither the IPEB nor the AFPB found that his...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00166
At that time, the IPEB determined that his disability was not combat related, a direct result of armed conflict or an instrumentality of war. Instrumentality of War: A vehicle, vessel, or device designed primarily for military service and intended for use in such service at the time of the occurrence of the injury. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003084161C070212
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT REQUESTS : That the DD Form 199 (Physical Evaluation Board Proceedings (PEB) block 16 be corrected to show that his disability retirement was in the line of duty and caused as a direct result of armed conflict or an instrumentality of war. Both the applicant’s skin condition and hearing loss were considered to be in the line of duty but were not diagnosed until...