NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 02100-08
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinions furnished by Chief of Naval Operations and Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards dated 26 February and 3 March 2009, copies of which are attached, and your rebuttal. Conseuuent ty, wnen applying {or 3 correction of em official...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 02114-08
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In effect, the Board believed that the action taken by the BRDD provided sufficient relief in your case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 02121-08
The Board considered an advisory opinion furnished by NPC memo 1430 Ser 811/304 of 8 Apr 08. The petitioner is requesting retroactive advancement to E6 and E7 and advancement to E8 based on awards not recorded on DD Form 214. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for the use by the Board for correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 02132-08
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the United States Navy, applied to this Board requesting to change the RE-4 reenlistment code that was issued on 27 June 2004. Given his overall service record and subsequent enlistment in the Army Reserve, the Board finds no reason not to change the RE-4 reenlistment code. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show that he was assigned an RE-1 reenlistment code on 27 June 2004, vice the RE-4...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 02141-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 August 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 02145-08
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. On 23 March 1964, you were issued orders to report to military authorities. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 02149-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 October 2008. You were released from active duty on 17 March 2006, and discharged from the USMCR on 6 December 2006 at the expiration of your enlistment. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 02156-08
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 SMS Docket No: 2156-08 27 October 2008 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD oF =i Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. Apparently, the separation authority approved the discharge recommendation and directed an OTH discharge by reason of misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show that he...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 02159-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 October 2008. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by the Navy Personnel Command dated 30 April 2008, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 02160-08
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Concerning your request for a change in the reenlistment code, the Board was aware that an RE-4 reenlisted code is the only authorized code when an individual is discharged because they are a conscientious objector. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 02162-08
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, applied to this Board requesting to change his RE-4 reenlistment code that was assigned on 31 October 1997, when he was honorably released from active duty. Specifically, the Board finds that Petitioner served without © incident, completed his required active service, attained pay grade E-4, and was consistently recommended for retention and promotion. Given his overall service record that...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 02169-08
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected to show that he was retired by reason of physical disability vice discharged. The Board, consisting of Messrs. , thie, 208 My © eviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 19 March 2009 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the partial corrective action indicated below should...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 02176-08
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. You subsequently requested an undesirable discharge (UD) for the good of the service to avoid trial by court-martial for the three periods of UA totaling 115 days. The Board also considered your contention that you contracted hepatitis C while in the Navy.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 02177-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 October 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. On 10 May 1985, you were so discharged.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 02180-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 December 2008. Your request was approved by the discharge authority, and you received an undesirable discharge on 5 January 1972. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 02187-08
There was not noted to be too much response to the ECTs for the first five treatments, however, following that the patient began to improve markedly. In that anniversary year you were credited with 48 of the 50 retirement points needed for a qualifying year of service. Sincerely, Nadu W. DEAN PFEJURF Executive Dil r DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT SECRETARY (MANPOWER AND RESERVE AFFAIRS) 1000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON DC 20350-1000 May 5, 2008 This correspondence is in...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 02192-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 March 2009. Due to your disciplinary record and final average conduct mark of 3.8 your release from active duty on 9 July 1976 was characterized as under honorable conditions (general) and your discharge from the Marine Corps on 10 July 1980 was likewise characterized as general. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 02194-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 April 2009. You received an OTH on 3 December 1980. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 02195-08
A three-member panel of thé Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 November 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 02200-08
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was entitled to Family Separation Allowance (FSA) for the period he was extended for duty in Bahrain. The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Pfeiffer, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 4 August 2008 and, pursuant to its regulations,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 02207-08
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in Support thereof, your naval record and applicable Statutes, regulations and policies. The petitioner argues that there is no record anywhere in his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) or his service record book (SRB) that documents the NUP, and therefore this fitness report should be removed. The Board found that the lack of documentation elsewhere in the petitioner’s...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 02208-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 May 2008. Finally, if you are correct that the reporting senior was relieved because of unspecified “inappropriate behavior with enlisted Marines,” the Board was unable to find this would call into question his ability to render a fair and accurate performance evaluation, noting the reviewing officer concurred with the appraisal he gave you. Consequently, when...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 02211-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 June 2008. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in the report of the PERB. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 02221-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 May 2009. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 02222-08
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and_ applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In connection with this processing, you acknowledged that separation could result in an OTH discharge and waived the right to have your case heard by an administrative discharge board (ADB). Nevertheless, the Board concluded that these factors were not sufficient to warrant...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 02224-08
