AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02788
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02788 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable. On 30 Jun 87, the applicant received a general (under honorable conditions) discharge with a narrative reason for separation of Homosexuality Acts and corresponding separation code of HRA. His DD Form 214, reflects a Reenlistment (RE)...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02793
In order to consider a service member for a medical retirement there must be evidence of an existing disqualifying medical condition that interfered with the service members ability to perform military service to the extent and duration that rendered the individual non-worldwide qualified and warranted referral for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). A complete copy of the BCMR Medical Consultants evaluation is at Exhibit C. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the BCMR...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02794
According to his DD Form 4/1, on 27 Dec 00, the applicant enlisted in the Air National Guard (ANG) for a period of six years in the grade of Airman Basic (AB, E-1). We took notice of the applicants complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. Exhibit D....
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02800
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02800 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect he was awarded: 1. The Air Force Achievement Medal (AFAM). We took notice of the available evidence of record and the applicant's complete submission in...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02811
The commander was told that since the applicant was a ten year First Sergeant who did not hold a 9- skill level she could not remain a CMSgt and that there was not a method for First Sergeants to be promoted to CMSgt. A complete copy of the rebuttal is at Exhibit F. ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicants MILPDS record was reviewed and noted as follows: 16 Jan 03, member last held AFSC 2A671; 17 Jan 03, member was selected into a SDI 8F000 (First Sergeant); 1 Mar 11,...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02816
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02816 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His retirement pay be adjusted to provide credit for public service performed as a Temporary Early Retirement Authority (TERA) retiree. Based on the procedures established for the TERA processing, and the information contained in the retirement application signed by the applicant, it appears he was properly...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02820
Without a request, a TEB application cannot be approved. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02821
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02821 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable. On 21 Dec 90, the discharge authority concurred with the findings and recommendations and directed the applicant be furnished a general discharge without probation and rehabilitation. In the interest of justice, we...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02823
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02823 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her 11 Mar 11 application for transfer of her Post-9/11 GI Bill Educational Benefits to her dependents be approved with an Active Duty Service Commitment (ADSC) date of 10 May 15. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIT recommends denial as there is no evidence the applicant signed the SOU in Mar 11. THE BOARD DETERMINES...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02824
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02824 XXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be promoted to the grade of Lieutenant Colonel (Lt Col) effective 18 Sep 65. The applicant submitted a Consideration for Permanent Reserve Promotion, dated 15 Apr 65, stating he was considered but not recommended for promotion to the grade of Lt Col. A complete copy of the ARPC/PB evaluation is...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02829
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02829 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His name be included in the official list of United States Air Force Academy (USAFA) graduates, class of 1966. On 28 Apr 66, according to the DD Form 785, Record of Disenrollment from Officer Candidate-Type Training, the applicant was disenrolled for breach of Cadet Honor Code. Applicant did not file within three...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02838
According to the court order provided by the applicant, dated 15 Jan 13, his legal name has been changed to On 24 Mar 15, the applicant was forwarded a copy of the SAF/MR memorandum, dated 9 Mar 15, that was provided in order to comply with 10 U.S.C. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is included at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIRP recommends denial,...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02840
He suffered from a serious brain tumor condition that was corrected by surgery and removal of the tumor was more than three years ago. The board finds the member unfit for duty at this time and he should be placed on the TDRL and re-evaluated in 18 months. The applicant contends that he is fit for duty and there is no reason to question the Commandant of Cadets who indicated the applicant was fulfilling all duties required of cadets at the time he was placed on TDRL.
