Upgrade.Vet

NAVY | DRB | 2015_Navy | ND1500675

Original file (ND1500675.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-AN, USN

Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request

Application Received: 20150212

Characterization of Service Received: (corrected) UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS

Narrative Reason for Discharge: (per DD 214) MISCONDUCT
Authority for Discharge: (per DD 214) MILPERSMAN 1910-146 [DRUG ABUSE]

Applicant’s Request: Characterization change to: HONORABLE
                  Narrative Reason change to: NONE REQUESTED

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
Inactive:        USNR (DEP)       19991113 - 20000725 COG         Active: NONE

Pre-Service Drug Waiver: YES

Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Current Enlistment: 20000726    Age at Enlistment: 18
Period of Enlistment: 4 Years NO Extension
Date of Discharge: 20020926     Highest Rank/Rate: AN
Length of Service: 02 Year(s) 02 Month(s) 01 Day(s)
Education Level: 12     AFQT: 34
Evaluation Marks:        Performance: 2.5 (2)     Behavior: 2.0 (2)       OTA: 2.0

Awards and Decorations (per DD 214):     NDSM

Periods of UA/CONF: NONE

NJP: 1

- 20020603:      Article 112a (Wrongful use, possession, etc., of controlled substances, THC 24ng)
         Awarded: RESTR EPD FOP RIR Suspended: NONE

SCM: NONE        SPCM: NONE

CC: 1

         [Extracted from CO’s ltr dated 20020819] Brandishing a Firearm and malicious wounding

Retention Warning Counseling: NONE

Administrative Corrections to the Applicant’s DD 214

The NDRB did note administrative error(s) on the original DD Form 214:

         Block 24, Character of Service, should read: “UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS”
         Block 4a, Grade, Rate or Rank, should read: “AA”
         Block 4b, Pay Grade, should read: “E2”

The NDRB will recommend to the Commander, Navy Personnel Command, PERS-312A, that the DD 214 be corrected as appropriate.

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

Related to Military Service:
         DD 214:          Service/Medical Record:          Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:               Finances:                 Education/Training:
         Health/Medical Records:          Rehabilitation/Treatment:                 Criminal Records:
         Personal Documentation:          Community Service:                References:
         Department of VA letter:                  Other Documentation:
                  Additional Statements:
         From Applicant:          From/To Representation:          From/To Congress member:

Pertinent Regulation/Law

A. The Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 33, effective 22 August 2002 until
28 April 2005, Article 1910-146, SEPARATION BY REASON OF MISCONDUCT - DRUG ABUSE.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

1. The Applicant contends that immaturity should be a mitigation for drug use and warrants a discharge characterization upgrade.

Decision

Date: 20150325 DOCUMENTARY REVIEW Location: Washington D.C. Representation: NONE

By a vote of 5-0 the Characterization shall remain UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS .
By a vote of 5-0 the Narrative Reason shall remain MISCONDUCT .

Discussion

The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. The Board did complete a thorough review of the circumstances that led to the discharge and the discharge process to ensure his discharge met the pertinent standards of equity and propriety. The Applicant’s record of service contained one nonjudicial punishment (NJP) for violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ): Article 112a (Wrongful use, possession, etc., of controlled substances). The Applicant also had a pre-service drug waiver for using marijuana prior to entering the Navy. Based on the Article 112a violation, processing for administrative separation is mandatory. When notified of administrative separation processing using the administrative board procedure, the Applicant exercised his rights to consult with a qualified counsel and submit a written statement. The Applicant waived is right to request an administrative board.

Issue 1: (Decisional) (Equity) RELIEF NOT WARRANTED. The Applicant contends that immaturity should be a mitigation for drug use and warrants a discharge characterization upgrade. The Applicant’s in-service conduct included an NJP for Article 112a (Wrongful use, possession, etc., of controlled substances). While the Applicant was on restriction from these charges, he broke restriction and was charged with Article 91 (Insubordinate conduct toward warrant officer, noncommissioned officer or petty officer), Article 92 (Failure to obey order or regulation), Article 95 (Resistance, flight , breach of arrest, and escape) and Article 128 (Assault). He was then administratively processed for separation. His administrative separation package contained references to civil charges pending with a grand jury for brandishing a firearm and malicious wounding. The Violation of Article 112a requires mandatory processing for administrative separation regardless of grade or time in service. This usually results in an unfavorable characterization of discharge or, at a maximum, a punitive discharge and possible confinement if adjudicated and awarded as part of a sentence by a special or general court-martial. The command did not pursue a punitive discharge but opted instead for the more lenient administrative discharge. While the Applicant may feel his youth and immaturity at age twenty was an underlying cause of the misconduct, the record clearly reflects his willful misconduct and demonstrated he was unfit for further service. The characterization of service received was appropriate considering the length of service and the number of UCMJ violations. Relief denied.

Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, service record entries and discharge process, the Board found the discharge was proper and equitable. Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall remain UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS and the narrative reason for separation shall remain MISCONDUCT. The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of his discharge. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum for additional information.

ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Disabled American Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted their opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 701 South Courthouse Road, Suite 1001, Arlington, VA 22204-2490 for further review.

Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.

Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Effective 6 February 2015, the NDRB is authorized to change a NDRB Applicant’s Reenlistment Code if related to an accompanying change in discharge characterization or narrative, but this authority is strictly limited to those cases where an applicant’s narrative reason or characterization of discharge is changed and that change warrants revision of the previously issued reenlistment code. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE-CODE” is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.

Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.

Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

USMC | DRB | 2011_Marine | MD1100019

Original file (MD1100019.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities.
NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0902098

Original file (ND0902098.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214:Service/Medical Record:Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Substance Abuse: Criminal Records: Family/Personal Status: Community Service: References: Additional Statements: From Applicant: From/To Representation:From/ToCongress member:Other Documentation: Pertinent Regulation/Law A. The NDRB voted unanimously to not change the awarded...
NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1102155

Original file (ND1102155.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Representation: NONE By a vote of the Characterization shall .By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall FRAUDULENT ENTRY (DRUG ABUSE).Discussion The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted.In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to...
NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0900151

Original file (ND0900151.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The Applicant has requested an upgrade in his discharge characterization to “Honorable”. The Board determined the Applicant’s conduct, which forms the primary basis for determining the character of his service, reflected a significant departure from the conduct expected of a service member and was not indicative of those receiving an “Honorable” discharge characterization. ” Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing,...
NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700725

Original file (ND0700725.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive: USNR (DEP)19940131 - 19940209Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 19940210Years Contracted:; Extension: Date of Discharge:19950609Length of Service: 01 Yrs 04Mths00 DysLost Time:Days UA: Days Confined: Education...
NAVY | DRB | 2015_Navy | ND1401550

Original file (ND1401550.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the...
NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-01379

Original file (ND04-01379.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

T he Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) conducted a documentary review, as originally requested by the Applicant. Applicant appealed the NJP on 29SEP03, appeal denied 7OCT03.031007: Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge with the least favorable characterization of service as under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse.031007: Applicant advised of rights and having consulted with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to...
NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0600084

Original file (ND0600084.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Applicant’s DD Form 214 (member 1 copy) Applicant’s DD Form 214 PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Inactive: USNR (DEP) 20000427 – 20000525 COG Active: None Period of Service Under...
USMC | DRB | 2010_Marine | MD1000101

Original file (MD1000101.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

” However, the Board found that the administrative separation process,the determined characterization of service (Under Other Than Honorable Conditions), and narrative reason (Misconduct) were proper and correct due to the Applicant’s guilty plea, subsequent guilty finding during Commanding Officer’s NJP on 16 Feb 2000, and documentation in the Applicant’s service and administrative separation records.The NDRB will submit DD-214 correction recommendations to the Commandant of the Marine...
USMC | DRB | 2015_Marine | MD1500783

Original file (MD1500783.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Administrative Corrections to the Applicant’s DD 214 The NDRB did note administrative error(s) on the original DD Form 214: Block 28, Narrative Reason for Separation, should read: “MISCONDUCT” The NDRB will recommend to the Commandant of the Marine Corps that the DD 214 be corrected as appropriate. Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall remain GENERAL (UNDER HONORABLE CONDITIONS) and the narrative reason for separation shall remain MISCONDUCT . ” Additional Reviews :...

Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2015_Navy | ND1500675

Similar Decisions