IN THE CASE OF:  	

      BOARD DATE:  	31 May 2013

      CASE NUMBER:  	AR20130002720
___________________________________________________________________________

Board Determination and Directed Action

After carefully examining the applicant's record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the Discussion and Recommendation which follows, the Board determined the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief.




      
      Presiding Officer
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Department of the Army Discharge Review Board in this case.

THE APPLICANT’S REQUEST AND STATEMENT:

1.  The applicant requests an upgrade of his discharge characterization from general, under honorable conditions to fully honorable.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that he would like to take advantage of his Veterans benefits.  He is the sole care provider for his mother who suffers from ovarian and breast cancer.

DISCHARGE UNDER REVIEW INFORMATION:

a. Application Receipt Date:		4 February 2013
b. Discharge Received:		General, Under Honorable Conditions 
c. Date of Discharge:			9 December 2011
d. Reason/Authority/SPD/RE:		Pattern of Misconduct, AR 635-200, Chapter 14-12b						JKA, RE-3
e. Unit of assignment:			HHC, 10th Combat Aviation Brigade, Fort Drum, NY
f. Current Enlistment Date/Term:	6 October 2010, 4 years
g. Current Enlistment Service:	1 year, 2 months, 4 days
h. Total Service:			1 year, 2 months, 4 days
i. Time Lost:				None
j. Previous Discharges:		None
k. Highest Grade Achieved:		E-2
l. Military Occupational Specialty:	15P10, Aviation Operations Specialist
m. GT Score:				102
n. Education:				HS graduate
o. Overseas Service:			None
p. Combat Service:			None
q. Decorations/Awards:		NDSM, GWOTSM, ASR
r. Administrative Separation Board: 	No
s. Performance Ratings:		None
t. Counseling Statements:		Yes	
u. Prior Board Review:			No
SUMMARY OF SERVICE:		
	
The applicant's record shows he enlisted in the Regular Army on 6 October 2010 for a period of 4 years.  He was 20 years old at the time and was a high school graduate.   The applicant’s record does not show any significant achievements or acts of valor.  When his discharge proceedings were initiated, he was serving at Fort Drum, NY.




SEPARATION FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES

1.  On 16 November 2011, the unit commander notified the applicant of his intent to process him for separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 14-12b, by reason of pattern of misconduct; specifically for:

      a.  on divers occasions failed to report to his designated place of duty 
      b.  made false official statements 
      c.  failed to obey lawful orders  

2.  Based on the above misconduct, the unit commander recommended a general, under honorable conditions discharge and informed the applicant of his rights.

3.  On 17 November 2011, the applicant waived legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement on his behalf.  The unit commander subsequently recommended separation from the Army and waiver of further rehabilitative efforts.  The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed action and recommended approval of a general, under honorable conditions discharge.  

4.  On 18 November 2011, the separation authority, waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicant’s discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.  

5.  The applicant was separated on 9 December 2011, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, Chapter 14-12b for a Pattern of Misconduct, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge, an SPD code of JKA and a RE code of 3.

6.  The applicant’s record does not show any time lost.

EVIDENCE OBTAINED FROM THE APPLICANT'S RECORD

1.  The applicant's disciplinary record includes his acceptance of nonjudicial punishment (NJP) under the provisions of Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), as follows:

      a.  On 25 August 2011, for failing to report (110801), with intent to deceive provided a false statement on two occasions (110801).  His punishment consisted of reduction to E-1, forfeiture of pay in the amount of $342.00 (suspended), 14 days of extra duty and restriction (FG).
      
      b.  On 5 October 2011, for disobeying a lawful order by breaking restriction (110828).  His punishment consisted of forfeiture of pay in the amount of $733.00 for 2 months (suspended), 45 days of extra duty and restriction, and an oral reprimand (FG).
      
      c.  On 10 November 2011, for providing a false official statement (111019).  His punishment consisted of a forfeiture of pay in the amount of $733.00 for 2 months (suspended), 45 days of extra duty and restriction, and an oral reprimand (FG).
2.  There are two negative counseling statements dated 30 August 2011 and 28 October 2011, for violating restriction and providing a false statement.

