ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130002167
Discharge Received: General, Under Honorable Conditions c. Date of Discharge: 9 December 2010 d. Reason/Authority/SPD/RE: Misconduct (Serious Offense), AR 635-200, 14-12C JKQ, RE-3 e. Unit of assignment: G Company, 54th Engineer Battalion(Provisional) APO AE f. Enlistment Date/Term: 27 April 2010, 3 years g. Current Enlistment Service: 0 years, 7 months, 13 days h. Total Service: 3 years, 1 month, 15 days i. On 28 September 2010, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130002168
It states a separation will be described as entry-level with service uncharacterized if, at the time separation action is initiated, the Soldier has less than 180 days of continuous active duty service. The regulation also provides, except in cases of serious misconduct, that a Soldiers service will be uncharacterized when the separation is initiated while the Soldier is in entry level status. NA Counsel: None Witnesses/Observers: NA Board Vote: Character Change: 0 No Change: 5 Reason...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130002170
On 13 October 2003, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The applicant was discharged from the Army on 24 January 2004, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c(1), AR 635-200, for misconduct, a Separation Program Designator code (SPD) of JKD and an RE code of 3. Army...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130002298
The evidence contained in the applicants service record shows that on 18 July 2011, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c(2), AR 635-200, by reason of commission of a serious offense for wrongfully using cocaine. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7b, provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions. The third party statements provided with the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130002332
It states a separation will be described as entry-level with service uncharacterized if, at the time separation action is initiated, the Soldier has less than 180 days of continuous active duty service. The separation authority approved the applicant's discharge as entry-level status, with the description of service as uncharacterized. The Regulation also provides, except in cases of serious misconduct, that a Soldiers service will be uncharacterized when the separation is initiated while...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130002342
IN THE CASE OF: Mr. BOARD DATE: 31 July 2013 CASE NUMBER: AR20130002342 ___________________________________________________________________________ Board Determination and Directed Action After carefully examining the former Service Members record of service during the period of enlistment under review and the Discussion and Recommendation that follows, the Board noted that the government introduced the results of a command directed urinalysis into the discharge process. On 3 March 2010,...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130002394
IN THE CASE OF: Mr. BOARD DATE: 26 June 2013 CASE NUMBER: AR20130002394 ___________________________________________________________________________ Board Determination and Directed Action After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review, and considering the Discussion and Recommendation which follows, the Board determined the characterization of service was too harsh based on the overall length and quality of the applicant's service, to...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130002397
The separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Two negative counseling statements dated 21 August 2003 and 5 March 2002, for leaving her place of duty without proper authority and wrongfully using marijuana. However, in review of the applicants entire service record and the reasons for the discharge, it appears that these accomplishments did not overcome the reason for...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130002447
Prior Board Review: No SUMMARY OF SERVICE: The applicant enlisted in the U.S. Army Reserve on 22 May 2001, for a period of 8 years. EVIDENCE OBTAINED FROM THE APPLICANT'S RECORD: NIF EVIDENCE SUBMITTED BY THE APPLICANT: The applicant provided discharge orders, dated 15 February 2005, for service under current review. The reasons for separation, including the specific circumstances that form the basis for the discharge are considered on the issue of characterization.
