AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03207
________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOR recommends denial of the applicants request to upgrade his discharge to honorable. The applicant did not provide any evidence of an error or injustice that occurred in the discharge processing. The complete Medical Consultants evaluation is at Exhibit E. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The BCMR Medical...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03209
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-03209 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable. The SJA noted the squadron commander recommended the applicant receive an UOTHC discharge; however, SJA agrees that it was in the best interest of the Air Force...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03210
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-03210 COUNSEL: HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. On 23 Nov 1990, the applicant was discharged with service characterized as a general (under honorable conditions) with a narrative reason for separation of Misconduct Pattern Discreditable Involvement with Military or Civil Authority. He served 3...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03211
Had he not been limited by his medical condition, he would have made the Air Force a career. ______________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03216
On 3 Feb 1998, he was discharged with service characterized as general (under honorable conditions) with a narrative reason for separation of Misconduct. He served 6 months and 18 days on active duty. In the interest of justice, we considered upgrading the characterization of the applicants discharge based on clemency; however, after considering his overall record of service, the infractions which led to his administrative separation and the post-service documentation provided by the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03217
The military judge sentenced the applicant to be discharged from the Air Force with a BCD, confined for six months, and to be reduced to the grade of Amn. On 10 Feb 2005, the United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals concluded that the approved findings and sentence are correct in law and fact and that there is no error prejudicial to the substantial rights of the applicant. The complete JAJM evaluation is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03220
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-03220 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Fitness Assessments (FAs) dated 29 Oct 10, 28 Oct 11, and 16 Nov 12 be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). The applicant clarifies in his response to the Air Force Evaluation that the FA he is...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03222
A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIM evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant provided a memorandum dated 28 Mar 14 from her commander expressing his support to have the 28 Aug 12 FA removed from her records. The applicant contends that her medical conditions unfairly precluded her from attaining a passing score on her 17 Dec 10, 11 Feb 11, 6 May 11, and 28 Aug 12...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03223
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-03223 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His discharge be changed to reflect a medical retirement. In support of his appeal, the applicant submits his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty and his medical records. The applicant did not provide any evidence of an...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03225
His time in service be corrected to reflect 1 day of active duty during the time of war. Documentation from his master personnel record reflects his pay date as 16 May 1975. The applicant has provided no documentation to support his contention that he performed for the base commander.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03229
JAJM states that upgrading the applicants BCD is not appropriate and recommends the Board deny the request as untimely or on the merits. It also indicates that a bad conduct discharge is more than merely a service characterization; it is a punishment for the crimes the applicant committed while a member of the armed forces. While JAJM states that a BCD is for bad conduct and more than merely a service characterization, all his charges stemmed from one incident.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03230
Members of the Board considered this application on 14 January 2014. Panel Chair Attachment: Ltr, AFPC/DPSIT, dtd 16 Jul 13 DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON DC Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR BC-2013-03230 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, it is directed that: The pertinent military records of the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03232
The medal is awarded to enlisted personnel during a three year period of active military service or for a one year period of service during a time of war. _______________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03235
The applicants last 10 FA results are as follows: Date Composite Score Push Ups Rating 23 Aug 13 92.63 Exempt Excellent 29 May 13 21.38 Exempt Unsatisfactory 5 Feb 13 84.10 21/6.00 Unsatisfactory 19 Jul 12 79.67 22/6.30 Satisfactory 13 Mar 12 Exempt Exempt Exempt 21 Oct 11 85.00 19/5.50 Satisfactory *6 Sep 11 73.67 18/5.00 Unsatisfactory *20 Jul 11 81.00 16/4.30 Unsatisfactory 5 Nov 10 96.25 Exempt Excellent 14 May 10 75.20 25/8.00 Good *Contested FA On 14 Feb 14, a similar request was...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03237
He in-processed at Seymour Johnson AFB on 3 Jun 13 and was required to take the FA 14 days later. Although a member in an inbound status is given 42 days from his/her DAS date to acclimatize before assessment and MilPDS shows a DAS of 3 Jun 13, the applicant failed to provide DAS documentation. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to the APPLICANT be corrected...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03238
Because of this, he argues his records should be corrected to reflect he was ordered to EAD under 10 USC § 12301(d), which, he states, would make his EAD service creditable for accelerated Reserve retired pay under the provisions of 10 USC § 12731(f). After a thorough review of the evidence of record and the applicant's complete submission, to include his rebuttal response, the majority of the panel does not find the applicant's arguments or the evidence presented sufficient to conclude...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03239
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-03239 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code of 2C (Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service) be changed to RE Code 1 so that he can be eligible to rejoin the military. The only available RE Code a...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03241