EVIDENCE SUBMITTED BY THE APPLICANT 

VA Claim and six pages of medical documents which include a Mental Health Evaluation that shows a PTSD screening score of 4.

POST-SERVICE ACTIVITY: 

None provided with the application.

REGULATORY AUTHORITY

1.  Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Chapter 14 establishes policy and prescribes procedures for separating members for misconduct.  Specific categories include minor disciplinary infractions, a pattern of misconduct, and commission of a serious offense, to include abuse of illegal drugs, convictions by civil authorities and desertion or being absent without leave.  Action will be taken to separate a member for misconduct when it is clearly established that rehabilitation is impractical or unlikely to succeed.  Army policy states that an under other than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate; however, a general, under honorable conditions or an honorable discharge may be granted.  

2.  Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7a, provides that an honorable discharge is a separation with honor and entitles the recipient to benefits provided by law.  The honorable characterization is appropriate when the quality of the member’s service generally has met the standards of acceptable conduct and performance of duty for Army personnel, or is otherwise so meritorious that any other characterization would be clearly inappropriate.  Whenever there is doubt, it is to be resolved in favor of the individual.

3.  Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7b, provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions.  When authorized, it is issued to a Soldier whose military record is satisfactory but not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge.  A characterization of under honorable conditions may be issued only when the reason for the Soldier’s separation specifically allows such characterization.

DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The applicant’s request for an upgrade of the characterization of his discharge was carefully considered.  However, after examining his military records and the issues submitted with the application, there are insufficient factors to merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge.  

2.  The record confirms that the applicant’s discharge was appropriate because the quality of his service was not consistent with the Army's standards for acceptable personal conduct and performance of duty by military personnel.  It brought discredit on the Army, and was prejudicial to good order and discipline.  By the repeated incidents of misconduct, the applicant diminished the quality of his service below that meriting a fully honorable discharge.  The applicant’s service was marred by three Articles 15 for multiple violations of the Uniform Code of Military Justice and several negative counseling statements.

3.  The applicant provided no independent corroborating evidence demonstrating that either the command's action was erroneous or that his service mitigated the misconduct or poor duty performance.  

4.  The applicant contends that he is the sole provider for his mother and would like to receive Veterans benefits.  However, eligibility for Veteran's benefits to include medical and educational benefits under the Post-9/11 or Montgomery GI Bill does not fall within the purview of the Army Discharge Review Board.  Accordingly, the applicant should contact a local office of the Department of Veterans Affairs for further assistance.

5.  Moreover, the service record contains a mental status evaluation that shows a screening positive score of 4 for Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder.  However, the applicant did not submit any evidence to show the discharge was the result of any medical condition.  

6.  Records show the proper discharge and separation authority procedures were followed in this case.

7.  Therefore, the reason for discharge and the characterization of service being both proper and equitable, recommend the Board deny relief. 

SUMMARY OF ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING:

Type of Hearing:  Records Review    	Date: 	31 May 2013 	Location: Washington, DC

Did the Applicant Testify?  No

Counsel: None



Board Vote:
Character  	Change:  0	No Change:  5
Reason	Change:  0	No Change:  5
(Board member names available upon request)

Board Action Directed:
Issue a new DD Form 214:			No
Change Characterization to:		No Change
Change Reason to:				No Change
Change RE Code to:			No Change
Grade Restoration to:			No Change
Change Authority for Separation:		NA
Other:						NA





























 
Legend:
AMHRR - Army Military Human Resource Record	FG - Field Grade	IADT – Initial Active Duty Training	 	RE - Reentry
AWOL - Absent Without Leave	GD - General Discharge	NA - Not applicable	SCM- Summary Court Martial
BCD - Bad Conduct Discharge	HS - High School	NIF - Not in File	SPCM - Special Court Martial
CG - Company Grade Article 15	HD - Honorable Discharge	OAD - Ordered to Active Duty	UNC - Uncharacterized Discharge  
CID - Criminal investigation Department	MP – Military Police	OMPF - Official Military Personnel File	UOTH - Under Other Than                           			               Honorable Conditions
ADRB Case Report and Directive (cont)		AR 20130002720

Page 6 of 6 pages



ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (ADRB)

CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE



1