Upgrade.Vet

NAVY | DRB | 2015_Navy | ND1501191

Original file (ND1501191.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-SA, USN

Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request

Application Received: 20150602

Characterization of Service Received:

Narrative Reason for Discharge:
Reenlistment Code:
Authority for Discharge: MILPERSMAN

Applicant’s Request:     Characterization change to:
         Narrative Reason change to:
         Reentry Code change to:

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
Inactive:        USNR (DEP)       20020329 - 20020827     Active:

Period of Service Under Review:

Date of Current Enlistment: 20020828    Age at Enlistment:
Period of Enlistment: Years Extension
Date of Discharge: 20020927     Highest Rank/Rate: SA
Length of Service: Year(s) Month(s) 00 Day(s)
Education Level:        AFQT: 31
Evaluation Marks:        Performance: NFIR        Behavior: NFIR OTA: NFIR

Awards and Decorations (per DD 214):     NONE

Periods of UA/CONF:

NJP:     SCM:     SPCM:    CC:      Retention Warning Counseling:

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

Related to Military Service:
         DD 214:          Service/Medical Record:          Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:               Finances:                 Education/Training:
         Health/Medical Records:          Rehabilitation/Treatment:                 Criminal Records:
         Personal Documentation:          Community Service:                References:
         Department of VA letter:                  Other Documentation:
                  Additional Statements:
         From Applicant:          From/To Representation:          From/To Congress member:

Pertinent Regulation/Law

A. The Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), re-issued October 2002, effective 22 August 2002 until 19 June 2005, Article 1910-130, Separation by Reason of Defective Enlistments and Inductions - Erroneous Enlistment.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part IV, Para 403m(7)(a), Presumption Concerning Court-Martial Specifications.

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

1. The Applicant admits that he made false and misleading statements to Navy psychiatrists in order to gain a separation and that he is now more mature and focused and wants to rejoin the Navy.

Decision

Date: 201500806 Location: Washington D.C. Representation:

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .
By a vote of the Reenlistment Code shall .

Discussion

The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. The Board completed a thorough review of the circumstances that led to discharge and the discharge process to ensure discharge met the pertinent standards of equity and propriety. Based on statements he made to medical personnel, he was diagnosed with pre-service PTSD, command administratively processed for separation based on erroneous enlistment. When notified of administrative separation processing using the procedure, the Applicant waived rights to consult with a qualified counsel, submit a written statement, and request a General Court-Martial Convening Authority review.

: (Decisional) () . The Applicant admits that he made false and misleading statements to Navy psychiatrists in order to gain a separation and that he is now more mature and focused and wants to rejoin the Navy. The Applicant provided a psychiatric assessment dated 04 April 2008 that states that the Applicant does not currently meet criteria for any psychiatric conditions in addition to a character reference from his employer. The psychiatric assessment is over six years old and was completed five years after the discharge. Due to the Applicant’s admission of providing significant false information to care providers, the NDRB has concerns that the psychiatric assessment results are valid. In addition, the information is no longer considered current as it is six years old. In reviewing discharges, the NDRB presumes regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. The Board concluded that Erroneous Entry with a reentry code of RE-4 still most clearly describes the circumstances surrounding the Applicant’s processing for administrative separation. Relief denied.

Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, service record entries, and discharge process, the Board found the discharge was proper and equitable at the time of discharge. Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall remain UNCHARACTERIZED and the narrative reason for separation shall remain ERRONEOUS ENTRY (OTHER). The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of his discharge. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum for additional information.

ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Disabled American Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted their opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 701 South Courthouse Road, Suite 1001, Arlington, VA 22204-2490 , or http://www.secnav.navy.mil/mra/bcnr/Pages/default.aspx for further review.

Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.

Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Effective 6 February 2015, the NDRB is authorized to change a NDRB Applicant’s Reenlistment Code if related to an accompanying change in discharge characterization or narrative, but this authority is strictly limited to those cases where an applicant’s narrative reason or characterization of discharge is changed and that change warrants revision of the previously issued reenlistment code. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE-CODE” is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.

Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.

Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0801887

Original file (ND0801887.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The Applicant has requested an upgrade to his discharge characterization to “Honorable”. For the edification of the Applicant, an “Uncharacterized” description shall be used when separation is within the first 180 days of continuous active duty service unless separation for misconduct, fraudulent enlistment, or homosexual conduct is authorized and when characterization of “Under Other Than Honorable Conduct” is warranted. ” Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former...
NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0900380

Original file (ND0900380.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Besides the Applicantsstatement on the DD Form 293, she provided a character reference, congressional correspondence and a recent psychiatric diagnosis of her current condition, stating there is no evidence of a diagnosis for personality disorder.The Board applauds the Applicant for her success in life now and wishes her the best in future endeavors.Although the Applicant has made great strides over-coming difficult situations and stressors in her life, the Board has determined that the...
NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1001682

Original file (ND1001682.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The Applicant believes his post-service conduct is worthy of consideration.Because of the limited time in service, the NDRB cannot change the Applicant’s characterization of service. Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, medical and record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain . ”...
NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0900927

Original file (ND0900927.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

discharge. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities.
NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0901022

Original file (ND0901022.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to: Narrative Reason change to: Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive:USNR (DEP)20070525 - 20070625Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 20070626Age at Enlistment:Period of Enlistment: YearsExtensionDate of Discharge:20070802Highest Rank/Rate:SRLength of Service: Year(s)Month(s)07 Day(s)Education Level:AFQT: 49EvaluationMarks:Performance:NFIRBehavior:NFIROTA: NFIRAwards and Decorations (per DD 214):Periods of UA/CONF:...
NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0801144

Original file (ND0801144.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The Board determined a change to the narrative reason for discharge would be inappropriate.After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant Complaint Procedures : If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional...
NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0800671

Original file (ND0800671.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Applicant’s Request: Characterization change to: Narrative Reason change to: Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive: USNR (DEP)19980421 - 19980422Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 19980423Period of enlistment: YearsExtensionDate of Discharge:19980512Length of Service: Yrs Mths20 DysEducation Level: Age at Enlistment:AFQT: 36Highest Rank/Rate:SREvaluation marks:Performance: NFIR Behavior:NFIROTA: NFIRAwards and Decorations (per DD 214):Periods of UA/CONF: Types...
NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1101892

Original file (ND1101892.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Based on the diagnosis by competent medical authority, his command administratively processed him for separation for Erroneous Enlistment as his psychiatric condition was disqualifying and affected his potential for performance of expected duties and responsibilities while on active duty.When notified of administrative separation processing using the notification procedure, the Applicant exercised his rights to consult with a qualified counsel and submit a written statement. These...
NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0901048

Original file (ND0901048.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The Applicant is requesting that his narrative reason be changed to family related issues and contends that he was wrongfully diagnosed with a personality/mental disorder. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of...
NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0800605

Original file (ND0800605.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Post service – Equity (post service psychiatric evaluation submitted as evidence) Decision Date: 20080416Location: Washington D.C Representation: By a vote of the Characterization shall .By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall PATTERN OF MISCONDUCT.Discussion Issue 1 (): The Applicant claims he was disabled whileenlisted and his misconduct was due to his disability. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record...

Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2015_Navy | ND1501191

Similar Decisions