IN THE CASE OF:  	

      BOARD DATE:  	1 May 2013

      CASE NUMBER:  	AR20130000959
___________________________________________________________________________

Board Determination and Directed Action

After carefully examining the applicant's record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the Discussion and Recommendation which follows, the Board determined the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief.






      
      
      Presiding Officer
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Department of the Army Discharge Review Board in this case.

THE APPLICANT’S REQUEST AND STATEMENT:

1.  The applicant requests an upgrade of his discharge from general, under honorable conditions to honorable.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, he did not have any Article 15s during his eight years of service and did not receive one when he was discharged. 

DISCHARGE UNDER REVIEW INFORMATION:

a. Application Receipt Date:		2 January 2013
b. Discharge Received:		General, Under Honorable Conditions
c. Date of Discharge:			26 August 2011
d. Reason/Authority/SPD/RE Code:	Pattern of Misconduct , AR 635-200, 14-12b 		
      JKA, RE-3
e. Unit of assignment:			532nd  Network Support, Fort Bliss, TX
f. Current Enlistment Date/Term:	23 April 2009, 6 years 
g. Current Enlistment Service:	2 years, 4 months, 4 days
h. Total Service:			8 years, 0 months, 2 days
i. Time Lost:				None
j. Previous Discharges:		RA-(030825-060224)/HD
RA-(060425-070522)/HD				       RA-(070523-090422)/HD	
k. Highest Grade Achieved:		E-4
l. Military Occupational Specialty:	25L10, Cable System Installer/Maintainer
m. GT Score:				NIF
n. Education:				HS Graduate
o. Overseas Service:			Southwest Asia/Korea
p. Combat Service:			Iraq (090301-100221)
q. Decorations/Awards:		JSCM, AAM-2, AGCM-2, NDSM, ICM-W/CS 							GWOTSM, KDSM, NPDR, ASR, OSR-3, JMUA
r. Administrative Separation Board: 	No
s. Performance Ratings:		None
t. Counseling Statements:		No
u. Prior Board Review:			No

SUMMARY OF SERVICE:		
	
The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 25 August 2003, for a period of 4 years.  He was 18 years old at the time of entry and a high school graduate.  On his last reenlistment of          23 April 2009, he reenlisted for a period of 6 years and was 24 years old at the time.  He was serving at Fort Bliss, TX, when his discharge was initiated.  His record also shows that he served a combat tour and earned several awards including a JSCM, AAM-2, and an AGCM-2. 



SEPARATION FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES:

1.  The applicant’s record is void of the complete facts and circumstances concerning the events which led to the discharge from the Army.  However, the record contains a properly constituted DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), which was authenticated by the applicant’s digital signature.  He was discharged as a SPC/E-4.

2.  The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-b, AR 635-200, for a pattern of misconduct, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.  The DD Form 214 shows a Separation Program Designator (SPD) code of JKA and a reentry (RE) code of 3.  

3.  On 1 May 2002, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicant’s discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.

4.  The applicant’s available record does not show any record of unauthorized absences or lost time.

5.  The applicant was discharged from the Army on 26 August  2011, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12b, AR 635-200, for a pattern of misconduct, a Separation Program Designator code (SPD) of JKA and a RE code of 3.

EVIDENCE OBTAINED FROM THE APPLICANT'S RECORD:

The record does not contain any negative counseling statements or any actions under Article 15 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice.

EVIDENCE SUBMITTED BY THE APPLICANT:

The applicant provided a DD Form 149, dated 4 October 2012; and DD Form 214, dated        26 August 2011.

POST-SERVICE ACTIVITY: 

The applicant did not provide any.

REGULATORY AUTHORITY:

1.  Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Chapter 14 establishes policy and prescribes procedures for separating members for misconduct.  Specific categories include minor disciplinary infractions, a pattern of misconduct, and commission of a serious offense, to include abuse of illegal drugs, convictions by civil authorities and desertion or being absent without leave.  Action will be taken to separate a member for misconduct when it is clearly established that rehabilitation is impractical or unlikely to succeed.  Army policy states that an under other than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate; however, a general, under honorable conditions or an honorable discharge may be granted.   

2.  Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7a, provides that an honorable discharge is a separation with honor and entitles the recipient to benefits provided by law.  The honorable characterization is appropriate when the quality of the member’s service generally has met the standards of acceptable conduct and performance of duty for Army personnel, or is otherwise so meritorious that any other characterization would be clearly inappropriate.  Whenever there is doubt, it is to be resolved in favor of the individual.

3.  Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7b, provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions.  When authorized, it is issued to a Soldier whose military record is satisfactory but not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge.  A characterization of under honorable conditions may be issued only when the reason for the Soldier’s separation specifically allows such characterization.

DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The applicant’s request for an upgrade of the characterization of his discharge was carefully considered.  However, after examining the applicant’s record of service, his available military records, and the issue and document submitted with the application, there are insufficient mitigating factors to merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge.

2.  The DD Form 214 also indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12b, by reason of a pattern of misconduct, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.  Barring evidence to the contrary, the presumption of government regularity prevails as it appears that all the requirements of law and regulation were met and the rights of the applicant were fully protected throughout the separation process.  

3.  The applicant provided no independent corroborating evidence demonstrating that either the command's action was erroneous or that the applicant’s service mitigated the misconduct or poor duty performance.

4.  The applicant contends he did not have any Article 15s during his eight years of service and did not receive one when he was discharged.  The applicant's contention was carefully considered.  However, the analyst is unable to determine whether his contention has merit because the facts and circumstances leading to the discharge are unknown.  

5.  If the applicant desires a personal appearance hearing, it will be his responsibility to meet the burden of proof and provide the appropriate documents (i.e., the discharge packet) or other evidence sufficient to explain the facts, circumstances, and reasons underlying the separation action, for the Board’s consideration because they are not available in the official record.

6.  Therefore, based on the available evidence and the government presumption of regularity, it appears the reason for discharge and the characterization of service are both proper and equitable, thus recommend the Board deny relief. 

SUMMARY OF ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING:

Type of Hearing:  Records Review        Date:  1 May 2013          Location: Washington, DC

Did the Applicant Testify?  No 

Counsel: NA

Witnesses/Observers: NA 

Board Vote:
Character Change:  0	No Change:  5
Reason Change:	0	No Change:  5
(Board member names available upon request)

Board Action Directed:
Issue a new DD Form 214:			No
Change Characterization to:		No Change
Change Reason to:				No Change
Change Authority for Separation:		No Change
Change RE Code to:			No Change
Grade Restoration to:			NA
Other:						NA















Legend:
AMHRR - Army Military Human Resource Record	FG - Field Grade	IADT – Initial Active Duty Training	 	RE - Reentry
AWOL - Absent Without Leave	GD - General Discharge	NA - Not applicable	SCM- Summary Court Martial
BCD - Bad Conduct Discharge	HS - High School	NIF - Not in File	SPCM - Special Court Martial
CG - Company Grade Article 15	HD - Honorable Discharge	OAD - Ordered to Active Duty	UNC - Uncharacterized Discharge  
CID - Criminal investigation Department	MP – Military Police	OMPF - Official Military Personnel File	UOTHC - Under Other Than                           			               Honorable Conditions


ADRB Case Report and Directive (cont)		AR20130000959



Page 5 of 5 pages


ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (ADRB)

CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE



1