Her diagnosis of Personality Disorder is in error. Therefore, the Board determined that execution of the previously approved AFI 36-3206 action is appropriate. The complete DPFD evaluation is at Exhibit C. The BCMR Medical Consultant recommends granting the applicant alternative relief by changing the reason for discharge to Secretarial Authority. The Medical Consultant states that he found sufficient evidence of an alternative choice available to the applicant's commander in selecting...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03242
In this case, the applicant indicated his urinary incontinence was exacerbated by over-hydrating during the day and he should be granted a waiver to continue his service. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSOR evaluation is at Exhibit E. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant argues that the only time he should have been prevented from participating in his graduation was during the time he was experiencing...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03244
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-03244 XXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Fitness Assessments (FAs), dated 20 Dec 10, 30 Mar 12, 16 Jul 12 and 11 Oct 12 be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). The applicants request is to remove the contested FAs entirely from his...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03246
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-03246 COUNSEL: NO HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable. On 5 Apr 83, the applicant was discharged for Misconduct-Pattern of Minor Disciplinary Infractions with service characterized as general (under honorable conditions). In the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03248
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-03248 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. ________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant is a former member in the Air Force Reserve who served as a Clinical Nurse, Air Force Specialty Code (AFSC) 46N3. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03249
The FAAB removed the duplicate FA, dated 21 Jan 07 from the AFFMS but found insufficient evidence to warrant removal of the FAs, dated 15 Jul 12 and 10 Feb 13, and denied this portion of the request. The applicants last nine FA results are as follows: Date Days Since Last Test Composite Score Rating 9 Feb 14 62 46.90 Unsatisfactory 8 Dec 13 146 72.80 Unsatisfactory 14 Jul 13 69 7.50 Unsatisfactory 5 May 13 83 67.90 Unsatisfactory *10 Feb 13 27 46.90 Unsatisfactory 13 Jan...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03251
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-03251 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) punishments, dated 10 September 2009 and 3 November 2009, be set-aside. She received two Article 15s and two Letters of Counseling (LOC) between 13 August 2009 and 12 November 2009. We...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03252
ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-03252 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable. ________________________________________________________________ RESUME OF CASE: On 29 Apr 14, the Board considered and denied the applicants request to upgrade...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03259
On 20 May 2013, after her separation she saw an allergist and included his letter noting there was no reaction when she ingested shrimp. The complete SGPS evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPSOR recommends denial of the applicants request to change her narrative reason for separation. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03261
Congress declared two RCSBP Open Enrollment Seasons from 1 March 1999 through 29 February 2000 and 1 October 2005 through 30 September 2006. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03262
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-03262 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code of 2C Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry-level separation without characterization of service, be changed to allow him to reenter the military. On 8 December 2010, the applicant was notified of...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03263
The possibility exists that the applicant may not have received any information about the Post- 9/11 GI Bill and TEB program. If the Board finds there was an injustice to the extent that the applicant did not receive adequate counseling as required by law and DOD regulation, and was not personally notified about the need to transfer while serving in the Armed Forces, the Board may approve the applicants request. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03266
________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant is a former cadet of the United States Air Force Academy (USAFA). The applicant had the right to counsel throughout the LOR, ARC, and Hearing Officer processes. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that the DD Form 785, Record of...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03271
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-03271 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect he was on Medical Continuation (MEDCON) orders from 1 Dec 2011 through 30 Aug 2012 and that he receive full pay, benefits and service credit for this period. In support of his request, the applicant provides...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03277
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON DC Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR BC-2013-03277 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, it is directed that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to be corrected to show that he transferred his Post 9-11 GI Bill benefits to his...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03278
________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFLOA/JAJM states that if AFPC confirms that the member received an honorable discharge, the Board should set-aside his BCD. On 26 Feb 1957, the Air Force Board of Review found the approved finding of guilty and the sentence correct in law and fact. The complete DPSOR evaluation is at Exhibit E. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03279
On 8 November 2011, the applicants DD Form 4 and DD Form 1966 were corrected to reflect he entered the Air Force in the pay grade of E-2. Based on the corrected enlistment documents, on 3 September 2012, the applicant should have entered IADT in the rank of Airman (Amn, E-2), with the Time-in- Grade (TIG) effective as of that date. THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that: a.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03284
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-03284 COUNSEL: NO HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His honorable discharge be changed to an honorable hardship discharge. On 22 Apr 92, the applicants commander concurred with the supervisors recommendation and non-selected the applicant for reenlistment. He discussed his family concerns and...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03287
