NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7374 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION Of VAL COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 7018 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 . yOus la Val PLUS ; + + } yet I 1¢ Board nceur wit: 1 ; ins advisory ngly ur application has votes of the n ers of tl ane] | fannot be sion upon submiSSsio! : WiC of the idered 5 de cistence of Docket No.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7376 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 §. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 atts HCG Docket C NR7376-14 24 Mar 1 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records f a Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exna ted all administrati Ss available under existing law and regulations p a a m K @ a= | =| @ a tH a within the Departmen enclosure (2) fice having o 7 a \ oO tH nm correspondence attached re ia cognizance over the subject matter...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7379 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 December 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7384 14
a nsidered the advisory opinion furnished by HQMC memo January 2015, a copy of which is attacne It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken. You reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence within one year from the date of the Board's decision. NR7384-14 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7385 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner advanced to E-6/OM1 from the March 2012 Navy-wide advancement examination. Exnicios, and Mr. Green reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 13 November 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7386 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 April 2015. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of Docket No.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7389 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 764 8. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that she was advanced to E-4/MC3 from the September 2013 Navy-wide advancement examination cycle. The Board, consisting of Mr. Ruskin, Mr. Exnicios, and Mr. Midboe reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 28 October 2014 and, pursuant to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR739 14
a DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY. T, J\/REED Recorder 5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7395 14_Redacted
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to back date an advancement to a higher grade. The Board, consisting of reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 26 May 2015 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7396 14_Redacted
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 July 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7443 14_Redacted
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on S June 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR746 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 duly 2014. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by OCNO memo 7220 Ser N1i30C/1400651 Gated 27 May 2014, a COpy of which is attached. consequently, when applying for a4 correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7480 14_Redacted
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 June 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in Support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. As a result of this action, you were spared the stigma of another court-martial conviction and the potential penalties of a punitive discharge and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7483 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 February 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in Support thereof, your naval record and applicable Statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7485 14_Redacted
VA 2 2 20 4- 2 49 0 SJN Docket No : 7485-14 10 July 2015 Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Commandant of the Marine Corps From : To : Subj : REVIEW NAVAL RECORD OF USMC, Ref : (a) 10 U.S.C. The Board, consisting of reviewed Petitioner's allegatio~rror and injustice on 6 J uly 20 1 5 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record . However, on t he Navy Discharge Review Board...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7488 14_Redacted
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 July 2015. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Subsequently, administrative discharge action was initiated by reason of misconduct due to wrongful drug use.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7489 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in your case. NR7489-14 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7490 14_Redacted
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 July 2015. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7492 14_Redacted
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, Sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 July 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in Support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7494 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 100° ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 Tascam DravrA fray Carract tan mnt Nears In mnmwedr " - ow + 7 J Liat incqiv y Upon review and consideration of all t especially in light f the contents of enc-osure 2) € Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the followins rrective RECOMMENDATION : That Petitioner's naval record be corrected, w show that: arnaed and weentiered an 9/10 cTune ania wae...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7501 14
NR7501-14 17 Mar 15 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 usc 1552, A three- member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 March 2015. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7503 14
1552 Encl: (1) DD Form 149 dtd 4 Jun 14 w/attachments (2) HOMC MIQ memo dtd 6 Jan 15 i... Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the undated service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)") entry whose first sentence reads as follows: “Counseled this date concerning the following aeficiencies: You violated Marine...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7506 14_Redacted
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 March 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Subsequently, administrative discharge action was initiated by reason of misconduct due to wrongful drug use.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7518 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 760i 5. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to authorize reimbursement for Personally Procured Move (PPM) . The Board, consisting of que reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 10 December 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7527 14_Redacted
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 June 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. In your case, the Board determined that a personal appearance was not necessary and considered your case based on the evidence of record.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7528 14
Your current request has been carefully examined by a three- member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session on 22 January 2015. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board determined your letter, even though not previously considered by the Board, was insufficient to establish the existence of material error or injustice. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR753 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 January 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7534 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S, COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 100% ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 DIC Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, he referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Boa requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be c to cancel agreements to extend enlistment, and issue an imme reenlistment contract. It is certified that quorum was present at the Board’s review and deliberations, and that the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7539 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be c to modify an immediate reenlistment contract. The Board, consisting AI iets reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 26 January 2015 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the 1s et corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. A copy...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7556 14
Your current request has been carefully examined by a three- member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, Sitting in executive session on 9 December 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application and any material submitted in support of your application. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7562 14_Redacted
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 July 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in Support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. In your case, the Board determined that a personal appearance was not necessary and considered your case based on the evidence of record.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7563 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2480 DIC Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to modify an immediate reenlistment contract. Ruskin, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 21 July 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7569 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 March 2015. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of Docket No.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR757 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO Memo 7220 Ser N130D2/14U0971 of 21 Jul 14, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an efficial naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate ine existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7570 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he was entitled to a Performance Mark Average (PMA) score of 3.80 vice 3.73 for a Passed but Not Advanced (PNA) point of .5 for the September 2011 Navy-wide advancement exam. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Exnicios, Ruskin and Midboe, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 28 October 2014 and,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7574 14_Redacted
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S$. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 July 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7576 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 DIC Docket No. CONCLUSION Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the following corrective action. The certificate of release or discharge from active duty (DD Form 214, Aug 2009), executed on or about 28 August 2011, is modified to read...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7579 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, Suite 1004 ARLINGTON, VA 22204 JET : Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to an Enlistment Bonus for Source Rate (EBSR). reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 22 December 2014 and, pursuant...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7581 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 100; ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 HCG Docket Ne NR7581-14 24 Mar 5 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Recoras To ; Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICO W NPC memo 1430 (3) Subject’s naval record da Pursuant referred to requesting, i ect ; to update cycle 219 Profile Sheet . b. Petitioner's Final Multiple Score (FMS) is changed to reflect 191 15 vice 187.15. c. That part of the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7582 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The transfer of Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits requires military members, active and selective reserve, to log into the Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) website and transfer the benefits. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7589 14_Redacted
A three member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 July 2015. After careful consideration of your application, the Board concluded that your application was not timely filed, and that it would not be in the interest of justice to excuse your failure to submit your application in a timely manner. Specifically, you provided the statement “Having difficulty finding employment due to the under other than honorable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7591 14_Redacted
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 July 2015. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7592 14_Redacted
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 July 2015. In your case, the Board determined that a personal appearance was not necessary and considered your case based on the evidence of record. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7594 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, ‘considered your application on 10 March 2015. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memo 5420 PERS-80 dated 9 Dec 14, a copy of which is attached. NR7594-14 Consequently, when applying.for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7595 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, Suite 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204 JET Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference {a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish that the debt he owes due to a recoupment of an overpayment of Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) and an early Gischarge be reduced from $9,223.05 to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR760 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 September 2014. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memo dated 29 July 2014, a copy of whic is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to) demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7613 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE RD SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490 BAN Docket No.NRO7613-14 21 January 2015 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record submitted pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. The Board for Correction of Naval Records recently reviewed allegations of error and injustice in your naval record. The - proceedings have been reviewed, and the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7625 14_Redacted
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, Sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 June 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in Support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7631 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 November 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7632 13
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. This is an important feature of the law because the transferability Docket No. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.