I
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
WASHINGTON DC
OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT SECRETARY
AFBCMR 90-02340
"Y
2 3 1gg5
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force
Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of
Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed that:
The
he Department of the Air Force
relating
be corrected to show that he was
not discharged on 28 July 1978, but on that date, he was released from
active duty, transferred to the Reserve of the Air Force, with obligated
service until 28 January 1980, and furnished a separation program
designator (SPD) code of "MBK."
f Deputyfor
Air Force Review Boards
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
IN THE MATTER OF:
DOCKET NUMBER: 90-02340
COUNSEL; None
HEARING DESIRED:
MAY 2 3 1995
Blocks 9a (Type of Separation), 9c (Authority & Reason), and 13
(Terminal Date of Reserve/Military Service Obligation (MSO)) of
his DD Form 214 be changed.
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
Since his reenlistment eligibility (RE) code was changed on
18 March 1982, the areas in question should also be corrected.
Applicant's 6 November 1994 letter to his congressman, with
attachments, requesting these changes is provided at Exhibit A.
-:
Applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force in the grade of
airman basic on 29 July 1974. He was discharged on 28 July 1978
in the grade of senior airman under the provisions of AFR 39-10
with an RE code of 2H (Identified as alcohol abuser according to
AFR 30-2 & has not completed period of follow-on support for
alcohol rehabilitation treatment) and a separation program
designator (SPD) code of KBK (Expiration Term of Service). Block
13 reflected IrN/A. I'
Available military records do not provide
information concerning the circumstances surrounding his
discharge.
In a letter dated 18 March 1982, the Director of Manpower &
Personnel Data Systems, AFMPC/DOAl, advised applicant that the RE
code on his DD Form 214 was administratively changed from 2H to
1J (Eligible to reenlist but elects separation or discharge).
Applicant subsequently enlisted in the Regular Air Force on
10 May 1982 in the grade of sergeant, and is currently serving in
the Regular Air Force in the grade of master sergeant.
In an application dated 7 July 1990, he requested that Blocks 9a,
9c and 13 on his DD Form 214 should also be changed in view of
his RE code being changed to 1J. On 11 January 1991, the Board
denied applicant's request as untimely. A copy of the Record of
Proceedings is attached at Exhibit C.
g :
The Military Personnel Technician, AFMPC/DPMARS2, reviewed the
application and states that if applicant had been given an RE
code of 1J at the time he separated, he would have been released
from active duty and would have fulfilled his MSO in the Air
Force Reserve. Since he was discharged and did not complete his
MSO, they cannot give him credit for time not served.
A complete copy of the Air Staff evaluation is attached at
Exhibit D.
A P PLICANT'S REVIRW OF AIR STAFF E VALUATION:
A complete copy of the Air Staff evaluation was forwarded to the
applicant on 6 March 1995 for review and comment within 30 days.
As of this date, no response has been received by this office.
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice
warranting corrections to applicant's DD Form 214.
In this
respect, we note that on 18 March 1982, the Director of Manpower
and Personnel Data Systems changed applicant's RE code from 2H to
1J. In the absence of discharge records, we must rely on the
presumption of regularity that responsible officials applied
appropriate standards in effecting the change in applicant's RE
code. In view of the fact that the applicant would have been
released from active duty and would have fulfilled his MSO in the
Air Force Reserve had he been given the correct RE code at the
time he separated, it appears that the failure to update the
related items on his DD Form 214 was an administrative oversight.
In view of the above, and to offset any possibility of an
injustice, we conclude that applicant's records be corrected to
the extent indicated below.
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that he was not
discharged on 28 July 1978, but on that date, he was released
from active duty, transferred to the Reserve of the Air Force,
2
with obligated service until 28 January 1980, and furnished a
separation program designator (SPD) code of "MBK.
The following members of the Board considered this application in
Executive Session on 27 April 1995, under the provisions of AFR
31-3:
Mr. Douglas J. Heady, Panel Chairman
Mr. John T. Dorsett, Member
Mr. Gregory H. Petkoff, Member
All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The
following documentary evidence was considered:
w/atchs .
Exhibit A. Applicant's Letter to C/M Hobson, dated 6 Nov 94,
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Record of Proceedings, dated 11 Jan 91, w/atchs.