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02845
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: In 1974, the original award approval correspondence was forwarded to Headquarters United States Air Force Europe (USAFE) for award of the LOM for superior service from 1967 to 1974. However, the position does not meet the criteria of serving in a qualifying position in accordance with AFI 36-2803, The Air Force Military Awards and Decorations Program. The complete MRBP evaluation is at Exhibit D. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: He provided a copy of AF...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02847
In a letter dated 2 June 2015, SAF/MRBR provided the applicant an opportunity to request that her case be administratively closed until such time as her case is resolved through the appropriate IG authority and requested she respond within 30 days (Exhibit G). After considering the applicants appeal, several character statements and the Staff Judge Advocates legal review, the demotion authority approved the demotion action on 24 February 2014. As such, an applicant must first exhaust all...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02849
The applicant admits that the error was on his part, but requests that the Board adjust the date of submission to his original date of Mar 13. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation, was forwarded to the applicant on 27 Oct 14 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit C). We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02858
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02858 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable. He had not completed the work order and the aircraft inspection as not completed. Exhibit B.
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02863
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02863 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code 2C (involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service) be changed to 3A (first-term airman involuntarily separated entry-level for inability to satisfactorily progress in a required training program without characterization of...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02864
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02864 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His General (Under Honorable Conditions) discharge be upgraded to Honorable. On 30 Mar 84, the applicant was furnished a General (Under Honorable Conditions) discharge, and was credited with 2 years, 9 months, and 9 days of active service. In the interest of justice, we considered upgrading the discharge based...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02870
STATEMENT OF FACTS: According to DD Form 4, Enlistment/Reenlistment Document, Armed Forces of the United States, dated 23 July 1984, the applicant enlisted in the Air Force Reserve. The Outstanding Airman of the Year Ribbon is awarded to Airmen competing at Air Force level in the 12 Outstanding Airmen of the Year Program. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 25 March 2015.
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02873
On 24 Jul 13, the action was found to be legally sufficient and the discharge authority concurred with the commanders recommendation and directed the applicants entry level separation with uncharacterized service. As of this date, no response has been received by this office. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02877
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02877 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His military records be corrected to include his Air Force Reserve time. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPTS recommends...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02878
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02878 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His undesirable discharge be upgraded. As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit B). In the interest of justice, we considered upgrading the discharge based on clemency; however, in the absence of any evidence related to the applicants post-service activities, there is no way for us...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02880
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02880 DANNY L. WAGNER COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be changed to reflect his grade as Staff Sergeant (SSgt/E-4). The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02883
AFI 36-3207, Separating Commissioned Officers, states the Air Force normally requires recoupment of a portion of education assistance, special pay, or bonus money received when officers separate before completing the period of active duty they agreed to serve. Further, the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense (OUSD) Memorandum, dated 29 Nov 10, directs members with an SPD Code of FGQ (Intradepartmental Transfer) are required to repay the unearned portion of the bonus. THE BOARD...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02885
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit C. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant states he was never permanently stationed in Vietnam but would fly into...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02889
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02889 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect he served in Vietnam (administratively resolved), Thailand, Okinawa, and Europe. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02890
The applicant failed to allocate a month of benefits in MilConnect to all eligible dependents during his initial application and by regulation they are now ineligible. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. Exhibit D....