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-03287 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reentry (RE) code of 4H (Serving suspended punishment to Article 15) be removed from his records. The applicant does not contend an error or injustice in his receipt of nonjudicial punishment, but rather feels the 4H RE code on his DD Form 214...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03292
Members of the Board considered this application on 11 March 2014. Panel Chair Attachment: Ltr, AFPC/DPSIT, dtd 25 Jul 13 DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON DC Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR BC-2013-03292 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, it is directed that: The pertinent military records of the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03294
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-03294 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His narrative reason for separation be changed from Misconduct Pattern of Minor Disciplinary Infractions to Convenience of the Government, or Reduction in Force. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03297
On 3 Feb 05, the discharge authority recommended denial of the retirement request and recommended execution of the approved discharge, and, on 28 Mar 05, the Major Command Director of Personnel office concurred with the discharge authoritys recommendation. On 13 May 05, in accordance with AFI 36-3203, Service Retirements, the Secretary of the Air Force Personnel Council (SAFPC) reviewed the applicants request for retirement in lieu of discharge, and recommended his application to retire...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03302
DPSOR states that the discharge record reflects the applicant was involved in Homosexual Acts or Tendencies at the time of his discharge. The complete DPSOR evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPSID recommends denial of the GCM, stating, in part, due to the applicant's 63 days' time lost, the applicant did not meet the standards creditable towards award of the Good Conduct Medal. In view of this we find no basis to recommend granting the applicants request to upgrade his discharge to...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03309
k. On 4 Apr 79, the applicant was in violation of AFR 35-10 and again failed to go at the prescribed time to his appointed place of duty. On 9 Nov 79, 22 Nov 79, 2 Dec 79 and 11 Dec 79, the applicant's commander received notice from American Express stating that the applicant's account was overdrawn. On 21 Jan 80, 5 Feb 80, 11 Feb 80, 14 Mar 80, 15 Mar 80 and 15 Apr 80, the applicant's commander received notice from AAFES stating that the applicant had written numerous dishonored checks.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03311
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandums prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPR), which are attached at Exhibits C, D and E. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPFD recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. However, after admittedly making false statements regarding the extent of his injuries, the applicant's neurogenic bladder injuries were subsequently rated by the IPEB at 60...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03312
His Date of Rank (DOR) to the grade of Airman First Class (A1C) be corrected to 31 Jul 2001 (Administratively Corrected). In a letter dated 10 Jan 2014, AFPC/DPSOE advised the applicant his DOR to the grades of SrA, SSgt, TSgt and MSgt were administratively corrected and that he would receive supplemental promotion consideration for promotion to the grade of SMSgt during the May 2014 Senior Noncommissioned Officer (SNCO) Supplemental Promotion Board. After a thorough review of the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03316
At the time, there was no indication of any other required steps to complete. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that on 10 Jul 2009, he signed a Statement of Understanding to start his four year Active Duty Service Commitment for transfer of his Post 9/11 GI Bill Educational Benefits to his dependents. Exhibit C. Letter,...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03317
In support of his appeal, the applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty; medical records, letters of support, and other various documents associated with his request. Thus none of these conditions are In the Line of Duty (ILOD) as applied to Air Force disability retirement. The complete BCMR Medical Consultant evaluation is at Exhibit E. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANTS REVIEW OF AIR FORCE...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03337
DPAPP requested the applicants DD Form 214 be corrected to reflect Indochina Service as Yes. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIC recommends denial of the applicants request to change the decedents Primary Specialty Number and Title. DPSIC states that Air Force Specialty Code (AFSC) 42372 and the AFSC title (Aircrew Egress Systems Repairmen), captured on the decedents DD Form 214 were correct at the time of his 23 Jun 1977...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03340
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-03340 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His General (Under Honorable Conditions) discharge be upgraded to Honorable. On 2 Feb 89, the applicant was furnished a General (Under Honorable Conditions) discharge for unsatisfactory performance and was credited with 1 year, 9 months, and 22 days of total active service. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03345
On 11 Sep 14, pursuant to the Boards request, the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) confirmed that records reflect the applicant did not receive any bonus payments. After a thorough review of the applicants military personnel record and the supporting documentation provided by the applicant there is an error and an injustice, if he was not paid the entitled bonus. Therefore, since the applicant was entitled to a bonus payment, we recommend the applicants record be corrected...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03346
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-03346 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be allowed to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill Transfer of Educational Benefits (TEB) to his dependents. He received approval from the Air Force via mail to transfer his benefits to his dependents and did so per the instructions. The remaining...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03347
Commander memorandum, medical docs, or FAC memorandum). In accordance with (IAW) guidance at the time of contested FA, AFI 36-2905_ Fitness Program AFGM3 (3 Jan 12), Attachment 1, Section 10, If an Airman becomes injured or ill during the FA and is unable to complete all required components, he/she will have the option of being evaluated at the Medical Treatment Facility (MTF) but his/her test will still count unless rendered invalid by the Unit Commander. The FSQ should be completed no...