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board noted that as a result of your prior period of honorable service, you may be eligible for veterans' benefits. -You may also request that Headquarters Marine Corps (MMSB-10) issue a discharge certificate for your honorable period of service.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 02235-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 October 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Nevertheless, the Board concluded that these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge due to the seriousness of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 02236-08
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the report of the Headquarters Marine Corps Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB), dated 3 March 2008, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 02240-08
In addition, the Board considered the report of the Headquarters Marine Corps Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB), dated 3 March 2008, a copy of which isattached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in the report of the PERB. Consequently, when...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 02243-08
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Given your diagnoses that resulted in discharge after about three months of active service and since you have been treated no differently than others in your situation, the Board could not find an error or injustice in the entry level separation or assignment of the RE-4 reenlistment code. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 02249-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 March 2009. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by the Navy Personnel Command dated 24 July 2008, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 02276-08
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the fitness report for 1 November 2004 to 1 April 2005, a copy of which is at Tab A. d. Petitioner alleges that on 10 December 2004, the reporting senior assaulted his wife, and that the reporting senior then told Petitioner that if Petitioner reported the incident, he would ruin...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 02281-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 November 2008. The Board found those factors insufficient to warrant vecharacterization of your discharge due to your extensive disciplinary record. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 02282-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 March 2009. Nevertheless, the Board found that these factors were not sufficient to warrant vecharacterization of your discharge or changing your reenlistment code given your two NJP’s and conviction by GCM for very serious offenses. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 02296-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 November 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board found that these factors and contentions were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given your record...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 02307-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 November 2008. The Board found that these factors and contention were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given your record of misconduct. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 02312-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 July 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations -and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 02314-08
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100RG Docket No: 2314-08 12 December 2008 — From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD — Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed an application with this Board requesting that his under other than honorable conditions (UOTH) discharged be upgraded....
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 02321-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 November 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board found that these factors and contention were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given the frequency of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 02328-08
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 TRG Docket No: 2328-08 3 December 2008 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD or iii [ees Ref: {a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Marine Corps, filed an application with this Board requesting a better characterization of service than the discharge...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 02329-08
A-three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Records, sitting in executive session, considered y application on 18 November 2008. Documentary material considered by the Boay your application, together with all material submit thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes and policies. After review, the separation autho an entry level separation by reason of entry level and conduct and you were so separated on 2 Februar that time you were not recommended for...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 02333-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 July 2008. The Board did not consider whether your characterization of service or reason for separation should be changed, since you have not exhausted your administrative remedies by applying to the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB). Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 02335-08
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected to show that he was retired by reason of physical disability. The Board, consisting of Messrs. settee: “iii, 205 wreviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 20 February 2009 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 02341-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 November 2008. The Board found that these factors and contention were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given your disciplinary record and especially your conviction by a special court-martial of a serious offense. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 02343-08
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board found that these factors and contention were not sufficient to warrant a correction to your record to show that you received a ‘general discharge. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 02359-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 November 2008. Your ADB was conducted on 23 January 1975, and found sufficient evidence to find that you were unfit for military service due to the frequency of your misconduct. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 02365-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 January 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. On 3 August 1950, you had CM for not observing taps.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 02386-08
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire _record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to.establish the existence of probablé material error or injustice. He recommended a general discharge since you had admitted your homosexual activities, and agreed to waive your right to an administrative discharge board in return for a general discharge. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 02388-08
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show she enlisted for a 4 year term, with a concurrent 24 month extension, vice an 8 year term.2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Pfeiffer, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 24 March 2008 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 02391-08
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 CRS, Docket No: 2391-08 26 June 2008 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records TO: secretary of the Navy Subj: FORMER@iRy ee ca REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.c. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner applied to this Board requesting her naval record be corrected by changing the reentry code she was assigned on 8 November 2004. Applicable directives...