Applicant Name: ?????
Application Receipt Date: 080201 Prior Review: Prior Review Date: 17 July 07, ABCMR, denied (RE Code change)
I. Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change
Issues: See DD Form 293 and documents submitted by the applicant. The applicant provided copies of document that indicated he received two Army Commendation Medals that are not in his OMPF.
II. Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?
Tender Offer: NA
See Attachments: Legal Medical Minority Opinion Exhibits
III. Discharge Under Review
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: 050829
Discharge Received: Date: 060105 Chapter: 14 AR: 635-200
Reason: Misconduct (Drug Abuse) RE: SPD: JKK Unit/Location: A Co., 2/2 IN BN, Vilseck, Germany
Time Lost: None
Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): 050722, wrongful use of Ecstasy and controlling a vehicle while under the influence of Ecstasy (050617), reduction to E1, forfeiture of $617.00 for two months, and extra duty for 45 days (FG).
Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None
Counseling Records Available: Yes No
IV. Soldiers Overall Record
Age at current enlistment: 18
Current ENL Date: 020828 Current ENL Term: 04 Years ?????
Current ENL Service: 03 Yrs, 04Mos, 08Days ?????
Total Service: 03 Yrs, 04Mos, 08Days ?????
Previous Discharges: None
Highest Grade: E4 Performance Ratings Available: Yes No
MOS: 11B Infantryman GT: 90 EDU: HS Grad Overseas: Germany Combat: Iraq (040214-050220)
Decorations/Awards: NDSM, ASR, OSR, CIB, GWOTEM, GWOTSM.
V. Post-Discharge Activity
City, State: Pressath, Germany
Post Service Accomplishments: Not Listed
VI. Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation
a. Facts and Circumstances:
The evidence of record shows that on 29 August 2005, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconductfor wrongful use of Ecstasy and controlling a vehicle while under the influence of Ecstasy, with a general under honorable conditions discharge. He was advised of his rights. The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. The unit commander subsequently recommended separation from the service and waiver of further rehabilitative efforts. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general under honorable conditions discharge. On 16 September 2005, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general under honorable conditions.
b. Legal Basis for Separation:
Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 14 establishes policy and prescribes procedures for separating members for misconduct. Specific categories include minor disciplinary infractions, a pattern of misconduct, and commission of a serious offense, to include abuse of illegal drugs, convictions by civil authorities and desertion or absence without leave. Action will be taken to separate a member for misconduct when it is clearly established that rehabilitation is impractical or unlikely to succeed. Army policy states that an under other than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate, however, a general under honorable conditions or an honorable discharge may be granted.
c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:
After a careful review of all the applicants military records, and the issue and documents he submitted, the analyst found no mitigating factors that would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge. The applicants discharge was appropriate because the quality of his service was not consistent with the Army's standards for acceptable personal conduct and performance of duty by military personnel. By his misconduct, the applicant diminished the quality of his service below that meriting a fully honorable discharge. The applicant provided no independent corroborating evidence demonstrating that either the command's action was erroneous or that the applicants service mitigated the misconduct or poor duty performance. Therefore, the analyst determined that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief.
VII. Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing
Type of Hearing: Date: 14 November 2008 Location: Washington, DC
Did the Applicant Testify? Yes No
Counsel: NA
Witnesses/Observers: NA
Exhibits Submitted: NA
VIII. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief.
IX. Board Decision
XI. Certification Signature
Board Vote: Approval Authority:
Character - Change 1 No change 4
Reason - Change 0 No change 5
(Board member names available upon request)
EDGAR J. YANGER
Colonel, U.S. Army
President, Army Discharge Review Board
Issue a new DD Form 214
Change Characterization to:
Change Reason to: NA
Other: NA
RE Code:
Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA
ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE
Case Number AR20080002096
______________________________________________________________________________
Page 1 of 2 pages
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080006731
The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in her own behalf. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 20 August 2004, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general,...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060016235
Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 8 December 2004, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense for use of illegal drugs-cocaine, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. ...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070018437
Applicant Name: ????? Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080008395
Out of four years of service in the Army I never had a disciplinary action until 2004. I just want to be considered so the Re-Entry gets change to be able to enter the service. The applicant, as a soldier, had the duty to support and abide by the Army's drug policies.
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080011242
Application Receipt Date: 2008/07/16 Prior Review: Prior Review Date: NA I. The Ad Hoc Review Board met; and on 6 May 2008, the Deputy Assistant Secretary (Army Review Boards), approved the recommendation of the Army Ad Hoc Review Board, and directed that the applicant be discharged from the U.S. Army with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The evidence of record shows that the separation authority approved the applicant's discharge under the provisions...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090014124
Applicant Name: ????? The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, unconditionally waived his right to an administrative separation board, and submitted a statement in his own behalf. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE Case...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090009321
Applicant Name: ????? On 28 January 2000, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE Case Number...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090010799
The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, waived consideration his case by an administrative separation board, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. On 2 May 2006, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090006970
Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 1 October 2007, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconductabuse of illegal drugs, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The applicant's DD Form 214 indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 12c(2), AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct (Drug Abuse),...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060007840
The Board determined that the applicant's overall length and quality of service to include his combat service, mitigated the discrediting entries in his service record. Accordingly, the Board voted to grant partial relief in the form of an upgrade of the characterization of service to general, under honorable conditions. Board Action Directed No Change Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: E4 XI.