NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 06860-11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive seseion, considered your , application on i November 2011. However, neither the DVA nor the Department of Defense considers a general discharge issued by the SDRP to entitle you to any benefits denied by the original discharge. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 06865-11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 August 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material | submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 06896-11
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 LCce Docket No. The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Pfeiffer, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 15 August 2011 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Mhtave JE ROBERT D. ZSALMAN WILLIAM J. HESS, ITI Recorder Acting Recorder 5, Pursuant to the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 06978-11
It was recommended that he be discharged from the naval service. He was so discharged on 9 September 1944. d. The Board found that available records indicate that his conduct average was 4.0., more than high enough under normal circumstances to warrant an honorable characterization of service. The Board concludes that based upon his overall record of service and current Department of the Navy policy as established in reference (b) and its radical departure from the policy which was in...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 07004-11
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, an active duty enlisted member of the Marine Corps, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that the nonjudicial punishment (NIP) he received on 16 April 2009 be removed from his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) . The Board, consisting of Mr. Garst, Mr. Sproul, and Ms. Zivnuska, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 26 July 2011 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 07040-11
You requested completely removing the fitness report for 1 June 2010 to 8 May 2011. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 August 2011. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 07087-11
d. The Petitioner filed a Complaint of Wrongs regarding his denial of retention on active duty and being discharged from the Navy. In other words, JAG/AL specifically recommended that - ASN(M&RA), acting for the Secretary of the Navy (SECNAV), make the determination to correct the record, vice this Board, if warranted. On 15 July 2011, after review of the Complaint of Wrongs by ASN(M&RA), the Board was directed to review the Complaint of Wrongs and provide a recommendation to correct the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 07101-11
R three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 July 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 07134-11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval’ Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 July 2031. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 18 November 2009, you received a punitive letter of reprimand.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 07142-11
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, an enlisted member of the Marine Corps, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that his naval record be corrected by removing all references to the nonjudicial punishment (NIP) imposed on 28 July 2009. In this regard, the Board concludes that since his commanding officer's intent is to get aside the 28 July 2009 NJUP, it and all references surrounding the circumstances of it in his record should be removed or obliterated. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 07262-11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 August 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 07273-11
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written application, enclosure (1), with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by changing the characterization of his other than honorable (OTH) conditions discharge issued on 22 August 1978 to general. It was recommended that he be administratively separated with a type warranted by his service record characterization of service. However, due to his misconduct...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 07401 11
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 §. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to modify an immediate reenlistment contract. The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Zsalman, and Mr. George, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 27 February 2012 and, pursuant to its regulations,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 07407-11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 July 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support a thereof, your late son’s naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Additionally, he was counseled and warned after his first NUP, that further misconduct could result in administrative discharge action.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 07429-11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 July 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 07547 11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 February 2012. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 07582 11
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD ARLINGTON, VA 22204 LCC Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner is entitled to full separations pay. The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Pfeiffer, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 07648-11
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 REC Docket No: 07648-11 27 July 2011 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of ‘the Navy Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C, 1552 Fnel: (1) DD Form 149 with attachments {2} Case Summary (3) Subject's naval record 1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy Reserve, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 07664-11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 July 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 07727-11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considere@a your -application on 2 August 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Nevertheless, the Board concluded these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge or a change of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 07853-11
It is noted that the Commandant of the Marine Corps (CMC) has directed removing the contested fitness report. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 August 2011. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 07871 11
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD ARLINGTON, VA 22204 Lee Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the Petitioner is reimbursed for the cost of his travel to Pearl Harbor, HI. The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Pfeiffer, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 08022-11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 August 2011. In this regard, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinion. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 08164-11
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to ag Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the fitness report for 30 November 2007 to 1 May 2008, a copy of which is at Tab A. The Board, consisting of Ms. Trucco and Messrs. Grover and McBride, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 4 August 2011, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 08179-11
