ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022582
IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 4 November 2010 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100022582 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant states he was released from active duty and not given the opportunity to use PDMRA days he earned and was entitled to. The available evidence shows the applicant served a qualifying period of active duty service under 10 USC for award of PDMRA.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022584
BOARD DATE: 2 November 2010 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100022584 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant states he was released from active duty and not given the opportunity to use PDMRA days he earned and was entitled to. The available evidence shows the applicant served a qualifying period of active duty service under 10 USC for award of PDMRA.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022585
Appendix B shows that during his service in Vietnam, the applicant participated in the following five campaigns: * Vietnam Counteroffensive Phase V (1 July - 1 November 1968) * Vietnam Counteroffensive Phase VI (2 November 1968 - 22 February 1969) * TET 69, Counteroffensive, 1969 (23 February - 8 June 1969) * Vietnam Summer - Fall 1969 (9 June - 31 October 1969) * Vietnam Winter - Spring 1970 (1 November 1969 - 30 April 1970) c. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, stated...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022586
IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 21 October 2010 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100022586 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant states he was released from active duty and not given the opportunity to use PDMRA days he earned and was entitled to. The available evidence shows the applicant served a qualifying period of active duty service under 10 USC for award of PDMRA.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022593
IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 4 November 2010 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100022593 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant states he was released from active duty and not given the opportunity to use PDMRA days he earned and was entitled to. The available evidence shows the applicant served a qualifying period of active duty service under 10 USC for award of PDMRA.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022596
BOARD DATE: 2 November 2010 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100022596 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant states he was released from active duty and not given the opportunity to use PDMRA days he earned and was entitled to. The available evidence shows the applicant served a qualifying period of active duty service under 10 USC for award of PDMRA.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022597
BOARD DATE: 2 November 2010 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100022597 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant states he was released from active duty and not given the opportunity to use PDMRA days he earned and was entitled to. The available evidence shows the applicant served a qualifying period of active duty service under 10 USC for award of PDMRA.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022598
BOARD DATE: 2 November 2010 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100022598 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant states he was released from active duty and not given the opportunity to use PDMRA days he earned and was entitled to. The available evidence shows the applicant served a qualifying period of active duty service under 10 USC for award of PDMRA.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022599
BOARD DATE: 2 November 2010 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100022599 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant states he was released from active duty and not given the opportunity to use PDMRA days he earned and was entitled to. The available evidence shows the applicant served a qualifying period of active duty service under 10 USC for award of PDMRA.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022600
IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 4 November 2010 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100022600 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant states she was released from active duty and not given the opportunity to use PDMRA days she earned and was entitled to. The available evidence shows the applicant served a qualifying period of active duty service under 10 USC for award of PDMRA.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022606
The applicant requests removal of duplicate orders awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) from his official military personnel file (OMPF). Paragraph 2-4 contains guidance on changing the OMPF and specifies that the Army Board for Correction of Military Records may direct removal or movement of documents filed in the OMPF in the interest of justice or equity. The evidence of record shows the applicant was issued two orders awarding him the first award of the Army Good Conduct...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022609
He provided a DA Form 2823, dated 13 March 1970, which shows an investigator stated that on 11 March 1970 the applicant's father had been advised by the applicant that action had been initiated to discharge him from the Army because of his homosexual problems. 24 April 1970, the appropriate separation authority approved the applicants discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-212 for unfitness and directed the issuance of a UD Certificate. As a result, the Board recommends...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022613
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. Following consultation with legal counsel, he requested discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Personnel), chapter 10, for the good of the service - in lieu of court-martial. The DD Form 214 the FSM was issued at the time shows he was discharged under other than honorable conditions by reason of for the good of the service - in lieu of court-martial.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022614
On 12 July 2010, the Army Discharge Review Board denied his request to change the narrative reason for separation of his discharge from personality disorder to physical disability retirement. The evidence of record confirms the applicant underwent two mental health evaluations that diagnosed him as having a personality disorder not amounting to a disability that interfered with the performance of his duties. The narrative reason for separation was assigned based on his being separated...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022615
His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows in: * Item 31 (Foreign Service): * Germany from 17 February through 9 October 1969 * Vietnam from 12 October 1969 through 2 July 1970 * Korea from 17 December 1971 through 17 January 1973 * Item 38 (Record of Assignments), in part: * duty as a Troop Aidman with Headquarters and Headquarters Troop, 1st Squadron, 1st Calvary Regiment from 25 October 1969 to 23 June 1970 * assigned in a patient status to the Medical Holding Company, 249th...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022616
The applicant provides the following documents in support of his application: * AGCM Award Orders, dated 10 December 2008 * AGCM Revocation Orders, dated 6 January 2009 * DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), dated 8 September 2008 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. These orders awarded the applicant the AGCM (3rd Award) for the period 20 December 2006 through 19 December 2008. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022617