Exhibit D. Letter, AFMPC/DPMARS2, dated 14 Feb 95.
Exhibit E. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 6 Mar 9 5 .
DOUGLAS J. HEADY
Panel Chairman
3
-
.
. . .
.
.
.
- . I . , .
* . . *
- . .
. .
A I R FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
I N THE MATTER OF:
DOCKET NUMBER:
90- 02430
T h e r e l e v a n t f a c t s p e r t a h i n g t o t h i s a p p l i c a t i o n a r e n o t known as
t h e a p p l i c a n t ' s m i l i t a r y r e c o r d s h a v e b e e n l o s t / d e s t r o y e d .
t h i s a p p l i c a t i o n a n d n o t e d
t h a t
r e v i e w e d
t o
AFMPC/DPMARS2
t h e
a p p l i c a n t h a s n o t f i l e d a t i m e l y r e q u e s t and h i s i n o r d i n a t e d e l a y
may h a v e c o n t r i b u t e d
t o
r e g u l a r i t y and
r e v l c x .
recommend t h a t t h e a p p l i c a t i o n be d e n i e d .
A complete copy of
t h e i r n o t h a v i n g a n a d e q u a t e r e c o r d
t h e e v a l u a t i o n is a t E x h i b i t C .
They m u s t rely on
t h e p r e s u m p t i o n of
A copy of
3 O c t o b e r 1 9 9 0 f o r r e v i e w and
r e s p o n s e .
r e s p o n s e h a s been r e c e i v e d by t h i s o f f i c e .
t h e A i r S t a f f e v a l u a t i o n was f o r w a r d e d t o a p p l i c a n t on
t h i s d a t e , n o
A s o f
I
- .
. . '
.
I I
. *
..
V I
.
. . .
.
.
t h r e e y e a r s a f t e r
The a p p l i c a t i o n was n o t f i l e d w i t h i n
1.
a l l e g e d error or
have b e e n d i s c o v e r e d , a s
U n i t e d S t a t e s Code
Although t h e a p p l i c a n t a s s e r t s a d a t e of d i s c o v e r y w h i c h would,
c o r r e c t , make
gave r i s e t o t h e a p p l i c a t i o n were known
t h e a s s e r t e d d a t e o f d i s c o v e r y .
c o n s t i t u t e d
t h r e e - y e a r p e r i o d f o r f i l i n g .
t h e
i n j u s t i c e was d i s c o v e r e d , or
r e a s o n a b l y c o u l d
r e q u i r e d by S e c t i o n 1552, T i t l e 1 0 ,
( 1 0 USC 1552), and A i r F o r c e R e g u l a t i o n 31-3.
i f
t h e e s s e n t i a l f a c t s which
t o a p p l i c a n t l o n g b e f o r e
t h o s e f a c t s
t h e
Thus t h e a p p l i c a t i o n is u h t i m e l y .
K n o w l e d g e of
and
t h e b e g i n n i n g of
t h e a p p l i c a t i o n
t h e d a t e of
d i s c o v e r y
t i m e l y ,
-
t h e
f i l i n g
i n t e r e s t of
P a r a g r a p h b of 1 0 USC 1552 permits us, i n o u r d i s c r e t i o n , t o
2.
e x c u s e u n t i m e l y
j u s t i c e .
h a v e
c a r e f u l l y r e v i e w e d a p p l i c a n t ' s s u b m i s s i o n and
t h e e n t i r e r e c o r d ,
and w e do n o t f i n d a
t h e u n t i m e l y
f i l i n g of
a p p l i c a n t h a s n o t shown a
i n f i l i n g , and w e are n o t p e r s u a d e d
p l a u s i b l e r e a s o n f o r d e l a y
t h a t t h e r e c o r d r a i s e s issues of e r r o r or i n j u s t i c e w h i c h require
A c c o r d i n g l y , we c o n c l u d e
r e s o l u t i o n on t h e merits a t t h i s t i m e .
t h a t i t would n o t be
t h e
u n t i m e l y f i l i n g of t h i s a p p l i c a t i o n .
j u s t i c e t o e x c u s e
t h i s a p p l i c a t i o n .
s u f f i c i e n t b a s i s
i n t e r e s t of
t o e x c u s e
t h e
The
i n
i n
We
-
......................
