NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 06168-11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 March 2012. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 06172-11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 July 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with ali material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 06182-11
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 DIC Docket No. 6182-11 23 Aug il From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records TO: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICO Ref: {a} Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure {1} with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 06184-11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 September 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 06187-11
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON BC 20370-5100 MEH Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference fa) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure {1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to an Enlistment Bonus for Source Rate (EBSR). The Board, consisting of Messrs. Exnicios, George, and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 06188-11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 31 October 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 06189-11
A copy of documentation on file in Petitioner’s record about his request for voluntary retirement in lieu of processing for administrative show cause proceedings, which includes correspondence concerning the Secretary of the Navy (SECNAV) decision of 12 March 2009 to retire him as a captain, is at Tab A. Petitioner further requested that the separation code of RNC1 (“acts of unacceptable conduct (i.e., moral and/or professional dereliction not otherwise listed herein”) shown in block 26 of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 06196-11
6196-11 13 Sep 11 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Sub}: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ico Ref: {a) Title 10 U.S.C, 1552 Encl: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments {2) NPC Memo 1160 Ser 811/323 dtd 27 Jun 11 (3) Subiect’s naval record 1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 06198-11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 March 2012. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 06205-11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 September 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by the Navy Personnel Command dated 11 July 2011, a copy of which is attached.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 06206-11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 March 2012. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 06210-11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 March 2012. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in Support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. In this regard, an RE-4 reentry code is required when an individual is discharged for misconduct and is not recommended for retention.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 06215-11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 August 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 06216-11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 March 2012. The Board also noted that you were fortunate to receive a general discharge since a separation under other than honorable conditions is often directed when an individual is Found to have committed misconduct. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 06217-11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 July 2011. Your sentence included a dismissal. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 06222-11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 March 2012. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. In this regard, an RE-4 reenlistment code is required when an individual is discharged for unsuitability and is not recommended for retention.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 06223-11
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show enlistment in paygrade E-3, vice E-1. The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, PEeiffer, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 29 August 2011 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 06231-11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 March 2012. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 06236-11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 February 2012. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 06246-11
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS _2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 DIC Docket No, 6246-11 21 Jun 11 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Sub}: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICO Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C, 1552 Encl: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) NPC Memo 1160 Ser 811/307 dtd $ Jun 11 (3) Subject’s naval record 1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 06247-11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 March 2012. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 06251-11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 September 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official navai record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 06262-11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 August 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 06285-11
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that Subject’s applicable naval record be corrected to show he declined enrollment in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) as he was not married and had no eligible beneficiary at the time of his retirement. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Pfeiffer, and George, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 22 August 2011 and, pursuant to its regulations,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 06292-11
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 06296-11
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. - After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 06297-11
06297-11 16 September 2011 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: ; REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: fa) 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he accepted his commission as a lieutenant in the Navy Reserve on 1 October 2006, rather than 14 November 2007, and that the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 06305-11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 March 2012. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 15 June and 3 August 1990, you received NJP for failure to go to your appointed place of duty, two periods of UA totaling 28 days, and disobedience.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 06326-11
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 BUG Docket No: 6326-11 22 August 2011 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Sub jp EVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. The Board, consisting of Messrs. W. Hicks, Spooner and Swarens, reviewed allegations of error and injustice on 18 August 2011, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the limited corrective action indicated below...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 06337-11
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 MEH Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference {a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to an Enlistment Bonus for Source Rate (EBSR)} . The Board, consisting of Messrs. Exnicios, George, and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 06338 11
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD 1001 ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490 MEH Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to transfer Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits to his dependents. The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Pfeiffer, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 06354-11
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that her naval record be corrected to by the removal therefrom of documents pertaining to a pre-service medical condition. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Genteman, Green and Storz, [STOP], reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 2 February 2012 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 06388-11
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 06403-11
In his application, he submits a letter from LNC(SW/AW) C---, who was the command legal chief at the time of the NUP onboard the USS WASP (LHD 1), dated 21 June 2011, stating, in part, that Petitioner had requested to have his NJP removed from his record, and it had been approved up the chain of command, which included his own signature. He also submitted another statement from his leading Chief, MMCM S~--- at the time of his NJP who also stated, in part, that his request to have his NJP...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 06412-11
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 MEH Docket No, 6412-11 29 Aug 121 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Sub}: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ico Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to ag Petitioner, filed enclosure {1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show enlistment in...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 06431-11
06431-11 19 August 2011 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: a, REVIEW OF NAVAL’ RECORD Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. The Board, consisting of Messrs. W. Hicks, Spooner and Swarens, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 18 August 2011, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. That any material or entries inconsistent with the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 06433-11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 August 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 06444-11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 October 2011. Documentary evidence considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 06447-11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 August 2011. Documentary evidence considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 06448-11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 August 2011. Documentary evidence considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with ali material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 06453-11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, :“gitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 “August 2011. Documentary evidence considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 06468-11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 August 2011. Documentary evidence considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 06469-11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 August 2011. Documentary evidence considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 06471-11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, Sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 August 2011. Documentary evidence considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 06480-11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 August 2011. Documentary evidence considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 06486-11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 August 2011. Documentary evidence considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 06490-11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 March 2012. The sentence at your second SPCM included a bad conduct discharge (BCD). Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 06492-11
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 7 -ecb 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 6 October 2011 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code section 1552. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 October 2011. Documentary evidence ‘considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 06504-11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 August 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 06512-11
R three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 November 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...