He served in four campaigns and departed Vietnam on 20 August 1968. He had served 1 year, 9 months, and 7 days of total active service and his DD Form 214 issued at the time of his REFRAD shows he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal, Vietnam Campaign Medal, Good Conduct Medal, Vietnam Service Medal (VSM), and the Air Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from his DD Form 214,...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022618
She and the FSM were married in 1988 and he elected spouse coverage for her within the first year of their marriage. The applicant provides: * the FSM's divorce degree * the FSM's DD Form 1883 (Survivor Benefit Plan Election Certificate) * the applicant and the FSM's marriage license * the FSM's Joint Uniform Military Pay System (JUMPS)-Army Retired/Annuitant Pay Statement effective February 1991 * a letter from DFAS to the FSM, dated 1 February 1991 * the FSM's Retiree Account Statement...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022620
The applicant requests correction of her DA Form 3286 (Statement for Enlistment-U.S. Army Enlistment Program), dated 18 March 2009, to show she enlisted under the Army Civilian Acquired Skills Program (ACASP) in military occupational specialty (MOS) 68WM6 (Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)) with promotion to specialist (SPC), E-4. The advisory opinion from the Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff, G-1, Recruiting Policy Branch revealed that the applicant was eligible for enlistment on 17 March...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022623
He states, in effect, his DD Form 214 should: a. show in item 11 the entry 13B, Cannon Crewmember - 17 years, 7 months and 31C, Radio Operator - Maintainer, 21 years, 1 month; b. include in item 13 the entry Iraq Campaign Medal with two bronze service stars and the Combat Action Badge; c. include in item 14 the entry Radio Teletype Operator Course, 13 weeks, November 1984; and d. show in item 18 the entry Immediate Reenlistments This Period: 19871209 - 19930908, 19930909 - 19970521, and...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022625
The applicant states he was to be court-martialed due to a total nervous breakdown. On 5 April 1977, the separation authority approved the applicant's discharge from the Army under the provisions of chapter 13 of Army Regulation 635-200 by reason of unsuitability with the issuance of a General Discharge Certificate. The DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) he was issued shows he was discharged under the provisions of chapter 13 of Army Regulation 635-200 with a General...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022627
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. On 16 June 2008, the DODIG informed the applicant that after an extensive review of the additional evidence he provided, it concluded a preponderance of the evidence presented in the case did not support the substantiated reprisal finding. The DODIG indicated that after conducting an in-depth analysis of all evidence and interviewing relevant witnesses, it concluded that a preponderance of the evidence did not support the substantiated...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022631
The applicant requests his military records be changed to reflect his new name. The DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) prepared upon his entry on active duty also lists the last name he would now like changed item 1 (Name) and the applicant signed the form using the name he would now liked changed in item 47 (Signature of Individual) on 15 April 1969. However, while his desire to change his military record to reflect his current name is understood, the record shows he entered,...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022632
The summary contains the following considerations of the board: * the SSG stated everybody must be held to the same standard * defense counsel objected to the foregone conclusion that a DUI off-post should result in a reduction board * the board president stated that based on the regulation, the board is enforcing one standard in the interest of good order and discipline; the applicant had a horrible lapse in judgment and the board held him accountable * the applicant asked the board...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022633
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. On 13 May 1975, the applicant was discharged accordingly. Consulting counsel would advise the member concerning the elements of the offense or offenses charged, type of discharge normally given under the provisions of this chapter, the loss of VA benefits, and the possibility of prejudice in civilian life because of the characterization of such a discharge.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022634
IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 21 October 2010 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100022634 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant states he was released from active duty and not given the opportunity to use PDMRA days he earned and was entitled to. The available evidence shows the applicant served a qualifying period of active duty service under 10 USC for award of PDMRA.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022635
Once it was determined the applicant did not disclose this information during his OCS enlistment processing, he was discharged from the DEP. Following a review of the applicant's medical waiver, including the psychiatric consult provided by the applicant and an additional consult from the MEPS medical officer, the USAREC Surgeon determined the applicant was not a viable candidate for waiver consideration or enlistment into the Army. The evidence further shows the applicant requested a...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022636
On 2 June 1972, the applicant's commander notified the applicant that he was being processed for elimination under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-212 (Personnel Separations Discharge Unfitness and Unsuitability). The U.S. Army Physical Disability Agency, under the operational control of the Commander, U.S. Army Human Resources Command (HRC), is responsible for administering the Physical Disability Evaluation System (PDES) and executes Secretary of the Army decision-making...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022638
He provided his: * Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) results * Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) results * Memorandum for a Disability Grade Determination CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. The effective date of pay grade shows 30 June 2009. Notwithstanding the determination made by the AGDRB on 29 June 2010, Army Regulation 15-80 states that the circumstances pertinent to whether a Soldiers service is found satisfactory may include medical reasons, which may have been a contributing or a decisive...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022642
The applicant states: a. although his medical condition was determined to be in the line of duty (LOD), he did not receive INCAP pay for the period he was not allowed to perform IDTs, nor was he processed by a medical or physical evaluation board (MEB/PEB); b. he received pay for his active duty service performed from 20 January through 5 June 1998 and INCAP pay for the months August through October 1998; and c. he was discharged from the Puerto Rico Army National Guard (PRARNG) on 2...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022647
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The evidence of record clearly shows that the applicant was an infantry officer who had served with an infantry company in the RVN where he had engaged the enemy in combat as an infantry platoon leader. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from item 24 of his DD Form 214 the Vietnam Service Medal; b....
