ex-HA, USN

Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request


Applicant’s Request:     Characterization change to:     
         Narrative Reason change to:     
         Reentry Code change to: RE-1

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
Inactive:        USNR (DEP)       19981218 - 19990128     Active: 

Period of Service Under Review:

Date of Current Enlistment: 19990128    Age at Enlistment:
Period of Enlistment: Years Extension
Date of Discharge: 20020513     Highest Rank/Rate: HN
Length of Service: Year(s) Month(s) 16 Day(s)
Education Level:        AFQT: 51
Evaluation Marks:        Performance: 4.33 (3)    Behavior: 2.66 (3)      OTA: 3.72

Awards and Decorations (per DD 214):

Periods of UA/CONF:

NJP:

- 20011127:      Article
         Article 125 (Sodomy)
         Awarded: Suspended:

SCM:     SPCM: NONE       CIVIL ARREST:    Retention Warning Counseling:

Administrative Corrections to the Applicant’s DD 214

The NDRB did note administrative error(s) on the original DD Form 214:

         Net Active Service This Period, should read: “3 Years 3 Months 16 Days”
        
The NDRB will recommend to the Commander, Navy Personnel Command, that the DD 214 be corrected as appropriate.









Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

Related to Military Service:
         DD 214:           Service/Medical Record:           Other Records:  

Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:               Finances:                 Education/Training:     
         Health/Medical Records:           Rehabilitation/Treatment:                 Criminal Records:       
         Personal Documentation:           Community Service:                References:     
         Department of VA letter:                  Other Documentation:    
                  Additional Statements:
         From Applicant:           From/To Representation:           From/To Congress member:        

Types of Witnesses Who Testified

         Expert:           Character:      

Pertinent Regulation/Law

A. The Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 30, effective 24 August 2000 until
14 May 2002, Article 1910-148, Separation by Reason of Homosexual Conduct.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part IV, Para 403m(7)(a), Presumption Concerning Court-Martial Specifications.

C. Public Law 111-321, signed 22 Dec 2010 (implemented 20 Sep 2011).

D. Under Secretary of Defense (P&R) Memorandum (Repeal of Don’t Ask Don’t Tell), 20 Sep 2011.

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

1.       The Applicant seeks a change to the characterization of service, narrative reason for separation, and reentry code, contending that his Under Other Than Honorable is inequitable based on a record devoid of aggravating factors and, as such, warrants the change in accordance with the repeal of the “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” policy.


Decision

Date: 20150827            Location: Washington D.C.        Representation:

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .
By a vote of the Reenlistment Code shall .

Discussion

The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. The Applicant’s record of service included for of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ): Article 107 (False official statement), Article 125 (Sodomy). Based on the Article 125 violation involving a Homosexual Act, processing for administrative separation was mandatory. When notified of administrative separation processing using the procedure, the Applicant waived rights to consult with a qualified counsel, submit a written statement, and request an administrative board.

: (Decisional) () . The Applicant seeks a change to the characterization of service, narrative reason for separation, and reentry code, contending that his Under Other Than Honorable is inequitable based on a record devoid of aggravating factors and, as such, warrants the change in accordance with the repeal of the “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” policy. In accordance with Naval Military Personnel Manual (MILPERSMAN), (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 18, effective 12 December 1997 to 31 August 1998, Article 1910-148, Separation by Reason of Homosexual Conduct, which was in effect at the time of the Applicant’s discharge, the Applicant’s in-service commitment of homosexual acts required administrative separation. Because the act was adjudicated at NJP, and a false official statement was made in connection with the act, the Commanding Officer recommended an Other Than Honorable characterization of service. Given the detailed documents of record, the NDRB determined that the Applicant’s separation for Homosexual Acts was proper and equitable at the time it was issued.

Narrative Reason for Separation: In accordance with the 20 September 2011 Under Secretary of Defense (Personnel & Readiness) memorandum regarding the repeal of “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell,” service discharge review boards should normally grant requests to change the narrative reason for discharge wherein Homosexual Admission was the only basis for discharge. This memorandum further directs that the narrative reason for separation should normally change to Secretarial Authority with a corresponding Separation Code (SPD code). The Applicant’s record of service reflects that, at the time of discharge, there was no other reason for discharge other than homosexual acts, and there were no aggravating factors involved. Accordingly, the NDRB determined that relief in the form of a change to the narrative reason for separation, as requested, shall be granted; additionally, the DD Form 214 shall be amended to reflect a corrected authority for discharge (MILPERSMAN 1910-164) and corresponding SPD code of JFF.

Reentry Code: The Applicant seeks a change to his assigned reentry code at discharge from RE-4 to RE-1. In accordance with the Under Secretary of Defense (P&R) Memorandum (Repeal of Don’t Ask Don’t Tell), dated 20 September 2011, service review boards should normally grant requests to change the reentry code to an immediately-eligible-to-reenter category if the discharge and corresponding reentry code was: (1) based solely on DADT or a similar policy in place prior to enactment of DADT; and (2), there were no aggravating factors in the record, such as misconduct. As authorized by the Assistant Secretary of the Navy (Manpower & Reserve Affairs), the NDRB may change reentry codes as set forth in the USD (P&R) memorandum dated 20 September 2011. The USD (P&R) policy memorandum stated that, if applicable, the new RE code should be RE-1J, however, this is an Air Force specific re-entry code. In accordance with the guidance and intent of the policy memorandum, the applicable U.S. Navy reentry code would be RE-1 (eligible for reenlistment). The Applicant’s service record documents faithful service with no misconduct. The Applicant received an RE-4 reentry code due to early termination of his service for Homosexual Acts. In accordance with the MILPERSMAN, the Applicant met all requirements for, and was, retention eligible prior to the homosexual acts. The NDRB determined that the record of service, along with his enlisted qualifications, would clearly warrant a recommendation for retention had the Applicant not been involuntarily separated for his homosexual acts. As such, the NDRB determined that the relief, as requested, is warranted. The Applicant’s reentry code shall change to RE-1.

Summary : After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, service record entries, and the administrative separation process, the NDRB found the discharge was proper and equitable at the time of discharge. However, pursuant to Public Law 111-321 and in accordance with the guidance set forth in the Under Secretary of Defense (P&R) Memorandum (Repeal of Don’t Ask Don’t Tell), dated 20 Sep 2011, the awarded characterization of service shall c hange to HONORABLE , the narrative reason for separation shall change to SECRETARIAL AUTHORITY with a corresponding SPD Code of JFF , the authority for discharge shall change to MILPERSMAN 1910-164 , and the reentry code shall change to RE-1.

The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge.
The Applicant is directed to the Addendum for additional information.

ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Disabled American Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted their opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 701 South Courthouse Road, Suite 1001, Arlington, VA 22204-2490 , or http://www.secnav.navy.mil/mra/bcnr/Pages/default.aspx for further review.

Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.

Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Effective 6 February 2015, the NDRB is authorized to change a NDRB Applicant’s Reenlistment Code if related to an accompanying change in discharge characterization or narrative, but this authority is strictly limited to those cases where an applicant’s narrative reason or characterization of discharge is changed and that change warrants revision of the previously issued reenlistment code. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE-CODE” is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.

Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.

Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023