NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4851 14
Aerwrierds DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY tg ie BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 bc Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure: (1) with this Board © requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner enrolled in spouse coverage under the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP). CONCLUSION Upon review and consideration of all the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4852 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 5. PERS-007 memo dtd 6 Apr 15 2 The Board, consisting of Messrs reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 16 April 2015, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. e. Inenclosure (4), PERS-00J, the NPC Assistant Legal Counsel, commented to the effect that the contested document should be removed, as “no evidence...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4855 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 January 2015. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its cecision in this case. NR4855-14 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4856 14
BR three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 November 2014. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4860 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 May 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4881 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 December 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4885 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY __ BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 7074 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1004 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 Duc Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the Petitioner declined enrollment in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP). The Board, consisting of @jaIRRnubi eee , reviewed Petitioner's allegations of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4887 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record tioner’s Home of Record (HOR) was changed be corrected to show Peti ro and Mr. Ruskin, consisting of Ms. Bianchi, Mr. Vogt, of error and injustice on 7 9, The Board, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations October 2014 and, pursuant to sts regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4892 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB). The Board, consisting of reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 25 November 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4895 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he received two award points toward his February 2012 Reserve Navy- wide advancement examination and that he was advanced to CM1/E-6. The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Ruskin and Exnicios reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 10 September 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4896 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 December 2014. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4898 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference {a} Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) . The Board, consisting of reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 25 November 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4900 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 May 2015. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4903 14
A three member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 May 2015. After careful consideration of your application, the Board concluded that your application was not timely filed, and that it would not be in the interest of justice to excuse your failure to submit your application ina timely manner. Specifically, you provided no reason for waiving the Statute of limitations.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4905 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 May 2015. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4907 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS ~ 7071S. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB). The Board, consisting of reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 25 November 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4909 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY =CORDS BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RE 701 S, COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 100% \ ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 three-member were ther wit! materia. gq ana CNe Ser 314 -hat the Consequently, when apply record, the bur i probable material err _r Db 2heunt 45.6 NEILL Executive Director o 1160 Ser 913/314 dtd 16 Dec 14 Enclosure: NPC mem Yih 2
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4910 14
pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, an enlisted member of the Marine Corps, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that his naval record be corrected by removing any and all derogatory material referencing a conviction by summary court-martial (scm). d. An AO, enclosure (4), received from the Marine Corps recommends relief regarding Petitioner's request to remove the improperly filed documentation, specifically, the SCM, and references thereto. That...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4914 14
In August 2011, NAVADMIN 235/11 changed this requirement and established a deadline for transfer of eligibility of August 1, 2013. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Beginning 1 August 2013, DoD Policy requires that all service members who wish to transfer their education benefits to a family member obligate for an additional four years of service regardless of their time in service or retirement date.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4915 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 May 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Regarding your assertion, alcohol abuse may be a mitigating factor for misconduct; however, the Board felt your multiple incidents of misconduct prior...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4929 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 May 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. In this regard, an RE-3C reentry code is authorized when a Marine is released from active duty, and is not recommended for reenlistment.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4930 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 May 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4931 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 TAL Docket No: 4931-14 6 May 2015 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. A three member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 March 2015. After careful consideration of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4932 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 May 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4933 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 May 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Subsequently, administrative discharge action was initiated by reason of misconduct due to commission of a serious offense.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4936 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. NR4936-14 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4939 14
A three member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 May 2015. After careful consideration of your application, the Board concluded that your application was not timely filed, and that it would not be in the interest of justice ‘to excuse your failure to submit your application ina timely manner. Specifically, you provided no reason for waiving the Statute of limitations.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR494 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4941 14