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On two occasions, 19 September 1996, and 19 November 2007, you signed and acknowledged the Navy’s policy concerning sexual harassment. commanding officer submitted a request for detachment for cause by reason of sexual harassment, which you were allotted sufficient time to respond.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 08281-11
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. The record further reflects that you were to be processed for an administrative separation due to the imposition of the NUP. Nonetheless, the record does not reflect such action.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 08411 11
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written application, enclosure (1), with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by showing that on 18 July 1986, he was issued an honorable characterization of service vice the other than honorable (OTH) discharge of record. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show that on 18 July 1986, he was issued an honorable characterization of service vice the OTH...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 08757-11
Pursuant to the provisions of reference {a}, Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy Reserve, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his record be corrected to show that he was not discharged on 2 Aprii 1999, but continued to serve in the Individual Ready Reserve (IRR) until 1 April 2001. However, on 13 July 2000, he was informed by Naval Reserve Personnel Center that he was discharged on 2 April 1999 vice released from active duty and a correction to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 09279 11
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner is entitled to payment of separation pay 2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Pfeiffer, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 27 February 2012 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 09716 11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 February 2012. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 09798 11
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner, Filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that his Basic Bllowance for Housing (BAH) is based on his dependents location in at the time of his Permanent Change of Station he USS GEORGIA on 1 October 2009. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and Exnicios reviewed Petitioner’ 6 allegations of error and injustice on 9 October 2012 and, pursuant to its...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 09807 11
9807-11 12 Mar 12 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552: A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 March 2012. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 09913 11
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD ARLINGTON, VA 22204 MEH Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to an Enlistment Bonus for Source Rate (EBSR). The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Pfeiffer, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 10028 11
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 § COURTHOUSE RD SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490 WJH Docket: 10028-11 13 March 2012 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy ' NAVAL RECORD Ref: fa) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he is eligible...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 10041 11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 July 2012. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 10044 11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 October 2012. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 10126 11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 March 2012. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 10171 11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 February 2012. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 10173 11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 August 2012. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 8 September 1995, your case was heard and the ADB recommended that you receive an OTH discharge by reason of misconduct.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 10262 11
The Board, consisting of Messrs. pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 25 June 2012 and, pursuant to 4ts regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be teken on the available evidence of record. In March 2011, after being notified of the deficiency in his clearance status, Petitioner re-submitted the required security questionnaire documents to obtain the required security clearance. VOZ62-12 that Petitioner...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 10501 11
a 2 DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD ARLINGTON, VA 22204 &E FH, TR DIC Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, Filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “a” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB). The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Zsalman, and Mr. George, reviewed Petitioner’s...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 10607 11
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that she was advanced to E-5/MA2 from the March 2009 Navy-wide advancement exam. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 5 March 2012 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 10624 11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 February 2012. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 10656 11
Under BUPERINST 1430.16F, (Advancement Manual for Enlisted Personnel of the U.S. Navy and U.S. Navy Reserve), all personnel designated in certain ratings, including Petitioner’s rating, “must maintain, as a minimum, continuous security clearance eligibility.” This provision has been interpreted by NPC to mean that, in order to be eligible to participate in an advancement cycle, take an advancement exam or advance to the next highest grade, a Sailor in one of the designated ratings must hold...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 10673 11
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD ARLINGTON, VA 22204 DJC Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “B” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) . 10673-11 RECOMMENDATION : That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to show that: a.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 10734 11
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to modify an enlistment/reenlistment document. The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Zsalman, and Mr. George, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 27 February 2012 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 11006 11
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he advanced to E-4/CTR3 from the September 2010 Navy-wide advancement examination. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 21 February 2012 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 11083 11
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 §. (3) Subject’s naval record 1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) .
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 11147 11
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was entitled to payment of separation pay when discharged. The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Pfeiffer, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 27 February 2012 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 11153 11
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 §. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to established entitlement to payment of 60 days lump sum leave (LSL). The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Zsalman, and Mr. George, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 27 February 2012 and, pursuant...