ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001228C070206
Title 10, United States Code, chapter 61, provides disability retirement or separation for a member who is physically unfit to perform the duties of his office, rank, grade or rating because of disability incurred while entitled to basic pay. Chapter 7 (Physical Profiling) of Army Regulation 40-501 (Standards of Medical Fitness) provides that the basic purpose of the physical profile serial system is to provide an index to the overall functional capacity of an individual and is used to...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001231C070206
The applicant requests that his records be corrected to reflect award of the Purple Heart. The applicant’s military records are not available to the Board for review. The medical evidence, which is available to the Board, does confirm that the applicant was evacuated from Europe and hospitalized.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001231C070206
The applicant requests that his records be corrected to reflect award of the Purple Heart. The applicants military records are not available to the Board for review. The medical evidence, which is available to the Board, does confirm that the applicant was evacuated from Europe and hospitalized.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001237C070206
The applicant states he was never awarded the Purple Heart for injuries he incurred while a POW (Prisoner of War) between July 1950 and September 1953. Unfortunately, in the absence of more compelling medical evidence, particularly from the applicants service medical records, the 1992 radiology report, the undated statement from the physician, and the 1997 statement from the other POW are not sufficient to confirm that the applicant meets the requirements for award of the Purple Heart. ...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001237C070206
The applicant states he was never awarded the Purple Heart for injuries he incurred while a POW (Prisoner of War) between July 1950 and September 1953. Unfortunately, in the absence of more compelling medical evidence, particularly from the applicant’s service medical records, the 1992 radiology report, the undated statement from the physician, and the 1997 statement from the other POW are not sufficient to confirm that the applicant meets the requirements for award of the Purple Heart. ...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001239C070206
The evidence of record and independent evidence provided by the applicant fails to support his claim of entitlement to the Purple Heart. Although this document shows the applicant was recommended for discharge with disability as noted on his WD AGO Form 53-55, this document does not show any wounds or injuries received as a result of hostile action. In the absence of military records which show the applicant was wounded or treated for wounds or injuries as a result of hostile action, there...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001239C070206
The evidence of record and independent evidence provided by the applicant fails to support his claim of entitlement to the Purple Heart. Although this document shows the applicant was recommended for discharge with disability as noted on his WD AGO Form 53-55, this document does not show any wounds or injuries received as a result of hostile action. In the absence of military records which show the applicant was wounded or treated for wounds or injuries as a result of hostile action, there...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001240C070206
The applicant's records contain several medical documents that show he was evaluated by military medical personnel. On 19 August 1988, the separation authority approved the applicants request for discharge and directed that he receive an under other than honorable conditions discharge. The applicant's record of service shows charges were preferred against the applicant for being AWOL for 42 days.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001240C070206
The applicant's records contain several medical documents that show he was evaluated by military medical personnel. On 19 August 1988, the separation authority approved the applicant’s request for discharge and directed that he receive an under other than honorable conditions discharge. The applicant's record of service shows charges were preferred against the applicant for being AWOL for 42 days.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001243C070206
The applicant requests that her record be corrected to show that she was discharged because of a hardship on 19 June 1987. On 16 June 1987 the applicant requested that she be discharged because of pregnancy with a discharge date of 16 June 1987. Consequently, her request to correct her DD Form 214 to show that she was discharged because of a hardship is not granted.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001243C070206
The applicant requests that her record be corrected to show that she was discharged because of a hardship on 19 June 1987. On 16 June 1987 the applicant requested that she be discharged because of pregnancy with a discharge date of 16 June 1987. Consequently, her request to correct her DD Form 214 to show that she was discharged because of a hardship is not granted.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001244C070206
Michael J. Flynn | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant requests correction of his records to show award of the Purple Heart. The applicant's DD Form 214 with the ending period 2 September 1966 shows he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal and the Combat Infantryman Badge.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001244C070206
