Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2015_Navy | ND1500744
Original file (ND1500744.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-LCDR, USN

Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request
Application Received: 20150224
Characterization of Service Received:
Narrative Reason for Discharge:
Authority for Discharge: SECNAVINST

Applicant’s Request:     Characterization change to:     
         Narrative Reason change to:     
        
Summary of Service

 Prior Service:
 Inactive:               Active:  20000906 - 20001212

Period of Service Under Review:
 Date of Appointment: 20001213    Age: 25
Years Contracted: Indefinite
Date of Discharge: 20140331      Highest Rank: LCDR
Length of Service: Year(s) Month(s) 19 Day(s)
Education Level:         AFQT:
Officer’s Fitness reports: Available

Awards and Decorations (per DD 214):     (3) (3)

Periods of UA/CONF:

NJP:

- 20130508:      Article 80 (Attempts) Did on or about 18 April 2013, attempt to wrongfully entice a person, who was not his wife, to engage in the act of sexual intercourse in exchange for money or other compensation, which, under the circumstances, was to the prejudice of good order and discipline in the armed forces or was of a nature to bring discredit upon the armed forces.
         Article Did on or about 18 April 2013, fail to obey a lawful general regulation, to wit: to immediately advice his immediate commander of the fact threat he was arrested on or about 18 April 2013.
         Awarded: Suspended:

SCM:

SPCM:

CIVIL ARREST:

- 20130418:      Charges: Soliticiation for prostitution

CC:

Retention Warning Counseling:





Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

Related to Military Service:
         DD 214:           Service/Medical Record:           Other Records:  

Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:               Finances:                 Education/Training:     
         Health/Medical Records:           Rehabilitation/Treatment:                 Criminal Records:       
         Personal Documentation:           Community Service:                References:     
         Department of VA letter:                  Other Documentation:    
                  Additional Statements:
         From Applicant:           From/To Representation:           From/To Congress member:        

Types of Witnesses Who Testified

         Expert:           Character:      

Pertinent Regulation/Law

 A. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 1920.6C (ADMINISTRATIVE SEPARATION OF OFFICERS), effective 15 December 2005 until Present, establishes policies, standards and procedures for the administrative separation of Navy and Marine Corps officers from the naval service in accordance with Title 10, United States Code and DoD Directive 1332.30 of 14 March 1997.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part IV, Para 403m(7)(b), Presumption Concerning Court-Martial Specifications.




DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

1.       The Applicants request an Honorable discharge and questions whether a General discharge was appropriate under the facts and circumstances of his service and subsequent discharge.

Decision

Date: 20150604            Location: Washington D.C.        Representation:

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .
Discussion

The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. The Board did complete a thorough review of the circumstances that led to discharge and the discharge process to ensure discharge met the pertinent standards of equity and propriety. The Applicant’s record of service included for of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ): Article 80 (Attempts, 1 specification), and Article 92 (Failure to obey an order or regulations, 1 specification). Based on the offense(s) committed and further pending administrative processing, the Applicant chose to submit a written statement, and submit an unqualified letter of resignation.

: (Decisional) () . The Applicants request an Honorable discharge and questions whether a General discharge was appropriate under the facts and circumstances of his service and subsequent discharge. The NDRB reviews the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge individually, on a case-by-case basis. If such a review reveals an impropriety or inequity, relief is in order. Regulations permit relief on equitable grounds if the Applicant’s discharge is inconsistent with standards of discipline of the Naval Service. After an exhaustive review of available records, nothing indicates that the Applicant’s discharge was in any way inconsistent with the standards of discipline in the United States Navy. Furthermore, 07 November 2013, the Applicant submitted a qualified resignation from the Naval Service for a General (Under Honorable Conditions) discharge. If the Applicant felt that the discharge was inequitable, he could have declined the qualified resignation and opted to go to a Board of Inquiry (BOI). At the BOI, he would have had the opportunity to mount a defense against the charges, submit matters of mitigation, and show the discharge requested via the qualified resignation does not reflect his overall service. The Applicant submitted no new evidence of extenuating or mitigating circumstance that were not know at the time of discharge; therefore, the NDRB relied upon the presumption of regularity in the conduct of government affairs. The NDRB recognizes that serving in the military is challenging. Most servicemembers, however, serve honorably and therefore earn their Honorable discharges. In fairness to those Marines and Sailors who served honorably, Commanders and Separation Authorities are tasked to ensure that undeserving servicemembers receive no higher characterization than is due. The NDRB found the characterization of the Applicant’s discharge was equitable and consistent with the characterization of discharge given others in similar circumstances. Relief denied.

Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall remain GENERAL (UNDER HONORABLE CONDITIONS) and the narrative reason for separation shall remain MISCONDUCT (OTHER). The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum for additional information.



ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

 Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Disabled American Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted their opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 701 South Courthouse Road, Suite 1001, Arlington, VA 22204-2490 for further review.

 Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.
Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

 Reenlistment/RE-code: Effective 6 February 2015, the NDRB is authorized to change a NDRB Applicant’s Reenlistment Code if related to an accompanying change in discharge characterization or narrative, but this authority is strictly limited to those cases where an applicant’s narrative reason or characterization of discharge is changed and that change warrants revision of the previously issued reenlistment code. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE-CODE” is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.
Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

 Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.

 Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

 Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
 Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
 720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023


Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0800361

    Original file (ND0800361.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    From Representation: From Member of Congress: Other Documentation (Describe) DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT Applicant’s Issues 1. The Applicant has requested an upgrade based on performance while on active duty. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Service Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the

  • NAVY | DRB | 2012_Navy | ND1201930

    Original file (ND1201930.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1.The Applicant contends she served honorably.2. Although the NDRB did not have the Applicant’s complete administrative separation package, the NDRB presumed regularity in government affairs based on the Applicant’s Form DD 214,which indicates she submitted a request for resignation. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0801953

    Original file (ND0801953.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to: Narrative Reason change to: Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive: USMCR (DEP) 19720616 - 19720628 Active enlisted: 19720629 – 19740828 USMC 19740829 – 19750411 USMCR19750412 – 19781201 USAR 19790915 – 19830909 USNR 19830910 – 19850908 USNR 19850909 – 19870429 USNR Period of Service Under Review: Date of Commission: 19870430Age: 33Years Contracted: Indefinite Date of Discharge: 20020702Highest Rank: LCDRLength of Service: 15 Year(s)...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1001309

    Original file (ND1001309.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214:Service/Medical Record:Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Rehabilitation/Treatment: Criminal Records: Personal Documentation: Community Service: References: Department of VA letter: Other Documentation: Additional Statements:From Applicant: From/To Representation:From/ToCongress member: DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0501549

    Original file (ND0501549.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND05-01549 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20050920. The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. 930702: Chief of Naval Personnel recommended to Secretary of the Navy approval of Applicant’s request for resignation with a general character of service.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0900546

    Original file (ND0900546.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board did complete a thorough review of the Applicant’s record of service; however, could only determine he resigned in lieu of administrative separation or board action for a civilian conviction based on the Separation Code (BKB) on his DD Form 214. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Record Entries, Discharge Process the Board found ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant Complaint Procedures : If you believe that the...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2013_Navy | ND1301571

    Original file (ND1301571.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214:Service/Medical Record:Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Rehabilitation/Treatment: Criminal Records: Personal Documentation: Community Service: References: Department of VA letter: Other Documentation: Additional Statements:From Applicant: From/To Representation:From/ToCongress member: DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD...

  • USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0901892

    Original file (MD0901892.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ” There is no requirement to notify the service member of a recommended Narrative Reason for Separation, only the recommended Character of Service. The NDRB conducted a complete review of officer separation codes and narratives and determined that BNC1, Resignation (Unacceptable Conduct), were the most appropriate DD-214 entries.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700676

    Original file (ND0700676.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Subsequent to his appointment, the Applicant requested and was granted a resignation prior to completing the course of instruction to become a Naval Officer. Discharge Process Date Applicant Discharged: 20021018 Types of Documents Submitted by Applicant and Considered By BoardRelated to Military Service: Service and/or Medical Record:Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment:Finances:Education: Health/Medical Records: Substance Abuse: Criminal Records: Family/Personal...

  • USMC | DRB | 2008_Marine | MD0801775

    Original file (MD0801775.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Discharge Process 20061101:Applicant apprehended by US Customs for transporting illegal fur from Afghanistan.Applicant submitted resignation request.Commandant of the Marine Corps denied resignation request.Applicant pleaded guilty to importing endangered species into the United States.Sentence: $5,000; one year unsupervised probation; forfeiture of item.20070717:Commanding General, Marine Corps Combat Development Command, directed Applicant to show cause forretention at a Board of...