AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 00028
On 30 June 1978, the applicant did not concur with the recommended findings and requested an appearance before the Formal PEB (FPEB) In a letter dated 1 August 1978, a plastic and reconstructive surgeon who cared for the applicant's hands provided a letter to the PEB challenging the notion that he was fit to return to duty. Counsel asserts that while the BCMR Medical Consultant recommends the applicants request be denied, an examination of the clinical evidence available in 1978...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 00771
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00771 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. The applicant also requests that his civilian treatment records from Good Samaritan Hospital be filed in his master personnel records. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 18 May 12.
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 00966 2
The Medical Consultant states that in the case under review, despite the applicants pain episodes and his current contentions, the record indicates that he had an approved retirement date of 1 August 2009, which was revoked in order for him to receive surgical treatment and, that his medical condition had improved significantly after surgery. As indicated by the evidence of record, the applicant was found fit, with restrictions, subsequent to his surgery; and, returned to duty so he could...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 01051
He requested a separate and unfitting condition of 30 percent for right side radiculopathy VASRD 8516. On 11 Mar 10, the FPEB determined that based on a limited ROM and right radicular pain, the FPEB rated his spinal fusion at 20 percent and considered his chronic left shoulder pain to also be unfitting and best rated at 10 percent. On 11 Mar 10, the Formal Physical Evaluation Board, found the applicant unfit to perform the duties of his office, rank, grade, or rating by reason of physical...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 01103
He receive military pay and Air National Guard (ANG) retirement points for the periods of time requested above. For an accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding the applicants original request and the rationale of the earlier decision by the Board, see the Record of Proceedings (ROP) at Exhibit H. On 11 Mar 14, the applicant submitted a request for reconsideration, reiterating that he sustained a shoulder injury while serving on active duty due to being electrocuted when...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 01163
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01163 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) characterization of discharge be upgraded to honorable. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. Exhibit C. FBI Report Exhibit D....
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 01270
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01270 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be allowed to transfer his Post 9/11 GI Bill benefits to his dependents. He requests that the TEB be corrected to reflect his daughter and the 18 months of VA benefits he allocated to her in Aug 2009. He retired in Jun 2011 and submitted his...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 01332
In the interest of justice, we considered upgrading her discharge based on clemency; however, we do not find the evidence presented sufficient to recommend granting the relief. We note the applicants records were burned in the fire at the NRPC and her date and place of birth is not reflected in her records; therefore, in the interest of justice, we recommend the records be corrected to the extent indicated below. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 01346 2
ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01346 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be allowed to accomplish a Post-9/11 GI Bill transfer of educational benefits (TEB) to his dependent daughter. Accordingly, from his additional research into this issue, he is submitting newly discovered evidence that will...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 01409
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01409 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her records, to include an Officer Selection Brief reflecting the Air Force Commendation Medal (AFCM) awarded for the period 13 September 2008 to 1 July 2011 and the Certificate and Citation to accompany award of the AFCM, be considered for...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 01414
If the MS was discovered while he was on active duty, he would have most likely been 100 percent medically retired from military service. He believes a review of his medical records by an Air Force neurologist who specializes in MS would associate his symptoms while on active duty with the disease. He also requests a review of his medical records by an Air Force neurologist specializing in MS.
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 01472
A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSOE evaluation is at Exhibit H. AFLOA/JAJM addresses the applicants nonjudicial punishment (Article 15), and determines the applicants commander did not act arbitrarily or capriciously in making the decision to punish the applicant under Article 15. In addition, while the Board notes the applicant was denied the opportunity to test for promotion during the 10E5 promotion cycle, the fact she did not test also constitutes a harmless error because she was not...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 01506
While you may revoke your transfer at any time, a revocation DOES NOT automatically cancel the associated Active Duty Service Commitment (ADSC), EVEN IF BENEFITS HAVE NOT BEEN USED. It would be an injustice to force him to serve this ADSC when the SOU specifically states that he may revoke his election at any time and his family and he used absolutely no benefits. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission to include his rebuttal statement, in judging the merits of the case;...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 01539 2
STATEMENT OF FACTS: On 27 November 2012, the Board considered and denied his request for RCSBP spouse coverage. For an accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding the applicants request and the rationale of the earlier decision by the Board, see the Record of Proceedings at Exhibit E. Directive Type Memorandum, Changes in the SBP Enacted by Public Law 108-375 National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2005, dated 5 August 2005, states that finance centers shall notify...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 01544 2
In an earlier decision, the applicant was advised of her right to request reconsideration. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2012-01544 in Executive Session on 25 March 2014 and 11 April 2014, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: , Vice Chair , Member , Member The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit E. Record of Proceedings, dated 7 Jan 13, with Exhibits. Exhibit F....
