AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03833
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. There was no official documentation located in the applicants military personnel records to show he was deployed to Turkey in support of Operation DESERT SHIELD/STORM during the inclusive...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03842
According to the applicants AF Form 418, Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP) Consideration for Airmen in the Regular Air Force/Air Force Reserve, dated 17 Nov 11, he was non-recommended for re-enlistment by his supervisor as a result of a quality force review conducted IAW the FY12 Enlisted DOS Rollback PDSM 11-94. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03857
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-03857 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His bad conduct discharge be upgraded to general (under honorable conditions). The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application is described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) which is included at Exhibit D. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFLOA/JAJM recommends denial. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03861
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-03861 XXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her character of service be changed from Not Applicable to Honorable. APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: She was told that an entry level separation was an honorable discharge. Her narrative reason for separation is Entry Level Performance and Conduct. The character of service on her DD Form 214 reflects...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03864
In accordance with AFI 36-2306, For individuals eligible for retirement on 1 August 2009, no additional service is required. Based on his TAFMSD, he would have incurred no active duty service commitment (ADSC) obligation with TEB approval. On 31 May 13, the applicant retired from the Air Force. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03865
He was not aware the ARPC Form 123, Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan Election Certificate, he signed on 14 Sep 94 requesting RCSBP spouse coverage would be used for retirement since he was not yet retired. We note the applicant did not request his RCSBP election for spouse coverage be terminated within 90 days of notification of eligibility for Reserve component retired pay IAW 10 U.S.C. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03866
On 21 Apr 09, the IPEB adjudicated the applicants conditions as unfitting with a compensable rating of 10%, and recommended permanent retirement. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The DoD Physical Disability Board of Review (PDBR) Special Review Panel (SRP) recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03870
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-03870 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, be amended to reflect he served in Korea. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03873
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-03873 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His type of separation (entry level), character of service and narrative reason for separation be corrected. He believes his service should be characterized as honorable, and narrative reason changed, because his only deficiency was physical standards. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03874
Even the military review board deemed his punitive discharge to be a Heavy Price To Pay. While the appellate court was saddened that a fine military career was terminated by a punitive discharge, the sentence as approved by the convening authority was appropriate for the offenses of which the applicant stood convicted. While the applicant received a severe punishment, when he otherwise served honorably for 20 years, the commander, convening authority and appellate courts were in position...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03880
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-03880 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Fitness Assessment (FA) dated 26 Jul 13 be corrected to reflect Satisfactory in the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03892
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. While there is no specific time period to qualify for the MOVSM (for example 500 hours of community service within 24 calendar months), approval authorities shall ensure the service to be honored...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03902
On 13 November 2012, the Air Force Board for Corrections of Military Records (AFBCMR) considered the applicants request and determined that although the applicant was initially placed on the TDRL on 28 May 2009, and not permanently retired until 19 September 2010, time on the TDRL is not considered active duty service. While they understand the applicants desire to take advantage of the Post 9/11 GI Bill, they do not grant extensions in order to provide eligibility for programs...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03908
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPFFF recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. Since the applicant was married at the time of his retirement, and he elected spouse coverage, SBP monthly premiums should have been deducted beginning the first month following his retirement....