The applicant requests correction of his records to show award of the Purple Heart. The applicant's DD Form 214 with the ending period 2 September 1966 shows he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal and the Combat Infantryman Badge. There also is no evidence in his service personnel records that shows that he was wounded or treated for wounds as a result of hostile action in Vietnam.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001246C070206
On 27 January 1983, the applicant reenlisted, in the pay grade of E-4, for 4 years, for an overseas assignment (Germany). There is no evidence that the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) for an upgrade of his discharge within its 15-year statute of limitations. The evidence of record shows the applicant was discharged under the provisions of AR 635-200, chapter 10, for the good of the service, in lieu of trial by court-martial.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001246C070206
On 27 January 1983, the applicant reenlisted, in the pay grade of E-4, for 4 years, for an overseas assignment (Germany). There is no evidence that the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) for an upgrade of his discharge within its 15-year statute of limitations. The evidence of record shows the applicant was discharged under the provisions of AR 635-200, chapter 10, for the good of the service, in lieu of trial by court-martial.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001247C070206
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 06 OCTOBER 2005 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20050001247 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. On 23 February 1981, the applicant requested a discharge for the good of the service under the provisions of chapter 10, Army Regulation 635-200, in lieu of court-martial. Therefore, he is not entitled to an...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001247C070206
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 06 OCTOBER 2005 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20050001247 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The application submitted in this case is dated 27 January 2005. On 23 February 1981, the applicant requested a discharge for the good of the service under the provisions of chapter 10, Army Regulation 635-200, in...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001249C070206
U.S. Army Military Personnel Center [Alexandria, Virginia] Letter Order Number 9-4, dated 10 September 1975, discharged the applicant with a Bad Conduct Discharge. There is no evidence showing that the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within its 15-year statute of limitations. The applicant provided insufficient evidence, and there is no evidence in the available records, which supports his contention that his bad conduct discharge should...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001249C070206
U.S. Army Military Personnel Center [Alexandria, Virginia] Letter Order Number 9-4, dated 10 September 1975, discharged the applicant with a Bad Conduct Discharge. There is no evidence showing that the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within its 15-year statute of limitations. The applicant provided insufficient evidence, and there is no evidence in the available records, which supports his contention that his bad conduct discharge should...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001250C070206
The applicant is requesting correction of an alleged error which occurred on 31 August 1992, the date of his separation from active duty. There are no orders in the applicant's records that show he was awarded the Purple Heart. Further, the Purple Heart is not included in the list of authorized awards listed on the applicant's DD Form 214, which he authenticated with his signature.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001250C070206
The applicant is requesting correction of an alleged error which occurred on 31 August 1992, the date of his separation from active duty. There are no orders in the applicant's records that show he was awarded the Purple Heart. This regulation also provides that there is no statute of limitations on requests for award of the Purple Heart.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001251C070206
Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. He served 1 year, 7 months, and 23 days in Germany. Army Regulation 635-208, in effect at the time, set forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel for unfitness.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001251C070206
In his acknowledgement, he requested counsel, waived a hearing before a board of officers, and did not elect to make a statement. He served 1 year, 7 months, and 23 days in Germany. Army Regulation 635-208, in effect at the time, set forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel for unfitness.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001253C070206
The applicant's DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) issued at the time of his separation, shows in Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized), that he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal, Vietnam Service Medal with 3 bronze service stars, Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal, and Expert Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar. His DA Form 20 does not show an entry in Item 40...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001253C070206
The applicant's DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) issued at the time of his separation, shows in Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized), that he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal, Vietnam Service Medal with 3 bronze service stars, Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal, and Expert Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar. Therefore, he is entitled to correction of his records...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001258C070206