A three member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 May 2015. After careful consideration of your application, the Board concluded that your application was not timely filed, and that it would not be in the interest of justice to excuse your failure to submit your application in timely manner. Specifically, you provided no reason for waiving the statute of limitation other than “I was ordered out.” The...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4942 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 7O1S. A three member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 May 2015. After careful consideration of your application, the Board concluded that your application was not timely filed, and that it would not be in the interest of justice to excuse your failure to submit your application in timely manner.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4944 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 April 2015. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4949 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 February 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4950 14
Although your application was not filed in a timely manner, the Board found it in the interest of justice to waive the statute of limitations and consider your application on its merits. A three member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, Sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 May 2015. You May request reconsideration of this decision within one year from the date of the Board’s decision.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4955 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 TAL Docket No: 4955-14 6 May 2015 naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552). Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 May 2015. Specifically, you provided a statement that “Request the other than honorable discharge to be changed for eligibility for VA loan/benefits.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4956 14
A three member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 May 2015. After careful consideration of your application, the Board concluded that your application was not timely filed, and that it would not be in the interest of justice to excuse your failure to submit your application in timely manner. Specifically, you provided no reason for waiving the statute of limitation.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4957 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS £01 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 Buc Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter - referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to cancel agreements to extend enlistment, and modify an immediate reenlistment contract. The Board, consisting of reviewed Petitioner's allegations oL er ace...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4958 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 May 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. You were so discharged on 31 August 1990.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4959 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 DIC Docket No. NR4959- 14 5 Dec 14 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ico Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.c. 1552 Encl: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) HOMC memo 5420 MMEA dtd 14 Oct.14 (3) HOMC e-mail dtd 5 Nov 14 “ (4) Subject’s naval record 1.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4961 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 May 2015. Marine Corps regulations authorize an uncharacterized entry level separation if the processing of a Marine’s separation begins within 180 days of his entry on active duty. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4962 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requestiny, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to estaolish entitlement to an Enlistment Bonus for Source Rate (EBSR). The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to Petitioner's allvgations of error and injustice, finds as follows: a. CONCLUSION Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4963 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 May 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 3 February 2011, you received NJP for disobedience and communicating a threat.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4965 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure {1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he enlisted in paygrade E-3, vice E-1. If Petitioner was eligible for, but did not take an E-4 examination in September 2013, March 2014, and September 2014 because the above changé had not yet been made, the following procedures will apply to remediate that missed opportunity. Once...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4966 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 May 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4968 14
The Board, consisting of Messrs. Hicks, Spooner and Swarens, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 20 November 2014, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. af a CONCLUSION: Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of enclosure (2), the Board finds an error warranting removal of the report ending 31 March 2008, rather than the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4970 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to cancel an agreement to extend enlistment, and cancel, and then issue an immediate reenlistment contract. The Board, consisting of reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 25 November 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4982 14
A three member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 May 2015. After careful consideration of your application, the Board concluded that your application was not timely filed, and that it would not be in the interest of justice to excuse your failure to submit your application ina timely manner. Specifically, you provided the statement “Previous issues of DD-214 were lost during moves, received current DD-214 from...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4988 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 TAL Docket No: 4988-14 8 July 2015 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF Qe UsMc, ELD Ref: (a) LO U.8sG. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Marine Corps, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that the general characterization of his...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4991 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 TON, VA 22204-24 ARLINGTON, VA 2 90 HD Docket No:NR4991-14 22 May 2015 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. A three member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 May 2015. After careful consideration...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4994 14
ur a ircumstan rn rE mrt Cor — + a ast eb 1 rect oO = Dearc tne Boare pes Sie gara LG silaritt we Ae +S 2 applying I if f for the Docket No. NR 4994-14 a correction of an official naval recora, applicant to demonstrate the existence error or injustice. Enclosure: ~he burden is on of probable material Sincerely, 4 7 DD ae a fo LU 52 AV AMAL ywers ue = oe ROBERT J. O'NEILL Executive Director CNRC ltr 1133 Ser N32 of 4 Nov 14
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4995 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 May 2015. Subsequently, you were notified of pending administrative separation by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse at which time you waived your procedural rights to consult with legal counsel and to present your case to an administrative discharge board (ADB). Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...