CG | BCMR | Advancement and Promotion | 2012-036
A Reserve officer to whom this section applies is not considered to have failed of selection when eliminated from a list of selectees for promotion solely as a result of being removed from an active status.” 14 USC § 734(a) states: “A Reserve officer shall not be promoted to a higher grade unless the officer has been found to be physical qualified and the character of the officer’s service subsequent to the convening of the selection board which recommended the officer for promotion has been...
CG | BCMR | Advancement and Promotion | 2012-094
This final decision, dated December 7, 2012, is approved and signed by the three duly APPLICANT’S REQUEST AND ALLEGATIONS The applicant, a Reserve lieutenant commander (LCDR) serving on active duty, asked the Board to correct her record to show that her LT date of rank is July 3, 2005, instead of July 30, 2005, and to show that she was promoted to LCDR on March 1, 2012, instead of May 1, 2012. (4)(a) of COMDTINST M1000.3, all officers must serve a minimum of 30 months in the grade of...
CG | BCMR | Advancement and Promotion | 2012-095
This final decision, dated December 7, 2012, is approved and signed by the three duly APPLICANT’S REQUEST AND ALLEGATIONS The applicant, a Reserve lieutenant commander (LCDR) serving on active duty, asked the Board to correct her record to show that her LT date of rank is July 3, 2005, instead of July 30, 2005, and to show that she was promoted to LCDR on March 1, 2012, instead of May 1, 2012. PSC noted that the applicant was also promoted to LCDR on May 1, 2012, and concluded that the...
CG | BCMR | Advancement and Promotion | 2012-107
He stated that although his retired pay was corrected at the time he received the letter, it is in the interest of justice to correct his DD 214 to show his correct pay grade and rank for his family and himself. To be timely, an application for correction of a military record must be submitted within three years after the applicant discovered the alleged error or injustice. In this case, the applicant’s CWO appointment was terminated by his discharge from active duty on May 31, 1991 and he...
CG | BCMR | Advancement and Promotion | 2012-115
The applicant stated that he was eligible for advancement under Article 1.C.12.f. On February 21, 1995, the Military Personnel Command issued the applicant physical disability retirement orders, which state that the applicant would be retired with a 100% disability rating as of March 21, 1995. Moreover, the JAG argued, even if the Board finds that it is in the interest of justice to waive the statute of limitations in this case, the Board should deny relief because the applicant has failed...