Michael J. Flynn | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant requests correction of his records to show awards of the Air Medal and the Combat Infantryman Badge. Evidence of record shows that the applicant was awarded the MOS 45J (Armorer) upon completion of AIT.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001258C070206
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 11 August 2005 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20050001258 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant requests correction of his records to show awards of the Air Medal and the Combat Infantryman Badge. Evidence of record shows that the applicant was awarded the MOS 45J (Armorer) upon completion of AIT.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001259C070206
The applicant requests, in effect, that he be promoted to the rank of sergeant (SGT) and that his most significant duty assignment (item 28) on his report of separation (DD Form 214) be corrected to show Headquarters, Division Artillery. 2. The applicants military records are not available to the Board for review. However, there is no evidence that he was recommended for promotion or that he was unjustly denied a promotion.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001259C070206
The applicant requests, in effect, that he be promoted to the rank of sergeant (SGT) and that his most significant duty assignment (item 28) on his report of separation (DD Form 214) be corrected to show “Headquarters, Division Artillery.” 2. The applicant’s military records are not available to the Board for review. Army Regulation 635-5 serves as the authority for the preparation of the DD Form 214.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001260C070206
Carol A. Kornhoff | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant requests, in effect, that his military records be corrected to show his foreign service in Iraq. The applicant states, in effect, that Item 12f (Foreign Service) of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) with a separation date of 17 July 2003 is incorrect.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001260C070206
Member Ms. Carol A. Kornhoff Member The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant requests, in effect, that his military records be corrected to show his foreign service in Iraq. The applicant states, in effect, that Item 12f (Foreign Service) of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) with a separation date of 17 July 2003 is incorrect.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001261C070206
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 6 OCTOBER 2005 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20050001261 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. His request for this award is not granted. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief and to excuse failure to timely file.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001261C070206
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 6 OCTOBER 2005 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20050001261 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. His request for this award is not granted. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief and to excuse failure to timely file.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001263C070206
The applicant provides: a. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief and to excuse failure to timely file. Ronald E. Blakely ______________________ CHAIRPERSON INDEX CASE ID AR20050001263 SUFFIX RECON DATE BOARDED 20050927 TYPE OF DISCHARGE UOTHC DATE OF DISCHARGE 19840502 DISCHARGE AUTHORITY AR 635-200 C10 DISCHARGE REASON BOARD DECISION GRANT REVIEW AUTHORITY ISSUES 1.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001263C070206
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant provides: a. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief and to excuse failure to timely file.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001264C070206
The applicant requests correction of his discharge document to show award of the Purple Heart and that he was in a Prisoner of War (POW) status. There is no evidence in the records that show he was in a POW status while he was in Vietnam. Since the applicant did not depart Vietnam until 18 February 1971, this provided Army officials more than a month and a half to report the appropriate changes in the applicant's duty status, to notify his next-of-kin, and document the applicant's status...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001264C070206
The applicant requests correction of his discharge document to show award of the Purple Heart and that he was in a Prisoner of War (POW) status. There is no evidence in the records that show he was in a POW status while he was in Vietnam. Since the applicant did not depart Vietnam until 18 February 1971, this provided Army officials more than a month and a half to report the appropriate changes in the applicant's duty status, to notify his next-of-kin, and document the applicant's status...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001265C070206
DA Pamphlet 672-3, Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register, dated 29 January 1988, which lists unit awards received by units serving in Vietnam, shows that the unit the applicant was assigned to was awarded the Meritorious Unit Commendation, for the period 1 July 1968 through 28 February 1969, by Department of the Army General Order (DAGO) Number 51, dated 1971. Evidence shows that the applicant’s records contain administrative error which does not require action by the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001265C070206
