ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080001880
Applicant Name: ????? The intermediate commander's reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Certification Signature Board Vote: Approval Authority: Character - Change 1 No change 4 Reason - Change 0 No change 5 (Board member names available upon request) EDGAR J. YANGER Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080001882
Applicant Name: ????? The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in her own behalf. Army Regulation 635-200 also provides, except in cases of serious misconduct, that a soldiers service will be uncharacterized when her separation is initiated while the soldier is in entry level status.
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080001887
The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, voluntarily and unconditionally waived consideration of his case by an administrative separation board and submitted a statement in his own behalf. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080001916
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 26 March 2004, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 5-17, AR 635-200, by reason of other designated physical or mental condition, specifically for having been diagnosed with an adjustment disorder with depressed mood, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Certification Signature Board Vote: Approval Authority: Character...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080002078
Applicant Name: ????? The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. On 13 April 2004, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general under honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080002079
Applicant Name: ????? It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge. Certification Signature Board Vote: Approval Authority: Character - Change 0 No change 5 Reason - Change 0 No change 5 (Board member names available upon request) EDGAR J. YANGER Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080002080
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 13 December 2006, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct commission of a serious offense on 19 October 2006, you received a Field Grade Article 15 for drug use, with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. On 21 December 2006, the separation authority approved the unconditional waiver...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080002081
Applicant Name: ????? Yes No Counsel: None Witnesses/Observers: None Exhibits Submitted: None VIII. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief.
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080002082
Applicant Name: ????? On 19 August 2005, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general under honorable conditions. Certification Signature Board Vote: Approval Authority: Character - Change 0 No change 5 Reason - Change 0 No change 5 (Board member names available upon request) EDGAR J. YANGER Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080002083
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 18 September 1996, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct for wrongful use of marijuana (960705), with an under other that honorable conditions discharge. Certification Signature Board Vote: Approval Authority: Character - Change 0 No change 5 Reason - Change 0 No change 5 (Board member names...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080002084
Applicant Name: ????? His DD Form 214 indicates that he was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 12c( 2) by reason of misconduct, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions discharge. The DD Form 214 indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 12c (2) by reason of misconduct-drug abuse, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080002085
Applicant Name: ????? By abusing illegal drugs, the applicant knowingly risked a military career and diminished the quality of service below that meriting a general or honorable discharge. Army Regulation 635-200 also provides, except in cases of serious misconduct, that a soldiers service will be uncharacterized when his separation is initiated while the soldier is in entry level status.
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080002086
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 22 December 2006, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconductfor Patterns of Misconduct in that your past conduct make you a disruptive influence on the unit and your continued retention will have an adverse impact on morale, and good order and discipline, with a general under honorable conditions...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080002088
Applicant Name: ????? Applicant enlisted in the Kansas Army National Guard on 990519 for 6 years. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial.
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080002091
Applicant Name: ????? The unit commander recommended approval of the Chapter 10 request with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the Applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080002092
On 15 April 1994, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of AR 635-200, Chapter 5, paragraph 5-13, by reason of personality disorder, diagnosed by a medically qualified psychiatrist as suffering from a personality disorder of such severity that it impairs his ability to perform his daily military duties. On 22 April 1994, the separation authority directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of fully...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080002093.
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 20 November 2002, the unit commander notified the Applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 13, AR 635-200, by reason of unsatisfactory performance for having received a Field Grade Article 15 on 3 September 2002 for multiple failures to report and having been counseled numerous other times for misconduct, with a general under honorable conditions discharge. On 21 November...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080002096
Applicant Name: ????? The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. On 16 September 2005, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general under honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080002097
Applicant Name: ????? The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. Certification Signature Board Vote: Approval Authority: Character - Change 0 No change 5 Reason - Change 0 No change 5 (Board member names available upon request) EDGAR J. YANGER Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080002099
The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. On 30 December 2003, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080002104
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 15 January 2002, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct between on or about 11 April 2001 and 11 May 2001 the applicant wrongfully used marijuana, and between on or about 26 September 2001 and 26 October 2001, you again wrongfully used marijuana, with a general under honorable conditions discharge. The applicant...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080002106
The regulations state I can never join the active army with the RE code 4. the re code should not be 4. please help with my records so I can return to active service." The narrative reason specified by Army Regulations for a discharge under this paragraph is "Misconduct (Drug Abuse)", the separation code is "JKQ", and the reentry code is "RE 4".
