ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050018288C070206
The applicant provides his DD Form 214 for the period ending 5 November 2004 with a DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214) dated 8 July 2005; results of a lumbar spine examination dated 9 February 2000; a 13 May 2005 letter from Alliance Primary Care; a Standard Form (SF) 88 (Report of Medical Examination) dated 9 January 2000; an SF 93 (Report of Medical History) dated 9 January 2000; dental records; 7 pages of laboratory results dated 9 January 2000; a health risk appraisal profile;...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050018290C070206
On 10 February 1987, the applicant’s commander notified him that he was initiating action to separate him from the service under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 14, for a pattern of misconduct involving commission of a serious offense and use/abuse of illegal drugs. There is no evidence in the available records to show that he ever applied to the ADRB for an upgrade of his discharge within that board’s 15- year statute of limitations. As a result, the Board further...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050018292C070206
The applicant concluded that he was never advised of any consequences associated with being discharged as a conscientious objector or offered the chance to withdraw his request. The regulation states that military personnel who seek either discharge or assignment to noncombatant duties because of conscientious objection will submit an application on DA Form 4187. The evidence confirms that the applicant’s RE code was assigned based on his status as a conscientious objector and therefore,...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050018295C070206
There is no evidence that he was awarded or was recommended for award of the Joint Service Achievement Medal. The applicant's records show that he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing award of the Meritorious Service Medal (Second Oak Leaf Cluster), and a silver service star for wear on his already awarded Vietnam Service Medal.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050018298C070206
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 25 July 2006 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20050018298 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. His punishment consisted of 14 days extra duty, 14 days restriction, a forfeiture of $50.00 pay for one month, and reduction to private E-2 (suspended until 8 June 1981). However, the evidence of record shows that...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050018300C070206
The applicant states that the Meritorious Service Medal (MSM) he was awarded for the period 1 November 1993 through 31 October 2003 and the 7th Award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM) he was entitled to based on his 21 years of honorable active duty service were erroneously omitted from the list of awards contained in Item 13 of his final DD Form 214. It also contains a second MSM Award Certificate that verifies he was awarded the MSM for meritorious service from 1 November 1993...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050018312C070206
Scott Faught | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant requests, in effect, that his 19 August 1982 discharge, be upgraded to honorable, and that the reason for his separation be changed. The applicant provides his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) and a copy of his general discharge certificate from the New York Army National Guard, in support of his request.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050018314C070206
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 28 SEPTEMBER 2006 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20050018314 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. While the applicant may have been assigned to an infantry element during his initial tour of duty in Vietnam and exposed to combat action during both tours, he did not hold an infantry specialty and as such he would...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050018315C070206
On 23 March 2005, the applicant submitted a memorandum to the Adjutant General's Office, wherein he accepted and requested promotion to the grade of lieutenant colonel effective no later than 21 April 2005. The Chief of Personnel Division stated that per memorandum, dated 30 January 2004, from the Director, Army National Guard, regarding promotion of mobilized Army National Guard officers, who were selected for promotion by a DA Mandatory Promotion Board, indicated that the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050018319C070206
The applicant requests that his report of separation (DD Form 214) be corrected to reflect three awards of the Army Achievement Medal (AAM) and the award of the Global War on Terrorism Service Medal (GWOTSM). The applicant provides a copy of the orders awarding him the AAM for the period of 3 March 2000 to 2 March 2004 and indicating his participation in Operation Noble Eagle, a copy of his DD Form 214 and a Certificate of Achievement for his support of Operation Noble Eagle. The...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050018336C070206
The applicant requests, in effect, that his general under honorable conditions discharge be upgraded to honorable, and the narrative reason for his separation to be changed. His service was characterized as general under honorable conditions, and he completed 3 years, 4 months, and 9 days of active military service. There is no indication that the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within the board's 15-year statue of limitations.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050018353C070206
Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) states, in pertinent part, that a DD Form 214 will not be issued for enlisted members discharged for immediate reenlistment in the Regular Army. Since the applicant’s record of service included one nonjudicial punishment, an offense punishable by court-martial, and a bar to reenlistment during his second enlistment (his court-martial during his first enlistment should not have been and is not now a consideration in determining the equity of his...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050018367
Ms. Catherine C. Mitrano Director Ms. Anita McKim-Spilker Analyst The following members, a quorum, were present: Ms. Linda D. Simmons Chairperson Ms. Eloise C. Prendergast Member Mr. James R. Hastie Member The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant states, in effect, that his active duty service time is not correctly calculated in his military record. The applicant is a commissioned Regular Army officer and will...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 2005001976C070206
Larry J. Olson | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. His medical history is consolidated in a report of physical examination in which it was stated that the applicant had: a hearing loss since working on aircraft from 1962 to 1968; a head injury and broken bones from a car accident in 1964; a back injury from a truck accident in 1967; alcoholism which was treated by complete abstinence since 1973; and anxiety...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 2005005199C070206
The applicant requests, in effect, promotion to captain. In an advisory opinion, dated 1 July 2005, the Chief, Personnel Division, Departments of the Army and the Air Force, National Guard Bureau (NGB), Arlington, Virginia, stated that the applicant was commissioned in the TXARNG as a second lieutenant on 3 November 1987, completed his bachelor's degree on 11 August 1989, and was separated from the ARNG and transferred to the USAR on 9 November 1989. Records show the applicant should have...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 2005006592C070206
The applicant requests award of the Purple Heart, the Combat Infantryman Badge, and the Korean Service Medal. Once the Korean War Service Medal has been authorized by the Department of the Air Force, the applicant may apply to the Army Board for Correction of Military Records to add this foreign award to his DD Form 214. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending his DD Form 214 to show that he was awarded...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 2005007561C070206
The applicant's DD Form 214 does not list award of the Combat Infantryman Badge and his service record does not contain any orders awarding him this badge. The records available contain no evidence which shows the applicant was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by awarding the first award of the Good Conduct Medal for the period 6 March 1968 through 5 March 1970, and the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 2005008267C070206
The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show his service during Desert Shield/Desert Storm. There is no evidence of record, and the applicant has not provided any evidence, which shows he served during Desert Shield/Desert Storm. Therefore, there is insufficient evidence in which to base correction of his DD Form 214 to show his dates of service in Iraq during Desert Shield/Desert Storm.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20055558943C070206
Jeanette R. McCants | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The new evidence presented by the applicant is noted. In the absence of more conclusive evidence, the applicant is not entitled to award of the Purple Heart or correction of his records to show this decoration.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 200560003707C070206
On 3 August 1992, the applicant's unit commander advised the applicant that he intended to recommend his separation from the Army under the provisions of paragraph 14-12c of Army Regulation 635-200 (Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations), for commission of a serious offense. The applicant served 1 year, 2 months, and 19 days of active service. On 12 June 1996, the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) considered the applicant's request to upgrade his discharge.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | AR20050008436C070206
Qawiy Sabree | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The evidence of record clearly establishes that the applicant was selected for promotion to the rank of captain with an effective date of 17 March 2004; however, he was discharged by reason of disability with severance before orders could be published. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | AR20050012068C070206
Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes, based on their service records or the reason for discharge. The RCP for personnel serving in the pay grade of E-4 in 1991 was 10 years. Accordingly, he was properly discharged in the pay grade of E-4 on 10 September 1991.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | AR20050012187C070206
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | AR20050012292C070206
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | AR20050012313C070206
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | AR20050012322C070206
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests that his undesirable discharge be upgraded to an honorable discharge. There is no evidence in the available records to show that he ever applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within that board’s 15-year statute of limitations.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | AR20050012525C070206
