NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05828-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your a application, together with all material submitted in support thereof , your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and sides.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to est bush the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 1 December 1998 at age 19. On 10 January 2002 you began another period of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05829-06
Accordingly, the Board recommends the following corrective action. That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected to show that his disability rated by the VA under code 5312 for status/post left anterior tibia gunshot wound, was caused by an instrumentality of war, and that he is entitled to combat-related special compensation for that condition. It is certified that a quorum was present at the Board’s review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and complete record of the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05838-06
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 November 2006. On 29 July 1971 you were convicted by civil authorities of trespassing. Finally, even if you were not in the hands of civil authorities during the entire period from 1973 to 1975, you were either in the hands of civil authorities or in a deserter status.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05840-06
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus(SRB).2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Frankfurt, Mr. Geisler, and Mr. Leeman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 24 October 2006 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05841-06
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to reflect that he resumed coverage under the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) spouse category effective 19 January 2000.2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Frankfurt, Mr. Geisler, and Mr. Leeman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 24 October 2006 and, pursuant to its regulations,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05842-06
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed nclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the a plicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zon “A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB).2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Frankfurt, Mr. Geisler, and Mr. Leeman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 24 October 2006 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05855-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.Sincerely,W. This is an advisory memorandum for the use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05866-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The reference requests an advisor opinion onpetition t correct his record to showThat he was retired as a Colonel (0-6 and issue him a SE~ code that calculates his retired pay in a onstandard mannerclaims that his retirement as a Lieutenant Colonel and the SEP code 4ie was assigned upon...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05882-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memo 7220 N13OD1/06U066l of 10 Nov 06, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05885-06
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed an application with this Board requesting a change in his separation code to establish entitlement to full separation pay. The Board, consisting of Mr. , Mr. and Mr. reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error a the injustice on 24 October 2006 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05888-06
5888-06 4 January 2007This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 Usc 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 January 2007. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05903-06
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner made a timely election of the REDUX Retired Pay System and is entitled to a lump sum payment of the Career Status Bonus (CSB) in the amount of $30,000.00. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Beckett, Dunn, and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 17...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05914-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. In addition, you did not submit a claim to the Veterans Administration for residuals of wounds,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05917-06
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) , Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Marine Corps, applied to this Board requesting that his naval record be corrected by restoring him to the rank of corporal (CPL; E-4).2 The Board, consisting of Messrs ~ reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 16 August 2006 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. They stated that...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05921-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1430 Ser 4811E9/064, 7 February 2007, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05924-06
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 January 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05924-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memo 1160 Ser 4811/028 dated 18 Jan 07, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05928-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps dated 3 July 2006, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05940-06
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100LCCDocket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was advanced when first eligible.2. The Board, consisting of George, Koman, and Rothlein, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 13 February 2007...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05943-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The reenlistment code was correctly assigned and was based on his overall record.2.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05951-06
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) , Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the lineal position, date of rank, and effective date in the grade of lieutenant colonel he would have been assigned had he been selected for promotion to that grade by the Fiscal Year (FY) 2006 Lieutenant Colonel Selection Board, vice the FY 2007 Lieutenant Colonel Selection Board.2. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05952-06
5952-06 25 Oct 06This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 October 2006. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05954-06
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB).2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Frankfurt, Mr. Geisler, and Mr. Leeman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 24 October 2006 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05957-07
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100DJC Docket No. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.Sincerely,W.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05960-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Boa d found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.The Board found that you enlisted in the Marine Corps on 7 October 1953. Nevertheless, these...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05962-06
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 October 2006. Additionally, during your period of service the applicable directive stated that an individual who received more than one special court-martial would be separated under honorable conditions, regardless of the marks. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05966-06
A review of the member’s headquarters record revealed the report in question is not on file, however, a copy of the report is present in enclosure (1). We recommend the member’s reporting senior be required to correct the report by changing the promotion recommendation in block 45 to “Significant Problems” as required by reference (a), and the member should be required to sign the report and prepare a Statement to the Record if he so desires. DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVY PERSONNEL...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05979-06
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)”) entry dated 26 April 2000 (copy at Tab A). The Board, consisting of Ms. Humberd and Messrs. Grover and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 28 September 2006, and pursuant to its regulations, determined...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05990-06
In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnishedby the Office of the Chief of Naval Operations dated 3 October 2006 with enclosure, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. DEAN PFEIFFERExecutive DirectorEnclosure5420 OPNAV N135 3 OCT 06MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05994-06
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject’s former spouse, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that after his divorce fromin June 2005, Subject submitted a written request changing his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) beneficiary election from “spouse” to “former spouse.”2. The Board also considered an advisory opinion prepared by the Bureau of Naval Personnel Office of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 06013-06
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, the son of a deceased former enlisted member of the Marine Corps Reserve, filed an application with this Board requesting that his late father's discharge be upgraded to honorable. It is unclear from the record exactly why Subject was issued a discharge under honorable conditions, but the Board believes it was probably correct under regulations in effect in 1945. However, since he has no disciplinary record, his conduct mark average...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 06047-06
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to change the date of rank on his original appointment as a lieutenant, Medical Corps from 1 May 2004 to a date “no earlier than 1 May 2002.” Enclosure (2) reflects he later amended his application to request adjustment to 26 May 2002. The Board, consisting of Ms. LeBlanc and Messrs. Boyd and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 06054-06
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 January 2007. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 06099-06
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) , Petitioner, a former member of the Navy, filed an application with this Board requesting that the reason for his discharge and reenlistment code be changed. Since the error resulted in recoupment of the unearned portion of his reenlistment bonus, Petitioner’s record should be corrected, where appropriate to show that he is entitled to keep the SRB payments he received before his discharge on 31 December 2003.The Board further concludes that this...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 06103-06
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 February 2007. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 06106-06
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show enlistment in an advanced paygrade.2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Koman, and Ms. Gilbert, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 6 September 2006 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 06119-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. 6119-07your application has been denied. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.Sincerely,W.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 06120-07
6120-07 17 Dec 07DearThis is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 December 2007. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Per...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 06127-06
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS2 NAVY ANNEXWASHINGTON DC 20370-5100WJHDocket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that she enlisted in an advanced paygrade.2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Koman and Ms. Gilbert reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 6...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 06138-06
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYBOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS2 NAVY ANNEXWASHINGTON DC 2O37O-5100 CRSDocket No: 6138-0621 September 2006This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.A three-member panel of the Board f or Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 September 2006. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 06143-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your son’s naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.The Board found that your son reenlisted in the Navy on 22 January 2004 after more than three...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 06155-06
06155-06 11 May 2007This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 May 2007. In addition, it considered an advisory opinion provided by officials of Headquarters, U.S. Marine Corps, dated 14 July 2006, a copy of which is attached.After careful and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 06160-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps dated 10 July 2006, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 06162-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.Sincerely,W. In your petition you requested that you would like to have documentation stating that you were onboard...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 06164-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps dated 10 July 2006, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 06177-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in Support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Subsequently he petitioned the Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB) to modify CD report 19901101 to 19901221, CH report 19901222 to 19910327, CH report 19910823 to 19920510 and TR report 19920511 to 19920816 and to remove his failure’of selection. The PERB concluded that the petitioned...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 06182-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Service member petitioned the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) in accordance with reference (a), to correct errors andfor remove injustices in her Physical Readiness Information Management System (PRIMS) record.2. Reference (b) and (c) states in enclosure (3), paragraph 3. f. 2.,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 06184-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.On 29 September 1978 you enlisted in the Marine Corps at age 17. Nevertheless, the Board concluded...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 06187-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your Naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to estabi~sh the existence of pob ble material error or injustice.The Board found you en±isced in che Navy on 21 December 1937 au age 21 and served without incident...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 06192-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.The Board found that you served on active duty in the Navy from 7 December 1985 to 9 August 1988,...