AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03131
There is no record the member signed his SOU on 18 Feb 10. DPSIT recommends the members date of TEB application be changed to 18 Feb 10 and the ADSC date be adjusted to 17 Feb 11, due to the fact that he did not receive emails instructing him to sign the SOU. The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2014-03131 in Executive Session on 11 May 15 under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: , Panel Chair , Member , Member All members voted to correct the records as recommended.
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03138
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-03138 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her date of separation (DOS) be changed to 30 Jul 13, rather than 17 Jul 13, to eliminate a break in service. APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Through no fault of her own, she was not scrolled for appointment as a reserve officer in time to prevent a break in service when she transferred from the Regular Air Force to...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03156
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-03156 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She receive federal service credit for employment at Fort Benjamin Harrison, IN (1967 to 1969), the Veterans Affairs Hospital in Cleveland, OH (1971 to 1975), and the Equal Opportunity Commission (1976 to 1977). With regards to the applicants request to confirm her retirement date, her retirement date is 7 Dec 05;...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03159
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPTS recommends denial of award of the AFEM and JMUA, indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. The JMUA is only awarded to those members of the Armed Forces of the United States who were present at the time and directly participated in the service or...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03161
On 19 Jul 12, the applicant was furnished a referral EPR covering the period 21 Sep 11 through 6 Mar 12, on which he was rated Does Not Meet in Part III, Block 2, Standards, Conduct, Character, and Military Bearing, and rated (3) Average in Part V, Overall Performance Assessment. The EPR contained the comment Received an LOR for driving under the influence; civilian authorities retained jurisdictionCC established UIF. According to the documentation provided by the applicant, on 24...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03162
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPR), which are attached at Exhibits C and D. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOR recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. Airmen are given Entry Level Separation and Uncharacterized service characterization when separation is initiated within the first 180 days of continuous active service. A complete...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03168
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-03168 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His grade of Staff Sergeant (SSgt/E-5), with a Date of Rank of 1 Jul 72, be restored. On 1 Jul 72, he was progressively promoted to the grade of SSgt. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFLOA/JAJM recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice in the processing of the Article 15.
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03173
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-03173 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her reenlistment eligibility (RE) code be changed so she may reenlist. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03177
Although the applicant refers to orders, we are unable to locate any of the award elements that should have been attached to the memorandum, and none were provided. DPSID also notes that based on a review of the applicant's official military personnel record, they were able to determine the applicant should be awarded the VSM w/3BSS and the RVNGC w/P, during his service from 6 Sep 66 to 4 Sep 70 which were not reflected in his records. Upon final board decision, administrative correction...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03178
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: While stationed in , he was wrongfully accused of shooting at another airman. In the interest of justice, we considered upgrading the discharge based on clemency; however, we do not find the evidence presented is sufficient for us to conclude that the applicants post-service activities overcome the misconduct for which he was discharged. Exhibit B.
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03179
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-03179 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) in lieu of the Armed Forces Expedition Medal (AFEM). Once the VSM was established, provisions were provided to authorize service members who received the AFEM for service in Vietnam to exchange the award for the VSM. The National Defense Service Medal should have been...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03182
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-03182 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Bad Conduct Discharge (BCD) be upgraded to honorable. In accordance with 10 USC 1552(f), the Board has no authority to overturn the court-martial conviction but may only on the basis of clemency, correct the actions taken by the reviewing authorities, i.e., the sentence. The complete AFLOA/JAJM evaluation is...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03183
The Board should find it in the interest of justice to consider his application because he feels it is unfair that his dependents be punished for an error made by not being educated on the process of allocating one month to each dependent. Airmen who wish to retain their transfer benefit may reference Attachment 3, Enlisted Palace Chase Program, for continued service in the Guard or Reserve. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03185
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-03185 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His General (Under Honorable Conditions) discharge be upgraded to Honorable. The discharge authority reviewed the case and based on the applicants failure to successfully complete the alcohol abuse rehabilitation program approved his discharge with a service characterization of General (Under Honorable...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03187
His fathers service record be corrected to reflect the award of the following Air Force Medals: a. The service members WD AGO Form 53-55, Enlisted Record and Report of Separation Honorable Discharge, and DD Form 215, Correction to DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, reflects the following Decorations, Citations and Badges: - Basic Munition Badge - American Service Medal - Good Conduct Medal - Asiatic Pacific Service Medal with two Bronze Service Stars -...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03190
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-03190 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His General (Under Honorable Conditions) discharge be upgraded to Honorable. APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was an excellent Airman and all Enlisted Performance Reports and Feedback Worksheets reflect that fact. The discharge authority approved the administrative discharge with a service characterization of General...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03193