He goes on to state that when he submitted the DA Forms 1380 (Record of Individual Performance of Reserve Duty Training) to be credited with the points he earned, he was informed that the orders attaching him to the unit for points only should never have been published because Retired Reservist cannot drill for points only. Accordingly, it would be in the interest of justice to correct his records to show that he was assigned to the Retired Reserve on 25 June 2005, instead of 25 June 2004,...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | AR20050012554C070206
The Deputy State Surgeon indicated that the applicant had declined medical care at the Mobilization Station and requested Release from Active Duty (REFRAD). There is no evidence in the available record which indicates whether the applicant or his family members used or sought the use of these TAMP health care benefits. The record provides a memorandum from the Military Department of Arkansas, Office of the Adjutant General (TAG), dated 11 May 2005, directing the applicant and spouse (if...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | AR20050012649C070206
Randolph Fleming | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. There is no evidence in the available records to show that the applicant ever applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within that board’s 15-year statute of limitations. ______William Powers________ CHAIRPERSON INDEX |CASE ID |AR20050012649 | |SUFFIX | | |RECON | | |DATE BOARDED |20060502 | |TYPE OF DISCHARGE |(BCD) | |DATE...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | AR20050012741C070206
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. Army Regulation 600-200, in effect at the time, served as the authority for the conduct of selection boards. It is also noted that at the time the applicant’s records were forwarded to the E-9 Promotion Selection Board, he had only 2 years in grade as an E-8, which is indicative that he was in all likelihood in the secondary zone of consideration.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | AR20050012996C070206
Army Regulation (AR) 601-210 (Regular Army and Army Reserve Enlistment Program), Chapter 3 (Enlistment in the Regular Army and Army Reserve for Prior-Service Applicants), Table 3-1 (US Army reentry eligibility codes) states: “RE-3A – Applies to: Soldiers separated prior to the effective date (16 May 2005) of this regulation but did not meet reentry criteria at time of separation. A RE Code of RE-4 indicates that a person is not qualified for continued Army service by virtue of being...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | AR20050013442C070206
Edward Montgomery | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant requests, in effect, that the bar to reenlistment be removed from his records, that he be paid monetary benefits as a result of the upgrade of his discharge and given authority to use his Montgomery G.I. His punishment consisted of a reduction to the pay grade of E-2, a forfeiture of pay (suspended for 60 days) and extra duty.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | AR20050013537C070206
William Crain | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. On 3 March 1982, the applicant’s commander initiated action to bar the applicant from reenlistment. The commander also initiated action to separate the applicant from the service under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 14, for misconduct based on his established pattern of showing dishonorable failure to pay his just debts.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | AR20050013559C070206
Jerome Pionk | |Member | | | | | | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant requests that his award of the Meritorious Service Medal (MSM) be added to his report of separation (DD Form 214). The applicant states, in effect, that he was awarded the MSM on 5 January 1981 and his records were being processed for retirement at the time and it was omitted from his DD Form 214.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | AR20050013629C070206
He had completed 6 months of active service and was returned to his PAARNG unit, where he remained until he was honorably discharged on 21 August 1965 and was transferred to the USAR Control Group (Annual Training) to complete his remaining service obligation of 1 year. Inasmuch as there is no evidence to show that the applicant had no potential for full mobilization at the time or that there was cause to discharge him before completion of his MSO, it would be in the interest of justice to...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | AR20050013742C070206
The applicant requests that his Active Duty Service Obligation (ADSO) date be changed from 30 June 2007 to 30 June 2006. Although no additional service obligation was added at that time, none was satisfied, which in effect extended the time for him to complete his ADSO. While the Board understands that there may have been other physicians that did not serve an additional year based on their conducting 1 year of research during GME training, that in itself does not nullify the provisions of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | AR20050014086C070206
The applicant requests that his records be corrected to reflect his service in Korea and Vietnam. The applicant states that his reports of separation (DD Form 214) do not reflect his service in Korea and Vietnam. He further states that during his second enlistment he served 13 months in Korea and then was transferred to the Canal Zone.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | AR20050014427C070206
Jerome Pionk | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant states, in effect, that he was entitled to receive a prior service enlistment bonus for his enlistment and it was never paid. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by paying the applicant the initial $1,250.00 of his prior-service enlistment bonus, less any taxes due (if...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | AR20050014597C070206