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 01632
According to his Congressman, the Air Force has no record of this service. The applicant provided a copy of a travel order directing his TDY to Camp Sill, Osan, Korea; however, no source documents were provided, i.e., travel vouchers, evaluation reports, letters of evaluation, decorations or other official military documents, that reflect travel was completed and the inclusive periods of the travel. We took notice of the applicants complete submission in judging the merits of the case;...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 01672 2
ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01672-2 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Duty Title of Bioenvironmental Engineer on his six officer Performance Reports (OPR), covering the period Sep 99 through Sep 04, be changed to read Bioenvironmental Engineering Flight Commander. RESUME OF CASE: On 25 May 11, the Board considered and denied the applicants original request to...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 01713 2
ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01713 COUNSEL: NONE (DECEASED FORMER SERVICE MEMBER) (APPLICANT) HEARING DESIRED: NO ______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her late fathers records be corrected to reflect his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage reflects she was incapable of self- support prior to age 18. There is no evidence the service...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 01775
According to the information provided by the Air Force office of primary responsibility the applicant carried forward 63.5 days of leave at the beginning of FY 2010. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. Exhibit C....
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 01840
For an accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding the applicants requests and the rationale of the earlier decision by the Board, see the Record of Proceedings at Exhibit F. On 23 January 2014, the applicant submitted a request for reconsideration which includes evidence the Board previously invited him to provide. The Board advised the applicant that if he submitted additional evidence that other airmen received the DFC for similar or identical missions during the same periods,...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 01966
DPAPP states that a review of the applicants Master Personnel Records and the documentation submitted does not substantiate his claim that he served in Vietnam. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 2 Jul 12. Panel Chair AFBCMR BC-2012-01966 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS (AFBCMR) SUBJECT: AFBCMR Application of I have carefully reviewed the evidence of record and the recommendation of the Board members.
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 02069
AFBCMR BC-2012-02069 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: XXXXXXX Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, we recommend the applicant's records be corrected to show that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 02116
________________________________________________________________ RESUME OF CASE: On 7 Mar 13, the Board considered and denied the applicants original request to correct his records. However, while we are reluctant to substitute our judgment for that of the commander in the NJP process as we are not privy to the totality of the evidence he considered, we believe that it would be in the interest of justice to correct the applicants record to reflect he was honorably discharged. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 02158 2
STATEMENT OF FACTS: On 6 December 2012, the Board considered and denied the applicants request that his UOTHC discharge be upgraded. For an accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding the applicants separation and the rationale of the earlier decision by the Board, see the Record of Proceedings, with attachments, at Exhibit E. In an application dated 11 February 2014, the applicant seeks reconsideration of his earlier request. Therefore, we do not find the additional...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 02179 3
STATEMENT OF FACTS: According to an AF Form 469, Duty Limiting Condition Report, dated 4 Feb 12, the applicants Primary Care Manager (PCM), recommended a review by a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) or Physical Evaluation Board (PEB). AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The BCMR Medical Consultant recommends denial of the applicant's petition for continuation on active duty orders for the period 12 Jan 12 [sic] to 19 Sep 12. Exhibit G. Record of Proceedings, dated 30 Jul 13, w/atchs Exhibit H. Letter,...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 02208
________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility at Exhibit C. _____________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial of the applicants request to replace the Enlisted Performance Report (EPR), rendered for the period 2 Jun 2009 through 1 Jun 2010. We note that...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 02387
In a memorandum dated 19 Mar 2013, the AFRS commander states the recommendation for the MSM was not forwarded for his approval in accordance with AFI 36-2803. The commander stated in his memorandum that generally personnel awarded the MSM had held supervisory positions at the flight chief or higher level and had exceptional duty performance. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive Session...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 02440
________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He received unsatisfactory FA scores due to his marginal run times. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this case are contained in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility which is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial. Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSIM, dated 25 Jul, w/atchs.