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130002449
The DD Form 214 indicates that on 17 December 2006, the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 19-12, AR 635-200, for non-retention on active duty, with a characterization of service of honorable. Declination of continued service; RA Soldiers serving on a second or subsequent enlistment who refuse to take action to meet military service remaining requirements by signing DA Form 4991R pursuant to AR 601280 may request voluntary separation. There is sufficient evidence...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130002451
The evidence contained in the applicants service record indicates that on 14 May 2012, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c(2) AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-abuse of illegal drugs for wrongfully using marijuana (120302-120402). The separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130002455
The evidence indicates the applicant requested an administrative separation board and was entitled to one because he had over 6 years of total active and reserve military service at the time of initiation of the separation action. Discharge Received: General, Under Honorable Conditions c. Date of Discharge: 27 February 1998 d. Reason/Authority/SPD/RE Code: Misconduct, AR 635-200, Paragraph 14-12c, JKQ RE-3 e. Unit of assignment: C Company, 2nd Battalion, 504th Parachute Infantry Regiment,...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130002457
IN THE CASE OF: Ms. BOARD DATE: 23 September 2013 CASE NUMBER: AR20130002457 ___________________________________________________________________________ Board Determination and Directed Action After carefully examining the applicant's record of service during the period of enlistment under review, hearing her testimony, and considering the Discussion and Recommendation which follows, the Board determined the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief. On 4 June 2004,...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130002458
On 11 August 2011, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Two negative counseling statements dated 7 January 2011 and 21 March 2011, concerning the applicant shoplifting at the Army Air Force Exchange Services. The record confirms that the applicants discharge was appropriate because the quality of his service was not consistent with the Army's standards for...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130002459
The record indicates the applicant was separated from the Army for homosexual admission, with an uncharacterized discharge. Army Regulation 635-200, in effect at the time, set forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. NA Counsel: None Witnesses/Observers: NA Board Vote: Character Change: 0 No Change: 5 Reason Change: 5 No Change: 0 (Board member names available upon request) Board Action Directed: Issue a new DD Form 214: Yes Change Characterization to: No...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130002460
Prior Board Review: No SUMMARY OF SERVICE: The applicant enlisted in the United States Army Reserve on 6 September 2002, for a period of 8 years. On 16 November 2007, the approving authority directed that the applicant be separated from the US Army Reserve with an Under Other Than Honorable Conditions Discharge and reduced to PVT/E-1 under the provisions of AR 600-8-19, paragraph 10-1d. The evidence of record shows that the period of service under review indicates the applicant was...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130002461
Time Lost: 65 days j. On 29 July 1998, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The applicant desires to rejoin the Military Service, and redo his time in the military. However, Soldiers being processed for separation are assigned reentry codes based on their service records or the reason for discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130002462
IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 10 April 2013 CASE NUMBER: AR20130002462 ___________________________________________________________________________ Board Determination and Directed Action After carefully examining the applicant's record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the enclosed Discussion and Recommendation that follows, the Board determined the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief. Prior Board Review: No SUMMARY OF...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130002464
IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 26 June 2013 CASE NUMBER: AR20130002464 ___________________________________________________________________________ Board Determination and Directed Action After carefully examining the applicant's record of service during the period of enlistment under review, and considering the Discussion and Recommendation which follows, the Board determined the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief. On 28 September 2012, the separation authority...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130002465
Prior Board Review: No SUMMARY OF SERVICE: The applicants current enlistment contract is NIF; however, his DD Form 214 indicates he reenlisted in the Regular Army on 12 November 2011. A characterization of under honorable conditions may be issued only when the reason for the Soldiers separation specifically allows such characterization. The DD Form 214 also indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12c by reason of misconduct...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130002466
IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 28 June 2013 CASE NUMBER: AR20130002466 ___________________________________________________________________________ Board Determination and Directed Action After carefully examining the applicant's record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the Discussion and Recommendation which follows, the Board determined the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief. Prior Board Review: No SUMMARY OF SERVICE: The...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130002467
The applicant requests an upgrade of his discharge from general, under honorable conditions to honorable, to change the narrative reason for his discharge, and to reenlist. On 20 April 2012, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. EVIDENCE SUBMITTED BY THE APPLICANT: The applicant provided DD Form 293 (Application for the Review of Discharge or Dismissal from the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130002469
Presiding Officer I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Department of the Army Discharge Review Board in this case. On 29 November 2012, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The applicant was discharged from the Army on 6 December 2012, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130002478
He was discharged as a PVT/E-1. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7b, provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions. However, because of an administrative error in the discharge process, recommend the Board change DD Form 214, block 27 reentry code to 3, as provided by regulation.
