NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4999 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to cancel an agreement to extend enlistment. The Board, consisting of reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 25 November 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5001 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 January 2015. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion from Headquarters Marine Corps dated 6 November 2014, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5021 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 May 2015. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5022 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 May 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in Support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. In your case, the Board determined that a personal appearance was not necessary and considered your case based on the evidence of the record.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5025 14
A three member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 May 2015. After careful consideration of your application, the Board concluded that your application was not timely filed, and that it would not be in the interest of justice to excuse your failure to submit your application ina timely manner. Specifically, you stated “confirmation of my law-abiding status and my staunch compliance to statutory principles” as a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5027 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 April 2015. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5028 14
A: three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 April 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5029 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 May 2015. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5030 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 December 2014. evidence not previously considered by the Board its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official ‘naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5034 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 EGA Docket No: 5034-14 29 May 2015 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. A three member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 May 2015. After careful consideration of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5035 14
A three member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 May 2015. After careful consideration of your application, the Board concluded that your application was not timely filed, and that it would not be in the interest of justice to excuse your failure to submit your application ina timely manner. Specifically, you stated “I have been an upstanding citizen for the last 30 years and I feel I served my country well”...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5036 14
Your application Ciditin, “Se ReGaets soo, T siqned a 1070/613 (Page 13) and also updated the system to transfer my POST 9-11 GI Bill entitlements to my dependents. pr-9> ac transferability request: anda 2, Complete e-ectron-c <= election using TEE.” The Board members furzher founc onlv change which occurred to the program, occurred w portal during affect the databases that contained the have not submitted any proof contrary to the Board members took into consideration, that...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5037 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 TAL Docket No: 5037-14 6 May 2015 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. A three member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 April 2015. Specifically, you provided no reason...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5039 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 EGA Docket No: 5039-14 29 May 2015 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. A three member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 May 2015. After careful consideration of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5040 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 7014 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 EGA Docket No: 5040-14 29 May 2015 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. A three member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 May 2015. After careful consideration of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5041 14
In March 2014, Petitioner submitted a request to BCNR to show that he completed 20 years of qualifying service in the Navy Reserve and to receive a non-regular Reserve retirement at age 60, enclosure (1). Accordingly, the Board concludes that the record should be corrected to show that Petitioner had a Satisfactory year from 3 January 1970 through 2 January 1971, and was eligible for a non-regular Navy Reserve Retirement without pay on 1 October 1993 with 20 years of Satisfactory service. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5043 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 December 2014. . after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. The Board, in its review of your entire record and application, carefully weighed all potentially Mitigating factors, such as your request for removal of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5045 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to modify an immediate reenlistment contract. The Board, consisting of Mr. Ruskin, Ms. McCain, and Mr. Exnicios, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 12 November 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5046 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 May 2015. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5048 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE RD SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490 BAN Docket No.NRO5048-14 21 November 2014 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy =): ey Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.c. 1552 Encl: (1) DD.Form 149 w/attachments i {2) Headquarters Marine Corps (HOMC) memo 1400-3-MMPR-2 of 28 Oct 2014 (3) Headquarters Marine Corps (HOMC) memo 1070 MIQ of 26 Sept 2014 a i. Pursuant to the provisions of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5050 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS fU1 8S, COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 Duc Docket No. NR5050-14 26 Nov 14 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Rei: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to established entitlement to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5053 14
A three member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 May 2015. After caréful consideration of your application, the Board concluded that your application was not timely filed, and that it would not be in the interest of justice to excuse your failure to submit your application ina timely manner. Specifically, you stated “I was under extreme duress when I signed the statement and did not remember that I had been...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5054 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 May 2015. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5057 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to ag Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show timely election of the REDUX Retired Pay Plan with a lump sum payment of the Career Status Bonus (CSB). The Board, consisting of Mr. Chapman, Ms. White-Olson, and Mr. Green, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 22 October 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5058 14
A three member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 May 2015. After careful consideration of your application, the Board concluded that your application was not timely filed, and that it would not be in the interest of justice to excuse your failure to submit your application in timely manner. Specifically, you provided no reason for waiving the statute of limitation other than “At the time I tried to apply for...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5067 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 May 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5069 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 May 2015. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5071 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 March 2015. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5073 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 May 2015. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5074 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 May 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5075 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 May 2015. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5077 14
A three member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 May 2015. After careful consideration of your application, the Board concluded that your application was not timely filed, and that it would not be in the interest of justice to excuse your failure to submit your application ina timely manner. Specifically, you provided a statement that “you could not cope” as a reason for waiving the statute of limitations.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5078 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 JDR Docket No: 5078-14 18 May 2015 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records TO: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW NAVAL RECORD OF BREN NAME STARS USN, XXX-XX- > Ref: (a) 10 (b) 10 552 U 68 #€ x U.S.C. The separation authority approved and directed a general discharge due to homosexuality and, on 9 March 1983, she was so discharged. JDR Docket No:...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5078 14_Redacted
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 JDR Docket No: 5078-14 18 May 2015 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To; Secretary of the Navy Subj : —— a _ OF x Ref; (a) 10 U.S.C. Additionally, on 23 August 1982, she received NIP for failure to go. The separation authority approved and directed a general discharge due to homosexuality and, on 9 March 1983, she was so discharged.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5084 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to issue an agreement to extend enlistment. The Board, consisting of Mr. Ruskin, Mr. Exnicios, and Mr. George, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 10 September 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5085 14_Redacted
14-528C, a three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sittina in executive session, considered your application on 18 November 2014. You were sentenced to confinement, a reduction in paygrade, a forfeiture of pay, and a bad conduct discharge (BCD) You received the BCD on 3 March 1992, after appellate review was completed Ce eae eV The Secretary of Defense memorandum of September 3, 2014, “Supplemental Guidance to Military Boards for Correction of Military/Naval Records...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5087 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 February 2015. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5088 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 May 2015. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR509 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 February 2015. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5091 14
In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNPC memo 1780 PERS-314/025 of 22 Sep 14, a copy of which is attached. This is an important feature of the law because the transferability Docket No. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5092 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he made timely election to change his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) “spouse and child” category of coverage to “former spouse and child” within one year after his divorce on 12 April 2013. The Board, consisting of Ms. Countryman, Mr. Bey, and Mr. Koman reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 19 November...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5093 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memo 1160 Ser 813/243 dated 16 October 2014, a copy of which is attached. NR5093-14 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5094 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 May 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5095 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Members who are retired are not eligible to transfer the benefits. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5096 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. CONCLUSION: Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of enclosure (2), the Board finds an error and injustice warranting the following corrective action: RECOMMENDATION : a. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(c)) it is...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5098 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 January 2015. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. NR5098-14 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5099 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 December 2014. evidence not previously considered by the Board its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official Naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR510 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 January 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Subsequently, administrative discharge action was initiated by reason of misconduct due to frequent involvement.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5100 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 May 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5101 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...