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 02467 2
By virtue of a DD Form 149, Application for Correction of Military Record, dated 9 Jul 14, the applicant is requesting award of the VSM. THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: After reviewing the evidence of record, the applicants prior submission, and the additional evidence provided in support of his appeal, we are not convinced the requested relief is warranted. The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2012-02467 was considered: Exhibit F. Record of Proceedings,...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 02471
ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02471 COUNSEL: YES HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect he was medically separated. Therefore, while the applicant argues that recent determinations by the DVA constitute new and relevant evidence that should form the basis of our reconsideration of this case,...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 02494
On 16 Jul 10, the applicants commander considered his response and recommended his removal from the promotion list. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letters prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPR), which are attached at Exhibits C, D, and E. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice with respect to the applicants contested OPR. In addition, the unit...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 02567
Since that time, she was seen at the clinic for alcohol abuse and a suicide attempt on 4 Oct 2002. However, the mental health professional who evaluated her determined that her primary diagnosis was Borderline Personality Disorder and that she had an S4T profile, secondary to her alcohol abuse and involvement in the ADAPT program. She suffers from depression, suicidal ideations, anger issues, and has a personality disorder, which began during her time in the military and has continued...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 02570
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON DC Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR BC-2012-02570 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, it is directed that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to , , be corrected to show that she be considered for promotion to the grade of...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 02595
After further review of his fitness history, DPSIM states that he had a passing FA dated 3 Jan 2011, which was in between his failed FAs dated 4 Oct 2010 and 27 Jul 2011. The complete DPSIM evaluation is at Exhibit B. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 30 Oct 2012.
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 02598
There is no evidence of Air Force error in this case; however, absent a competing claimant and to prevent a possible injustice, DPSIAR recommends the member's record be corrected to reflect he elected former spouse coverage based on full retired pay, naming the applicant as the former spouse beneficiary. There is no evidence of Air Force error; however, to preclude an injustice, we agree with AFPC/DPSIARs recommendation that the members records should be corrected to reflect that he made...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 02615
On 24 Sep 12, 11 Jun 13, and 22 Nov 13, the United States Air Force Central (AFCENT) Decorating Processing Unit considered the applicants request to be awarded the PH; however, they disapproved all requests. After a thorough review of the available evidence and applicants complete submission, we find no evidence the records should be corrected to show he was awarded the PH. In addition, based on a preponderance of the evidence presented and the lack of official documentation to support...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 02636
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02636 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be entitled to the Air Force Longevity Service Award (AFLSA). The complete DPSIDR evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 11 Sep...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 02648
AFBCMR BC-2012-02648 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: XXXXXXX Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, we recommend the applicant's records be corrected to show that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 02683 1
________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He should not have been discharged from active duty with unresolved medical issues and a Line of Duty (LOD) determination should have been initiated prior to his release from active duty. Although the applicant stated he received treatment for his medical conditions while he was on active orders, he has only provided subjective evidence following his release from active duty. If the applicant was...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 02752
The member did not request coverage for his former spouse be terminated and the fact that SBP premiums were deducted from his retired pay for over three years following their divorce are indicative of his intent to maintain the applicant as the eligible SBP beneficiary. There is no evidence of Air Force error in this case and absent a competing claimant, DPSIAR recommends the member's record be corrected to reflect on 10 Apr 2009, he elected to change SBP spouse to former spouse coverage...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 02768
This logic also concludes a medical condition causing weight gain would cause an increase in AC. She should have never taken the walk test while her dosage was still being adjusted and the FA should be invalidated based on the solid medical evidence presented. While we note the applicant requests the entire FA dated 25 Apr 2012, be removed, the AF Form 422 reflected that she was cleared to test using AC and she has not provided substantial evidence to persuade us otherwise.
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 03005
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03005 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be placed on medical continuation (MEDCON) orders from 9 Nov 11 until he is returned to duty or disability separated. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 03025
ADDENDUM RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03025 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Fitness Assessment (FA) dated 1 Feb 12 be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). For an accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding the applicants request; and, the rationale of the earlier decision by...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 03065
________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force Office of Primary Responsibility (OPR). To date, a response has not been received (Exhibit C). Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 22 Aug 2012.
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 03069
DPSIM states the applicant did provide documentation per their 31 Jul 2012 request. After she was given the opportunity to retest on 6 Jan 2012, she was still unable to complete the FA due to the injury she sustained from the original FA on 22 Dec 2011. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that her FA dated 22 Dec 2011 be...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 03077
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON DC Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR BC-2012-03077 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, it is directed that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to , , be corrected to show that: a. On 30 November 1996, he was not involuntarily...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 03095
________________________________________________________________ THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial. DPSIM states the applicant provided an AF Form 108, dated 28 Jun 2012, which reflects he was evaluated and did not have a medical condition that precluded the achievement of a passing FA score. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 03097
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility, which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. Although the applicant provided medical documentation, it was provided eight months after the injury occurred. We took notice of the...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 03114
________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 20 Aug 2012, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant for review and comment within 30 days. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 03122
_______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was told at his retirement briefing that he could transfer his education benefits to his dependents within three years of his retirement. If the Board finds there was an injustice to the extent that the member did not receive adequate pre-separation counseling, as required by law and DoD regulation, and was not personally notified about the need to transfer while serving in the Armed Forces, the...