AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00009
The applicants military personnel records indicate he enlisted in the Air Force Reserve on 24 Jan 14, for a period of three years. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letters prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPRs), which are attached at Exhibits C, D, E, and F. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPTOS recommends denial with respect to the applicants request for his lost time to be reinstated. A complete copy of the...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00010
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memoranda prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPR), which are attached at Exhibits C and D. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPFDC recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. Regarding the applicants request for CRDP, a medically retired member with less than 20 years of service is not entitled to CRDP. In addition, members retired by reason of physical...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00011
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00011 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Social Security Number (SSN) on his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be changed. We note the Air Force office of primary responsibility recommends denial stating the applicant separated from active duty before his...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00016
The Board should consider it in the interest of justice to consider his application. On 28 Apr 14, SAF/MRBR provided the applicant an opportunity to provide information pertaining to his activities since leaving the service (Exhibit C). ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that that the application will only be...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00017
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: His public service as a teacher qualifies for active duty service under the Temporary Early Retirement Authority (TERA) Public and Community Service Program. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOR recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00018
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He did not realize in order for his former spouse to receive an SBP annuity he had to elect SBP coverage for her prior to his retirement. There is no evidence of an Air Force error; however, to preclude a possible injustice, it would be appropriate to void the applicants 8 Feb 12, election to decline SBP coverage and correct his record to reflect he elected former spouse coverage based on full retired pay effective 1 Aug 12, naming his former spouse as the eligible...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00027
On 20 Nov 13, the applicant was promoted to the grade of E-3. As such, he was never eligible for promotion to the grade of E-3, effective 21 Jun 13, as requested. A complete copy of the NGB/A1PP additional evaluation is at Exhibit E. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: He argues a change to the FY13, R&R Initiatives added his AFSC 2T2X1 to the critical skills AFSC list, effective 1 Oct 12, as verified through his Force Support Squadron (FSS).
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00028
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The inclusive dates of 10 Dec 07 through 29 Jun 11 are incorrect as there are officer performance reports (OPR) accomplished for 2010, 2011, and 2012, which are on file in her records. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: NGB/A1PS recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00029
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00029 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Date of Rank (DOR) to the grade of Airman First Class (A1C) be changed from 20 Nov 13 to 20 Jun 13. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is included at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00032
On 16 July 1986, the Air Force Court of Military Review found the approved findings and sentence were correct in law and fact. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit E. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFLOA/JAJM recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice with respect to the court-martial proceedings. We find no...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00036
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIDE recommends denial noting the applicant has not exhausted her administrative remedies. A review of the applicants request determined her first avenue of relief is through the Evaluation Report Appeals Board (ERAB). A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIDE evaluation is at...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00037
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00037 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be amended to reflect his Gulf War service. The Board should consider it in the interest of justice to consider his application for possible additional benefits in the future. We...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00038
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit B. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ANGB/A1PF recommends approval. While we note the NGB/A1PF recommendation to grant the applicants request because the delay in the release of the FY 2013 ARP Policy was through no fault of his own, we are not convinced the applicant is the victim of an...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00042
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIT recommends denial. The member was released from active duty on 31 May 1985 and no policy was in effect at the time of members release; therefore, the member is not eligible to transfer any educational benefits to his daughter. We took notice of the applicants complete...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00045
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00045 COUNSEL: HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be allowed to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill Educational Benefits to his dependents. As of this date, this office has not received a response. _______________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00047
On 25 Feb 60, applicant received a Letter of Counseling (LOC) for consuming alcohol within six hours of duty. On 9 Mar 60, the applicant submitted a letter to his commander requesting a discharge that outlined his reasons as to why he no longer wished to be in the Air Force. Exhibit C. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 28 Apr 14.