DA Pamphlet 672-3, Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register, dated 29 January 1988, which lists unit awards received by units serving in Vietnam, shows that the unit the applicant was assigned to was awarded the Meritorious Unit Commendation, for the period 1 July 1968 through 28 February 1969, by Department of the Army General Order (DAGO) Number 51, dated 1971. Evidence shows that the applicants records contain administrative error which does not require action by the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001266C070206
The FSM's military records are not available to the Board for review. The WD AGO Form 234 prepared by the 4106th U.S. Army Hospital on 16 February 1945 shows the FSM suffered a penetrating wound to the first and second toes on his right foot. However, this document does not indicate the cause of this wound.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001266C070206
The WD AGO Form 234 prepared by the 4106th U.S. Army Hospital on 16 February 1945 shows the FSM suffered a penetrating wound to the first and second toes on his right foot. However, this document does not indicate the cause of this wound. Therefore, the Board requests that the CMSD-St. Louis administratively correct the records and separation document of the individual concerned to show his participation in the Rhineland campaign, and his entitlement to the Meritorious Unit Commendation,...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001267C070206
The applicant requests, in effect, that clemency in the form of a discharge upgrade be granted. Evidence of record shows the applicant, a military policeman, was dishonorably discharged for stealing blank checks and writing bad checks. _____John Meixell_____ CHAIRPERSON INDEX CASE ID AR20050001267 SUFFIX RECON DATE BOARDED 20050908 TYPE OF DISCHARGE DD DATE OF DISCHARGE 19940525 DISCHARGE AUTHORITY AR 635-200 Chapter 3 DISCHARGE REASON As a result of court-martial BOARD DECISION NC REVIEW...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001267C070206
The applicant requests, in effect, that clemency in the form of a discharge upgrade be granted. Accordingly, the applicant was dishonorably discharged on 25 May 1994 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 3, as a result of a court-martial. Evidence of record shows the applicant, a military policeman, was dishonorably discharged for stealing blank checks and writing bad checks.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001268C070206
He diagnosed the applicant’s condition as right knee pain, status post right total knee arthroplasty, and stated that he had moderate to severe activity-related pain of the right knee that had worsened over the last three months since surgery, that his upper extremity use was limited at the right wrist because of his persistent chronic right wrist pain, and that his right knee pain was exacerbated by excessive walking or standing. The evidence shows that the applicant had problems with his...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001268C070206
He diagnosed the applicants condition as right knee pain, status post right total knee arthroplasty, and stated that he had moderate to severe activity-related pain of the right knee that had worsened over the last three months since surgery, that his upper extremity use was limited at the right wrist because of his persistent chronic right wrist pain, and that his right knee pain was exacerbated by excessive walking or standing. Now, after perusing Army Regulation 40-501, the applicant...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001269C070206
Member The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. As a result, the time for the applicant to file a request for correction of any error or injustice to this Board expired on 6 December 1984. _________James C. Hise__________ CHAIRPERSON INDEX CASE ID AR20050001269 SUFFIX RECON YYYYMMDD DATE BOARDED 20050920 TYPE OF DISCHARGE UD DATE OF DISCHARGE 19750305 DISCHARGE AUTHORITY AR 635-200, chapter 13-5a(1) DISCHARGE REASON BOARD...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001269C070206
On 28 February 1975, the separation authority approved the recommendation for the applicant's discharge and directed that he be furnished an UD. Records show the applicant exhausted his administrative remedies in this case when his case was last reviewed by the ADRB on 7 December 1981. As a result, the time for the applicant to file a request for correction of any error or injustice to this Board expired on 6 December 1984.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001272C070206
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 22 November 2005 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20050001272 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. On 17 May 1967, he was discharged with an undesirable discharge and a characterization of service as under conditions other than honorable after completing 8 months and 25 days of creditable active service. The U.S....
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001272C070206
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 22 November 2005 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20050001272 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. On 12 January 1978, the ADRB reviewed and denied the applicant's request for upgrade. The U.S. Court of Appeals, observing that applicants to the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) are by statute allowed 15 years to...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001273 C070206
There is no evidence, and the applicant has provided none, to show that he was assigned or attached to an infantry unit for duty while he served in Vietnam. Evidence shows that the applicant’s records contain administrative error which does not require action by the Board. Therefore, the Board requests that the CMSD-St. Louis administratively correct the records of the individual concerned by: a. adding the already-awarded Air Medal to the applicant's DD Form 214; b. awarding the applicant...