NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 02509-10
You requested that your record be corrected to show, in effect, that the period of your service on the Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL) was active duty service, in order to increase the amount of your entitlement to combat-related special compensation. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 December 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 02513-10
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. However, the Board found that these factors were not sufficient to warrant any change in your character of service, given your record of three NJP’s, two convictions by SCM of misconduct, and civil conviction. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 02517-10
naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was stablish the existence of probable material that you enlisted in the Navy on 9 December 2009. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 02519-10
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 BAN Docket No. 02519-10 7 October 2010 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Tee: Secretary of the Navy Ret: (a) Teble LO USC. L552 Encl: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) Headquarters United States Marine Corps (HQMC) memo 1760 MMSR-6K of 16 Apr 10 (3) Headquarters United States Marine Corps (HOMC) memo 1760 MMSR-6K of 25 Jun 10 (4) Enai2 pv;
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 02528-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 May 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. You were discharged for the convenience of the government by reason of a personality disorder on 27 May 2005 and assigned a reentry code of RE-4, as...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 02529-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 December 2010. You submitted a request for a good of the service discharge to avoid trial by court-martial for the period of UA. Your request for discharge was granted and on 27 February 1975, you received an OTH discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 02530-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 January 2011. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 02531-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 November 2010. However, the Board concluded that your reentry code should not be upgraded due to your misconduct. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 02535-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 September 2010. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinion, but noted PRIMS reflects no BCA conducted on 8 May 2009 (it shows you were medically waived from the BCA conducted on 15 October 2009). Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 02536-10
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 MEH Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to remove the Loan Repayment Program (LRP) from his enlistment guarantees. The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Pfeiffer, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 02542-10
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to waive the recoupment of her Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB). The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Pfeiffer, and Zsalman reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 20 June 2011 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 02543-10
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 WJH Docket: 2543-10 20 July 2010 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records TO: Secretary of the Navy i ene REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 28 June 2010 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 02546-10
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written application, enclosure (1), with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by changing block 26 (Separation Code) of his DD Form 214 (certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) from “KBK1" (Normal Expiration of Service) to “MBK1” (Expiration of Term of Service). The Board, consisting of oo: Messrs. SS and , reviewed allegations o Yr and injustice...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 02548-10
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 MEH Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to an Enlistment Bonus for College Credit (EBCC) . The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Pfeiffer, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 02551-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 November 2010. Your sentence included a bad conduct discharge (BCD). Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 02557-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 November 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 02559-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 November 2010. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 02562-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 November 2010. The Board also considered the report of the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) dated 4 February 2010, and the character reference letters you submitted with your application. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to idemonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 02564-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 August 2010. In this regard, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinion. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 02565-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 November 2010. Since your discharge is less than 15 years old, you may apply to the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) for a possible upgrade. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 02576-10
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected to show that he was separated or retired by reason of physical disability. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show that on 23 March 2007 he was discharged by reason of physical disability pursuant to 10 U.S. Code 1203, with entitlement to severance pay, due to recurrent syncope, a condition that...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 02581-10
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 WJH Docket: 2581-10 20 July 2010 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy RR I Bet REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 28 June 2010 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 02586-10
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he is entitled to Basic Allowance for Housing (full rate) for the period 16 Nov 2009 to 26 Dec 2009. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 28 June 2010 and, pursuant to its regulations,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 02587-10
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written application, enclosure (1), with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by changing bleck 27 (Reentry Code) of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) from “RE-4" (Not Recommended for Reenlistment) to “RE-3F” (Failed the Physical Fitness Assessment (PFA)). and @@MM reviewed allegations of error and injustice on 16 November...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 02589-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 April 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 02591-10
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Further, you were given an opportunity to defend yourself, but waived your procedural right to present your case to an administrative discharge board. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 02594-10
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 WJH Docket: 2594-10 20 July 2010 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Tor Secretary of the Navy REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a) Title 2¢ U.6.€. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 28 June 2010 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 02603-10
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 WJH Doc: 2603-10 20 July 2010 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Ter Secretary of the Navy REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 28 June 2010 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 02609-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 January 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Finally, Sailors with an extensive record of misconduct, such as yours, normally receive discharges under other than honorable conditions, and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 02625-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 May 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable Statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 02629-10
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he is entitled to Basic Allowance for Housing (full rate) for the period 16 Nov 2009 to 26 Dec 2009. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 28 June 2010 and, pursuant to its regulations,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 02632-10
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by modifying the Marine Corps Total Force System (MCTFS) data to raise the “proficiency/conduct” marks of 1.9/1.5" for 31 July 2009 to at least %4.0/4.0." By the e-mail at enclosure {1), Petitioner amended his application to clarify he would be satisfied with removing the contested marks, if...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 02633-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 January 2011. On 9 March 2007 your commanding officer recommended an administrative separation by reason of unsatisfactory participation in the Ready Reserve due to failure to maintain medical readiness as evidenced by noncompliance with TNPQ status update requirements. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 02636-10
02636-10 30 April 2010 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Sub}: ee REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. The Board, consisting of Ms. Countryman and Messrs. Garst and Lippelis, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 29 April 2010, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. d. That any material or entries inconsistent with...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 02638-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 January 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Further, Marines with an extensive record of misconduct, such as yours, who are discharged by reason of unfitness normally receive discharges...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 02641-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 January 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 02645-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 January 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 02646-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 January 2011. On 6 June 1983 the discharge authority approved this recommendation and directed your commanding officer to issue you an other than honorable discharge by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse, and on 10 June 1983, you were so discharged. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 02648-10
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was authorized shipment of his household goods (HHG) from his last duty station to his Home of Record in West Bend, Wisconsin on 30 June 2009. Pfeiffer, Exnicios, and George, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 4 June 2010 and, pursuant to its...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 02652-10
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 DIC Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB). The 6 year reenlistment executed on or about 8 May 2009 is null and void.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 02653-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 January 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. As a result of the foregoing, on 28 August 1986, you submitted a written request for an other than honorable discharge in order to avoid trial by...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 02654-10
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 LCe Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the Petitioner enlisted in the Naval Reserve on 20 July 2009. The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Pfeiffer, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 02655-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 January 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Subsequently, you were notified of pending administrative separation action by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 02662-10
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former member of the Marine Corps, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that the narrative reason for separation that is reflected on his Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty (DD Form 214), specifically, “Temporarily Retired” be changed. Based on the foregoing, and considering Petitioner’s desire to receive veterans’ benefits, the Board concludes that no useful purpose is served by continuing to label his...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 02673-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 May 2010. Under the rules governing this Board, an application for a correction of a naval record must be made within three years after the discovery of the alleged error. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 02676-10
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB). The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Zsalman, and Mr. George, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 26 July 2010 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 02677-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 September 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 02682-10
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 WJH Docket: 2682-10 28 Feb 2011 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Qa, Ree : (a) Title 10 U.8.C. In Feb 2010, the PSAB found in favor of Petitioner and directed DONCAF to restore Petitioner's clearance. For these reasons, the majority finds that, Petitioner's request should be granted favorable action.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 02685-10
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 bc Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “B” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) . The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Zsalman, and Mr. George, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 02686-10
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or ifijuetice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...