NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 04858-11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 September 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your deceased husband’s naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by the Survivor Benefit Program Manager Casualty Assistance...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 04891-11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 October 2011. In this regard, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinion. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 04900-11
4900-11 18 Jul 11 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552, A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 July 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 04913-11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 September 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 04919-11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 June 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 04921-11
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 DIC Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable navai record be corrected to cancel an immediate reenlistment contract. The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Zsalman, and Mr. George, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 8 August...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 04924-11
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 MEH Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to remove the Loan Repayment Program (LRP) from his enlistment guarantees. The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Pfeiffer, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 04926-11
04926-11 17 June 2011 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: qa REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record: be corrected to show you were promoted to lieutenant (pay grade 0-3) with a date of rank and effective date of 1 November 2009. The Board, consisting of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 04929-11
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5700 MEH Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to an Enlistment Bonus for Source Rate (EBSR) . The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Pfeiffer, and 4salman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 04933-11
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 TAL Docket No: 4933-11 31 August 2011 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Sub]: REVIEW NAVAL RECORD OF Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a member of the Marine Corps, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting the removal of all adverse material from his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) regarding a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 04936-11
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, an enlisted member of the Marine Corps, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that his naval record be corrected by removing all references to the nonjudicial punishment (NUP) imposed on 7 December 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes, reguiations, and policies. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by totally obliterating or removing the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 04938 11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 February 2012. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. In this regard, you were assigned the appropriate reentry code based on your circumstances.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 04939 11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 February 2012. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Nevertheless, the Board concluded these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge because of your...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 04942 11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 February 2012. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 04943 11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 February 2012. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 04946 11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 February 2012. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 04950 11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 February 2012. Nevertheless, based on the information currently contained in your record, the Board concluded these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given your three NUP’s, conviction by SPCM of very serious offenses, and the fact that you were warned of the consequences of further misconduct. Consequently, when...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 04951-11
04951-11 15 duly 2011 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records TO: Secretary of the Navy Subj: eee REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ~ Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference {a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing all documentation of his administrative separation processing for unsatisfactory participation (medical noncompliance). The...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 04956-11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 February 2012. On 20 March 1987, you received an OTH characterization of service discharge due to misconduct, and were assigned an RE-4 (not recommended for retention) reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 04960-11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 February 2012. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 04964-11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 February 2012. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable Statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 04971-11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 February 2012. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 04972-11
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 LCC Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was not discharged on 30 September 2005 but placed on the Retired Reserve List ‘Awaiting Pay at age 60). The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Pfeiffer, and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 04987-11
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. In this regard, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinion. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 04989-11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval . Records, sitting in executive session, considered, your application on 20 July 2011. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 04991-11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 September 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, reguiations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 04992-11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 February 2012. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 04996-11
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 MEH Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to an Enlistment Bonus for Source Rate (EBSR) . Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 05000-11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 February 2012. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 05012-11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 June 2011. In addition, the Board considered the report of the Headquarters Marine Corps Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB), dated 26 April 2011, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 05013-11
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. The Board concluded that those factors in your case are insufficient to warrant an upgrade of your discharge, given your drug use. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is jon the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 05015-11
Guill and Siler and Mr. Silberman, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 15 September 2011, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11(L) entry dated 29 October 2007. That his record be corrected further by modifying as follows the fitness report for 10 April to 31 October 2007, dated 12 May...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 05027-11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 February 2012. You reenlisted in the Navy on 15 May 1983, and served without disciplinary incident until 29 May 1986, when you received nonjudicial punishment (NIP). The Board, in its review of your entire record and application, carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as your prior honorable service, claim that nothing in your...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 05039-11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 June 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policiés. As your present reentry code is correct, and you have not demonstrated that it would be in the interest of justice for the Board to assign a more...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 05046-11
—_ A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 05047-11
_A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 July 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 05063-11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval: Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 June 2011. In this regard, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinion. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 05066-11
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a member of the Marine Corps, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting the removal of all adverse material from his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) regarding a nonjudicial punishment (NJP) dated 2 September 2010 and to be reinstated to paygrade E-5. The ADB found that the government had failed to prove wrongful use of a controlled substance and recommended retention. f. An advisory opinion (AO) from the Military Law...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 05071-11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 February 2012. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 05073-11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 August 2011. record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 05092-11
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he accepted his commission in the Navy Reserve on 1 March 2009, rather than 3 April 2009. The Board, consisting of Ms. Nappo and Messrs. Chapman and Grover, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 14 July 2011, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 05096-11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 August 2011. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 05100-11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 August 2011. in addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by the Navy Personnel Command dated 24 May 2011, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 05103 11
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the United States Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his reentry code be changed from RE-4 to RE-1. This was in error, because he had already completed his 19 month extension. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show that he received a reentry code of RE-1 vice RE-4 on 14 February 1999 now of record.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 05114-11
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 MEH Docket No. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 05132-11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your , application on 20 July 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record,’ and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 05143-11
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, reguiations and policies. , The Board did not consider whether the reason for separation should be changed, since you have not exhausted an available administrative remedy by applying to the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB). Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 05153-11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 July 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 05161-11
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he reenlisted USNR vice USN. The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. George, and Mr. Exnicios, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 5 July 2011 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 05164-11
c. While Petitioner was assigned to the U. S. Defense Attaché Office, Lisbon, Portugal, the same Air Force reporting senior, a colonel, gave him two fitness reports, the uncontested commendatory report for 8 April 2006 to 31 July 2007 (copy at Tab B) and the contested adverse report, submitted on the occasion of Petitioner’s detachment. The fifth endorsement, from the Commandant, Naval District Washington (exhibit 10 to Petitioner's application at enclosure (1)), recommended approving...