ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130000818
On 25 October 2002, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The applicant was discharged from the Army on 15 November 2002, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c(2), AR 635-200, for misconduct (drug abuse), a Separation Program Designator code (SPD) of JKK and a RE code of 3. ...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130000834
IN THE CASE OF: Mr. BOARD DATE: 28 August 2013 CASE NUMBER: AR20130000834 ___________________________________________________________________________ Board Determination and Directed Action After carefully examining the applicant's record of service during the period of enlistment under review, and considering the Discussion and Recommendation which follows, the Board determined the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief. On 4 December 2012, the separation...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130000843
Prior Board Review: No SUMMARY OF SERVICE: The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 3 June 2009, for a period of 3 years and 23 weeks. The evidence contained in the applicants service record indicates that on 21 May 2012, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct (serious offense) for violating a lawful general regulation (111221) by wrongfully possessing and...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130000846
After carefully examining the applicant's record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the Discussion and Recommendation which follows, the Board determined the discharge to be both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief. He was 22 years old at the time of reentry and a high school graduate. On 22 July 2011, the separation authority approved and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general under honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130000872
IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 19 April 2013 CASE NUMBER: AR20130000872 ___________________________________________________________________________ Board Determination and Directed Action After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the Discussion and Recommendation which follows, the Board found no cause for clemency and voted to deny relief. Prior Board Review: No SUMMARY OF SERVICE: The record shows the applicant...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130000882
IN THE CASE OF: Mr. BOARD DATE: 1 May 2013 CASE NUMBER: AR20130000882 ___________________________________________________________________________ Board Determination and Directed Action After carefully examining the applicant's record of service during the period of enlistment under review, and considering the Discussion and Recommendation which follows, the Board determined the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief. Prior Board Review: No SUMMARY OF SERVICE: The...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130000895
On 15 December 2011, the Army Review Boards Agency requested the BOI amend its findings in order to provide specific relevant conduct to support the basis for separation. On 13 March 2012, the Army Board of Review recommended the applicants elimination from the Army with issuance of a general, under honorable conditions discharge. A separation under honorable conditions will normally be appropriate when an officer submits an unqualified resignation or a request for relief from active duty...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130000897
The board recommended the applicant be separated from the Army under Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 14-12c, for the commission of a serious offense and that the Soldiers separation be characterized as General, Under Honorable Conditions. The separation authority directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7b, provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130000907
The evidence contained in the applicants service record indicates that on 12 June 1999, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct (serious offense). The separation authority approved the recommendation of the administrative separation board and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Army...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130000914
Prior Board Review: No SUMMARY OF SERVICE: The applicant's record shows he enlisted in the Regular Army on 17 March 2000, for a period of 4 years. On 30 April 2003, the unit commander notified the applicant of his intent to process him for separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 14-12b, by reason of pattern of misconduct; specifically for: a. receiving a Field Grade Article 15 (030415, which was the date the appeal was denied), for wrongfully operating a...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130000959
IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 1 May 2013 CASE NUMBER: AR20130000959 ___________________________________________________________________________ Board Determination and Directed Action After carefully examining the applicant's record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the Discussion and Recommendation which follows, the Board determined the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief. Prior Board Review: No SUMMARY OF SERVICE: The...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130000974
IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 17 April 2013 CASE NUMBER: AR20130000974 ___________________________________________________________________________ Board Determination and Directed Action After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the Discussion and Recommendation which follows, the Board determined that the characterization of service was too harsh based on the applicants length and quality of his service to include...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130000978
IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 17 May 2013 CASE NUMBER: AR20130000978 ___________________________________________________________________________ Board Determination and Directed Action After carefully examining the applicant's record of service during the period of enlistment under review, and considering the Discussion and Recommendation which follows, the Board determined the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief. The characterization of service for Soldiers...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130000990
EVIDENCE OBTAINED FROM THE APPLICANT'S RECORD: There are no counseling statements or UCMJ actions in the record. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7b, provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions. A characterization of under honorable conditions may be issued only when the reason for the Soldiers separation specifically allows such characterization.
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130000993
Discharge Received: Under Other Than Honorable Conditions c. Date of Discharge: 21 December 2010 d. Reason/Authority/SPD/RE Code: Unsatisfactory Participant, AR 135-178, Chapter 13, RE NIF, SPD NA e. Unit of assignment: 814th MP Company, Arlington Heights, IL f. Current Enlistment Date/Term: 6 October 2006, 6 years g. Current Enlistment Service: 4 years, 2 months, 16 days h. Total Service: 6 years, 11 months, 13 days i. Prior Board Review: No v. SUMMARY OF SERVICE: The applicant served in...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130000997
The board recommended the applicants discharge with characterization of service of an under other than honorable conditions discharge. On 8 March 2006, the separation authority approved the recommendation of the administrative separation board and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of an under other than honorable conditions discharge. One negative counseling statement, dated 20 October 2005, informing the applicant of initiation of discharge proceedings.