DECISION OF THE BOARD
The a p p l i c a t i o n was n o t t i m e l y f i l e d and i t would n o t be
i n t e r e s t of j u s t i c e t o w a i v e t h e u n t i m e l i n e s s .
of
t o r e j e c t t h e a p p l i c a t i o n a s u n t i m e l y .
i n . t h e
I t is t h e d e c i s i o n .
t h e B o a r d ,
t h e r e f o r e ,
T h e f o l l o w i n g members of
a c c o r d a n c e w i t h
3 1 May 1985:
i n
-
t h e p r o v i s i o n s of p a r a g r a p h 9 , AFR 31- 3, d a t e d
t h e Board c o n s i d e r e d
t h i s a p p l i c a t i o n
Mr. M a r t i n H. R o g e r s , P a n e l Chairman
Ms. L. J u l i e C o p e n h a v e r , Member
M r . C. B r u c e B r a s w e l l , Member
The f o l l o w i n g documentary e v i d e n c e w a s c o n s i d e r e d :
E X H I B I T A.
EXHIBIT B .
EXHIBIT C.
E X H I B I T D.
DD Form 149, d a t e d 7 J u l 90, w / a t c h s .
A p p l i c a n t ' s A v a i l a b l e Master P e r s o n n e l R e c o r d s .
L e t t e r , AFMPC/DPMARS2, d a t e d 3 O c t 9 0 .
L e t t e r , AFBCMR, d a t e d 3 O C t 9 0 .
c
MARTI N H. ROGERS
p a n e l Chairman
2
9-d23547
The majority of the panel concluded that the contested report was not invalidated by a possible personality conflict between the rater and applicant, nor was it used as a means of retribution. The Chief, Inquiries/Special Actions Section, AFMPC/DPMAJWl, also reviewed this application and states that should the Board void the contested report in its entirety, upgrade the overall rating, o r make any other significant change, the applicant will be entitled to supplemental promotion...
A complete copy of the Air Staff evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR STAFF EVALUATION: In summary, applicant states that the evidence is clear there is no basis to time bar his petition. If h i s above r e q u e s t are n o t granted, he r e q u e s t s t h a t - t h e 0489A Promotion Recommendation For (PRF) be upgraded t o d e f i n i t e l y promote (DP) and he be considered f o r promotion t o t h e grade of major by Special S e l e c t i o n Board (SSB) f o r...
I L. e AFBCMR 93-01781 DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION O F MILITARY RECORDS WASHINGTON DC 20330-1430 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF I Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code and Air Force Regulation 31-3, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is directed that: The pertinent Force relating to show that he enr Scholarship...
I 4 By letters dated 7 August 1997, 26 October 1997, 9 December 1997, and 16 February 1998, applicant requested reconsideration of his He provided copies of documentation submitted with his appeal. 3 AFBCMR 91-01962 JAJM recommended that the Board deny the applicant's request: (1) on the basis that it is untimely; (2) on the merits; and ( 3 ) because it does not meet the criteria for reconsideration. Applicant contends that his SF Form 88, Report of Medical Examination, dated 16 August...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01368
Accordingly, applicant's request is denied. QFFICER/ENLISTED PROGRAM. The Secretary of each Military Department may prescribe regulations and policies regarding the criteria for eligibility for early retirement under the authority of reference (a) and this implementing guidance.
I I DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS WASHINGTON DC 20330-1430 , AFBCMR 93-02170 SEP 2 0 I993 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code and Air Force Regulation 31-3, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is directed that: -- corrected to show t T& pertinent - _ 1' :*w- Air...
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00225
TO: I SAFIMRBR 550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 FROM: SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD 1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3RD FLOOR ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7002 I (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used I AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMBER FD-2003-00225 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. However, based upon the record and evidence provided by...
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00426
NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) G W E AFSNISSAN AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD Texas Veterans Commission 1 ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD 1 ( 2 ( APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 1 3 1 LETTER OF NOTIFICATION 4 BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE ( ( TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPERANCE I 1 1 -. On or about 29 November 1988, he failed his room inspection, for which he received...