ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070011403
His DD Form 214 indicates that he was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-civil conviction with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. That DD Form 214 indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, Section II by reason of misconduct-civil conviction, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Certification Signature and Date Approval...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070011405
Applicant Name: ????? Current ENL Service: 02 Yrs, 07 Mos, 19 Days ????? Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial.
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070011406
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 4 May 2005, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconductcommission of a serious offense for receiving a Field Grade Article 15 for wrongfully using marijuana (030502), and the suspended portion was vacated (030509), was accused of using and possessing marijuana in another Soldier's barracks room and was tried...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070011407
Current ENL Service: 01 Yrs, 10 Mos, 01 Days Item 12c on the applicant's DD Form 214, net active service this period is incorrect, should read 01 Yrs, 10 Mos, 01 Days. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. Furthermore, the analyst noted the applicant's...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070011411
Applicant Name: ????? Furthermore, the DD Form 214 shows a Separation Code of JKA (i.e., misconduct-pattern of misconduct.) That DD Form 214 indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12b by reason of misconduct-pattern of misconduct, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070011413
Applicant Name: ????? Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070011419
Applicant Name: ????? The separation authority directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the applicant was not properly notified as to the reasons why he would not get an...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070011421
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 10 May 2004, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconductpattern of misconduct in that you made a false official statement to a SSG, (040304), failed to obey an order from a SGT (040304), disrespect to a 1SG (040305), disobeyed a direct order from a SGT (040329), showed up for formation smelling of alcohol...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070011424
Applicant Name: ????? The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, waived consideration of his case by an administrative separation board and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. On 10 March 2000, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070011426aC071121
Original Character of Discharge Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: 060125 Discharge Received: Date: 060215 Chapter: 10 AR: 635-200 Reason: In Lieu of Trial by Court-Martial RE: SPD: KFS Unit/Location: Company D, 1st Battalion, 222nd Aviation Regiment, Fort Eustis, VA 23604 Time Lost: AWOL, for a total of 133 days from (1 September 2005 to 11 January 2006). On 30 January 2006, the separation authority approved the discharge with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. Yes...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070011463
Applicant Request Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: See applicant's DD Form 293 and attached documents. The applicant's chain of command recommended approval of his request for discharge under the provisions of Chapter 10, AR 635-200 in lieu of trial by court-martial with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070011653
Applicant Name: ????? I was informed that I would have the chance to join again, and I had a new enlistment contract at the time I was discharged, and was supposed to ship to basic training. Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070011689
Applicant Name: ????? Current ENL Service: 00 Yrs, 03 Mos, 23Days ????? It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070011698aC071121
Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 5 October 2004, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct—pattern of misconduct (Soldier tested positive for marijuana on 25 June 2004 and 12 August 2004), with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 25 October 2004, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070011711
Applicant Name: ????? Current ENL Service: 2 Yrs, 1 Mos, 18 Days The applicant has a period of AWOL that was not shown on her DD Form 214, item 29 (Time Lost). Board Action Directed No Change Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA XI.
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070011712
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 8 April 1996, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense for being found guilty by a Summary Court-Martial for 18 days AWOL, and two specifications of use of marijuana, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 11 April 1996, the separation authority waived...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070011727
On 08 September 2006, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of AR 635-200, Chapter 5, paragraph 5-13, by reason of personality disorder, diagnosed by a medically qualified psychiatrist as suffering from a long standiing disorder of character and behavior, which is of such severity as to interfere with his being able to adequately serve in the U.S. Army. The regulation also directs that commanders will not take action prescribed in...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070011733
Applicant Name: ????? On 29 March 1994, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, requested consideration of his case by an administrative separation board, and submitted a statement on his own behalf. On 22 July 1994, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070011738
Applicant Request Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: See enclosed DD Form 293 submitted by the applicant. Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation a. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial.
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070011743aC071121
Confinement for a total of 84 days (070216-070510) by military authority, as a result of his Special Court-Martial on (070216). Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 14 May 2007, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct—commission of a serious offense (found guilty by Special Court-Martial of being absent without leave and wrongful use and possession of controlled...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070011748
Current ENL Service: 02 Yrs, 02 Mos, 24 Days ????? On 20 March 2006, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of AR 635-200, Chapter 5, Paragraph 5-17, Other Designated Physical Or Mental Conditions, by reason of a physical condition, not a disability (dysthymic disorder), and was previously diagnosed with a personality disorder, both which affected his ability to perform military duties, with an honorable discharge. The intermediate...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070011755
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 12 April 2002, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14-12b, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct for receiving two company grade Article 15s for failure to report X 6 and failure to pay just debt (010801) and failure to report X 3 (020401), with a general under honorable conditions discharge. On 25 April 2002, the separation authority...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070011759
His DD Form 214 indicates that he was discharged under the provisions of AR 635-200, Chapter 5, paragraph 5-13, by reason of personality disorder, with a characterization of service of honorable, and a reentry eligibility (RE) code of "3." His DD Form 214 indicates that he was appropriately discharged under the provisions of AR 635-200, Chapter 5, paragraph 5-13, by reason of personality disorder, with a characterization of service of honorable. With this type of discharge, the applicant...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070011760
Applicant Name: ????? The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Army policy states that an under other than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate, but a general discharge under honorable conditions or an honorable discharge may be granted.
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070011761
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 16 December 1997, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14-12b, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct for committing numerous military and civilian violations, to include writing bad checks, making false official statements, AWOL (971210-971211), failure to report (971212), with a general under honorable conditions discharge. The...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070011762
Applicant Name: ????? The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with an honorable discharge. Accordingly, the analyst recommends to the Board that the applicants characterization of service be upgraded to fully honorable.
