DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
HD:hd
Docket No. 04926-11
17 June 2011
From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To: Secretary of the Navy
Subj: qa
REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD
Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. 1552
Encl: (1) DD Form 149 dtd 26 Apr 11 w/attachment
(2) PERS-831 memo dtd 19 May 11
1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject,
hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this
Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record: be
corrected to show you were promoted to lieutenant (pay grade 0-3)
with a date of rank and effective date of 1 November 2009.
2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Dixit, Silberman and Vogt,
reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 16 June
2011, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective
action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of
record. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
the enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.
3. The Board, having reviewed all the Facts of record pertaining
to Petitioner's allegations. of error and injustice, finds as follows:
a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and regulations
within the Department of the Navy..
b. In enclosure (2), the Navy Personnel Command office with
cognizance over the subject matter of Petitioner’s case has commented
to the effect that the request has merit and warrants favorable
action.
CONCLUSION :
Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and
especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds
the existence of an injustice warranting the following corrective
action.
RECOMMENDATION:
a. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show he was
promoted to lieutenant with a date of rank and effective date of 1
November 2009. ‘Rees
b. That a copy of this Report of Proceedings be filed at an
appropriate location in Petitioner's naval record, and that another
copy of this report be returned to this Board, together with any
material directed to be removed from Petitioner's record, for
retention in a confidential file maintained for such purpose.
4. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the Board
for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations,
Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that a quorum was present at the
Board's review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true
and complete record of the Board's proceedings in the above entitled
matter.
Amat) dc baty
ROBERT D. ZSALMAN JONATHAN S. RUSKIN
Recorder Acting Recorder
5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6({e)
of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records
(32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6 (e)) and having assured
compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the
foregoing corrective action, taken under the authority of reference
(a), has been approved by the Board on behalf of the Secretary of
Vota
W. DEAN PFE
Executive Di
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 00084-11
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the lineal position, date of rank, and effective date in the grade of lieutenant colonel Petitioner would have been assigned had he been selected for promotion to that grade by the Fiscal Year (FY) 2009 Reserve Lieutenant Colonel Selection Board, rather than the FY 2011 Reserve Lieutenant...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 01876-11
The Board, consisting of Messrs. Boyd, Spooner and Swarens, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 21 July 2011, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to show the date of rank on her commission as a lieutenant, Medical Corps, Navy Reserve as 30 May 2003, rather than 30 May 2004. . c. That any material or...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 05092-11
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he accepted his commission in the Navy Reserve on 1 March 2009, rather than 3 April 2009. The Board, consisting of Ms. Nappo and Messrs. Chapman and Grover, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 14 July 2011, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 04302-11
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a}, Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he was awarded entry grade credit (EGC) for five years and eight months of prior commissioned service, and that his lieutenant date of rank be adjusted accordingly. The Board, consisting of Messrs. W. Hicks, Spooner and Swarens, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 12675-10
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the lineal position, date of rank, and effective date in the grade of lieutenant colonel Petitioner would have been assigned had she been selected for promotion to that grade by the Fiscal Year (FY) 2010 Lieutenant Colonel Selection Board, rather than the FY 2011 Lieutenant...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 03806-10
The Board, consisting of Ms. Siler and Messrs. Delorier and Tew, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 6 May 2010, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. The FY 2011 AR Lieutenant Colonel Selection Board, which considered Petitioner with a corrected fitness report record but status as an officer who had failed of © selection to lieutenant colonel, selected him. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 03187-11
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written application, enclosure (1), with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by modifying the fitness report for 22 June 2008 to 31 March 2009 (copy at Tab A) by removing section K (reviewing officer's (RO’s) marks and comments). Enclosure (2) reflects that the Headquarters Marine Corps (HOMC) Performance Evaluation Review Board has directed the requested...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 01746-11
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the lineal position, date of rank, and effective date in the grade of lieutenant colonel Petitioner would have been assigned had he been selected for promotion to that grade by the Fiscal Year (FY) 2010 Lieutenant Colonel Selection Board, rather than the FY 2011 Lieutenant...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 00391-12
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), counsel for Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the lineal position, date of rank, and effective date in the grade of lieutenant colonel Petitioner would have been assigned had he been selected for promotion to that grade by the Fiscal Year (FY) 2010 Lieutenant Colonel Selection Board, rather than the FY 2012...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 10873-10
10873-10 4 February 2011 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. The Board, consisting of Ms. Aldrich and Messrs. McBride and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 3 February 2011, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. That any material or entries inconsistent with the...