NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 03838-09
It is noted that the Commandant of the Marine Corps (CMC) has directed removing the contested report for 29 December 2001 to 15 May 2002. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 January 2010. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 03841-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval ' Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 January 2010. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by the Navy Personnel Command dated 15 May 2009, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 03847-09
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 MEH Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter ‘referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show timely election of the REDUX Retired Pay Plan with a lump sum payment of the Career Status Bonus (CSB). The Board, consisting of Messrs. Exnicios, George, and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 03854-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 February 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 03859-09
03859-0939 5 February 2010 ference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States A three-membe Records, sitt application o injustice wer regulations a Code, section 1552. r panel of the Board for Correction of Naval ing in executive session, considered your . Your allegations of error and e reviewed in accordance with administrative nd procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Consequently, when applying...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 03860-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 June 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 03861-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 June 4009, -Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 03868-09
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 DIC Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to cancel a reenlistment. The Board, consisting of Mr.Pfeiffer, Mr. Zsalman, and Mr. George, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 20 April 2009 and, pursuant to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 03874-09
Pursuant to the provisions of reference {a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner requested an extension of the 180-day period in which to ship household goods (HHG) at government expense incident to his release from active duty on 31 March 2008. The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Pfeiffer, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 03879-09
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON BC 20370-5100 DIC Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure {1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “B” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB). The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Zsalman, Mr. George, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 03883-09
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 MEH Docket No. 1552 Enel: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) CNO memo 1160 Ser N1L30D1/09U0549 of 16 Jul 09 (3) Subject's naval record i. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure {1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to retroactive Assignment Incentive...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 03890-09
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of ‘your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board was not persuaded that it would be in the interest of justice to assign you a more favorable reentry code as an exception to policy. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 03902-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 July 2009. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinions furnished by the Navy Personnel Command dated 8 and 21 May 2009, copies of which are attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 03908-09
Documentary material considered by.the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board did not consider whether your characterization of service or reason for separation should be changed, since you did not ask for such consideration and you have not exhausted your administrative remedies by applying to the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB). Consequently, when...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 03911-09
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 7 December 1961, administrative discharge action was initiated to separate you by reason of unfitness. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 03914-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 November 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 03915-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on , 23 November 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies, In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by HQOMC Memo 1050 MPO-40 dtd 5 Nov 09, a copy of which is attached. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 03921-09
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 28 September 1990, administrative discharge action was initiated to separate you by reason of civil conviction. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 03922-09
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board did not consider whether your characterization of service or reason for separation should be changed, since you did not ask for such consideration and you have not exhausted your administrative remedies by applying to the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB). Consequently, when...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 03923-09
BR three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 April 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 03933-09
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written application, enclosure (1), with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11A (“Administrative Remarks (1070)”) entry dated 16 October 2008, reflecting assignment of a reenlistment code of “RE-30 [refused orders assigned without sufficient obligated service remaining].” A copy of this entry is in enclosure (1) at Tab A. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 03942-09
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR GORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 BAN Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to E-2 effective 30 May 2007, E-3 effective 21 November 2007," and E-4 effective 16 May 2008, 2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 03943-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 May 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In this regard the Board found that the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) granted your request for service connection for hearing loss because of the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 03946-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 March 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with ail material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. The record reflects that there was no disciplinary action taken for this period of UA.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 03947-09
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Marine Corps, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that the characterization of his other than honorable discharge be changed and that his record be corrected to reflect the time he served on active duty. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected as follows, and that he be issued a corrected DD Form 214: {1) Correct the DD Form 214, block 12.b to reflect that Petitioner was discharged on 1...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 03948-09
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a member of the Marine Corps, applied to this Board requesting removal of an administrative remarks (page 11) service record entry dated 14 December 2007, as well as her rebuttal dated 20 December 2007. Regulations also authorize commanding officers to use non-punitive corrective action in such cases. The Board further considers her overall service record, favorable transfer fitness report and MSM that was awarded by the same command...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 03953-09
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 DIC Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure {1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to modify a reenlistment. 2, The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Exnicios, Mr. George, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 17 August 2009 and, pursuant...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 03957-09
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 MEH Docket No. Pursuant: to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to an increased amount of Enlistment Bonus for Source Rate (EBSR). The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Pfeiffer, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner's...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 03958-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 March 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 03962-09
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. As a result of the foregoing, you were notified of administrative separation by reason of erroneous enlistment as evidenced by your diagnosed severe adjustment disorder. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 03965-09
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. after the dismissal was approved at all level of review, the Assistant Secretary of the Navy, Manpower and Reserve Affairs, directed the execution of your dismissal from the Naval Service, and on 5 May 2006, you were issued a letter of dismissal. Consequently, when applying for a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 03972-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on*23 March 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. As a result of the foregoing, you were notified of administrative separation by reason of convenience of the government due to a pre-existing...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 03973-09
Pursuant to reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (2) with this Board requesting, that his naval record be corrected to show he accepted his commission in the Navy Reserve without a break in service, so as to be eligible for the Fiscal Year (FY) 10 Reserve Staff Lieutenant Commander Selection Board, which convened on 10 June 2009. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Butherus, Chapman and Silberman, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 03974-09
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner applied to this Board requesting his naval record be corrected by changing the reentry code he was assigned on 27 December 2005. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Sa ‘ Paeee and Neuschafer, reviewed Petitioner's allegatiéms of error and injustice on 3 February 2010 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Accordingly, the Board...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 03976-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 February 2010. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 03980-09
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 bIC Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to cancel a reenlistment. The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Zsalman, and Mr. George, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 14 December 2009 and,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 03981-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 July 2009. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 03982-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 March 2010. On 28 July 1992 you were notified of pending administrative separation action by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse and commission of a serious offense. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 03985-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 April 2009. It 1S immaterial whether or not the disqualifying defect was caused by RP or some other undiagnosed condition, such as optic neuropalhy or congenital nignt blindness as suggested by the retinal specialists you consulted after you were discharged from the Navy. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 03988-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7.May 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 03989-09
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 17 June 2008. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 03990-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 March 2010. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 03991-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 March 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 04000-09
04000-09 20 July 2009 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: FORMER glia a NAVAL RECORD REVIEW OF Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that her naval record be corrected to show that she was assigned a reentry code of RE-1. The Board, consisting of Ms. SMM and Messrs WMA and waite reviewed Petitioner's...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 04001-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 March 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 04004-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval- Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 December 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 04007-09
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. However, on 9 September 1945, you began another period of UA that was not terminated until 6 November 1945. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 04008-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 August 2009. The Board found that you served on active duty in the Navy from -43 January to 20 February 2009, when you were discharged by reason of fraudulent entry, with an entry level separation. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 04010-09
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board did not consider whether your characterization of service or reason for separation should be changed, since you have not exhausted your administrative remedies by applying to the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB). Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 04018-09
04018-09 29 June 2009 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records TO: Secretary of the Navy Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Exnicios, and George, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 29 June 2009 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6 (e) ‘of the revised...