AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01987
On 29 Nov 11, the applicant applied to the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) to have her discharge upgraded to honorable. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOR recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. The applicants commander notified her she was being separated...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01988
Any duty that requires him to report his arrest for DUI violates his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination. On 10 Oct 12, the applicants commander issued him an LOR for failing to report his arrest to his security officer as required by DoD Regulation 5200.2-R, paragraph C9.1.4. On 11 Mar 13, in response to a request from the applicant, his referral EPR was amended to remove reference to the DUI, however, the EPR remained an overall 3 based upon the applicants failure to...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01989
________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends the Board make a determination if the applicant served in the area of eligibility for award of the AFEM. While we note the comments of DPSID indicating the applicants records do not contain documentation verifying the exact location served for the requested award, we believe Special Order TE-043, dated 30 Jan 96 indicating Operation DESERT STORM, was more likely than not in support...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01996
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01996 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His General (Under Honorable Conditions) discharge be upgraded to Honorable. The applicant has provided no evidence which would lead us to believe the characterization of the service was contrary to the provisions of the governing regulation, unduly harsh, or disproportionate to the offenses committed. In the...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01997
AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial of the applicants request for the removal of the contested FAs due to the applicant not exhausting all administrative remedies. As such, an applicant must first exhaust all available avenues of administrative relief provided by existing law or regulations prior to seeking relief before this Board, as required by the governing Air Force Instruction. Furthermore, the Board cannot grant reconsideration on this portion of his request unless...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01998
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01998 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The following items on his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected: a. The applicants DD Form 214 reflects a Separation Code of JKN and a Reentry Code of 2B The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02000
AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIT recommends approval. THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that on 30 Dec 09, he elected to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill Educational Benefits to his dependents. The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 8 May 14 w/atchs.
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02007
The criteria for ADL loss as it is defined in the TSGLI procedures Guide follows: A member is considered to have a loss of ADL if the member REQUIRES assistance to perform at least two of the six activities of daily living. Initial medical review of the claim the physician indicated that he would allow for the applicant requiring assistance for dressing but not bathing. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPFC evaluation is at Exhibit C. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicants...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02012
In support of his appeal, the applicant submits a Medical Determination Letter, signed by his medical provider, which stated that, he had a documented medical condition that precluded him from achieving a passing score in a non-exempt portion of the FA test. The applicants complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. Air Force Instruction (AFI) 36-2905, Fitness Program, dated 21 Oct 2013, states that any military member can appeal his or her own FA through a Wing-Level...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02013
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02013 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Purple Heart (PH) Medal and the Air Force Combat Action Medal (AFCAM). The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPR), which are attached at Exhibits C and D. AIR FORCE...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02015
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02015 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, be corrected to reflect: - His service in Vietnam and Korea (Administratively Corrected Boots On Ground letter issued). The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02018
Based on the totality of what is expressed in the applicants case and the fact that he was at a non-Air Force deployed location, his application could not have been received. As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit D). ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to the APPLICANT be corrected to show that: a.
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02021
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02021 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded an additional 10 percent increase in his retired pay as a result of receiving the Silver Star for gallantry. On 1 Sep 04, the applicant was awarded the Silver Star for gallantry per Special Order G-306. Based on the policy in place at the time, the applicant was considered for the additional 10...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02022
On 26 Aug 09 the applicant waived her right to a hearing before an administrative discharge board provided she received a no less than an honorable discharge. § 654), commonly known as "Dont Ask, Dont Tell (DADT). In a memorandum, dated 20 September 2011, the Under Secretary of Defense published guidance that Service Discharge Review Boards should normally grant requests to change the narrative reason for discharge (the change should be to "Secretarial Authority"), requests to...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02023
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02023 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He would like to know if he was and or is entitled to early separation (strength reduction funds) of $10,000. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02024
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02024 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His rank listed on his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, issued 28 Jan 14, in Block 4a/b, Grade, Rate or Rank/Pay Grade, be changed to Staff Sergeant (SSgt/E-5). The DD Form 214 reflects the active duty grade the member held at time of retirement. IAW 10 USC 1372, our...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02026
According to documentation provided by the applicant, on 5 Apr 11, she received a Certificate of Eligibility from the Department of Veterans Affairs indicating she is entitled to benefits under the Post-9/11 GI Bill. An applicant cannot obtain approval for a program that did not exist at the time of their separation/retirement. Any member of the Armed Forces who, on or after 1 Aug 09, is eligible for the Post-9/11 GI Bill, had at least six years of service on the date of election may...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02030
In accordance with AFI 36-2905, Fitness Program, when an Airman receives four Unsatisfactory FA scores within a 24-month period and a medical records review by a military health care provider has ruled out medical conditions precluding the Airman from achieving a passing score, the Unit Commander must make a discharge or retention recommendation to the separation authority. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02032
The Article 15 action does not mean that a cadet must be disenrolled. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: USAFA/JA recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. While his enlisted service is commendable, it does not provide a basis for reinstatement to USAFA.
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02034
After a review of the applicants military personnel record, it appears there is no error or injustice justifying a change in her home of record. The applicants contentions are duly noted; however, we are not persuaded that her home of record or her place of entry currently reflected in her records were incorrectly recorded at the time she initially came on active duty. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02035
On 5 Aug 83, the applicant was furnished a general discharge, and was credited with 1 year, 6 months, and 14 days of active service. On 3 Aug 85, the applicant applied to the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) to have his discharge upgraded to honorable. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 25 Aug 14.
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02036
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02036 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, Block 28, Narrative Reason for Separation, be changed from Personality Disorder to Bipolar Disorder or similar mental illness condition. A complete copy of the BCMR Medical Consultant evaluation is at Exhibit E. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02039
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02039 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect he was issued a DD Form 4, Enlistment/Reenlistment Document - Armed Forces of the United States, upon graduation from the United States Air Force Academy (USAFA). On 23 May 2012, an AF IMT 133, Oath of Office (Military Personnel) was initiated showing the applicant was...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02042
As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit D). Therefore, we recommend the applicant's records be corrected as indicated below. THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to the APPLICANT, be corrected to show that she was not discharged from the Air Force on 15 May 13, but on that date, she was continued on active duty through 30 Jul 13, on which date she was released from active duty.
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02043
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02043 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Home of Record (HOR) be corrected. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIP recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. Additionally, it states the place recorded as the individuals home when reinstated, reappointed, or reenlisted remains the same as that recorded when commissioned,...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02044
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02044 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect the following: 1. He was awarded the Cold War Medal and other awards/decorations not recorded on the DD Form 214. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02045
There was no error within the process, the applicant failed to submit his DD Form 2839 within the proper timeline, as established on the CSB Notification Memorandum, which states I have considered my option for CSB and if I accept CSB I will provide a DD Form 2839 within 30 days of my 15 year mark. His Total Active Federal Military Service Date is 10 Nov 98. On 17 Jun 13, he signed his notification memorandum and the MPS updated the Military Personnel Data System (MilPDS) and...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02051
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02051 COUNSEL: JOHN E. FITZGIBBONS HEARING DESIRED: YES APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His court-martial conviction be set aside and his bad conduct discharge be upgraded to honorable. APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The only reason he testified at his court-martial, was to show the members that the Air Force entrapped him. The complete JAJM evaluation is at Exhibit C. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02059
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/PB recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. When considered by the CY11 and CY12 Nonparticipating Reserve Major Promotion Selection Board, the applicant was assigned to the Nonobligated Nonparticipating Ready Personnel Section (NNRPS). ...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02061
On 27 Oct 87, the case was found legally sufficient and, on 4 Nov 87, the discharge authority directed the applicant be discharged. Based on the available evidence of record, it appears the discharge was consistent with the substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and within the commander's discretionary authority. Exhibit C. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 4 Aug 14, w/atchs.
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02063
Beginning on 1 Jan 01, service members who failed to make an RCSBP election within 90 days after receiving their eligibility letter are automatically enrolled in under Option C (immediate annuity on day after date of death) for his dependents. Due to the service member receiving his eligibility letter prior to effective date for automatic SBP coverage, the requested relief cannot be granted by law. While the applicant argues that it is unfair that service members who failed to make an...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02064
In accordance with AFI 36-2306, For individuals eligible for retirement on 1 Aug 09, no additional service is required. Given that the applicant was eligible for retirement prior to 1 Aug 09, he would have incurred no active duty service commitment (ADSC) obligation with TEB approval. Based on the applicants retirement date, he retired prior to the TEB program being established and therefore, he is not eligible to transfer benefits to his dependents. THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02066
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02066 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect he was entitled to two stripes for his active duty time in the Marine Corps Reserves. APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: In Mar 55, he joined the Air Force; had two stripes and no lost time. After a thorough review of the applicants personnel records and other supporting documentation,...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02068
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit B. We took notice of the applicants complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02070
AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIT recommends denial, stating that on 28 Jun 12, the applicant submitted the Pre-Application Checklist which states by law (USC Title 38), certain enrollment actions (e.g., initiation of Post-9/11 GI Bill transfer of benefits) are only available while on active duty and lost once separated or retired. The applicant has not provided supporting evidence that an error or injustice has occurred on the part of the Air Force. There is no proof the applicant did not...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02071
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02071 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded Vietnam Ribbon. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial of the applicants implied request for the...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02072
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02072 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her deceased husbands Bad Conduct Discharge (BCD) be upgraded to general (under honorable conditions). Based on the available evidence of record, it appears the discharge was consistent with the substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and within the commander's discretionary authority. Exhibit C....
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02074
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02074 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect the following Air Force Medals and or Ribbons: a. Korean Defense Service Medal (KDSM) - (ADMINISTRATIVELY CORRECTED) b. Vietnam Training Medal, Second Class APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was awarded the Vietnam Training...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02077
AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPTT recommends denial. To date, a response has not been received (Exhibit D). We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice.
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02081
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02081 COUNSEL: Kimberly ONeal HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The deceased be awarded the Purple Heart (PH) medal. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends disapproval for award of the PH. The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2014-02081 was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 2 Jul 13, w/atchs.
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02082
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02082 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Home of Record (HOR) be changed to Branson, Missouri. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIPE recommends denial indicating there...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02084
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: NGB/A1P recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. In accordance with AFI 36-3003, Military Leave Program, para 10.1., the situation preventing members from using leave must have been caused by a catastrophe, national emergency, and/or crisis of...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02087
AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFRC/RSOO recommends denial. Current AFR enlistment incentive information is available in AFI 36-2638, Air Force Reserve Enlisted Incentives. According to the AFRC Master Incentive Bonus List dated October 2011 - September 2012 effective at the time of the applicants enlistment (15 February 2013), AFSC 2A554B was not on the Master Incentive List for an enlistment bonus. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02093
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02093 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge be upgraded to honorable or general. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit D. AIR FORCE...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02096
On 13 Nov 13, the applicant was commissioned in the grade of captain (O-3) in the Reserve of the Air Force. While we note that despite the fact the applicant was led to believe she would be accessed in the grade of captain, her appointment in the grade of first lieutenant was procedurally correct and consistent with the constructive service credit (CSC) policy prescribed in AFI 36-2005, which was the policy in effect at the time of the applicants accession once the FY13 CSC policy expired...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02101
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02101 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general discharge be upgraded to honorable. On 10 March 1986, the applicant was furnished a general discharge for Misconduct (Drug Abuse) and was credited with 4 years, 10 months, and 6 days of total active service. As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit C).
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02102
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02102 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general under honorable conditions discharge be upgraded to Honorable. On 13 Mar 85, the applicant acknowledged receipt of the notification his driving privileges were suspended and receiving the Article 15. In the interest of justice, we considered upgrading the discharge based on clemency; however, we do not...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02106
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02106 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His General (Under Honorable Conditions) discharge be upgraded to Honorable. Based on the available evidence of record, it appears the discharge was consistent with the substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and within the commander's discretionary authority. In the interest of justice, we considered...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02107
However, she tested three days later on 16 May 2014 and received a measurement of 30.5 which led to a satisfactory score. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 10 November 2014.
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02108
Based on documentation on file in the master personnel records, the discharge to include the Separation Program Designator (SPD) code, the narrative reason for separation and character of service was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge instruction and was within the discretion of the discharge authority. Therefore, his uncharacterized character of service is correct and in accordance with DoD and Air Force instructions The complete DPSOR evaluation...