Upgrade.Vet

NAVY | DRB | 2015_Navy | ND1500408

Original file (ND1500408.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-AA, USN

Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request

Application Received: 20141121

Characterization of Service Received: (per DD 214) UNCHARACTERIZED (ENTRY LEVEL SEPARATION)

Narrative Reason for Discharge: (per DD 214) ERRONEOUS ENTRY (OTHER)
Authority for Discharge: (per DD 214) MILPERSMAN 1910-130 [ERRONEOUS ENTRY]

Applicant’s Request:     Characterization change to:      HONORABLE
         Narrative Reason change to:      NONE REQUESTED

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
Inactive:        USNR (DEP)       20130612 - 20131209 COG         Active: NONE

Period of Service Under Review:

Date of Current Enlistment: 20131210    Age at Enlistment: 19
Period of Enlistment: 4 Years 24 MONTHS Extension
Date of Discharge: 20140211     Highest Rank/Rate: AA
Length of Service: 00 Year(s) 02 Month(s) 02 Day(s)
Education Level: 12     AFQT: 51
Evaluation Marks:        Performance: NFIR        Behavior: NFIR OTA: NFIR

Awards and Decorations (per DD 214):     NONE

Periods of UA/CONF: NONE

NJP: NONE        SCM: NONE        SPCM: NONE       CC: NONE         Retention Warning Counseling: NONE

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

Related to Military Service:
         DD 214:          Service/Medical Record:          Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:               Finances:                 Education/Training:
         Health/Medical Records:          Rehabilitation/Treatment:                 Criminal Records:
         Personal Documentation:          Community Service:                References:
         Department of VA letter:                  Other Documentation:
                  Additional Statements:
         From Applicant:          From/To Representation:          From/To Congress member:

Pertinent Regulation/Law

A. The Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 11 effective 20 June 2005 until Present, Article 1910-130, Separation by Reason of Defective Enlistments and Inductions - Erroneous Enlistment.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part IV, Para 403m(7)(b), Presumption Concerning Court-Martial Specifications.

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

1. The Applicant contends that her discharge was inequitable because it was based on pre-service drowning incidents that had no effect on her mental state.
Decision

Date: 20150402 DOCUMENTARY REVIEW Location: Washington D.C. Representation: NONE

By a vote of 5-0 the Characterization shall remain UNCHARACTERIZED (ENTRY LEVEL SEPARATION)
By a vote of 5-0 the Narrative Reason shall remain ERRONEOUS ENTRY (OTHER)

Discussion

As a result of the Applicant’s claim of PTSD or TBI, in accordance with U.S. Code, Title X, Section 1553 (d)(1), the Naval Discharge Review Board included a member who is a physician, clinical psychologist, or psychiatrist. The Board also conducted a review of the Applicant's record to see if she deployed in support of a contingency operation and was, as a consequence of that deployment, diagnosed with either PTSD or TBI. A review of her record revealed that she did not deploy in support of a contingency operation, and so his case did not warrant an expedited review in accordance with U.S. Code, Title X, Section 1553(d)(1).

The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. The Board did complete a thorough review of the circumstances that led to the discharge and the discharge process to ensure her discharge met the pertinent standards of equity and propriety. The Applicant’s record of service included no NAVPERS 1070/613 (Page 13) warnings, non-judicial punishment, or court martials. Based on the offense committed by the Applicant, her command administratively processed her for separation. When notified of administrative separation processing using the notification procedure, the Applicant waived her rights to consult with a qualified counsel, submit a written statement, and request a General Court-Martial Convening Authority review.

Issue 1: (Decisional) (Propriety) RELIEF NOT WARRANTED. The Applicant contends that her discharge was inequitable because it was based on pre-service drowning incidents that had no effect on her mental state. The Applicant provided a post-service psychiatric evaluation dated 30 Jun 2014 from St. Yves Medical and Behavioral Health Services attesting that the Applicant does not have a chronic and debilitating condition and that she is not a danger to others. While on active duty, she was evaluated by a licensed clinical psychologist and per the report dated 24 January 2014, the Applicant’s was assessed with Post Traumatic Stress Disorder, Existing Prior to Service, and found to be disqualified for service and posed a risk if retained. The report cites that the Applicant reported several incidents of near drowning with a loss of consciousness and need for life saving measures. The report also documents that the Applicant has five failed swim qualification attempts. An Uncharacterized discharge is appropriate when separation is initiated while a member is within the first 180 days of continuous active duty except when the characterization of service as Under Other Than Honorable Conditions (UOTHC) is authorized or Honorable is clearly warranted. The Applicant had no misconduct that would rate an UOTHC discharge, and there was no evidence of unusual circumstances involving personal conduct and performance that would merit an Honorable characterization. Since the Applicant served only 64 days, an Uncharacterized Discharge is the most appropriate characterization of service. Relief denied.

Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, service record entries, and discharge process, the Board found the discharge was proper and equitable at the time of discharge. Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall remain UNCHARACTERIZED (ENTRY LEVEL SEPARATION) and the narrative reason for separation shall remain ERRONEOUS ENTRY (OTHER). The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of her discharge. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum for additional information.

ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Disabled American Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted their opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 701 South Courthouse Road, Suite 1001, Arlington, VA 22204-2490 for further review.

Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.

Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Effective 6 February 2015, the NDRB is authorized to change a NDRB Applicant’s Reenlistment Code if related to an accompanying change in discharge characterization or narrative, but this authority is strictly limited to those cases where an applicant’s narrative reason or characterization of discharge is changed and that change warrants revision of the previously issued reenlistment code. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE-CODE” is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.

Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.

Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0900380

Original file (ND0900380.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Besides the Applicantsstatement on the DD Form 293, she provided a character reference, congressional correspondence and a recent psychiatric diagnosis of her current condition, stating there is no evidence of a diagnosis for personality disorder.The Board applauds the Applicant for her success in life now and wishes her the best in future endeavors.Although the Applicant has made great strides over-coming difficult situations and stressors in her life, the Board has determined that the...
NAVY | DRB | 2015_Navy | ND1500697

Original file (ND1500697.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The Applicant’s record of service included an Uncharacterized entry level administrative discharge from the Navy for reason of Fraudulent Entry into Military Service. Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall remain UNCHARACTERIZED (ENTRY LEVEL SEPERATION). ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been...
NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1100707

Original file (ND1100707.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

According to regulations, the characterization of service for members separated for erroneous enlistment should be Honorable unless an entry-level separation or void enlistment is required. Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain ERRONEOUS ENTRY...
NAVY | DRB | 2012_Navy | ND1200601

Original file (ND1200601.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or...
NAVY | DRB | 2015_Navy | ND1500463

Original file (ND1500463.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to...
NAVY | DRB | 2014_Navy | ND1400051

Original file (ND1400051.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to:Narrative Reason change to: Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive:USNR (DEP)20100310 - 20100816Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Current Enlistment: 20100817Age at Enlistment:Period of Enlistment: YearsExtensionDate of Discharge:20101216Highest Rank/Rate:SNLength of Service:Year(s)Month(s) 00 Day(s)Education Level:AFQT: 53EvaluationMarks:Performance:NFIRBehavior:NFIROTA: NFIRAwards and Decorations (per DD 214):NONEPeriods of...
NAVY | DRB | 2015_Navy | ND1500164

Original file (ND1500164.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214: Service/Medical Record: Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Rehabilitation/Treatment: Criminal Records: Personal Documentation: Community Service: References: Department of VA letter: Other Documentation: Additional Statements: From Applicant: From/To Representation: From/To Congress member: Pertinent Regulation/Law A. Summary: After a...
NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0801466

Original file (ND0801466.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Applicant’s Request: Characterization change to: Narrative Reason change to: ERRONEOUS ENTRY (OTHER) Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive: USNR (DEP) 20050620 -20060730 Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 20060731Period of Enlistment: Years Extension Date of Discharge: 20060815Length of Service: Years Months15 Days Education Level: Age at Enlistment: AFQT: 46Highest Rank/Rate: E-3 Evaluation Marks: Performance: NFIR Behavior: NFIR OTA: NFIRAwards and Decorations...
NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0900043

Original file (ND0900043.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Receiving an erroneous entry narrative reason does not place or indicate any blame on the Applicant’s behalf.The Applicant’s statement she was healthy when she enlisted into the Navy as evidenced by a pap smear done in May 2005, a year earlier, is contradicted by the medical records which indicate she had an abnormal pap smear 8 May 2006 (within 7 days of commencing active duty). Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found ADDENDUM: Information...
NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1101607

Original file (ND1101607.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214:Service/Medical Record:Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Rehabilitation/Treatment: Criminal Records: Personal Documentation: Community Service: References: Department of VA letter: Other Documentation: Additional Statements:From Applicant: From/To Representation:From/ToCongress member: DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD...

Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2015_Navy | ND1500408

Similar Decisions