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03909
DODI 1332.32, Physical Disability or Medical Disqualification, paragraph E3.P3.2.1, in effect at the time of the applicants service reads: A service member shall be considered unfit when the evidence establishes the member, due to physical disability is unable to reasonably perform the duties of his or her office, grade, rank or rating. The Medical Consultant concedes a more thorough evaluation of his right knee should have been documented at the time of separation than appears on his...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03910
The Board should find it in the interest of justice to consider his untimely application because the reason he waited so long to submit his application is because he was ashamed. We took notice of the applicants complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error of injustice. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03914
d. On 23 Jun 87, the applicant received a LOR for failing to go to his appointed place of duty at the prescribed time on 6 different occasions. On 3 Dec 90, the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) denied the applicants request to upgrade his general discharge to an honorable discharge and to change the narrative reason for separation, indicating the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulations and was within the sound...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03923
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-03923 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The daughter of the deceased former military member is requesting a waiver of The Barring Act which would entitle her to claim the arrears of pay (monies due and unpaid to a member at time of death) that have been barred. The amount of arrears pay that would be payable if the barring statute was waived is $36.93...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03925
The Board should consider her untimely application in the interest of justice because her records were never evaluated for awards during the time of her deployment. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 10 Feb 15, for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit C). The Air Force office of primary responsibility has reviewed this application and indicated there is an available avenue of administrative relief (Force...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03926
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-03926 XXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reentry (RE) code of 2C, which denotes Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service be changed. In an undated letter, the applicants commander notified him that he was recommending he be discharged from the Air Force under...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03932
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-03932 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Home of Record (HOR) be updated to Austin, TX. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIPE recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice;...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03935
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial indicating the applicant has not exhausted all available avenues of administrative relief prior to seeking correction of his military records. In this respect, we note this Board is the highest administrative level of appeal within the Air Force. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03944
On 11 Dec 80, an evaluation officer reviewed the case file and determined the applicant desired to be discharged and to have the recommended general (under honorable conditions) discharge upgraded to honorable. However, based upon his findings, the evaluation officer recommended the applicant be discharged from the Air Force and be furnished a general (under honorable conditions) discharge without the offer of probation or rehabilitation. Based on the available evidence of record, it...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03946
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-03946 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Air Force Expeditionary Medal (AFEM) be added to his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, along with any other decorations, medals, badges and citations his unit may have been awarded. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03960
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-03960 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable. On 8 January 1973, according to AF Form 1137, Unfavorable Information File Summary, the applicant was issued a Letter of Reprimand (LOR), for failure to go, in violation of Article 86, UCMJ. We took notice of the applicant's complete...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03982
On 27 Feb 95, the applicant applied to the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) to have his discharge upgraded to Honorable. As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit C). THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03986
According to DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, associated with her 13 Jul 03 release from active duty, her HOR at time of entry is listed as 36707 San Pedro Dr., Apt 120, Fremont, CA 94536. The complete DPSIPE evaluation is at Exhibit C. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant submitted a response stating when she was in contact with her recruiter she was a full-time out-of-state student at Alliant International University in California. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03988
On 11 Dec 85, the applicant received an honorable discharge. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOE recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. While we acknowledge the applicants request to have her Staff Sergeant rank reinstated due to current weight management program standards, this board notes that standards in effect during the applicants service were the standards to be adhered to by all Air Force service members at that time.
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03998
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-03998 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reentry (RE) Code 2B which denotes Separated with a General or Under Other than Honorable Conditions [UOTHC] Discharge be changed to RE code 3A which denotes 1st term airman separating before 36 months to allow reenlistment in the Armed Forces. On 15 Aug 14, the applicant was discharged with...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 04000
He states Air Force members do not receive the RDP when the award is presented. The applicant was considered and not selected for promotion to master sergeant during the 14E7 promotion cycle. Because the applicant did not take corrective action to ensure his decoration was properly updated in his record until four years after it was awarded and after he became aware he missed promotion by less than three points, it is recommend denying his request to use the AFCM in the promotion process...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 04008
Her narrative reason for separation [Fraudulent Entry into Military Service] and the corresponding separation code of JDA be changed. The complete DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit E. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Her discharge for fraudulent reasons is unfair. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 04025
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-04025 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His narrative reason for separation of VolRetirement for Years of Service Established By Law be changed to reflect that he had a service connected disability. The Medical Consultant found no evidence of error or injustice in the applicants release from service due to completion of required service for...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 04047
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-04047 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Home or Record (HOR) be corrected to reflect North Carolina on his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 04053
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-04053 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be amended to reflect 8 months of foreign service. A complete copy of the DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPSOR defers to AFPC/DPAPP and the AFBCMR to dictate the amount of foreign service needing recorded on the DD Form 214. Exhibit E....
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 04059
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-04059 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His ability to transfer any/all remaining Post 9/11 GI Bill Education Benefits to his daughter be restored. While we acknowledge the applicants request to transfer Post- 9/11 GI Bill education benefits to his daughter, we do not believe he has demonstrated evidence of an injustice. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 04071
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-04071 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable. On 21 Nov 83, the action was found to be legally sufficient and on 29 Nov 83, the discharge authority concurred with the commanders recommendation and directed the applicants general (under honorable conditions) discharge. As of this...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 04083
On 28 March 2003, according to special orders AC-007762, the applicant would be relieved from active duty, effective 31 January 2004 and retired effective 1 February 2004 in the grade of master sergeant. On 24 October 2003, according to special orders AC-000832, the applicant would be relieved from active duty, effective 31 January 2004 and retired effective 1 February 2004 in the grade of technical sergeant. We took notice of the applicants complete submission in judging the merits of...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 04154
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-04154 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect his retired pay as $755.00 per month, effective 30 Mar 97, versus $672.00 per month. On 14 Jul 14, the applicant was provided a Reserve Retired Pay Calculation Worksheet indicating his gross monthly pay was $755.00. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 3 Mar 15.
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 04177
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-04177 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, Item 12h (Effective Date of Pay Grade), be corrected. The applicants complete submission, with attachment, is at Exhibit A. The applicant entered active duty 5 April 1971 and was promoted to SSgt with a date of rank (DOR) and effective date of...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 04178
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: NGB/A1PS recommends denial. However, should after exhausting his administrative avenue of relief, the applicant feel he is still a victim of an error or injustice, the applicant may resubmit his application to the Board for consideration. The following documentary evidence was...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 04183
On 10 Feb 67, the applicant received an Article 15 for failing to report at the time and place prescribed in violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ). On 24 Oct 67, the discharge authority directed the applicant be discharged with a general discharge. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 17 Oct 14.
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 04187
In a letter dated 13 Jan 15, SAF/MRBR afforded the applicant an opportunity to request that his case be administratively closed to pursue the administrative avenues described in the Air Force evaluation below prior to submitting his application to the AFBCMR. The applicant failed to provide an invalidation memorandum from his Unit Commander and he has not exhausted all available avenues of administrative relief prior to seeking correction of his military records. Exhibit D. Letter,...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 04196
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-04196 N COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry code (RE) of 2X (First-term, second-term or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment) be changed to allow reentry in the military. The applicants complete submission is at Exhibit A. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 04221
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. Failure by the organizations to reflect debt on this checklist does not in any way represent a release or waiver of that debt. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIM evaluation, with attachment, is...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 04246
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-04246 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Home or Record (HOR) be corrected to reflect San Antonio, Texas on his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty. According to the AF Form 768, Extended Active Duty Order, the applicant commissioned with the Regular Air Force on 14 Aug 04. The applicants military personnel record was...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 04281
On 28 Sep 12, he was discharged with a RE code of 2C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial of the applicants request to change his RE code to the 1# series. On 25 Sep 12, the 37th Training Group Commander (37 TRG) directed he be discharged with an ELS for reluctance to make the effort necessary to meet Air Force standards of conduct and duty performance. AFI 36-2606, chapter 5 states not to separate airmen in the RE code 1# series except RE code 1J which denotes...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 04293
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-04293 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable. As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit C). Exhibit B.
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 04295
AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPTS recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. Per AFI 36-3202, Separation Documents, Section B, paragraph 2.2.3, the DD Form 214 provides the separating members with brief, clear records of their active military service at the time they are transferred, released, discharged or retired. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 23 Dec 14.
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 04313
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-04313 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Bad Conduct Discharge (BCD) be upgraded. Specifically, section 1552(f)(1) permits the correction of a record to reflect actions taken by a reviewing authority under the UCMJ. The complete JAJM evaluation is at Exhibit D. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 04327
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-04327 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, Item 28, be corrected to read Completion of Required Active Duty Service rather than Completion of Initial Active Duty Training. APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: This correction is required in order to be eligible for the Department of Veterans...