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130001015
The evidence contained in the applicants service record indicates that on 1 June 2011, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c(2), AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-abuse of illegal drugs, specifically for wrongfully using cocaine (110426-110429). The separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130001027
IN THE CASE OF: Mr. BOARD DATE: 10 May 2013 CASE NUMBER: AR20130001027 ___________________________________________________________________________ Board Determination and Directed Action After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review, and considering the Discussion and Recommendation which follows, the Board determined the narrative reason for the applicants discharge is now inequitable based on the current standard. The evidence of...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130001083
On 6 March 2012, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The applicant contends he did not use drugs nor was there any misconduct. The applicable Army regulation states there are circumstances in which the conduct or performance of duty reflected by a single incident provides the basis for a characterization of service.
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130001085
The evidence indicates the applicant was entitled to an administrative separation board because he had over 6 years of total active and reserve military service at the time of initiation of the separation action. On 18 December 2003, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. After a careful review of all the applicants military records and the issue submitted with...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130001086
Presiding Officer I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Department of the Army Discharge Review Board in this case. On 8 June 2012, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. One negative counseling dated 16 March 2012, for being positive for marijuana on a unit urinalysis.
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130001090
Prior Board Review: No SUMMARY OF SERVICE: The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 17 August 2006 for a period of 3 years and 17 weeks. On 19 July 2011, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. There is no evidence in the record, nor has the applicant produced any evidence to support the contention that the investigation against him had come back clean.
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130001101
IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 2 August 2013 CASE NUMBER: AR20130001101 ___________________________________________________________________________ Board Determination and Directed Action After carefully examining the applicant's record of service during the period of enlistment under review, and considering the Discussion and Recommendation which follows, the Board determined the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief. Based on the above misconduct, the unit...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130001104
On 11 January 2000, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. However, after examining the applicants record of service, his military records, the documents and the issues submitted with the application, there are insufficient mitigating factors to merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge. Eligibility for veteran's benefits to include educational benefits...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130001109
The applicant requests an upgrade of his general, under honorable conditions discharge to honorable. On 7 May 2012, the separation authority approved and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. After examining the applicants record of service, his military records, and the issues submitted with the application, there are several mitigating factors to merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge to honorable for the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130001114
Presiding Officer I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Department of the Army Discharge Review Board in this case. Prior Board Review: No SUMMARY OF SERVICE: The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 17 March 2004, for a period of 4 years. The DD Form 214 also indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12b, AR 635-200, by reason of pattern of misconduct, with a characterization of service...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130001122
Discharge Received: General, Under Honorable Conditions c. Date of Discharge: 6 October 2010 d. Reason/Authority/SPD/RE Code: Alcohol Rehabilitation Failure, AR 635-200, Chapter 9, JPD, RE-4 e. Unit of assignment: HHC, 7th U.S. Army Joint Multinational Training Command, Vilseck, Germany f. Current Enlistment Date/Term: 22 June 2007, 4 years g. Current Enlistment Service: 3 years, 3 months, 15 days h. Total Service: 6 years, 8 months, 17 days i. On 10 August 2010, the unit commander notified...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130001128
The applicant requests a change to the narrative reason for his discharge from the Army. The available evidence of record shows the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 15, paragraph 15-3a, AR 635-200, in effect at the time, by reason of a homosexual act. The Board considers any aggravating factors and in their absence, will change the narrative reason for the discharge to Secretarial Authority.
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130001132
Prior Board Review: No SUMMARY OF SERVICE: The record shows the applicant enlisted in the US Army Reserve on 11 January 2007 for a period of 8 years. EVIDENCE SUBMITTED BY THE APPLICANT: The applicant provided a DD Form 214 and a self-authored statement with her online application. Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator (SPD) Codes) provides the specific authorities (regulatory or directive), reasons for separating Soldiers from active duty, and the SPD codes to be entered...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130001136
It states a separation will be described as entry-level with service uncharacterized if, at the time separation action is initiated, the Soldier has less than 180 days of continuous active duty service. The regulations stipulates that a separation will be described as entry-level with service uncharacterized if, at the time separation action is initiated, the Soldier has less than 180 days of continuous active duty service. N/A Counsel: None Witnesses/Observers: N/A Board Vote: Character...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130001137
On 24 November 2003, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7b, provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions. However, after examining the applicants record of service, his military records, and the documents submitted with the application, there are insufficient mitigating...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130001138
The evidence contained in the applicants service record indicates that on 26 June 2006, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense for being arrested twice for driving while intoxicated (040917, 060429). On 18 July 2006, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130001139
IN THE CASE OF: Mr. BOARD DATE: 8 May 2013 CASE NUMBER: AR20130001139 ___________________________________________________________________________ Board Determination and Directed Action After carefully examining the applicant's record of service during the period of enlistment under review, and considering the Discussion and Recommendation which follows, the Board determined the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief. Prior Board Review: No SUMMARY OF SERVICE: The...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130001142
Presiding Officer I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Department of the Army Discharge Review Board in this case. On 1 August 2012, the Commander, U.S. Army Human Resources Command, approved the findings and recommendations of the BOI and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. SUMMARY OF ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING: Type of Hearing: Record Review Date: 21...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130001150
IN THE CASE OF: Mr. BOARD DATE: 29 May 2013 CASE NUMBER: AR20130001150 ___________________________________________________________________________ Board Determination and Directed Action After carefully examining the applicant's record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the Discussion and Recommendation which follows, the Board determined the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief. On 19 July 2011, the applicant consulted with...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130001155
The applicant requests his under other than honorable conditions discharge be upgraded to general, change the narrative reason and his reentry code. On 29 May 2012, the applicant was discharged accordingly. The narrative reason specified by Army Regulations for a discharge under this paragraph is "in lieu of trial by court-martial," and the separation code is "KFS."
