Upgrade.Vet

NAVY | DRB | 2015_Navy | ND1500952

Original file (ND1500952.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-HM3, USN

Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request

Application Received: 20150410

Characterization of Service Received:

Narrative Reason for Discharge:

Reenlistment Code:

Authority for Discharge: MILPERSMAN

Applicant’s Request: Characterization change to:
                  Narrative Reason change to:

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
Inactive:        USNR (DEP)       20070621 - 20071104     Active: 20071105-20110703 HON

Pre-Service Drug Waiver:

Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Current Enlistment: 20110704    Age at Enlistment:
Period of Enlistment: Years 34 MONTHS Extension
Date of Discharge: 20140331     Highest Rank/Rate: HM3
Length of Service: Year(s) Month(s) 28 Day(s)
Education Level:        AFQT: 69
Evaluation Marks:        Performance: 3.8 (6)     Behavior: 3.6 (6)       OTA: 3.75

Awards and Decorations (per DD 214):     Pistol (FEB 12 – DEC 12)

Periods of UA/CONF:

NJP: SCM: SPCM: CC:

Retention Warning Counseling:

- 20071127:      For numerous negative entries on you Recruit Personnel Data Record (Hard Card) to include: inappropriate behavior and unprofessional conduct to wit: wrongfully using racially explicit language while in a trainee status, and substandard performance.

Administrative Corrections to the Applicant’s DD 214

The NDRB did note administrative error(s) on the original DD Form 214:

         “”

The NDRB will recommend to the Commander, Navy Personnel Command, PERS-312A, that the DD 214 be corrected as appropriate.

Types of Documents Submitted/Reviewed

Related to Military Service:
         DD 214:          Service/Medical Record:          Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:               Finances:                 Education/Training:
         Health/Medical Records:          Rehabilitation/Treatment:                 Criminal Records:
         Personal Documentation:          Community Service:                References:
         Department of VA letter:                  Other Documentation:
                  Additional Statements:
         From Applicant:          From/To Representation:          From/To Congress member:

Types of Witnesses Who Testified

         Expert:          Character:

Pertinent Regulation/Law

A. The Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 29, effective 10 November 2009 until Present, Article 1910-146, SEPARATION BY REASON OF MISCONDUCT - DRUG ABUSE.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

1. The Applicant states that: “I feel the evidence in my case was misunderstood and should be reconsidered. I feel I was guilty of an offense far less severe than accused and have since gathered treatment and advice while perusing my education.”

Decision

Date: 20150618 Location: Washington D.C. Representation:

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .

Discussion

The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. The Board did complete a thorough review of the circumstances that led to discharge and the discharge process to ensure discharge met the pertinent standards of equity and propriety. Although the Applicant’s record of service is incomplete, the Applicant’s DD Form 214 shows that he was administratively discharged on 31 March 2014 for reason of MISCONDUCT (DRUG ABUSE) with characterization of service of UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS. The Applicant a pre-service drug waiver prior to entering the Navy. Based on drug abuse, processing for administrative separation is mandatory. The NDRB did not have the Applicant’s administrative separation package to determine whether or not the Applicant waived rights to consult with a qualified counsel, submit a written statement, and request an administrative board or a General Court-Martial Convening Authority review.

: (Decisional) () . The Applicant states that: “I feel the evidence in my case was misunderstood and should be reconsidered. I feel I was guilty of an offense far less severe than accused and have since gathered treatment and advice while perusing my education.” The government enjoys a presumption of regularity in the conduct of its affairs. The Applicant bears the burden of overcoming this presumption through the presentation of substantial and credible evidence to support his issue. There is no evidence in the record, nor has the Applicant produced any evidence, to support the contention that his discharge was not proper and equitable. The Applicant’s statements alone do not overcome the government’s presumption of regularity in this case. Relief denied.

Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall remain UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS and the narrative reason for separation shall remain MISCONDUCT (DRUG ABUSE).

The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum for additional information.

ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Disabled American Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted their opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 701 South Courthouse Road, Suite 1001, Arlington, VA 22204-2490 for further review.

Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.

Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Effective 6 February 2015, the NDRB is authorized to change a NDRB Applicant’s Reenlistment Code if related to an accompanying change in discharge characterization or narrative, but this authority is strictly limited to those cases where an applicant’s narrative reason or characterization of discharge is changed and that change warrants revision of the previously issued reenlistment code. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE-CODE” is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.

Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.

Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-01202

Original file (ND04-01202.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable and the reason for discharge be changed. PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION Verifiable proof of any post-service accomplishments must be provided in order for the Applicant to claim post-service conduct and behavior as a reason to upgrade a less than honorable discharge.
NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-01050

Original file (ND03-01050.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ND03-01050 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20030530. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable or general/under honorable conditions. Furthermore, it is the Applicant’s responsibility to obtain any training records while on active duty which may benefit him in further education.The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received,...
NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0501104

Original file (ND0501104.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable or general (under honorable conditions). 040622: DD Form 214: Applicant discharged under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse, authority: MILPERSMAN, Article 1910-146. The record contained evidence that he was properly notified for separation by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse with a least favorable characterization of...
NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00510

Original file (ND01-00510.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

So I respectfully request to put my past behind me and be granted to feel proud of my enlistment while in the USN. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).In the applicant’s issue 1, the applicant states that his “discharge was inequitable because it was based on a single action in 29 month of service.” The Board found that the applicant had several...
NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-00539

Original file (ND03-00539.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

No further information in service record. Verifiable proof of any post-service accomplishments must be provided in order for the Applicant to claim post-service conduct and behavior as a reason to upgrade a less than honorable discharge. The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of discharge.
NAVY | DRB | 2014_Navy | ND1400109

Original file (ND1400109.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities.
NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00050

Original file (ND02-00050.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Documentation Only the service record was reviewed, as the applicant did not provide additional documentation for the Board to consider. She is reminded that she remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of her discharge. The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:Naval Council of Personnel...
NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-00310

Original file (ND04-00310.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service was discovered by the NDRB. Patient is drug dependent.940914: DD Form 214: Applicant discharged honorable by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse; authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630620.No discharge package available for review PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion...
NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00009

Original file (ND02-00009.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

I thank the Board for its due consideration of my request.Respectfully submitted, Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:Copy of letter of appreciationCopy of Bachelor of Arts with a major in psychology degree dated December 19, 1995Letter from University of Illinois at Chicago dated May 3, 2001 Copy of DD Form 214Six pages from applicant's service record PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service...
NAVY | DRB | 2014_Navy | ND1400598

Original file (ND1400598.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to:Narrative Reason change to: Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive:USNR (DEP)20060301 - 20061204Active:20061205 - 20100218 Period of Service Under Review: Date of Current Enlistment: 20100219Age at Enlistment:Period of Enlistment: YearsExtensionDate of Discharge:20110405Highest Rank/Rate:HM2Length of Service:Year(s)Month(s) 17 Day(s)Education Level:AFQT: 66EvaluationMarks:Performance:3.3(6)Behavior:2.2(6)OTA: 2.95Awards and Decorations (per...

Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2015_Navy | ND1500952

Similar Decisions