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02893
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial of the applicants request for the GWOT-E, indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. After a review of the applicants personnel records and Defense Finance and Accounting Service records, the applicants deployment to Iraq...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02897
For this offense she was reduced to the grade of airman (E-2) (suspended until 1 Aug 82), forfeiture of $50 per month for two months, and 30 days extra duty. On 10 Apr 86, the applicant appeared before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) with counsel. The Board denied the applicants request to upgrade her discharge and concluded that the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation, was within the discretion of the discharge authority...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02905
The court order changing the applicants name is dated 8 November 1982, which is after the applicants period of service. Nevertheless, while the board notes the applicant provided a court order legally changing his name, he has not provided compelling evidence to convince the Board of an injustice. We took notice of the applicants complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02906
AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial indicating if the applicant would have provided a medical invalidation memorandum and unit commander invalidation memorandum their office could have recommended a FA removal or if he provided the fitness screening questionnaire that stated he had a medical problem that needed to be evaluated by a medical provider, it could have warranted a recommendation for a cardio component exemption. A member must notify the UFPM of the...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02908
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPFD recommends denial indicating the preponderance of evidence reflects there was no error or an injustice in the disability process. Further, it must be noted the USAF disability boards must rate disabilities based on the members condition at the time of evaluation; in...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02913
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: NGB/A1P recommends granting relief in the form of correcting the applicants end of tour date from to . The applicant was granted 14 days (the maximum downtime) of Post Deployment Stand-Down Time (PDSDT) based on his days deployed time-in-theater, in accordance with Air Combat...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02914
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02914 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, be amended to reflect he served in Vietnam. We took notice of the applicants complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02920
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandums prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPR), which are attached at Exhibits C and D. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOR recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. Both the commander and the discharge authority correctly concluded that discharge was in order. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSOR evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFBCMR Medical...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02921
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02921 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His under honorable conditions (general) discharge be upgraded. In the interest of justice, we considered upgrading the discharge based on clemency; however, we find the evidence presented is not sufficient for us to conclude that the applicants post-service activities overcome the misconduct for which he was...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02924
Item 7a (Place of Entry into Active Duty (PLEAD)) reflect Niceville, FL, rather than Tuscaloosa, AL. b. Item 7b (Home of Record (HOR) at Time of Entry) reflect Niceville, FL, rather than Clifton, VA. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02926
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02926 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His non-selection for promotion by the Calendar Year 2013 (CY13) USAFR Participating Reserve Major Promotion Selection Board be removed. In accordance with AFI 36-2504, Officer Promotion, Continuation and Selective Early Removal in the Reserve of the Air Force, paragraph 1.7, it is the eligible officers...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02927
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02927 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code of "2C" (Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry-level separation without service characterization of service) be changed to allow him to reenter military service. Therefore, the applicants request should be denied because the AFI in effect at the time of his separation...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02952
On 5 Jun 14, she received notification she was non-selected for promotion to major for the second time. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/PB recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02958
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02958 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His birth date be changed from 22 Jul 50 to 23 Jul 50 on his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty. According to his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, his birthdate is recorded as 22 Jul 50. ? THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02959
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02959 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Post 9/11 GI Bill Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) be properly updated in the system and approved. The complete DPSIT evaluation is at Exhibit C. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 10 Oct 14 for review and comment within 30...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02960
The Board should consider it in the interest of justice to consider his untimely application as the benefit was instituted in 2009 and he was not informed that such a program existed. We took notice of the applicants complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error of...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02962
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02962 XXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. Since ARPC has no record that the applicant notified them of her election within the required timeframe, she is not eligible to add her children to her RCSBP. We took notice of the applicants complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02967
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the memoranda prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPR), which are included at Exhibits C and D. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: NGB/A1P recommends granting relief in the form of correcting the applicants end of tour date from to . The applicant was granted 14 days (the maximum downtime) of Post Deployment Stand-Down Time (PDSDT) based on his 183 days deployed time-in-theater, in accordance with Air...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02968
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02968 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect his participation in Operation JOINT ENDEAVOR, while on Temporary Duty (TDY) in Brindisi, Italy. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02974
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02974 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His WD AGO Form 53, Enlistment Record and Report of Separation, be changed to reflect his Date of Birth (DOB) as 12 Aug 25, instead of 12 Aug 24. Air Force Instruction 36-2608, Military Personnel Records System, Table A7.5, Note 3 states Do not...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02975
A review of the applicants military personnel records failed to substantiate an error or injustice to warrant changing his HOR. The complete DPSIPE evaluation is at Exhibit C. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy Of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 23 Dec 14, for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D). We took notice of the applicants complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02977
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02977 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His claim under the Traumatic Servicemembers Group Life Insurance (TSGLI) Protection be approved. In this respect we note the applicant provides statements from two medical providers and his caregiver that discusses the specific limitations the applicant actually experienced and states the applicant indeed...