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022650
Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, stated the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on or after 27 August 1940 and, for the first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950 of less than 3 years but more than 1 year. Therefore, he is entitled to the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for his honorable period of service from 26 October 1966 through 25 October...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022653
The applicant states he completed 11 years of military service with no misconduct and had just one big mistake in his military career. There is no evidence the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within its 15-year statute of limitations. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7b, states a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022655
IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 19 October 2010 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100022655 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant states he was released from active duty and not given the opportunity to use PDMRA days he earned and was entitled to. The available evidence shows the applicant served a qualifying period of active duty service under 10 USC for award of PDMRA.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022657
IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 19 October 2010 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100022657 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant states he was released from active duty and not given the opportunity to use PDMRA days he earned and was entitled to. The available evidence shows the applicant served a qualifying period of active duty service under 10 USC for award of PDMRA.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022658
IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 19 October 2010 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100022658 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant states he was released from active duty and not given the opportunity to use PDMRA days he earned and was entitled to. The available evidence shows the applicant served a qualifying period of active duty service under 10 USC for award of PDMRA.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022659
BOARD DATE: 18 November 2010 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100022659 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant states she was released from active duty and not given the opportunity to use PDMRA days she earned and was entitled to. The available evidence shows the applicant served a qualifying period of active duty service under 10 USC for award of PDMRA.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022660
IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 19 October 2010 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100022660 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant states she was released from active duty and not given the opportunity to use PDMRA days she earned and was entitled to. The available evidence shows the applicant served a qualifying period of active duty service under 10 USC for award of PDMRA.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022663
IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 19 October 2010 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100022663 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant states he was released from active duty and not given the opportunity to use PDMRA days he earned and was entitled to. The available evidence shows the applicant served a qualifying period of active duty service under 10 USC for award of PDMRA.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022667
IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 19 October 2010 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100022667 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant states he was released from active duty and not given the opportunity to use PDMRA days he earned and was entitled to. The available evidence shows the applicant served a qualifying period of active duty service under 10 USC for award of PDMRA.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022668
The applicant requests that his records be corrected to show his service in Vietnam and his authorized awards for that period of service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding the applicant the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period 19 September 1966 through 21 August 1968; b. adding the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award), Vietnam Service Medal with four bronze service stars, Republic...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022674
IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 19 October 2010 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100022674 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant states he was released from active duty and not given the opportunity to use PDMRA days he earned and was entitled to. The available evidence shows the applicant served a qualifying period of active duty service under 10 USC for award of PDMRA.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022676
IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 19 October 2010 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100022676 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant states he was released from active duty and not given the opportunity to use PDMRA days he earned and was entitled to. The available evidence shows the applicant served a qualifying period of active duty service under 10 USC for award of PDMRA.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022680
BOARD DATE: 15 March 2011 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100022680 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant was psychiatrically cleared for separation action by his command. On 25 September 1982, the applicant's commander notified the applicant of his intent to recommend that he be discharged due to misconduct - frequent incidents with civilian and military authorities.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022682
Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides for award of the Driver and Mechanic Badge. _________X_____________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case. ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20100022682 3 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1 ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20100022682 4 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022684
IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 19 October 2010 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100022684 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant states he was released from active duty and not given the opportunity to use PDMRA days he earned and was entitled to. The available evidence shows the applicant served a qualifying period of active duty service under 10 USC for award of PDMRA.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022687
The applicant provides a doctor's letter as new evidence which was not previously considered by the Board. During the original review of the case, the Board determined, contrary to the applicants claim he had never been seen by medical personnel for any personality disorder, that prior to his separation processing he had been evaluated by medical authority and diagnosed with a personality disorder with dependent traits. It further found the applicant had been informed of the results of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022691
The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his records to show he applied for the Post-9/11 GI Bill Transferability Program in order to transfer his education benefits to his dependents before he retired from active duty on 30 September 2009. The evidence further shows the applicant did, in fact, apply to the VA for Post-9/11 GI Bill eligibility prior to his separation from active duty for retirement and the VA confirmed it had his application prior to his retirement. As a result,...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022693
The applicant requests, in effect, reconsideration of his request for award of the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM) with 3rd Oak Leaf Cluster (OLC) (4th Award) and its addition to his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) dated 18 July 1973. General orders dated 6 August 1970 awarded the applicant the ARCOM with "V" Device. __________X______________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022697
IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 19 October 2010 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100022697 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant states he was released from active duty and not given the opportunity to use PDMRA days he earned and was entitled to. The available evidence shows the applicant served a qualifying period of active duty service under 10 USC for award of PDMRA.