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130002489
The applicant requests his bad conduct discharge be upgraded to general, under honorable conditions. The record of trial was forwarded to The Judge Advocate General of The Army for review by the Court of Military Review and on 3 December 2010, The United States Army Court of Military Review affirmed the approved findings of guilty and ordered the sentence to be executed. The applicant was separated from the Army on 11 February 2011, with a bad conduct discharge, a separation code of JJD,...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130002500
The applicant requests an upgrade of his under other than honorable conditions discharge to honorable. On 30 June 2005, the separation authority approved the Chapter 10 request and directed the discharge with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. The applicant was discharged from the Army on 9 July 2005, with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130002504
EVIDENCE OBTAINED FROM THE APPLICANT'S RECORD: There are no counseling statements or UCMJ actions in the record. A characterization of under honorable conditions may be issued only when the reason for the Soldiers separation specifically allows such characterization. The applicant contends that an upgrade of his discharge would allow educational benefits through the use of the GI Bill.
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130002508
On 1 September 2011, the evidence shows that the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c (2), AR 635-200, for misconduct-abuse of illegal drugs, specifically for testing positive for marijuana on or about 3 March 2011 and on 10 June 2011. On 14 September 2011, the separation authority directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Further, the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130002511
Presiding Officer I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Department of the Army Discharge Review Board in this case. On 27 June 2012, the separation authority approved and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. After examining the applicants record of service, his military records, and the issues submitted with the application, there are several mitigating factors to...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130002525
The separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. EVIDENCE OBTAINED FROM THE APPLICANT'S RECORD: 1. The applicant received a negative counseling statement dated 16 February 2012, for being recommended for punishment under Article 15.
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130002528
The applicant requests an upgrade of his discharge characterization from general, under honorable conditions to honorable. On 16 June 2010, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. However, after examining his military records, the issues and documents submitted with the application, there are insufficient mitigating factors to merit an upgrade of the applicant's...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130002532
On 6 May 2002, the unit commander notified the applicant of his intent to process him for separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 14-12b, by reason of pattern of misconduct; specifically for: a. receiving a Company Grade (CG) Article 15 for an assault (001114). On 22 May 2002, the separation authority, waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. In addition, the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130002535
IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 21 June 2013 CASE NUMBER: AR20130002535 ___________________________________________________________________________ Board Determination and Directed Action After carefully examining the applicant's record of service during the period of enlistment under review, and considering the Discussion and Recommendation which follows, the Board determined the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief. The separation authority waived further...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130002591
The evidence contained in the applicants service record indicates that on 11 June 2007, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12b, AR 635-200, by reason of pattern of misconduct. On 27 June 2007, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The applicant was discharged from the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130002600
He requested to separate from the reserves to go into the Active Army and was told to wait on orders. The record contains a properly constituted order which indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of AR 135-178, by reason of unsatisfactory participation, with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. The applicant raised the issue that he was having family issues that affected his behavior, once the issues were resolved he was allowed to...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130002662
After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and notwithstanding the Discussion and Recommendation that follows, the Board determined that the applicant's length and quality of his service were not significantly meritorious to overcome the seriousness of the reason that caused his separation from the Army and as a result the discharge was found to be proper and equitable. The applicant requests an upgrade of his discharge from...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130002672
The applicant requests that his general, under honorable conditions discharge be upgraded to honorable and the reentry eligibility (RE) code changed which would allow him to reenter the military. A separation under honorable conditions will normally be appropriate when an officer submits an unqualified resignation or a request for relief from active duty under circumstances involving misconduct which renders the officer unsuitable for further service, unless an under other than honorable...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130002681
Discharge Received: General, Under Honorable Conditions c. Date of Discharge: 30 April 2010 d. Reason/Authority/SPD/RE: Misconduct (Serious Offense), AR 635-200 Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, JKQ, RE-3 e. Unit of assignment: Rear Detachment, 3-43rd ADA Bn, Fort Bliss, TX f. Current Enlistment Date/Term: 8 October 2009, 4 years g. Current Enlistment Service: 6 months, 3 days h. Total Service: 2 years, 3 months, 11 days i. The evidence contained in the applicants service record indicates that...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130002687
On 24 November 2009, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, specifically for: a. being absent without leave from 8 October 2009 until 21 October 2009 b. falsely signing a sick call slip, DA Form 689 2. Based on the above misconduct, the unit commander recommended separation with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 30 November 2009, the separation authority approved the separation and...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130002688
Presiding Officer I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Department of the Army Discharge Review Board in this case. On 5 December 2011, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. However, after examining the applicants record of service, his military records and the issues submitted with the application, there are...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130002696
Prior Board Review: No SUMMARY OF SERVICE: The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 20 September 1999, for a period of 3 years. EVIDENCE SUBMITTED BY THE APPLICANT: The applicant provided DD Form 214 and discharge orders for service under current review, and preseparation counseling checklist, dated 1 November 1999. The characterization of service for Soldiers separated under this provision of the regulation will normally be honorable.
