Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070011689
Original file (AR20070011689.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
Applicant Name: ?????

Application Receipt Date: 070820	

Prior Review    Prior Review Date: None

I.  Applicant Request
Request:  Upgrade     Reason Change     RE Code Change    

Issues: I WAS GOING TO BE DISCHARGED DUE TO THE FACT THAT I WASNT ADDAPTING WELL.  MY FATHER AND MOTHER WERE GOING THROUGH BAD HEALTH PROBLEMS AND REALLY DIDNT HAVE ANYONE TO TRANSLATE. THEY DO NOT SPEAK ENGLISH.  IT TOOK SO LONG FOR ME TO BE DISCHARGED THAT I LEFT.  JUST IT WAS WRONG FOR ME; BUT WHY IF I WAS GOING TO BE DISCHARGED DID IT TAKE SO LONG?  I DECIDED TO LEAVE AND HELP MY PARENTS.  IF I WAS WAITING ON MY DISCHARGE PAPERS WHY COULDNT RECEIVE A HIGHER DISCHARGE THAN I DID?

II.  Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?  
Yes    No        Tender Offer:   ?????

See Attachments:  Legal     Medical     Minority Opinion     Exhibits 

III.  Original Character of Discharge
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge:    Date: NIF
Discharge Received:     Date: 020728   
Chapter: 10     AR: 635-200
Reason: In Lieu of Trial by Court-Martial
RE:     SPD: KFS
Unit/Location: B Co, 30th AG Bn, Fort Benning, GA 31905 

Time Lost: AWOL for 204 days (011105-020528), apprehended.

Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None

Court-Martials (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None

Counseling Records Available: Yes    No 

IV.  Soldier’s Overall Record
Year/Month:  8309  
HOR City, State: Ashland, AL
Current ENL Date: 010821    Current ENL Term: 4 Years  ?????
Current ENL Service: 00  Yrs, 03 Mos, 23Days ?????
Total Service:  00  Yrs, 03 Mos, 23 Days ?????
Previous Discharges: None
Highest Grade: E-1
Performance Ratings Available: Yes    No 
MOS: None   GT: 109   EDU: HS Grad   Overseas: None   Combat: None
Decorations/Awards: None

V.  Post-Discharge Activity
Post Service Accomplishments: None Listed

VI.  Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation

      a.  Facts and Circumstances:
      The evidence of record shows that on 6 June 2002, the applicant was charged with AWOL (011105-020529).  On 6 June 2002, the applicant consulted with legal counsel and voluntarily requested, in writing, discharge under the provisions of Chapter 10, AR 635-200 in lieu of trial by court-martial.  In this request, the applicant admitted guilt to the offense, or a lesser included offense.  Further, the applicant indicated that he understood that he could receive an under other than honorable conditions discharge and that the discharge would have a significant effect on eligibility for veteran’s benefits.  The applicant did not submit a statement in his own behalf.  The unit commander recommended approval of an under other than honorable conditions discharge.  On 14 June 2002, the separation authority approved the discharge with an under other than honorable conditions discharge.  

      b.  Legal Basis for Separation:  
      Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial.  The request may be submitted at any time after charges have been preferred and must include the individual’s admission of guilt.  Army policy states that although an honorable or general discharge is authorized, a discharge under other than honorable conditions is normally considered appropriate.
      
      
      
      
      

      c.  Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:  
      After a careful review of all the applicant’s military records during the period of enlistment under review, the issues and document he submitted, the analyst found no mitigating factors that would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge.  The evidence of record shows the applicant was charged with the commission of an offense punishable under the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) with a punitive discharge.  The applicant consulted with defense counsel, and voluntarily in writing, requested separation from the Army in lieu of trial by court-martial.  In doing so, the applicant admitted guilt to the stipulated or lesser-included offenses under the UCMJ.  The analyst noted that all the requirements of law and regulation were met and the rights of the applicant were fully protected throughout the separation process.  It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge.  Furthermore, the analyst noted the applicant's issue and determined that the applicant had many legitimate avenues through which to obtain assistance or relief, without committing the misconduct, which led to the separation action under review.  In view of the foregoing, the analyst determined the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief.

VII.  Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing 

Type of Hearing: 			Date: 15 August 2008              
Location: Washington, DC

Did the Applicant Testify?  Yes     No  

Counsel: NA

Witnesses/Observers: NA 

Exhibits Submitted: NA




VIII.  Board Decision
The discharge was:			Proper	 	Improper	
				                 	Equitable	 	Inequitable	

The characterization of service was:   Proper	 	Improper	
				                 	Equitable	 	Inequitable	

The narrative reasons were: 	       	Equitable	 	Inequitable	

DRB voting record:  		      Change 0    No change 5   - Character
		 			      Change 0    No change 5   - Reason
					      (Board member names available upon request)

IX.  Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief.





















  

								        
X.  Board Action Directed
No Change 
Issue a new DD Form 214  
Change Characterization to:    
Change Reason to: None
Other: NA
RE Code:  
Grade Restoration:   No   Yes  Grade: None

XI.  Certification Signature and Date
Approval Authority: 

MARK E. COLLINS
Colonel, U.S. Army
President, Army Discharge Review Board

Official: 


CHRISTINE U. MARTINSON			DATE: 19 August 2009
Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army
Chief, Secretary Recorder
ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE

Case Number AR20070011689
______________________________________________________________________


Page 1 of 5 pages

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080007222

    Original file (AR20080007222.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Request Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: See DD Form 293 and attached documents submitted by the Applicant II. Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. The available record also includes a counseling statement dated 4 September 2001 indicating the applicant failed to report for a unit wide urinalysis test after he was called and directed by a noncommissioned officer.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060006720

    Original file (AR20060006720.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090015633

    Original file (AR20090015633.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Discharge Under Review Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: 041001 Discharge Received: Date: 041013 Chapter: 10 AR: 635-200 Reason: In Lieu of Trial by Court-Martial RE: SPD: KFS Unit/Location: Company B, 30th AG (Reception) Battalion, Fort Benning, GA Time Lost: AWOL x 1 for a total of 1,052 days from (011105-040921). Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060014936

    Original file (AR20060014936.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Request Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: I wish for my discharge to be upgraded because I was young and committed a very stupid action. Soldier’s Overall Record DOB: 740829 Current ENL Date: 930806 Current ENL Term: 4 Years ????? It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070014007

    Original file (AR20070014007.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation a. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070013670

    Original file (AR20070013670.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 25 October 2004, the separation authority approved the Chapter 10 request with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. The request may be submitted at any time after charges have been preferred and must include the individual’s admission of guilt.

  • AF | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060015157

    Original file (AR20060015157.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. Therefore, the analyst determined the reason for discharge and the characterization of...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060014124

    Original file (AR20060014124.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Original Character of Discharge Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: NIF Discharge Received: Date: 051206 Chapter: 10 AR: 635-200 Reason: In Lieu of trial by Court Martial RE: SPD: KFS Unit/Location: US Army 82nd Replacement Detachment, 82nd Paratrooper Support Battalion, 82nd Airborne Division, Fort Bragg, NC 28310 Time Lost: AWOL, for a total of 1,552 days from (01/07/11-05/10/13). On 18 November 2005, the separation authority approved the discharge with an under other than honorable...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070012364

    Original file (AR20070012364.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Current ENL Service: 00 Yrs, 04 Mos, 26Days ????? It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070009630

    Original file (AR20070009630.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Applicant Request Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: I received an other than honorable discharge in lieu of court martial for going AWOL. Since I have left the army I divorce my husband, obtained a 2 year associated degree in Paralegal studies and have had 2 children.