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00051
STATEMENT OF FACTS: The RCSBP Information Package that was mailed to the applicant at his initial election point stated: If you do not have a spouse or dependent children at the time you are entitled to make an RCSBP election, but later acquire a spouse or children, you may elect RCSBP coverage for that spouse or children within one year of acquisition. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPTT recommends denial based on the applicant not making the update within one year of his marriage as...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00053
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is included at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: PPA HQ/ECAF recommends granting relief, indicating sufficient evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. Additionally, Personal Property Headquarters (PPA HQ) advisories PPA-10-0034 and PPA 13-0045, dated 16 Apr 10 and 5 Jun 13, respectively,...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00054
In addition, personnel serving in Thailand, Laos, or Cambodia in direct support of operations in Vietnam during the same time period were also eligible for the VSM. A thorough review of the applicants official military record did not locate any documentation verifying award of the VSM. The applicant provided TDY Order-Military, dated 24 Jan 67 assigning him to the 4133rd Bomb Wing (Provisional), Anderson Air Force Base (AFB), Guam; TDY Order-military, dated 22 Feb 68, assigning him to the...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00057
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00057 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. In the interest of justice, we considered upgrading the discharge based on clemency; however, in the absence of any evidence related to the applicants post-service activities, we could not determine if such consideration is warranted. Exhibit B.
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00058
A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSID evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPSOO recommends approval for SSB consideration, indicating that while AFPC/DPSID cannot locate a special order verifying the JSCM was awarded to the applicant, the fact the applicant has provided what appears to be an authentic signed certificate, with a Given Under My Hand date of 9 Jan 09, and a citation with official seal, the citation should be filed in the applicants officer selection record (OSR), updated on his...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00061
After receiving an Article 15 subsequent to her deployment, the Air Force revoked the BSM and she was never issued the medal. Additionally, Army Regulation (AR) 600-8-22 requires an award be revoked if subsequent information is revealed that would not have warranted the award had it been known at the time of the award. The actions by the approval authority to revoke the BSM are correct and well within the regulations, as the applicants service during the inclusive award period was not...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00062
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Texas has been her legal permanent home state since 1964. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 15 September 2014.
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00064
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00064 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She be allowed to transfer her Post-9/11 GI Bill educational benefits. DPSIT recommends the applicants request for TEB be approved effective 1 Jun 10, the date the VA Form 22-1990 was submitted. THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00065
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00065 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her rank of E-3, airman first class be corrected to reflect E-4, sergeant. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOE recommends the application be time barred. The application was not filed...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00067
He receive constructive service credit (CSC) under the Public and Community Service (PACS) program for his teaching. On 1 Jul 95, the applicant retired under the Temporary Early Retirement Authority (TERA) program, after serving 16 years, 11 months, and 4 days of total active service. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00074
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He requested that his HOR and POE be changed after his last reenlistment on 13 Jan 96 because at that time, he was a legal resident of San Antonio, TX. According to item 7(a) of his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, his POE at time of entry reflects Springfield, MA. According to item 7(b), his HOR at time of entry reflects Hartford, CT. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIPE recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00087
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00087 COUNSEL: HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Report of Separation from Active Duty, be amended to reflect he served in Vietnam. He served 3 years, 11 months and 13 days on active duty. The complete DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00088
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00088 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The narrative reason for separation on his on his DD Form 214, Report of Separation from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect Secretarial Authority, instead of homosexual conduct. APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was discharged on the basis of unfounded accusations of homosexual conduct and his discharge did not...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00090
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial. The applicant has not provided supporting evidence or documentation from his commander indicating his/her decision to invalidate the applicants FA. We took notice of the applicants complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00092
Airmen crew members will be placed on indefinite flying status as long as they satisfactorily perform their duties, remain physically qualified, are assigned to an authorized Unit Manning Document (UMD) aircrew position (identified by the prefix "A") which requires duties as a crew member and participate in frequent and regular aerial flights. Lastly, he requests the Board review the uniqueness of the flying requirements of his AFSC in the T-29 Aircraft, and grant him the Air Force Crew...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00094
After due deliberation in consideration of the preponderance of the evidence, the SRP concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in the PEB fitness determination for the MH condition, and therefore, no disability ratings can be recommended. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 9 Jan 2014, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant for review and comment within 30 days...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00097
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memoranda prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPR), which are attached at Exhibits C and D. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. A review of the members official military records and the documentation submitted by the applicant did not reveal any evidence that the applicant qualified for award of the PH. THE...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00098
According to AF Form 356, Findings and Recommended Disposition of USAF Physical Evaluation Board, dated 5 Sep 02, the Formal PEB (FPEB) recommended the applicant be permanently retired with compensable percentage of 40 percent for an unfitting condition of chronic low back pain secondary to degenerative disk disease. According to AF Form 1180, dated 5 Sep 02, the applicant concurred with the findings and recommendation of the FPEB. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00103
He has earned this for his over 12 years of service to this country and he is still serving as a volunteer with the DVA. He is in complete disagreement with the misinformed decision and injustice. The applicant did not file within three years after the alleged error or injustice was discovered as required by 10 U.S.C.
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00104
The applicants complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. On 3 Jan 14, the applicant signed DD Form 2656-6, Survivor Benefit Plan Election Change Certificate, establishing his children as the beneficiaries of his RCSBP. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPTT recommends denial indicating there is...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00106
As of this date, no response has been received by this office. In the interest of justice, we considered upgrading the discharge based on clemency; however, we do not find the evidence presented is sufficient for us to conclude that the applicants post-service activities warrant such consideration. Exhibit C. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 28 Apr 14.
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00107
The applicants request was not boarded by the Purple Heart Review Board as it did not contain a supporting eyewitness or medical documentation attesting to an injury caused by enemy action. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 25 Apr 14, for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit C). The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2013-00107 was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149,...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00108
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00108 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect: 1. His DD Form 214 should be corrected to reflect this period of time deployed to Thailand, as well as award of the AFOUA, the VSM w/P and the RVNGC w/V. No action required by the Board, as the applicants official...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00109
The AFGCM is awarded to Air Force enlisted personnel during a three-year period of active military service or for a one-year period of service during a time of war. The complete DPTS evaluation is at Exhibit C. _____________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 25 Apr 14, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was provided to the applicant for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D). We took notice of the applicant's complete...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00110
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The AFBCMR Medical Consultant recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. A complete copy of the AFBCMR Medical Consultants evaluation is at Exhibit C. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant refutes virtually every point made by...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00111
He was deployed from 22 Apr to 27 Oct 13 and was not allowed to take leave during this period. The application must clearly establish an error or injustice by the Air Force caused the members lost leave. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00112
Records indicate that he did not elect to participate during these timeframes. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 15 September 2014.
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00113
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00113 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His General (Under Honorable Conditions) discharge be upgraded to Honorable. He received 15 days restriction. On 24 Jan 57, the applicant was recommended by his commander for discharge.
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00122
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00122 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He receive the ten percent annual retired pay increase he qualified for by being awarded the Airmans Medal (AmnM) for heroism. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00125
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is included at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPFFF recommends the requested relief be granted. Under the provisions of SBP, the spouses of married service members had to be informed when the service member declined SBP coverage, or elected less than the maximum level of coverage. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPFFF...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00126
________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 18 Feb 14 for redirection (Exhibit C). In view of this and since this avenue of administrative relief was available at the time the applicant submitted his application, we find it would be inappropriate to consider this application for adjudication at this level, as there exists a subordinate level of appeal that...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00128
On 27 Mar 87, the applicant was discharged by reason of Admitted Homosexual, with service characterized as general (under honorable conditions). She was dating an airman at that time, but had received a letter from a woman who said she was interested in her. Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSOR, dated 20 Mar 14.
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00130
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He received shrapnel wounds in his arms and legs during a rescue mission on 3 Apr 72 at Cam Lo, Vietnam. The AFGCM w/4BOLC to read Air Force Good Conduct Medal with one Silver Oak Leaf Cluster (AFGCM w/1SOLC). The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memoranda prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPR), which are attached at Exhibits C and D. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00131
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00131 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to an honorable discharge. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we find no evidence of an error or injustice that occurred in the discharge processing. In the interest of justice, we...