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memoranda prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPR), which are attached at Exhibits C, D, and E. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIRP recommends to grant relief to correct the applicants social security number, indicating there is evidence of an error or an injustice. A review of his personnel records revealed multiple source documents to validate his social security number is incorrect on...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03195
According to the Defense Manpower Data Center (DMDC) application, there is no record the member applied for TEB at any time. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03197
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-03197 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect all awards and decorations received. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03198
The DD Form 215 corrected the applicants DD Form 214 dated 8 Jan 74 by adding the award of the Air Force Outstanding Unit Award with Valor and one Bronze Oak Leaf Cluster and Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial indicating there is no evidence...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03203
At the time of retirement, he also had a total of 2 years, 10 months, and 19 days of inactive service. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOR recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSOR evaluation is at Exhibit C. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03205
On 28 May 14, the applicants commander notified him he was being considered for nonjudicial punishment (NJP) under Article 15. AFLOA/JAJMs position to deny the applicants request is supported; however, if the Board determines an error or injustice has occurred, and elects to restore the grade of master sergeant (E-7), the appropriate date of rank and effective date is 1 Feb 11. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03208
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-03208 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, effective 31 July 1972, be corrected to reflect he served in Korea from 1952 through 1953. However, the Korean service is accurately recorded on the appropriate DD Form 214 for the time period served. We took notice of the...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03209
The applicant retired before the Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) program was established. Therefore, the applicant cannot obtain approval for a program that did not exist at the time of his separation/retirement. We took notice of the applicants complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03211
In support of his appeal, the applicant submits the 17 Jul 13 e-mail from the TFSC stating that his application was rejected; a print-out from the milConnect website showing that he applied for his benefits in Aug 11 and inputted a request to transfer months of his benefits to his dependents; an AF Form 1411, Extension of Enlistment in the Air Force, which validates that he extended in order to qualify for TEB transfer; and an unsigned SOU. While the applicant did complete an extension for...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03213
He is unsure of the exact time frame of submitting the split disbursement of benefits amongst his dependents, but his intention was to give at least one month of benefits to each family member and not the whole amount to one dependent. Since the inception of the TEB website, when a member submits a TEB request and does not allocate months of benefits to a dependent, a message pops up which states: "Warning: You have one or more eligible family members to whom you have not transferred...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03219
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial of the applicants request for an RE code that would make her eligible to reenlist. Unless otherwise directed by the Board, AFPC/DPSOY will provide the applicant a corrected copy of her DD Form 214 with an RE code of 2C. We note the Air Force OPR has...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03222
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-03222 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Bad Conduct Discharge (BCD) be upgraded to a General discharge based upon clemency. Although he went Absent Without Leave (AWOL) twice, he went home to address problems with his family. We find no evidence which indicates the applicants service characterization, which had its basis in his court-martial...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03233
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-03233 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Special Program Designator (SPD) code on her DD Form 214, Report of Separation from Active Duty, be corrected. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03239
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-03239 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Purple Heart (PH) Medal. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends disapproval for award of the PH Medal....
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03240
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the memoranda prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPR), which are included at Exhibits C, D, and E. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIDR recommends granting relief to change the RDP date and Given Under Hand date of the applicants 14 Nov 13 AFCM, indicating there is evidence of an error or injustice. It is recommended the Board grant the applicants request and determine an appropriate RDP...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03242
In support of his request, the applicant provided a personal letter, a copy of his DD Form 214, and copies of his medical records. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. After a thorough review of the applicants official...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03244
There is no record in the DMDC that she applied for TEB prior to retirement; therefore, no eligibility for the program could be established, as the law/regulations cite the date of request as the date on which the appropriate service obligation would be established (IA W AFI 36-2306, Attachment 9, A9.18.1.2, A9.18.1.3 and A9.18.1.4). Given the applicant had more than 20 years of satisfactory service and would not have incurred an additional ADSC obligation to transfer his TEB, we find the...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03249
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-03249 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His son, the deceased former member, be reinstated to the grade of E-4. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOE recommends denial...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03250
On 23 May 83, the discharge authority directed the applicant be discharged with an UOTHC discharge. In the interest of justice, we considered upgrading the discharge based on clemency; however, in the absence of any evidence related to the applicants post-service activities, there is no way for us to determine if the applicants accomplishments since leaving the service warrant such an action. Available Applicant's Master Personnel Records Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 18 Sep 14, w/atch.