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130001156
The applicant requests an upgrade of his general, under honorable conditions discharge to honorable. On 22 October 2004, the separation authority directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. A characterization of under honorable conditions may be issued only when the reason for the Soldiers separation specifically allows such characterization.
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130001157
IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 19 April 2013 CASE NUMBER: AR20130001157 ___________________________________________________________________________ Board Determination and Directed Action After carefully examining the applicant's record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the Discussion and Recommendation which follows, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief. She was discharged as a PVT/E-2. However,...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130001158
Prior Board Review: No SUMMARY OF SERVICE: The applicant's record shows he enlisted in the Regular Army on 22 September 1999, for a period of 4 years. The evidence contained in the applicants service record indicates that on 8 June 2006, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense for his involvement with the incident that happened at...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130001170
IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 12 June 2013 CASE NUMBER: AR20130001170 ___________________________________________________________________________ Board Determination and Directed Action After carefully examining the applicant's record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the Discussion and Recommendation which follows, the Board determined the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief. The evidence contained in the applicants record...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130001179
IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 22 May 2013 CASE NUMBER: AR20130001179 ___________________________________________________________________________ Board Determination and Directed Action After carefully examining the applicant's record of service during the period of enlistment under review, and considering the Discussion and Recommendation which follows, the Board determined the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief. The DD Form 214 indicates that on 26 November...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130001189
On 16 August 2012, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The applicant was discharged from the Army on 4 September 2012, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c(2), AR 635-200, for misconduct, with a Separation Program Designator code (SPD) of JKK and an RE code of 4. Army...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130001191
Presiding Officer I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Department of the Army Discharge Review Board in this case. The evidence contained in the applicants service record indicates that on 17 August 2011, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c(2), AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-abuse of illegal drugs, specifically for wrongfully using cocaine...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130001196
IN THE CASE OF: Mr. BOARD DATE: 12 June 2013 CASE NUMBER: AR20130001196 ___________________________________________________________________________ Board Determination and Directed Action After carefully examining the applicant's record of service during the period of enlistment under review, and considering the Discussion and Recommendation which follows, the Board determined the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief. The separation authority waived further...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130001213
The evidence contained in the applicants service record shows that on 26 August 2009, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c(2), AR 635-200, by reason of misconductcommission of a serious offense (drugs), for wrongful possession of marijuana and drug paraphernalia (090611), wrongfully violating barracks policy, and miscellaneous positive drug results. On 28 September 2009, the applicant consulted...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130001231
The record shows that on 2 May 2008, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, for misconduct (serious offense), specifically for: a. Based on the above misconduct the unit commander recommended a general, under honorable conditions discharge and advised the applicant of his rights. On 7 May 2008, the separation authority and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130001266
Prior Board Review: No SUMMARY OF SERVICE: The applicant enlisted in the U.S. Army Reserve on 11September 2001 for 8 years. The available evidence in the record indicates that on 27 May 2010, DA, HQS, 88th Regional Support Command, Fort McCoy, WI, Orders number 10-147-00050, discharged the applicant from the U.S Army Reserve, effective 27 May 2010, with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. The reasons for separation, including the specific circumstances that form the basis...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130001286
IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 12 June 2013 CASE NUMBER: AR20130001286 ___________________________________________________________________________ Board Determination and Directed Action After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the Discussion and Recommendation which follows, the Board determined the characterization of service was too harsh based on the length and quality of the applicants service and the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130001288
In addition, in a memorandum for record, the unit commander presented the reason for his recommendation for an honorable discharge; wherein, the chain-of-command had counseled the applicant that if he waived his right for an Administrative Review Board, and had no further incidents of misconduct, he would be recommended for an honorable discharge, and that to date, the applicant had fulfilled the stated requirements for an honorable discharge. On 7 April 2010, the separation authority...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130001297
Discharge Received: General, Under Honorable Conditions c. Date of Discharge: 18 January 2011 d. Reason/Authority/SPD/RE Code: Pattern of Misconduct, AR 635-200, Chapter 14-12b, JKA, RE-3 e. Unit of Assignment: D Co, 3rd Bn, 509th IN (Abn), Joint Base Elmendorf- Richardson, AK f. Current Enlistment Date/Term: 12 August 2009, 3 years and 19 weeks g. Current Enlistment Service: 1 year, 5 months, 7 days h. Total Service: 1 year, 5 months, 28 days i. On 15 December 2010, the separation...