RECORD
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR
OF PROCEEDINGS
CORRECTION OF MILITARY
IN THE MATTER OF:
DOCKET NUMBER: 9 8 - 0 0 1 2 5
COUNSEL: None
HEARING DESIRED: NO
Applicant requests that his
social security number as shown on
the National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 22 (Report of Separation and
Record of Service) be changed from 0 1 9 - 5 8 - 0 5 5 4 to 0 1 9 - 5 8 - 0 6 4 5 and
his reenlistment eligibility (RE) code be changed from ineligible
to eligible. Applicant's submission is at Exhibit A.
As noted by the Air National Guard (ANG) , in their advisory
opinion of 8 Jun 98 (Exhibit C) , applicant's social security
number will be corrected upon resolution of his case. However,
after discussion with officials at the Air Force Personnel Center
(AFPC) , it appears that the NGB' is going to correct applicant's
social security number administratively. Therefore, the only
issue under consideration by this Board is his request to change
his RE code. The appropriate ANG office evaluated. applicant's
request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board
recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C) . The advisory
opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response
(Exhibit D). As of this date, no response has been received by
this office.
After careful consideration of applicant's request and the
available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of
error or injustice to warrant corrective action. The facts and
opinions stated in the advisory opinion appear to be based on the
evidence of record and have not been rebutted by applicant.
Absent persuasive evidence applicant was denied rights to which
entitled, appropriate regulations were not followed, or
appropriate standards were not applied, we find no basis to
recommend changing his RE code.
The Board staff is directed to inform applicant of this decision.
Applicant should also be informed that this decision is final and
will only be reconsidered upon the presentation of new relevant
evidence which was not reasonably available at the time the
application was filed.
Members of the Board Ms. Patricia J. Zarodkiewicz, Mr. William H.
Anderson, and Mr. Joseph A. Roj considered this application on
11 February 1999 in accordance with the provisions of Air Force
Instruction 36-2603, and the governing statute, 10, U.S.C. 1552.
Exhibits :
A. Applicant's DD Form 149
B. Available Master Personnel Records
C.
D. AFBCMR Ltr Forwarding Advisory Opinion
Advisory Opinion
I
AFPC/JA states that THC marijuana has a half-life in urine samples. Therefore, they do not feel that the Legal Advisor's refusal to instruct the board on the discharge characterization options constitute reversible error, A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. APPLICAN TIS RE VIEW OF AIR FORCE E VALUATIO8: The applicant reviewed the Air Force evaluation and indicated that he disagrees with their findings. While the applicant believes his rights to due process...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-01596
On 10 Dec 10, NGB/A1PS informed the applicant that he had not exhausted the administrative remedies regarding his application for correction of his military records. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force offices of primary responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis for our decision that the applicant has failed to sustain his burden of proof of the existence...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-00343
Second, he is concerned the Board might consider not granting his request to correct the known errors on the SF-50B as the Board may only correct military records - not civilian records. Based on the evidence of record, had the applicant not been separated, he would have continued to serve in the Air National Guard (ANG). We note applicant’s request that he be promoted to lieutenant colonel three years from the date of the Board.
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03927
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-03927 INDEX CODE: COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Item 18, Pay Date, located on his National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 22, Report of Separation and Record of Service, be changed from 760414 to 740103 and that Item 26, Reenlistment Eligibility, be changed from “Ineligible” to Retired Ready...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00396
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00396 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of “6H” (Pending Discharge IAW ANGR 39-10 – INVOL (ANG Only)) be changed to allow her to enlist in the Army National Guard. On 12 Apr 08, the applicant’s commander notified her that he was recommending her...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00614
Giving the circumstances surrounding the reason for his separation coupled with his honorable service characterization, we believe that a good probability exists that he may be able to provide effective and meaningful service to our nation as a member of the armed forces. THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that on 28 Sep 10, he was discharged with a RE code of 3K (Secretarial Authority). ...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-03700 ADDENDUM
Excluding him, when the written ACP program never excluded officers occupying API 0 positions and when the AFBCMR and the Director of the ANG approved it retroactively for other API 0 billeted pilots' pre-FYll service, would be a discriminatory application causing error and injustice. Further, NGB does not dispute that the ACP policy as written never excluded API 0 pilots as the Director ANG concluded by approving ACP for some of them in 2010. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01112
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01112 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code of 6H, which denotes (Air National Guard (ANG) pending discharge in accordance with ANGR 39-10 involuntary) be changed to an eligible code. ...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). He requests correction of his records to show that he was not discharged and that he is eligible for reenlistment. The record contains evidence of several failures to go to work on time, including three occasions after he was recommended for reenlistment.
The Board directed that the applicant’s records be corrected to reflect that he was not released from active duty on 8 Mar 96 under the provisions of AFI 36-3209 (Misconduct), transferred to the Kansas Air National Guard on 2 Apr 96, discharged from the Kansas Air National Guard on 31 Jul 97, and assigned to the Retired Reserve on 2 Aug 97; but was continued on active duty until 31 Jan 99; and, that he was released from active duty on 31 Jan 99 for the Convenience of the Government...