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080002108
Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed? On 7 May 2007, the Deputy Assistant Secretary (Army Review Boards) approved the recommendation of the Army Ad Hoc Review Board and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The applicants discharge was appropriate because the quality of her service was not consistent with the Army's standards for acceptable personal conduct and performance of duty...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080002109
Applicant Name: ????? Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The Applicant states in effect: "I enlisted with asthma but i was told when i went to basic if there were any secrets that i was hiding i i came forward at the present time there would be no repercations against me for comming forward and telling the truth. The evidence of record shows the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 8, paragraph 8-35i(1), NGR 600-200, by reason of acts or...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080002218
Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 8 August 2005, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense for wrongful use of marijuana on two separate occasions; willfully and without authority damaged military property of the United States; assault consummated by battery, failed to report for duty on several occasions; disrespectful in language...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080002220
Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed? The DD Form 214 indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 10, AR 635-200, for the good of the service in lieu trial by court-martial with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080002222
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 14 June 2007, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconductcommission of a serious offense in that you did between on or about (070101-070404) wrongfully used cocaine, and failed to go to his appointed place of duty (070412), with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 22 June 2007, the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080002226
Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed? On 4 February 2005, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of honorable. Certification Signature Board Vote: Approval Authority: Character - Change 0 No change 5 Reason - Change 0 No change 5 (Board member names available upon request) EDGAR J. YANGER Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080002228
Applicant Name: ????? Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080002230
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 8 November 2006, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct (Commission of a Serious Offense)for assault, disrespect, failure to repair, AWOL and other misconduct, with a general under honorable conditions discharge. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080002235
On 5 November 1999, the separation authority approved the discharge with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080002238
Applicant Name: ????? Discharge Under Review Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: Not In File Discharge Received: Date: 000601 Chapter: 8-26n AR: NGR 600-200 Reason: Failure to Report to IADT Phase I or II RE: SPD: NA Unit/Location: HHC, 2d Bn, 113th IN, Riverdale, NJ Time Lost: None Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None Counseling Records Available: Yes No IV. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080002242
Applicant Name: ????? The Army Discharge Review Board is empowered to change the characterization of the discharge only if clemency is determined to be appropriate. Accordingly, the analyst recommends to the Board that the applicants characterization of service be upgraded to general, under honorable conditions based on the overall length and quality of his service to include his combat service in Iraq.
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080002248
On 21 September 2005, the separation authority approved the discharge with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080002251
Applicant Name: ????? Legal Basis for Separation: National Guard Regulation (NGR) 600-200 and Army Regulation 135-91 govern procedures covering enlisted personnel management of the Army National Guard. Therefore, the analyst determined that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service remains both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief.
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080002256
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 28 December 2006, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of pattern of misconduct for failing to report to formations 11 times during the months of August, September and October, with a general under honorable conditions discharge. The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action,...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080002260
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 9 October 2007, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct for pattern of misconduct in that he failed to go several times to the prescribed appointed place of duty, and as a result of wrongful previous overindulgence in intoxicating liquor or drugs was incapacitated for the proper performance of his...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080002262
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 28 April 1999, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct for wrongful use of marijuana on two occasions and numerous incidents of failure to be at his appointed place of duty, with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. On 26 July 1999, the separation authority approved the conditional...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080002267
Applicant Name: ????? The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. On 28 February 2007, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general under honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080002270
Applicant Name: ????? The Board determined that the overall length and quality of the applicants service, to include his combat service, mitigated the discrediting entries in his service record. Certification Signature Board Vote: Approval Authority: Character - Change 5 No change 0 Reason - Change 0 No change 5 (Board member names available upon request) EDGAR J. YANGER Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080002272
Applicant Name: ????? The evidence of record indicates that the applicant was adjudged guilty by a court-martial and that the sentence was approved by the convening authority. After a thorough review of the applicants record and the issue he submitted, the analyst found no cause for clemency and therefore recommend to the Board no clemency.
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080002284
Applicant Name: ????? The applicable Army regulation states that there are circumstances in which the conduct or performance of duty reflected by a single incident provides the basis for a characterization. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080002287
Applicant Name: ????? The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. On 17 November 2000, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080002292
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 15 November 2007, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-pattern of misconduct for wrongfully wearing the rank of Sergeant on his uniform between (070820-071012), and making five false official statements (071025), (071024), (071012), (071010), and (070926), with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. The...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080002293
Applicant Name: ????? Army Regulation 635-200 states that a soldier is in an entry-level status if the soldier has not completed more than 180 days of creditable continuous active duty prior to the initiation of separation action. The analyst determined that no such unusual circumstances were present in the applicants record and his service did not warrant an honorable discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080002296
c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicants military records, and the issue she submitted, the analyst determined that the applicants available record of service during the period under review is void of the specific facts and circumstances concerning the events that led to her discharge from the Army National Guard. The applicant was released from the ARNG and SPD Codes are not applicable when a DD Form 214 is not required. ...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080002300
Applicant Name: ????? Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: See DD Form 293 submitted by the Applicant. The analyst found that the applicant's record shows a properly amended DD Form 215 correcting the characterization of service as Honorable, with the separation authority AR 635-200, paragraph 6-3A, narrative reason as Hardship, separation code as KDB.
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080002301
Applicant Name: ????? The DD Form 214 indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 12c by reason of misconduct, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The DD Form 214 indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 12c by reason of misconduct-drug abuse, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080002303
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 11 August 2006, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconductyou tested positive for the use of an illegal drug, marijuana, a controlled substance, during a 100% urinalysis on 15 May 2006, with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. On 25 October 2006, the separation authority approved the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080002304
The DD Form 214 indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 11, AR 635-200, by reason of entry level performance and conduct with an uncharacterized separation of service. Army Regulation 635-200 provides in pertinent part, that a soldier is in entry-level status for the first 180 days of continuous active duty. Therefore, the analyst determined the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the...