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130002698
IN THE CASE OF: Mr. BOARD DATE: 24 July 2013 CASE NUMBER: AR20130002698 ___________________________________________________________________________ Board Determination and Directed Action After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the Discussion and Recommendation which follows, the Board found no cause for clemency and voted to deny relief. EVIDENCE OBTAINED FROM THE APPLICANT'S RECORD: A Special Court-Martial...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130002709
The applicant was a USAR officer on active duty when his unit initiated elimination proceedings against him under AR 600-8-24, which applies to officers serving on active duty. On 29 December 2011, the Deputy Assistant Secretary (Army Review Boards) approved the recommendation of the Army Ad Hoc Review Board and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. After examining the applicants record of service, the documents and...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130002720
Prior Board Review: No SUMMARY OF SERVICE: The applicant's record shows he enlisted in the Regular Army on 6 October 2010 for a period of 4 years. On 18 November 2011, the separation authority, waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Records show the proper discharge and separation authority procedures were followed in this case.
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130002721
He was 25 years old at the time of entry and completed a year of college. The evidence contained in the applicants service record indicates that on 24 April 2012, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason misconduct (serious offense). On 2 May 2012, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130002723
The evidence shows that on 26 June 2001, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, for misconduct-commission of a serious offense, specifically for wrongfully using marijuana and driving while drunk. Based on the above misconduct, the unit commander recommended a general, under honorable conditions discharge and advised the applicant of his rights. Board Vote: Character Change: 0 No Change:...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130002724
Discharge received: General, Under Honorable Conditions c. Date of Discharge: 10 February 2005 d. Reason/Authority/SPD/RE: Other Designated Physical or Mental Conditions Chapter 5, paragraph 5-17, AR 635-200, JFV, RE-3 e. Unit of assignment: HHC, 2-14th Infantry Regiment, Fort Drum, NY f. Current Enlistment Date/Term: 5 March 2003, 3 years g. Current Enlistment Service: 1 year, 11 months, 6 days h. Total Service: 4 years, 15 days i. He was discharged as a SPC/E-4. The DD Form 214 indicates...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130002728
IN THE CASE OF: Mr. BOARD DATE: 21 June 2013 CASE NUMBER: AR20130002728 ___________________________________________________________________________ Board Determination and Directed Action After carefully examining the applicant's record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the Discussion and Recommendation which follows, the Board determined the discharge to be proper and equitable and voted to deny relief. On 5 January 2012, the separation authority...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130002731
Discharge Received: General, Under Honorable Conditions c. Date of Discharge: 10 March 2011 d. Reason/Authority/SPD/RE: Misconduct (Drug Abuse), AR 635-200, 14-12c(2) JKK, RE-4 e. Unit of assignment: RD, 1st Bn, 22d IN Regiment, Fort Carson, CO f. Current Enlistment Date/Term: 5 September 2008, 5 years and 15 weeks g. Current Enlistment Service: 2 years, 4 months, 3 days h. Total Service: 2 years, 7 months, 23 days i. The evidence of record shows that on 11 February 2011, the unit commander...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130002733
IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 17 July 2013 CASE NUMBER: AR20130002733 ___________________________________________________________________________ Board Determination and Directed Action After carefully examining the applicant's record of service during the period of enlistment under review, and considering the Discussion and Recommendation which follows, the Board determined the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief. The applicant requests an upgrade of her...