NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11779-08
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. , On 31 December 1988, administrative discharge action was initiated by reason of misconduct. Consequently, when applying for a. correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the oo existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11782-08
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 30 January 1988, the discharge authority directed an other than honorable discharge by reason of misconduct due to drug use. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11793-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 January 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in Support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11797-08
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) . The Board, consisting of Mr.Pfeiffer, Mr. Zsalman, and Mr. George, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 23 March 2009 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11811-08
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject’s widow, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1} with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show enrollment in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP). The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Zsalman, and Mr. George, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 8 September 2009 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11812-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 June 2009. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11813-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 March 2009. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11814-08
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY | BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 CRS Docket No: 11814-08 12 December 2008 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj ' ee Sea REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.c. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner applied to this Board requesting that his naval record be corrected to show that he was not transferred to the inactive Status list. The Board, consisting...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11815-08
BR three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 October 2009. Nevertheless, the Board found that these factors were not sufficient to warrant a change in the reasons for your discharge or reenlistment code since you were discharged by reason of fraudulent enlistment for failure to disclose all of your pre-service drug use. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11816-08
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY a BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 March 2009. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11817-08
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5700 DIC Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) . 2, The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Exnicios, Mr. George, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11819-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 January 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11821-08
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. It found your contention insufficient to warrant corrective action in your case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11822-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 October 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with ali material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11827-08
| A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 October 2009. On 30 February 1979 you were so discharged. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11829-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your co application on 16 September 2009. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11830-08
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 | SON Docket No: 11830-08 21 October 2009 This is in reference to your application for correction. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with alli material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11837-08
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 LCC Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was advanced when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Pfeiffer, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 22...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11838-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 October 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Subsequently, your case was forwarded, and on 1 June 1976 the separation authority approved the recommendation for an undesirable discharge.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11843-08
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board did not consider whether your characterization of service or reason for separation should be changed, since you did not ask for such consideration and you have not exhausted your administrative remedies by applying to the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB). Consequently, when...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11845-08
A.three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your . Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11848-08
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL] RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 MEH Docket No. (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he enlisted for a 4 year term, with 2 concurrent 12 month extensions, vice an 8 year term. The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Pfeiffer, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11849-08
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner applied to this Board requesting his naval record be corrected by changing the reentry code he was assigned on 28 December 2006. c. Applicable directives authorize the assignment of a reentry code of RE-3E or RE-4 to an individual separated by reason of erroneous entry. That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected to show that on = 28 December 2006, Petitioner was assigned an RE-3E reentry code.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11851-08
A three-member panel of the Board-for Correction of Naval ' Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 October 2009. Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all materiai submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11857-08
The minimum average marks required for a fully honorable characterization of service were 3.25 in conduct and 2,75 in overall traits on 26 November 1951. e. Reference (b) sets forth the Department of the Navy’s current policies, standards and procedures for administratively separating enlisted service members. Corps officials with the authority to involuntarily separate | those service members who commit a homosexual act or acts. Based upon Petitioner’s overall record of service...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11865-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 May 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11870-08
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner applied to this Board requesting her naval record be corrected by changing the reentry code she was assigned on 19 September 2008. reviewed Petitioner's allegation the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. The Board concludes that the reentry code of RE-3E- should be assigned since there is no evidence that Petitioner had any disciplinary infractions during her period of service and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11876-08
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 18 July 1990, administrative discharge action was initiated by reason of misconduct due to commission of a serious offense. The Board found that you waived your right to an ADB, your best opportunity for retention or a better characterization of service:.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11879-08
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 SUN Docket No: 11879-08 28 October 20039 From: Chairman, .Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Sub}: REVIEW OF MAVAL RECORD OF (U0 Ref: (a) 10 U.§.C. 1552 Encl: (1) DD Form 149 with attachments (2) Case Summary (3) Subject's naval record 1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) wath...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11880-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 November 2009. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by the Navy Personnel Command dated 1 July 2009, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11885-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 February 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11886-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 September 2009. The Board concluded that your belated decision to request retention in the Navy Reserve in lieu of discharge, and to undergo elective knee surgery, are insufficient to demonstrate that you were improperly found unfit for duty by the PEB, or to warrant rescinding the orders that directed your discharge from the Navy Reserve. Consequently, when...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11887-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 August 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11888-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval ‘Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 October 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11890-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 October 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, reguiations, and policies. On 25 October 1991, administrative discharge action was initiated by reason of misconduct due to commission of a serious offense.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11896-08
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was advanced when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Exnicios, Pfeiffer, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 23 February 2009 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11898-08
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20870-5100 WdH Docket No. 11898-08 6 July 2009 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj]: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICO Ref: {a) Title 10 U.S.C. Subject
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11901-08
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 15 June 1989, administrative discharge action was initiated by reason of misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct. On 23 June 1989, the discharge authority directed an other than honorable discharge by reason of misconduct.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11902-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your - application on 27 October 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is’on the applicant to demonstrate the existence...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11904-08
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. In addition, the Board considered the decision of the Navy Discharge Review Board (NDRB} on 10 February 1995, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11909-08
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 ‘ DIC Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “B” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) . The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Morgan, and Mr. George, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11913-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, . Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The petitioner is requesting to not be paid her $1,000.00 Enlistment Bonus Source Rate (EBSR} and the $5,000.00 Enlistment Bonus College Credit (EBCC) and cancel her 12 month agreement to extend.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11914-08
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicabie naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner terminated participation in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) within the 24-36 month window, with spouse concurrence, effective 1 September 1998. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Exnicios, and George, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 29...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11926-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 September 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11951-08
BR three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 August 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11955-08
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “BY” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB). The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Zsalman, and Mr. George, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 11 May 2009 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11958-08
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he enlisted for a 4 year term, with a concurrent 24 month extension, vice a 6 year term. The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Pfeiffer, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 6 January 2009 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11962-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 March 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in Support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11964-08
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that his retirement orders were issued prior to 6 April 2007 and he was entitled to an incentive payment for a Do-It-Yourself Move (DITY) for moving his household goods (HHG). The Board, consisting of Messrs. Exnicios, Pfeiffer, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11966-08
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX TRG WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 Docket No: 11966-08 19 March 2008 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Sub}: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD 0; ioe Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former member of the Navy Reserve, filed an application with this Board requesting that his record be corrected to show that he was not discharged on 23 May...