On 1 July 1974, he was honorably discharged in the pay grade of E-4, for the purpose of immediate reenlistment. He was transferred to Germany on 9 September 1982, reenlisted on 15 August 1984 for a period of 6 years and was promoted to the pay grade of E-6 on 1 November 1984. There is no evidence in the available records to show that the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within that board’s 15-year statute of limitations.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | AR20050014641C070206
In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant was separated under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 9; therefore, he was properly issued an RE Code of RE-3 in accordance with the applicable regulations. The applicant has failed to show through the evidence submitted or the evidence of record that he was issued the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | AR20050014836C070206
A review of his records shows no evidence that the FSM was ever advanced past the pay grade of E-4 while on active duty during the period covered by the DD Form 214 dated 26 October 1966. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to show through the evidence submitted with his application or the evidence of record...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | AR20050014849C070206
He also states that he told his commander that all he wanted was to get treatment and carry on with his duties but his commander did not want to hear that. He applied to the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) on 21 July 1977 for an upgrade of his discharge and contended at that time that it was unjust for the Army to discharge him for a civilian offense, because he was serving time for that offense at that time. The U.S. Court of Appeals, observing that applicants to the Army Discharge...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | AR20050015023C070206
The applicant requests that his records be corrected to show that he was discharged in the rank of corporal. The applicant’s military records are not available to the Board for review. The applicant’s DD Form 214 shows that his date of rank was 23 April 1955, over a year before his discharge, which is contrary to his assertion that he was reduced in grade just prior to his REFRAD.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | AR20050015083C070206
Evidence shows that the applicant’s records contain administrative error which does not require action by the Board. Records show the applicant should have discovered the alleged error or injustice now under consideration on 18 August 1969; therefore, the time for the applicant to file a request for correction of any error or injustice expired on 17 August 1972. Therefore, the Board requests that the CMSD-St. Louis administratively correct the records of the individual concerned by...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | AR20050015092C070206
The applicant requests, in effect, that the record of nonjudicial punishment (NJP) (DA Form 2627) dated 18 December 2003 be removed from his Official Military Personnel File, that the punishment be set aside, that he be reinstated to the pay grade of E-7 with entitlement to all back pay and allowances and credit for time served for the period of 29 December 2003 to 25 March 2004 while his unit was in Iraq and award of the National Defense Service Medal (3rd award), the Global War on...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | AR20050015095C070206
Jerome Pionk | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. He was advanced to the pay grade of E-4 on 9 July 1974 and on 19 October 1975, he was transferred to Germany. While the applicant has offered no basis for his upgrade, there is no evidence in the available records that is sufficiently mitigating to warrant relief when compared to the seriousness of his offenses and his overall record of service.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | AR20050015266C070206
Chester Damian | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant requests that his bad conduct discharge (BCD) be upgraded to a general discharge and that the reason for his discharge be changed to a more favorable reason. Accordingly, his punishment was not disproportionate to the offenses for which he was convicted and he has failed to show sufficient evidence or reasons to warrant an upgrade of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | AR20050015439C070206
The applicant requests that his undesirable discharge be upgraded to a more favorable discharge. On 6 December 1974, After consulting with defense counsel, the applicant submitted a request for discharge for the good of the service, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, in lieu of trial by court-martial. There is no evidence in the available records to show that he ever applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within that board’s...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | AR20050015532C070206
The applicant requests that his undesirable discharge be upgraded to a general discharge. The application submitted in this case is dated 14 October 2005. The Clemency Discharge is a neutral discharge, issued neither under “honorable conditions” nor under “other than honorable conditions.” It is to be considered as ranking between an undesirable discharge and a general discharge.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | AR20050015561C070206
The applicant requests that the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM), the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal (AFEM), the National Defense Service Medal (NDSM), the Joint Service Commendation Medal (JSCM), and the Korea Defense Service Medal (KDSM) be added to his DD Form 214. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) as amended provides that the National Defense Service Medal is awarded for honorable active service for any period between 27 July 1950 through 27 July 1954, 1 January 1961 through 14...