NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7637 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 TIR Docket No: 7637-14/ 431-09 20 March 2015 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United states Code, Section 1552 and request for a copy of the record of trial and the names and votes of Board members who considered your case. Regarding the names and votes of Board members who considered your...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7639 14_Redacted
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 ES Docket No: 7639-14 6 August 2015 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW NAVAL RECORD OF , USMC, XXK-XX- Ref: (a) 10 U.8.c. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Marine Corps, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that his naval record be corrected...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR764 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval recora, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. occasions, were You were notified of pending administrative discharge processing with an other than honorable (OTH) discharge due to misconduct {civil conviction). Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR764 14_Redacted
Although your application was not filed in a time Board found it in the interest of justice to wai limitations and consider your application on its three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 January 2015. After consulting with legal counsel, you lected to present your case to an administrative discharge board — (0 94...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7642 14_Redacted
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 July 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7657 14_Redacted
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 July 2015. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7659 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 SIN Docket No: 7659-14 28 January 2015 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Commandant of the Marine Corps XXX-XX Ref: (a) 10 U.S.c. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, an enlisted member of the Marine Corps Reserve, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his record he corrected by removing a special...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7666 14_Redacted
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 July 2015. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR767 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 January 2015. “After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient | to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7671 14
NR7671-14 21 Apr 15 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Tox Secretary of the Navy Subj: . Petitioner’s dependents arrived to Woodbridge, Virginia on or about 14 June 2013. It is certified that quorum was present at the Board’s review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and complete record of the Board's proceedings in the above mT mee S Pursuant to the delegation of authorit out in Section 6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7672 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 November 2014. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. é Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is'on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7674 14_Redacted
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 July 2015. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7678 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1004 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 DIC Docket No. NR7678-14 27 Jan 15 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj}: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICO Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. d. A copy of this Report of Proceedings will be filed in Petitioner's naval record.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7688 14_Redacted
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 July 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7689 14_Redacted
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 July 2015. Subsequently, you were notified of pending administrative separation by reason of misconduct at which time you waived your procedural rights to consult with legal counsel and to present your case to an administrative discharge board (ADB). Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR769 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION UF NAVAL RECORDS fut &. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was entitled to payment of involuntary Separation Pay (ISP) when he was discharged. The Board, consisting of Mr. yesalman, Mr. George, and Mr. Ruskin, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7693 14_Redacted
aA three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 July 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in Support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7695 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 April 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. NR7695-14 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7698 14_Redacted
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 July 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. You remained on active duty until 25 September 1975, when you were released under honorable conditions at the expiration of your enlistment, based on...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7703 14
NR7703-14 9 April 2015 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: ; _ ra REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a} 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1970)”} entry dated 16 January 2009. k copy of the contested entry is at...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7709 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S, COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 DIC Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “B” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) .° : _ * 2, The Board, consisting of QI iii cas reviewed Petitioner's allegations of e...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7722 14
- DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1004 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 HCG . Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to modify Petitioner's advancement effective date and Time in Rate (TIR} . The Board, consisting of i reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 28...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7727 13
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by OCNO memo 7220 Ser N130C/14U1330 dated 10 October 2014, a copy of which is attached. NR7727-13 consequentiy, wher appiyang [or @ correction Of am iliviai ives record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR773 14
Members who are retired are not ¢€ the benefits. Because my retirement date followed 50 closely behind the 1 memo (2270un2002) , the memo was release of the Post 9/11 GI Bil not well known at my command and key points of the memo were not ement.” However, the Board disseminated to me before my retir formation about the Post-9/11 found that whether as you claim in GI Bill was not disseminated to you or the command before your retirement, information about the Post-9/1i GI Billi has...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7742 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 June 2014. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR777 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 September 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. However, after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7771 14_Redacted
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 July 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. In your case, the Board determined that a personal appearance was not necessary and considered your case based on the evidence of record.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7773 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to retroactive Special Duty Assignment Pay from 24 December 2012 to 19 March 2013, at a rate of $450.00 per month. The Board, consisting of qn aay QP e viewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 4 December 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7804 14
Your current request has been carefully examined by a three- member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session on 28 January 2015. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board determined that your assertion of post- traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) since leaving the military, even though not previously considered by the Board, was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7804 14_Redacted
Your current request has been carefully examined by a three- member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session on 28 January 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application and any material submitted in support of at your application. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board determined that your assertion of post- traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) since leaving the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7808 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 DJC Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “a” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) . The Board, consisting of reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR781 14
The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining LO Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice, finds as follows: a. CONCLUSION Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the following corrective action. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6 {e) f the Board for Correction of Naval Records (e}) and having...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7810 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S COURTHOUSE RD SUITE 1601 ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490 BAN Docket No.NRO7810-14 13 January 2015 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. A three member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 December 2014. After careful consideration...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7811 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to 4s Petitioner, filed epclosure (1) with this Boaré requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page ll (“Administrative Remarks (1070}") entry dated 26 March 2014 lcopy at Tab A). That any material or entries inconsistent with or relating to the Board's recommendation be corrected, removed or completely expunged from Petitioner's record and that no...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7812 14_Redacted
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 August 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. The policy specifically covers veterans who received other than honorable (OTH) discharges.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7816 14
In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memo 1430 Ser 8112/0033 dated 26 January 2015, a copy of which is attached. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in your case. NR7816-14 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7817 14
NR7817-14 28 Apr 15 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICO Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a Zone “A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) . Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7819 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 December 2014. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7829 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDE 701 §. COURTHOUSE ROAD SUITE 100° ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490 tremm: MhHairmar Rnard for Cnr An mf Narre RPeazanrvac - Qearctary nf the Navw Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICO Encl: 1 achme (2 130C1/15U0053 dtd 23 Jan 15 3 cord establl RECOMMENDATION: That Petitioner's naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to show that: 2 The Deritianer Wee Feonead ariDprpe Order; 7an3 nffirieal arandve ae The Detiticicr Wess oes RIIPRPS VTClos =
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR786 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 February 2015. Nevertheless, the Board concluded these factors were not sufficient to warrant a change in the reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official Naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7861 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to remove the Loan Repayment Program (LRP) from his enlistment quarantees. 2.0 The Board, consisting 02 a ee 1 Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on a 2 015 and, pursuant’ to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7865 14
DEPARTMEW?T OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 7015. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred tc as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070}") entries dated 15 October 2013 {copy at Tab A) and 8 April 2014 (copy at Tab B). The Board, consisting of Ms. Polk and Messrs. Exnicios and Grover, reviewed...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7872 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 5. Pursuant to the provisions of reference {a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “B" Selective Reenlistment’ Bonus (SRB) . The Board, consisting of Ss ey reviewed Petitioner’s.allegations of error and injustice on 20 January 2015 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7873 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. hiter careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7874 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 Rugust 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7875 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 August 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7876 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 August 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7877 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 August 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7878 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 Bugust 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7879 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 August 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...