ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080000150
Applicant Name: ????? The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. On 17 November 2006, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general under honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080000153
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 20 June 2006, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconductfor commission of a serious offense, drug abuse, with a general under honorable conditions discharge. The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action,he requested consideration of administrative separation board if he...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080000155
His DD Form 214 indicates that he was released from active duty training under the provisions of Chapter 4, AR 635-200 by reason of completion of required active service, with service uncharacterized. The evidence of record shows that the applicant, while in entry-level status, was released from active duty for training under the provisions of Chapter 4, AR 635-200, by reason of completion of required active service, with service uncharacterized. The characterization of service for...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080000158
Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed? Furthermore, the analyst noted the applicants issue that he should have been medically discharged, however, the record indicates that his medical condition (asthma) was not what caused his misconduct that led to the separation action. Certification Signature Board Vote: Approval Authority: Character - Change 0 No change 5 Reason - Change 0 No change 5 (Board member names available upon request) EDGAR J. YANGER Colonel,...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080000162
The separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general under honorable conditions. The applicant, as a soldier, had the duty to support and abide by the Army's drug policies. Certification Signature Board Vote: Approval Authority: Character - Change 0 No change 5 Reason - Change 0 No change 5 (Board member names available upon request) EDGAR J. YANGER Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080000164
On 21 February 2007, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general under honorable conditions. Therefore, the analyst determined the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080000167
Applicant Name: ????? It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge. Certification Signature Board Vote: Approval Authority: Character - Change 0 No change 5 Reason - Change 0 No change 5 (Board member names available upon request) EDGAR J. YANGER Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080000169
Legal Basis for Separation: National Guard Regulation (NGR) 600-200 and Army Regulation 135-91 govern procedures covering enlisted personnel management of the Army National Guard. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the characterization of service was too harsh based on the applicants...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080000171
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 18 January 2007, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconductfor wrongfully using cocaine on about 060924 and 061024, with a general under honorable conditions discharge. On 7 February 2007, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080000173
Applicant Name: ????? The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief.
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080000177
The evidence of record shows that the applicant, while in entry-level status, was released from active duty for training under the provisions of Chapter 4, AR 635-200, by reason of completion of required active service, with service uncharacterized. A Soldier is in entry-level status for the first 180 days of continuous active duty. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080000182
Applicant Name: ????? The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and elected to submit a statement in his own behalf. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the characterization of service was too harsh based on the applicants length and...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080000198
Applicant Name: ????? On 21 June 2006, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general under honorable conditions. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE Case Number...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080000209
Applicant Name: ????? The DD Form 214 indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 11, AR 635-200, by reason of entry level performance and conduct with an uncharacterized separation of service. Army Regulation 635-200 provides in pertinent part, that a soldier is in entry-level status for the first 180 days of continuous active duty.
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080000222
The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, voluntarily waived consideration of his case by an Administrative Separation Board contingent upon him receiving a characterization of service no less favorable than general, under honorable conditions and did submit a statement in his own behalf. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general under honorable...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080000224
Applicant Name: ????? The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, voluntary waived consideration of his case by an Administrative Separation Board contigent upon him receiving a characterization of service no less favorable than general, under honorable conditions, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080000225
Applicant Name: ????? Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. Certification Signature Board Vote: Approval Authority: Character - Change 2 No change 3 Reason - Change 0 No change 5 (Board member names available upon request) EDGAR J. YANGER Colonel, U.S....
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080000241
Applicant Name: ????? A counseling statement dated 050317 indicates that, prior to 050407, the Applicant received a company grade Article 15 for failing to go to his prescribed place of duty as well as a field grade Article 15 for violating his restriction from the previous Article 15; however, there are no specific facts or circumstances in the record of evidence regarding these actions. On 27 December 2005, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080000242
On 20 July 1998, the PEB determined the Applicant's injury prevented reasonable performance of duties required by grade and military specialty. The characterization of service for Soldiers separated under the provisions of Chapter 4, AR 635-40 will normally be honorable unless the Soldier is in an entry-level status. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the Applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080000244
Applicant Name: ????? Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the Applicant was aware of that prior to requesting...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080000253
Applicant Name: ????? The applicant waived her right to consult with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in her own behalf. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicants military records, and the independent evidence she submitted, the analyst recommends to the Board that the applicants characterization of service be upgraded to fully honorable.
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080000256
Applicant Name: ????? Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080000274
Applicant Name: ????? The Board recommended separation with a general discharge. The separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general under honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080000275
The DD Form 214 shows a characterization of service as uncharacterized, with the separation authority AR 635-200, paragraph 6-3A, narrative reason of Harship, separation code of KDB and a reentry code (RE) of "3". The analyst determined that no such unusual circumstances were present in the applicant's record and his service did not warrant an honorable discharge. Certification Signature Board Vote: Approval Authority: Character - Change 0 No change 5 Reason - Change 0 No change 5 (Board...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080000276
The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 18 March 2003, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Certification Signature Board Vote: Approval Authority: Character - Change 0 No change 5 Reason - Change 0 No change...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080000277
Applicant Name: ????? Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080000278
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 22 March 1996, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct, for driving under the influence of alcohol and the more serious offense of your use of an illegal substance, with a general under honorable conditions discharge. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080000279
Applicant Name: ????? The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, voluntarily waived consideration of his case by an administrative separation board, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with an under other than honorable conditions discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080000280
Applicant Request Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: See DD Form 293 and attached documents submitted by the applicant. On 06 June 2006, the separation authority approved the discharge with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. Board Action Directed No Change Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: E-4 XI.
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080000281
Applicant Name: ????? It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080000282
Applicant Name: ????? Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080000283
Applicant Name: ????? The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, waived consideration of her case by an administrative separation board, and did not submit a statement in her own behalf. On 5 August 2007, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080000284
Applicant Name: ????? Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080000285
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 10 August 2007, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-pattern of misconduct for failure to report x 5 (061207), (061208), (061212), (061215) and (070104); arrested for domestic violence between (070618-070721); and AWOL (070723-070724), with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The intermediate commander...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080000290
Applicant Request Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: See DD Form 293 and attached documents submitted by the applicant. The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, requested consideration of his case by an administrative separation board, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. His DD Form 214 indicates that he was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 12c by reason of misconduct,...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080000292
Applicant Name: ????? Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080000324
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 23 April 2007, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconductcommission of a serious offense for wrongful use of marijuana on two separate occasions, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 30 April 2007, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080000459
Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation a. The Ad Hoc Review Board met; and on 11 August 2006, the Deputy Assistant Secretary (Army Review Boards) approved the recommendation of the Army Ad Hoc Review Board, accepted the applicant's resignation and directed that the applicant be discharge with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080000533
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 1 November 2000, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense for testing positive for cocaine (000807); received a Field Grade Article 15, reduced to E-3, forfeiture of $667 x 1, 45 days extra duty and 45 days restriction, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. ...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080000574
On 26 October 2005, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of AR 635-200, Chapter 5, paragraph 5-13, by reason of personality disorder, for being diagnosed with a personality disorder within the meaning of ICD-9, AR40-501, AR 635-200 and DSM-IV. On 8 November 2005, the separation authority directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of fully honorable. The narrative reason specified by Army...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080000603
Applicant Name: ????? Application Receipt Date: 080107 Prior Review: Prior Review Date: NA I. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080000613
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 11 July 2005, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-pattern of misconduct for receiving a Field Grade Article 15 on (050406), received a Company Grade Article 15 on (040518), and three (3) counseling statements (041104), (041004) and (040920), with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. ...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080000621
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 9 November 2004, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense for testing positive for use of an illegal substance, with a general under honorable conditions discharge. However, the applicant's election of rights and the unit commander's recommendation that the applicant be...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080000622
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 30 June 2003, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of AR 635-200, Chapter 5, Paragraph 5-17, Other Designated Physical or Mental Conditions, by reason of being treated extensively for medial malleolar stress fractures; however, the prognosis and recovery time would unreasonably interfere with her ability to successful ship to training, with service...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080000625
Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 7 October 2007, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense for receiving a Summary Court-Martial (070902), for failure to report, disrespect towards an officer, assaulted an NCO, dereliction of duty, consuming alcohol, resisted apprehension, and wrongfully communicated a threat towards a CPT x 3...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080000626
Applicant Name: ????? The unit commander's recommendation for approval of an under other than honorable conditions discharge is not part of the available record and the analyst presumed Government regularity in the discharge process. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080000653
Applicant Name: ????? On 26 September 2006, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. By abusing illegal drugs, the applicant knowingly risked a military career and his misconduct diminished the quality of service below that meriting a fully honorable discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080000654
Applicant Name: ????? On 11 June 2007, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Certification Signature Board Vote: Approval Authority: Character - Change 0 No change 5 Reason - Change 0 No change 5 (Board member names available upon request) EDGAR J. YANGER Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080000658
Applicant Name: ????? The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general under honorable conditions discharge. On 27 January 2004, the separation authority approved the conditional waiver of the applicant's right to appear before an administrative separation board and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general under honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080000678
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 22 April 2003, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconductfor assault on a MP, resisting arrest, assault on a NCO, disrespect to a NCO and drunk and disorderly conduct, with a general under honorable conditions discharge. On 29 April 2003, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts...