AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03348
We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case and agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air National Guard office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has been the victim of an error or injustice. THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that he accrued 22 days of...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03350
The FSQ should be completed no earlier than 30 calendar days, but no later than 7 days prior to FA to provide time for medical evaluation, when indicated; however, failure to complete FSQ does not invalidate the FA. On 7 Apr 14 the applicant submitted a letter from his commander, with attachments, requesting that the contested FA be removed from the record (Exhibit C). However, in response to the Air Force evaluation, the applicant submits a letter from his commander requesting the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03352
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON DC Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR BC-2013-03352 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, it is directed that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that on 14 December 2009, he elected former spouse...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03356
She does not recall receiving a letter from the Air Force informing her of her spouses decision to decline SBP participation. There is no record the required notice was sent to the applicant and the applicant has provided a sworn statement that the notification was not received. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 19 Sep 13.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03357
On 18 Feb 14, the Fitness Assessment Appeals Board (FAAB) disapproved the applicants request for relief on the basis she did not seek immediate medical attention, took the FA on 30 Apr 13, and was medically evaluated on 10 May 13; however, there was no memorandum from the commander to invalidate the contested FA. While the applicant contends that a medical condition precluded successful completion of the contested FA, there is insufficient evidence to support her claim. Exhibit C. Letter,...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03367
On 4 Feb 83, the case was found to be legally sufficient and the discharge authority approved the commanders recommendation, directing the applicants administrative discharge without probation and rehabilitation. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03368
________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was suffering from medical conditions the day of the contested FA, precluding him attaining a passing score. At the time of the contested FA, he was taking Prilosec to manage these conditions. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03370
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-03370 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to show he declined coverage under the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP). Public Law (PL) 99-145 requires spouses of married service members to concur in writing, prior to the service members retirement, in SBP elections that...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03375
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-03375 XXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Fitness Assessment (FA), dated 5 Mar 13 be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). The FSQ should be completed no earlier than 30 calendar days, but no later than 7 days prior to FA to provide time...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03377
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-03377 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected to show award of the Armed Forces Service Medal (AFSM). ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03379
For eligibility of the GWOT-E, individuals must have deployed abroad, on or after 11 Sep 2001 and a future date to be determined, for service in Operation Enduring Freedom (OEF), Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF), or Operation New Dawn (OND) and meet one of the following: Assigned, attached, or mobilized to a unit participating in OEF/OIF and serving for 30 consecutive days or 60 nonconsecutive days (there is no time limit required for nonconsecutive days to be accumulated); Be engaged in actual...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03381
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-03381 COUNSEL: HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He receives a retroactive promotion to the grade of captain (O-3) effective no later than his discharge on 26 Jan 1946. The complete DPSOO evaluation is at Exhibit B. Moreover, the applicant has not provided substantial evidence which would persuade us...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03384
Based on the available evidence of record, it appears the applicants general (under honorable conditions) discharge for drug abuse was consistent with the substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and within the discharge authoritys discretion. Therefore, in view of the above, and in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we conclude that no basis exists to upgrade the applicants general discharge. Applicant's Master Personnel Records Exhibit C. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 28 Mar 14.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03387
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-03387 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her records be corrected to show her Date of Enlistment (DOE) as 26 Jun 1958. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03388
After completing his FA, he requested his Unit Fitness Program Manager (UFPM) -re- accomplish an AC measurement. The tester will record this value as the AC measurement. The applicant did not provide his fitness score sheet nor did he provide documentation from the FAC acknowledging the error and an invalidation memorandum from the Unit Commander indicating his/her decision to invalidate the FA. While we note the applicant's stated request to have the entire FA removed, we believe the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03392
A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIM evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit B. While the applicant has not provided a letter from his commander invalidating the FA, he has provided an AF Form 108 signed by his medical provider stating that he did in fact have a medical condition that precluded him from passing the contested FA. Therefore, the majority of the Board recommends the applicants records be corrected as indicated below.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03396
________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He should be entitled to a Reserve Officer Affiliation Bonus since his Air Force Specialty Code (AFSC) 64PX/Contracting, was listed on the 13 Jan 12, Air Force Reserve Command (AFRC) Fiscal Year 2012 (FY12) Critical Skills Officer Incentive Eligible Skills memo. AFRC/AlKP appears to have interpreted Title 37 USC Section 308j in a manner that allowed them to add a caveat to the Commander's program...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03399
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-03399 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Master High Altitude Low Opening (HALO) Badge be added to his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03400
Members of the Board considered this application on 22 April 2014. Panel Chair Attachment: Ltr, AFPC/DPSIT, dtd 25 Jul 13 DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON DC Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR BC-2013-03400 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, it is directed that: The pertinent military records of the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03404
AFBCMR BC-2013-03404 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: XXXXXXX Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, we recommend the applicant's records be corrected to show that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03405
On 20 Jun 07, the applicant was relieved from the ANG and transferred to the Air Force Reserve. Any member of the Armed Forces (active duty or Selected Reserve, officer or enlisted) on or after 1 Aug 09, who is eligible for the Post-9/11 GI Bill, and: * Has at least 6 years of service in the Armed Forces on the date of election and agrees to serve 4 additional years in the Armed Forces from the date of election. - Subject to the time limitation for use of entitlement under section 3321 an...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03409
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C. THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/PB recommends denial of the applicant's request to remove the CY12 nonselection from her record. Through no fault of the applicant, her record was incomplete at the time she was considered by the selection board in question, in that four of her United States Marine Corps (USMC) evaluations (FitReps) were not...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03410
________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: At the time of their divorce, 30 Nov 12, her deceased former husband did not take any action to convert his SBP coverage to former spouse coverage. Because the former member passed away within a year of his divorce to the applicant, there can be no competing beneficiary because a subsequent spouse cannot attain eligibility for SBP benefits in their own right until one year after the date of the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03417
He was deferred for the second time and his MSD was established as 1 Mar 14. The applicant completed 24 years of commissioned service in May 08. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03418
If any of the measures differ by more than one inch from the other two, the tester will take an additional measurement. The tester will record this value as the AC measurement. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03431
Once he was notified, he immediately requested and filed for the date of his service commitment to be adjusted to the original request date. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicants military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ _ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIT recommends denial. Prior to accessing the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03433
Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR BC-2013-03433 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, it is directed that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that on 31 August 2009, he elected to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill Educational Benefits to his...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03434
He be awarded the Combat Readiness Medal (CRM). They did not find any official documentation in the applicant's record to verify he served in a combat ready position for 24 months and was awarded or recommended for the CRM by his assigned base. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2013-03434 in Executive Session on 17 Jun 2014, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: , Panel Chair , Member ,...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03435
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-03435 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Separation Program Designator (SPD) code of FCC (reduction in force) on her DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be changed to reflect Voluntary Separation Program (VSP), the program under which she separated from the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03438
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-03438 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His discharge with disability severance pay be changed to a Reserve retirement. ________________________________________________________________ THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPTT recommends denial, stating, in part, that the applicant claims he...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03450
In support of her request, the applicant submits copies of her DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, personal statement, and letters of recommendation. In the interest of justice, we considered upgrading the discharge based on clemency and considered the applicant's overall post-service activities, letters of character reference, and accomplishments; however, the evidence submitted was not sufficient to compel us to recommend granting the relief sought on that...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03451
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility, which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. In accordance with AFI 36-2606, Reenlistment in the USAF, commanders have selective reenlistment selection or non-selection authority. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03455
On 25 Apr 12, the applicant received notification of demotion action under AFI 36-2502, Failure to Keep Fit, paragraph 6.3.5, due to four fitness assessment failures within a 24-month period. However, recommend removing FA dated 18 Jun 10, based on the fact that this was before the implementation of AFI 36-2905 (AFGM2), dated 20 Dec 10, giving Unit Commanders the authority to invalidate FAs. Although the applicant provided a memorandum from his medical provider stating that he had a...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03456
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-03456 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His two-time non-selection for promotion status be rescinded. He had no clue that being passed over for promotion in the Individual Ready Reserves (IRR) would totally prohibit him from ever serving his country as a dental officer in the Armed Forces. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03461
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility, which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03463
He was notified the control roster action automatically placed him on the FY13 Rollback Program. He contacted the Separations office at Joint Base San Antonio (JBSA) Randolph to correct this issue, but they were unable to manually change separation code on DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, because the automatic LGH separation code was loaded in their system. On 15 Jul 13, the applicant was separated under the FY13 DOS Rollback Program, with a RE code of 2X;...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03464
Her current Date of Rank (DOR) be changed from 1 June 2013, to 28 May 2009; the date she reentered the Regular Air Force 3. They reaccomplished the applicants Total Active Federal Military Service (TAFMS)_ evaluation worksheet based upon her updated point credit summary report and deemed that she still does not meet the requirements in accordance with AFI 36- 2002, Regular Air Force and Special Category Accessions, paragraph Attachment 4, paragraph A4.2, Prior Service (PS) Date of Rank and...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03470
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility, which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFLOA/JAJM recommends denial, indicating the applicant has not shown a clear error or injustice. The applicant does not make a compelling argument that the Board should overturn the commander's original NJP decision on the basis...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03475
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: PPA/ECAF recommends approval. Incident to the PCS, the applicant effected a shipment of HHG at government expense, and personally arranged to ship his motorcycle to the Philippines. However, the motorcycle qualifies as HHG and he was authorized to ship it to the Philippines as HHG.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03476
Since the applicant sold the maximum 60 days of leave previously, he is ineligible to sell his 42 days of lost leave in conjunction with his 1 Dec 2012 retirement. Although he was paid for 60 days of accrued leave in conjunction with his 1 Jul 1995 retirement, the evidence reflects that he was recalled to active duty in Jul 2009 under the Rated Officer Recall Program and retired again on 1 Dec 2012. Therefore, in the interest of justice we recommend the applicants Extended Active Duty...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03477
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-03477 MEMBER: (DECEASED) COUNSEL: NONE APPLICANT: HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her late husbands record be corrected to show that his Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) election was option C immediate annuity for spouse and child(ren), rather that option A, decline to make an...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03478
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: His records unjustly reflect time in military confinement since he was found not guilty of the misconduct which led to his confinement. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFLOA/JAJM did not provide a recommendation. In this respect, we note this Board is the highest administrative level of...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03485
Therefore, 100 percent of the applicants monthly SBP annuity payments goes towards the indebtedness; once the debt is paid in full, the former spouse will begin receiving monthly SBP annuity payments. The complete DFAS evaluation is at Exhibit B. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03486
A change is permitted if there is evidence the Air Force erroneously recorded the data in question and a review of his records revealed that he served and was discharged under the name of . The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility, which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPTS recommends denial of the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03489
The applicant was notified by his commander of his intent to recommend his discharge from the Air Force under the provisions of AFR 39-16. An evaluation officer reviewed the case and recommended the applicant be discharged with service characterized as general. ________________________________________________________________ _ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice; the application was denied...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03497
They recommended the applicant be discharged with severance pay with a compensable disability rating of 20 percent. The applicant has presented reasonable evidence of an injustice in the application of a 20 percent disability rating for his urinary frequency. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to THE APPLICANT be corrected to show that: a.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03506
On 12 Apr 13, the applicant participated in the contested FA and attained an unsatisfactory score (37.00) completing all four components. If the FA is invalidated, the Airman will be required to retest on all non-exempt FA components within five duty days from original FA test date. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIM evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03507
________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Had she not been married to an active duty service member prior to her enlistment, she would have resided in Kell, IL, with her parents. After a thorough review of the applicants records and supporting documentation, there appears to not be an error or injustice in determining the members HOR. Exhibit B. Enlistment/Reenlistment Documents and DD Form 1966.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03510.docx
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-03510 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Narrative Reason for Separation, as reflected on his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be changed to reflect Hardship rather than Entry Level Performance and...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03513
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-03513 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His AF Form 1411, Extension Or Cancellation Of Extensions Of Enlistment In The Regular Air Force (REGAF)/Air Force Reserve (AF Reserve)/Air National Guard (ANG), dated 9 Nov 11, be corrected to reflect he extended his enlistment 36 months instead of 30...