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070011763
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 8 March 2001, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconductconviction by civil court and serious misconduct for being convicted of sexual battery by the State of Tennessee (010226), and on 11 June 1998, received a General Officer Memorandum of Reprimand for DUI, with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. On 5...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070011766
Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 16 March 2006, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 15, AR 635-200, by reason of homosexual conduct for making a statement admitting that she is bisexual and could not abide by the Army's homosexual policy, with an uncharacterized discharge. The applicant waived legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and submitted a statement in her own...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070011768
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 4 April 1996, after careful consideration of medical records, laboratory findings, and medical examinations, the Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) found that the applicant was medically unfit for enlistment in accordance with current medical fitness standards and in the opinion of the evaluating physicians the conditions existed prior to service. On 12 April 1996, the separation authority approved the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070011782
Current ENL Service: 00 Yrs, 10Mos, 13Days ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 23 November 1994, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 13, AR 635-200, by reason of unsatisfactory performance for failure of two consecutive Army Physical Fitness Test, with a honorable discharge. Regulations currently in effect list the narrative reason for separation as Physical Standards. Accordingly,...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070011786
The applicant waived legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. On 7 February 2005, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with an uncharacterized separation of service. By abusing illegal drugs, the applicant knowingly risked a military career and diminished the quality of his service below that meriting a fully honorable or a general, under...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070011791
On 9 February 2006, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 5-17, AR 635-200, by reason of physical condition, not a disability with a honorable discharge for being diagnosed as experiencing an adjustment disorder, unspecified and represents a psychiatric condition. Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200 provides the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. The narrative reason specified by...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070011878
Applicant Name: ????? Original Character of Discharge Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: 040919 Discharge Received: Date: 050515 Chapter: 8-26e(2) NGR: 600-200 Reason: Acts or Patterns of Misconduct RE: SPD: NA Unit/Location: 972d Military Police Co (716), Melrose, MA Time Lost: None Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None Court-Martials (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None Counseling Records Available: Yes No IV. The intermediate commanders reviewed the proposed discharge action and...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070012011
It indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Paragraph 8-27f, NGR 600-200, by reason of unsatisfactory participation with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions and a reenlistment eligibility (RE) Code of " 3." Legal Basis for Separation: National Guard Regulation (NGR) 600-200 and Army Regulation 135-178 govern procedures covering enlisted personnel of the Army National Guard. An enlisted member separated for misconduct which...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070012014
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 23 June 2004, the applicant stated in a memorandum to the unit commander and the first sergeant that prior to submitting this statement, she had complied with the Army homosexual "Dont Ask, Don't Tell" policy. The analyst noted that the applicant was entitled to have her case reviewed by an administrative separation board and that an administrative separation board is a right and required under the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070012015
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 27 April 2007, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 11, AR 635-200, by reason of entry level performance and conduct for failure to adapt and being diagnosed with a panic disorder, with an uncharacterized discharge. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicants military records during the period of...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070012022
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 11, AR 635-200, by reason of entry level performance and conduct for demonstrated character and behavior characteristics not compatible with satisfactory continued service, with an uncharacterized discharge. The separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be separated from the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070012079
Applicant Name: ????? The applicant waived legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and submitted a statement in his own behalf. Certification Signature Board Vote: Approval Authority: Character - Change 0 No change 0 Reason - Change 0 No change 5 (Board member names available upon request) EDGAR J. YANGER Issue a new DD Form 214 Colonel, U.S. Army Change Characterization to: President, Army Discharge Review Board Change Reason to: Other: NA RE Code: Grade...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070012107
Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 7 October 2003, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconductcommission of a serious offense for receiving a Field Grade Article 15 for being AWOL (030815 to 030914), with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The applicant waived legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, waived consideration of...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070012108
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 26 October 1999, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconductpattern of misconduct for continued misconduct with an honorable discharge. The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in her own behalf.
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070012109
Applicant Request Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: See DD Form 293 and attached documents submitted by the applicant. Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070012112
The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070012113
Applicant Request Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: See DD Form 293 and attached documents submitted by the applicant. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Official: CHRISTINE U....
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070012117
Applicant Name: ????? Applicant Request Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: See enclosed DD Form 293 submitted by the applicant. On 27 March 2007, the separation authority approved the discharge with an under other than honorable conditions discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070012118aC071121
The applicant waived legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. Army Regulation 635-200, Chapter 5, Paragraph 5-13 (h), indicates that the service of a Soldier separated under this provision will be characterized as honorable. Accordingly, the analyst recommends that the applicant's characterization of service be upgraded to fully honorable.
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070012119
The applicant consulted with legal counsel and voluntarily requested consideration of his case by an administrative separation board, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. The record further shows that the unit commander reinitiated notification proceedings and notified the applicant that he was initiating separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconductcommission of a serious offense, tested positive for the use of marijuana (050506),...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070012120
Applicant Name: ????? The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. On 8 August 1996, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070012121
Applicant Name: ????? On 29 September 1999, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The applicant's record contains a Military Police Report dated 25 September 1998. b.
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070012122
Applicant Request Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: See DD Form 293 and attached document submitted by the applicant. Total Service: 01 Yrs, 00 Mos, 19Days Includes 36 days of excess leave (070309-070413). On 28 March 2007, the separation authority approved the discharge with an under other than honorable conditions discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070012123
Applicant Request Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: I have been discharged now for over three years, and every time I go for employment my discharge from the Army is the only thing they see. The evidence of record clearly shows that the applicant was adjudged guilty by court-martial and that the sentence was approved by the convening authority. After a thorough review of the applicants record and the issues he submitted, the analyst found no cause for clemency and...