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03253
On 5 December 2011, AFPC/DPAPP notified the applicant that after a complete review of his official military records, they were able to verify and confirm boots on ground and foreign service time at Ching Chuan Kang Air Base, Taiwan, from 11 August 1967 to 15 September 1968, for one year, one month, and five days. The Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal (RVCM) is awarded to members who: (1) served for six months in South Vietnam during the period 1 March 1961 and 28 March 1973; (2) served...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03254
On 6 Nov 09, the applicant acknowledged receipt of the Article 15 punishment and, on 10 Nov 09, elected not to appeal the punishment or submit matters on his OSR. The applicant states that he was not aware post board counseling was available for members who have been non-selected for promotion and had he known, he would have requested counseling after the CY13 board. The complete ARPC evaluation is at Exhibit D. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03265
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-03265 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His time as an Health Professions Scholarship Program (HPSP) student be credited as active duty service. There is no valid contract for HPSP, and a correct contract for detail into medical school was never provided. The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2014-03265 in Executive...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03269
The applicant contends that during a FBI background check, he discovered they have him listed as dishonorably discharged. The applicant did receive an honorable discharge when his dishonorable discharge was suspended and his DD Form 214 properly annotates an honorable discharge. Should the applicant provide evidence to show that his Air Force records are in error, we would be willing to reconsider his request.
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03278
On 19 Jul 12, AFPC/DPAME administratively corrected the applicant's record by adjusting his ADSC for his time in the Air Force Reserve Officer Training Corps (AFROTC) by 3 months and 15 days, with a new Active Duty Service Commitment Date (ADSCD) of 5 Feb 15. Even though his DD Form 214 states that he served on active duty from 10 May 96 to 14 Jul 99, the law states that this time in the program is not creditable towards retirement (active duty) or pay. We took notice of the applicants...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03292
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPTT recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice which would warrant granting relief. In order to give him additional service time for the excess time he spent in ISLRS, the record would have to be changed to create a break in service after his...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03296
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-03296 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, be corrected to include the Presidential Unit Citation (PUC), Air Force Outstanding Unit Award (AFOUA) and Basic Missile Occupational Badge. (Administratively Corrected) APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: She served at Grand Forks Air Force...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03297
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-03297 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her General (Under Honorable Conditions) discharge be upgraded to Honorable. On 13 May 97, the applicant received a Letter of Reprimand for disobeying a direct order and making a false official statement a violation of Article 91 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice. The commander recommended her service be...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03298
His records be corrected to reflect that he was appointed into the medical corps (MC) in the grade of major in Jan 12, instead of being appointed in the grade of captain in Aug 13 and he receive medical special pays and bonuses effective said date. He worked as a full time Flight Surgeon for over a year but received only 50 percent CSC for this time, which unfairly delayed his promotion to major. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03299
On 17 Jun 88, the separation authority approved the applicants unconditional waiver indicating he would be discharged in absentia at the earliest possible date. The applicant has provided no evidence which would lead us to believe the characterization of the service was contrary to the provisions of the governing regulation, unduly harsh, or disproportionate to the offenses committed. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03307
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-03307 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His date of separation (DOS) be changed to 1 May 14, rather than 28 Feb 14, to prevent a break in service. APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Through no fault of his own, he was not scrolled for appointment as a reserve officer in time to prevent a break in service when he transferred from the Regular Air Force to the...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03313
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-03313 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His official military records reflect his Vietnam Service and Vietnam/Southeast Asia Service Ribbons. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPRs), attached at Exhibit C and Exhibit D. AIR FORCE...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03316
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-03316 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Under Other Than Honorable Conditions (UOTHC) discharge be upgrade to a General discharge. The applicant waived any right to a hearing before an administrative discharge board, and was notified of his right to legal counsel and to submit statements on his own behalf. Based on the available evidence of record,...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03325
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-03325 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She be awarded the Southwest Asia Service Medal with one Bronze Service Star (SWASM w/1BSS). Change Air Force Outstanding Unit Award with 3 Bronze OLC to read Air Force Outstanding Unit Award with one Silver Oak Leaf Cluster (AFOUA w/1SOLC). The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03327
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memoranda prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPR), which are attached at Exhibits C and D. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPFD recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPFD evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSOA...